Search

Trieu Tien Sang,1 Khoa Tran Van,1 Nguyen Thanh Tung,2 Phong Nguyen Van,1 Phuong Tran Hoang3 1Department of Biology and Medical Genetics, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, 10000, Vietnam; 2Military Institute of Clinical Embryology and Histology, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, 10000, Vietnam; 3Department of Oncology, 108 Military Central Hospital, Hanoi, 10000, VietnamCorrespondence: Trieu Tien Sang, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, 10000, Vietnam, Email trieusangk83@yahoo.com.vnBackground: Androgen resistance syndrome or androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS – Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome, OMIM 300068) is an X-linked recessive genetic syndrome causing disorders of sexual development in males. This disease is caused by mutations in the AR gene located on the X chromosome, which encodes the protein that structures the androgen receptor, with the role of receiving androgens. Mutation of the AR gene causes complete or partial loss of androgen receptor function, thereby androgen not being obtained and exerting its effect on target organs, resulting in abnormalities of the male reproductive system due to this organ system, differentiating towards feminization under the influence of estrogen. Disease prevention can be achieved by using pre-implantation genetic diagnosis, which enables couples carrying the mutation to have healthy offspring.Aim: To carry out preimplantation genetic diagnosis of androgen resistance syndrome.Methods: Sanger sequencing was used to detect the mutation in the blood samples of the couple, their son, and 01 embryo that were biopsied on the fifth day based on the findings of next-generation sequencing (NGS) of the affected son. We combined Sanger sequencing and linkage analysis using short tandem repeats (STR) to provide diagnostic results.Results: We performed preimplantation genetic diagnosis for AIS on an embryo from a couple who had previously had an affected son. Consequently, one healthy embryo was diagnosed without the variant NM_000044: c.796del (p.Asp266IlefsTer30).Conclusion: We report on a novel variant (NM_000044: c.796del (p.Asp266IlefsTer30)) in the AR gene discovered in Vietnam. The developed protocol was helpful for the preimplantation genetic diagnosis process to help families with the monogenic disease of AIS but wish to have healthy children.Keywords: androgen insensitivity syndrome, AIS, AR gene, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, short tandem repeats, STR

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been used not only to avoid genetic diseases and increase conception success rates but also to perform non‐medical sex selection, particularly in the surging cross‐border reproductive care (CBRC). In the context of commercialised biomedicine, assisted reproductive technologies, such as lifestyle sex selection, have been tailored to meet intended parents' preferences. However, there is a lack of analysis on how individuals' reproductive decisions on PGD‐assisted sex selection were shaped within the sociocultural norms and CBRC. This article explores Taiwanese gay fathers' navigations on sex selection while seeking third‐party reproduction overseas because of local legal constraints. Drawing on in‐depth interviews with 53 gay fathers (to‐be), I analysed how 'individual preferences' were dynamically shaped by local sociocultural norms and embedded within transnational settings of routinising PGD in chosen repro‐destinations. The findings showed that gay fathers mobilised strategic discourses on non‐medical sex selection from both the local and the global to negotiate their decisions in coherence with their LGBTQ+ identity and their role as sons carrying familial responsibility to procreate male heirs. This article proposed a nuanced understanding of gay fathers' reproductive practices of 'gendering the beginning of life' through PGD‐assisted sex selection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pre-Implantation genetic diagnosis is available to couples at risk of conceiving a pregnancy affected with a known genetic disorder. Assisted reproductive techniques are used in combination with micromolecular diagnostic technologies to recognise at-risk embryos with pathogenic genetic variants at the pre-implantation stage using polar body, blastomere or trophectoderm biopsy. This review will discuss the varying genetic disorders diagnosed by Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis, as well as the ethical, legal and safety implications of the process. Pioneering advances in molecular biology and cytogenomics have been utilised to expand the spectrum of genetic disorders detected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: 3M syndrome is a rare autosomal recessive developmental disorder characterized by pre and postnatal growth deficiency, dysmorphic facial features, and normal intelligence. 