Search

Magdalena Pasińska,1 Ewelina Łazarczyk,1 Anna Repczyńska,1 Agnieszka Sobczyńska-Tomaszewska,2 Janusz Zimowski,3 Agata Runge,1 Olga Haus1 1Department of Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland; 2Medical Center “Medgen”, Warszawa, Poland; 3Department of Genetics, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology, Warszawa, PolandCorrespondence: Magdalena Pasińska, Department of Clinical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University, ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 9, Bydgoszcz, 85-094, Poland, Tel/Fax +48 52 585 35 68 ; +48 52 585 36 70, Email magdalena@cm.umk.pl; magdapas@wp.plIntroduction: The X and Y chromosomes are responsible for the determination and differentiation of the gonads, and their numerical and structural abnormalities may cause the abnormal development of secondary sex characteristics. The presence of abnormalities concerning X chromosome can also contribute to many genetically heterogeneous diseases associated with cognitive impairment and intellectual disability.Purpose: This study shows the effect of aberrations of the maternal X chromosome on the abnormal development of the child.Patients and Methods: Ten women aged 26 to 40 years were consulted in genetic counselling clinic and subsequently subjected to cytogenetic and molecular tests due to abnormal psychomotor development of their children, in whom structural aberrations of the X chromosome had been detected.Results: Two women were diagnosed with changes in karyotype: 46,X,der(X)t(X;Y)(p22.3;q11.2) in one and 46,X,inv(X)(p21.2q13). Five women were diagnosed with microduplications in the short arm of the X chromosome; dupXp22.31 in one, and in four women dupXp22.33. The remaining three women were diagnosed with duplication in the long arm of the X chromosome; dupXq25 in one and dupXq26.3 in two women.Conclusion: Genetic analysis of the X chromosome, based on cytogenetic and molecular methods of the highest available resolution, is extremely important in women with reproductive failure. These methods allow establishing accurately the breakpoints and rearrangements in chromosomes, and assessment of the copy number variation (CNV) can explain phenotypic variability with apparently similar aberrations. A more precise characterization of the alterations is necessary for the correct genetic diagnosis, as well as determination of the carrier status and genetic risk in family members.Keywords: X chromosome, structural aberrations, genetic diagnostics, genetic counseling, intellectual disability

A group of 63 families from the Pomerania-Kujawy region were analyzed for three BRCA1 gene Polish founder mutations, 5382insC, 300T>G, and 4153delA, because of breast (BrCa) and/or ovarian cancer (OvCa) history. The analysis was carried out by multiplex polymerase chain reaction method. BRCA1 mutation was revealed in nine (14%) families: in three (33%) of hereditary BrCa and OvCa families, in three (8%) of hereditary BrCa families, and in three (21%) of hereditary OvCa families. According to risk criteria, it was revealed in 45% of high-risk families with more than three cancers, 13% of moderate-risk families with two cancers, and 8% of families with sporadic OvCa. In six families, the mutation was found in a proband with BrCa or OvCa and in three families, the mutation was found in a healthy proband, first-degree relative of a patient deceased of BrCa or OvCa. 5382insC frameshift mutation accounted for 67% and 300T>G missense mutation for 33% of all identified familial mutations. 4153delA frameshift mutation was not found in analyzed sample of families. 5382insC mutation was found in 9% and 300T>G in 5% of all investigated families, and in 27 and 18%, respectively, of high-risk families. This underlines the importance of applying strict inclusion criteria to analyze mutation frequency in hereditary BrCa/OvCa families.

Background Balanced complex translocations (BCTs) are rare events, they may result in reproductive failures: spontaneous abortions, missed abortions, stillbirths, congenital malformations in children, and male infertility. BCTs belong to the group of complex chromosome rearrangements (CCRs) – up to date about 260 cases were described. Results The described patient and her husband were referred to genetic counseling clinic because of four reproductive failures. GTG-banded chromosome analysis revealed presence of apparently balanced complex translocation t(2;5;13), which was verified and confirmed by molecular cytogenetics with single copy probes. This complex aberration was most likely responsible for reproductive failures in our patient. Since no high resolution molecular karyotyping (microarrays) was used, this rearrangement can only be considered to be balanced at cytogenetic level. Discussion Due to small number of reported cases of CCRs/BCTs and individual as well as unique character of such rearrangements, genetic counseling for CCRs carriers is complex and requires detailed pedigree analysis, as well as extended clinical and genetic testing.