Search

Background: The use of genetic testing in pediatric patients with chronic kidney diseases (CKD) has increased exponentially in the past few years, particularly with the emergence of novel sequencing techniques. However, the genetic yield remains unexpectedly low in nephrology, with an impact on diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Moreover, the increasing diversity of genetic testing possibilities can be seen as an obstacle by clinicians, in the absence of a strong background in genetics. Here, we propose a step-by-step, multidisciplinary strategy for the diagnostic evaluation of pediatric patients with CKD, and appropriate genetic test selection to maximize the yield of genetic testing., Methods: A total of 126 pediatric patients were enrolled in a retrospective file analysis. Genetic testing techniques used included phenotype-associated next-generation panel sequencing (N = 41), Sanger and SNaPshot sequencing (N = 3) and/or whole exome sequencing (N = 2)., Results: Overall genetic yield reached 63% and genetic testing significantly impacted patient management in 70%. The distribution of kidney diseases among patients was balanced and matched previously described pediatric cohorts in terms of glomerulopathies, tubulopathies and ciliopathies. Genetic analyses led to significant treatment modifications, kidney biopsy sparing and personalized nephroprotection, as well as tailored genetic counseling. Of note, the evaluation of Human Phenotype Ontology term accuracy in the cohort showed that causal mutations were precisely identified in 85% of the patients at most., Conclusion: Here we suggest a step-by-step, multidisciplinary strategy to maximize the yield of genetic testing in pediatric patients with CKD. This approach optimizes patient care while avoiding unnecessary treatments or procedures., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Pediatric Nephrology Association.)

Background: Early detection of hypertension in children with autosomal polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) may be beneficial, but screening children at risk of ADPKD remains controversial. We investigated determinants of hypertension in children with ADPKD to help identify a subgroup of children at risk of ADPKD for whom screening for the disease and/or its complications would be more relevant. Methods: In a retrospective study including consecutive children with ADPKD aged 5–18 years and followed at Saint-Luc Hospital Brussels between 2006 and 2020, we investigated the potential association between genotype, clinical characteristics and parental phenotype, and presence of hypertension. Hypertension was defined as blood pressure > P95 during 24-h ambulatory monitoring or anti-hypertensive therapy use. Parental phenotype was considered severe based on age at kidney failure, Mayo Clinic Imaging Classification and rate of eGFR decline. Results: The study enrolled 55 children with ADPKD (mean age 9.9 ± 2.2 years, 45% male), including 44 with a PKD1 mutation and 5 with no mutation identified. Nine (16%) children had hypertension. Hypertension in children was associated with parental phenotype severity (8/27 (30%) children with severe parental phenotype vs. 1/23 (4%) children with non-severe parental phenotype (p = 0.03)) and height-adjusted bilateral nephromegaly (6/9 (67%) children with bilateral nephromegaly vs. 3/44 (7%) children without bilateral nephromegaly (p < 0.001)). Conclusions: Severe parental phenotype is associated with higher prevalence of hypertension in children with ADPKD. Hence, children of parents with severe ADPKD phenotype may be those who will most benefit from screening of the disease and/or yearly BP measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]