3M syndrome should be suspected in a proband with a combination of characteristic or recognizable dysmorphic features. The diagnosis of 3M syndrome could be confirmed by identifying biallelic variants in CUL7, OBSL1, or CCDC8. Methods: Whole‐exome sequencing (WES) was performed to identify genetic causes. Reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) was performed to detect aberrant splicing events. Haplotypes were constructed using multiplex PCR and sequencing. Variants of the parental haplotype and target likely pathogenic variants were detected by PCR and Sanger sequencing from the embryos. Copy number variant (CNV) detection was performed by next‐generation sequencing. Results: We present the case of a nonconsanguineous Chinese couple with one abnormal pregnancy, where the fetus showed 3M phenotypes of shortened long bones. WES identified two novel heterozygous mutations in CUL7: NM_014780.5:c.354del (p.Gln119ArgfsTer52) and NM_014780.5:c.1373‐15G>A. RT‐PCR from RNA of the mother's peripheral blood leucocytes showed that c.1373‐15G>A caused the insertion of a 13‐bp extra intron sequence and encoded the mutant p.Leu459ProfsTer25. Both variants were classified as likely pathogenic according to ACMG/AMP guidelines and Clinical Genome Resource specifications. During genetic counseling, the options of prenatal diagnosis through chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis, adoption, sperm donation, and electing not to reproduce, as well as preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT‐M), were discussed. The couple hopes to conceive a child of their own and refused to accept the 25% risk during the next pregnancy and opted for PGT‐M. They finally successfully delivered a healthy baby through PGT‐M. Conclusion: This study expanded the mutation spectrum of CUL7, detected the aberrant splicing event of CUL7 via RT‐PCR, constructed the haplotype for PGT‐M, and demonstrated the successful delivery of a healthy baby using PGT‐M. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Congenital liver disease refers to a group of heterogeneous diseases from a clinical genetic point of view. The most crucial features are hepatosplenomegaly and elevated liver enzymes. This study aims to identify genetic variants causing the disease in three Iranian families with congenital liver disease using molecular techniques. Methods: Patients were referred to Next Generation Genetic Polyclinic (NGGC) in Mashhad after confirmed congenital liver disease diagnosis by gastroenterologists. Following informed consent signed by participants, DNA was extracted from blood samples. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed for three probands. After the analysis of raw data, candidate variants were confirmed in the patients and their parents. Results: We have found the possible disease-causing variant as the c.1718G>C variant (p. Trp573Ser) in the SMPD1 gene in the F-1 patient and c.1718G>C (p. Trp573Ser) in the SMPD1 gene in the F-3 patient. Moreover, we have found the c.3175C>T variant (p. Arg1059Ter) in the NPC1 gene in the F-2 patient. Conclusions: In this study, disease-causing variants were identified in three probands suspected of Niemann-Pick disease. Such results show the relatively high power of molecular techniques to assist clinicians with disease management, therapeutic strategies, and preventive options such as preimplantation genetic diagnosis and prenatal diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Question: Is there an efficient and cost-effective detection platform for different genetic conditions about embryos?Summary Answer: A multifunctional haplotyping-based preimplantation genetic testing platform was provided for detecting different genetic conditions.What Is Known Already: Genetic disease and chromosomal rearrangement have been known to significantly impact fertility and development. Therefore, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), monogenic disorders (PGT-M) and structural rearrangements (PGT-SR), a part of ART, has been presented together to minimize the fetal genetic risk and increase pregnancy rate. For patients or their families who are suffering from chromosome abnormality, monogenic disease, unexplained repeated spontaneous abortion or implantation failure, after accepting genetic counseling, they may be suggested to accept detection from more than one PGT platforms about the embryos to avoid some genetic diseases. However, PGT platforms work through different workflows. The high costliness, lack of material and long-time operation of combined PGT platforms limit their application.Study Design, Size, Duration: All 188 embryonic samples from 43 families were tested with HaploPGT platform, and most of their genetic abnormalities had been determined by different conventional PGT methods beforehand. Among them, there were 12 families only carrying structural rearrangements (115 embryos) in which 9 families accepted implantation and 5 families had normal labor ART outcomes, 7 families only carrying monogenic diseases (26 embryos) and 3 families carrying both structural rearrangements and monogenic diseases (26 embryos). Twelve monopronucleated zygotes (1PN) samples and 9 suspected triploid samples were collected from 21 families.Participants/materials, Settings, Methods: Here, we raised a comprehensive PGT method called HaploPGT, combining reduced representation genome sequencing, read-count analysis, B allele frequency and haplotyping analysis, to simultaneously detect different genetic disorders in one single test.Main Results and the Role Of Chance: With 80 million reads (80M) genomic data, the proportion of windows (1 million base pairs (Mb)) containing two or more informative single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) sites was 97.81%, meanwhile the genotyping error rate stabilized at a low level (2.19%). Furthermore, the informative SNPs were equally distributed across the genome, and whole-genomic haplotyping was established. Therefore, 80M was chosen to balance the cost and accuracy in HaploPGT. HaploPGT was able to identify abnormal embryos with triploid, global and partial loss of heterozygosity, and even to distinguish parental origin of copy number variation in mosaic and non-mosaic embryos. Besides, by retrospectively analyzing 188 embryonic samples from 43 families, HaploPGT revealed 100% concordance with the available results obtained from reference methods, including PGT-A, PGT-M, PGT-SR and PGT-HLA.Limitations, Reason For Caution: Despite the numerous benefits HaploPGT could bring, it still required additional family members to deduce the parental haplotype for identifying balanced translocation and monogenic mutation in tested embryos. In terms of PGT-SR, the additional family member could be a reference embryo with unbalanced translocation. For PGT-M, a proband was normally required. In both cases, genomic information from grandparents or parental siblings might help for haplotyping theoretically. Another restriction was that haploid, and diploid resulting from the duplication of a haploid, could not be told apart by HaploPGT, but it was able to recognize partial loss of heterozygosity in the embryonic genome. In addition, it should be noted that the location of rearrangement breakpoints and the situation of mutation sites were complicated, which meant that partial genetic disorders might not be completely detected.Wider Implications Of the Findings: HaploPGT is an efficient and cost-effective detection platform with high clinical value for detecting genetic status. This platform could promote the application of PGT in ART, to increase pregnancy rate and decrease the birth of children with genetic diseases.Study Funding/competing Interest(s): This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81873478, to L.H.), National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1003100, to L.H.), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (Grant 2022JJ30414, to P.X.), Hunan Provincial Grant for Innovative Province Construction (2019SK4012) and the Scientific Research Foundation of Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of China International Trust & Investment Corporation (CITIC)-Xiangya (YNXM-201910). Haplotyping analysis has been licensed to Basecare Co., Ltd. L.K., Y.M., K.K., D.Z., N.L., J.Z. and R.D. are Basecare Co., Ltd employees. The other authors declare no competing interests.Trial Registration Number: N/A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) m.3243A>G mutation is one of the most common pathogenic mtDNA variants, showing complex genetics, pathogenic molecular mechanisms, and phenotypes. In recent years, the prevention of mtDNA-related diseases has trended toward precision medicine strategies, such as preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and mitochondrial replacement therapy (MRT). These techniques are set to allow the birth of healthy children, but clinical implementation relies on thorough insights into mtDNA genetics. The genotype and phenotype of m.3243A>G vary greatly from mother to offspring, which compromises genetic counseling for the disease. This review is the first to systematically elaborate on the characteristics of the m.3243A>G mutation, from genetics to phenotype and the relationship between them, as well as the related influencing factors and potential strategies for preventing disease. These perceptions will provide clarity for clinicians providing genetic counseling to m.3243A>G patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the United Kingdom (U.K), 2.19 million people are affected by visual loss. Monogenic causes of visual loss include retinal dystrophies, optic neuropathies, and congenital glaucoma. A variety of reproductive options are available to adults with genetic visual loss to permit them to have an unaffected child. Prenatal diagnostic testing (PND) via amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling (CVS) or Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) is possible, provided the causal genetic variants are known in the family. We report a qualitative interview study of people with genetic causes of visual loss to explore their attitudes toward reproductive options. Participants reported a range of challenges associated with living with genetic conditions associated with visual loss. These had the potential to shape attitudes to reproductive options. Participants expressed enthusiasm for genetic testing, as it enabled them to understand if relatives might be affected by the visual loss. Decisions around reproductive options were recognized as challenging and highly personal. Positive opinions of PGT were reported, as it permitted conception of a child without the genetic cause of visual loss while avoiding the need for the termination of pregnancy. The provision of accessible information resources on genetics and reproductive options was reported to be important. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sang Trieutien,1,* Tam Vu Van,2,3,* My Tran Ngoc Thao,4 Son Trinh The,5 Khoa Tran Van,1 Tung Nguyen Thanh,5 Tuan Tran Van,5 Hanh Nguyen Thi6 1Department of Biology and Genetics, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, 12108, Vietnam; 2Director Office, Hai Phong Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haiphong, 40000, Vietnam; 3Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Haiphong University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Haiphong, 40000, Vietnam; 4Département de formation Biologie moléculaire et cellulaire, Sorbonne University, Paris, 75006, France; 5Military Institute of Clinical Embryology and Histology, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, 12108, Vietnam; 6Faculty of Biology, VNU University of Science, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, 12108, Vietnam*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Son Trinh TheMilitary Institute of Clinical Embryology and Histology, Vietnam Military Medical University, Hanoi, 12108, VietnamEmail trinhthesonart@gmail.comBackground: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a disorder characterized by the appearance of blisters, erosions and wounds in response to minimal trauma. The disease manifests with noticeable symptoms ranging from mild to severe, classified into four major types: epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS), junctional epidermolysis bullosa (JEB), dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) and Kindler syndrome. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for the disease remains the only available option for families at risk for the recurrence of the disorder without having to terminate an ongoing pregnancy.Materials and Methods: A novel COL7A1 mutation was used to design primers for the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to amplify the segment spanning the mutation in the family and their in-vitro fertilization (IVF) embryos. Then, the PCR products were sequenced with Sanger sequencing to detect the alteration in the allele, and some embryos would go through NGS-based preimplantation screening for chromosomal abnormalities.Results: The established protocol for EB detected mutant allele in 6/9 embryos (66.6%), while the remaining 3 embryos (33.4%) appeared to not carry any mutation. Only one among 3 embryos was recommended to be transferred into the mother’s uterus.Conclusion: The established preimplantation genetic diagnosis procedure is helpful to families affected by epidermolysis bullosa caused by COL7A1 mutations but wish to have healthy children.Keywords: epidermolysis bullosa, rare dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, EB, RDEB, skin disorder, COL7A1 gene mutation, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, PGD

Study Question: Can an artificial intelligence (AI) model predict human embryo ploidy status using static images captured by optical light microscopy?Summary Answer: Results demonstrated predictive accuracy for embryo euploidy and showed a significant correlation between AI score and euploidy rate, based on assessment of images of blastocysts at Day 5 after IVF.What Is Known Already: Euploid embryos displaying the normal human chromosomal complement of 46 chromosomes are preferentially selected for transfer over aneuploid embryos (abnormal complement), as they are associated with improved clinical outcomes. Currently, evaluation of embryo genetic status is most commonly performed by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), which involves embryo biopsy and genetic testing. The potential for embryo damage during biopsy, and the non-uniform nature of aneuploid cells in mosaic embryos, has prompted investigation of additional, non-invasive, whole embryo methods for evaluation of embryo genetic status.Study Design, Size, Duration: A total of 15 192 blastocyst-stage embryo images with associated clinical outcomes were provided by 10 different IVF clinics in the USA, India, Spain and Malaysia. The majority of data were retrospective, with two additional prospectively collected blind datasets provided by IVF clinics using the genetics AI model in clinical practice. Of these images, a total of 5050 images of embryos on Day 5 of in vitro culture were used for the development of the AI model. These Day 5 images were provided for 2438 consecutively treated women who had undergone IVF procedures in the USA between 2011 and 2020. The remaining images were used for evaluation of performance in different settings, or otherwise excluded for not matching the inclusion criteria.Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: The genetics AI model was trained using static 2-dimensional optical light microscope images of Day 5 blastocysts with linked genetic metadata obtained from PGT-A. The endpoint was ploidy status (euploid or aneuploid) based on PGT-A results. Predictive accuracy was determined by evaluating sensitivity (correct prediction of euploid), specificity (correct prediction of aneuploid) and overall accuracy. The Matthew correlation coefficient and receiver-operating characteristic curves and precision-recall curves (including AUC values), were also determined. Performance was also evaluated using correlation analyses and simulated cohort studies to evaluate ranking ability for euploid enrichment.Main Results and the Role Of Chance: Overall accuracy for the prediction of euploidy on a blind test dataset was 65.3%, with a sensitivity of 74.6%. When the blind test dataset was cleansed of poor quality and mislabeled images, overall accuracy increased to 77.4%. This performance may be relevant to clinical situations where confounding factors, such as variability in PGT-A testing, have been accounted for. There was a significant positive correlation between AI score and the proportion of euploid embryos, with very high scoring embryos (9.0-10.0) twice as likely to be euploid than the lowest-scoring embryos (0.0-2.4). When using the genetics AI model to rank embryos in a cohort, the probability of the top-ranked embryo being euploid was 82.4%, which was 26.4% more effective than using random ranking, and ∼13-19% more effective than using the Gardner score. The probability increased to 97.0% when considering the likelihood of one of the top two ranked embryos being euploid, and the probability of both top two ranked embryos being euploid was 66.4%. Additional analyses showed that the AI model generalized well to different patient demographics and could also be used for the evaluation of Day 6 embryos and for images taken using multiple time-lapse systems. Results suggested that the AI model could potentially be used to differentiate mosaic embryos based on the level of mosaicism.Limitations, Reasons For Caution: While the current investigation was performed using both retrospectively and prospectively collected data, it will be important to continue to evaluate real-world use of the genetics AI model. The endpoint described was euploidy based on the clinical outcome of PGT-A results only, so predictive accuracy for genetic status in utero or at birth was not evaluated. Rebiopsy studies of embryos using a range of PGT-A methods indicated a degree of variability in PGT-A results, which must be considered when interpreting the performance of the AI model.Wider Implications Of the Findings: These findings collectively support the use of this genetics AI model for the evaluation of embryo ploidy status in a clinical setting. Results can be used to aid in prioritizing and enriching for embryos that are likely to be euploid for multiple clinical purposes, including selection for transfer in the absence of alternative genetic testing methods, selection for cryopreservation for future use or selection for further confirmatory PGT-A testing, as required.Study Funding/competing Interest(s): Life Whisperer Diagnostics is a wholly owned subsidiary of the parent company, Presagen Holdings Pty Ltd. Funding for the study was provided by Presagen with grant funding received from the South Australian Government: Research, Commercialisation, and Startup Fund (RCSF). 'In kind' support and embryology expertise to guide algorithm development were provided by Ovation Fertility. 'In kind' support in terms of computational resources provided through the Amazon Web Services (AWS) Activate Program. J.M.M.H., D.P. and M.P. are co-owners of Life Whisperer and Presagen. S.M.D., M.A.D. and T.V.N. are employees or former employees of Life Whisperer. S.M.D, J.M.M.H, M.A.D, T.V.N., D.P. and M.P. are listed as inventors of patents relating to this work, and also have stock options in the parent company Presagen. M.V. sits on the advisory board for the global distributor of the technology described in this study and also received support for attending meetings.Trial Registration Number: N/A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Question: Is it possible to develop a comprehensive pipeline for all-in-one preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), also suitable for parents-only haplotyping and, for the first time, third-party reproduction?Summary Answer: Optimized reduced representation sequencing (RRS) by GENType, along with a novel analysis platform (Hopla), enables cheap, accurate and comprehensive PGT of blastocysts, even without the inclusion of additional family members or both biological parents for genome-wide embryo haplotyping.What Is Known Already: Several haplotyping strategies have proven to be effective for comprehensive PGT. However, these methods often rely on microarray technology, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) or a combination of strategies, hindering sample throughput and cost-efficiency. Moreover, existing tools (including other RRS-based strategies) require both prospective biological parents for embryo haplotyping, impeding application in a third-party reproduction setting.Study Design, Size, Duration: This study included a total of 257 samples. Preliminary technical validation was performed on 81 samples handpicked from commercially available cell lines. Subsequently, a clinical validation was performed on a total of 72 trophectoderm biopsies from 24 blastocysts, tested for a monogenic disorder (PGT-M) (n = 15) and/or (sub)chromosomal aneuploidy (PGT-SR/PGT-A) (n = 9). Once validated, our pipeline was implemented in a diagnostic setting on 104 blastocysts for comprehensive PGT.Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: Samples were whole-genome amplified (WGA) and processed by GENType. Quality metrics, genome-wide haplotypes, b-allele frequencies (BAFs) and copy number profiles were generated by Hopla. PGT-M results were deduced from relative haplotypes, while PGT-SR/PGT-A results were inferred from read-count analysis and BAF profiles. Parents-only haplotyping was assessed by excluding additional family members from analysis and using an independently diagnosed embryo as phasing reference. Suitability for third-party reproduction through single-parent haplotyping was evaluated by excluding one biological parent from analysis. Results were validated against reference PGT methods.Main Results and the Role Of Chance: Genome-wide haplotypes of single cells were highly accurate (mean > 99%) compared to bulk DNA. Unbalanced chromosomal abnormalities (>5 Mb) were detected by GENType. For both PGT-M as well as PGT-SR/PGT-A, our technology demonstrated 100% concordance with reference PGT methods for diverse WGA methods. Equally, for parents-only haplotyping and single-parent haplotyping (of autosomal dominant disorders and X-linked disorders), PGT-M results were fully concordant. Furthermore, the origin of trisomies in PGT-M embryos was correctly deciphered by Hopla.Limitations, Reasons For Caution: Intrinsic to linkage-analysis strategies, de novo single-nucleotide variants remain elusive. Moreover, parents-only haplotyping is not a stand-alone approach and requires prior diagnosis of at least one reference embryo by an independent technology (i.e. direct mutation analysis) for haplotype phasing. Using a haplotyping approach, the presence of a homologous recombination site across the chromosome is biologically required to distinguish meiotic II errors from mitotic errors during trisomy origin investigation.Wider Implications Of the Findings: We offer a generic, fully automatable and accurate pipeline for PGT-M, PGT-A and PGT-SR as well as trisomy origin investigation without the need for personalized assays, microarray technology or WGS. The unique ability to perform single-parent assisted haplotyping of embryos paves the way for cost-effective PGT in a third-party reproduction setting.Study Funding/competing Interest(s): L.D.W. is supported by the Research Foundation Flanders (FWO; 1S74619N). L.R. and B.M. are funded by Ghent University and M.B., S.S., K.T., F.V.M. and A.D. are supported by Ghent University Hospital. Research in the N.C. lab was funded by Ghent University, VIB and Kom op Tegen Kanker. A.D.K and N.C. are co-inventors of patent WO2017162754A1. The other authors have no conflicts of interest.Trial Registration Number: N/A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening (PGD/PGS) aims to help couples lower the risks of transmitting genetic defects to their offspring, implantation failure, and/or miscarriage during in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. However, it is still being debated with regard to the practicality and diagnostic accuracy of PGD/PGS due to the concern of invasive biopsy and the potential mosaicism of embryos. Recently, several non-invasive and high-throughput assays have been developed to help overcome the challenges encountered in the conventional invasive biopsy and low-throughput analysis in PGD/PGS. In this mini-review, we will summarize the recent progresses of these new methods for PGD/PGS and discuss their potential applications in IVF clinics.

Reproductive counseling in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) can be challenging due to the complexity of its underlying genetic mechanisms and due to incomplete penetrance of the disease. Full understanding of the genetic causes and potential inheritance patterns of both distinct FSHD types is essential: FSHD1 is an autosomal dominantly inherited repeat disorder, whereas FSHD2 is a digenic disorder. This has become even more relevant now that prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis options are available for FSHD1. Pregnancy and delivery outcomes in FSHD are usually favorable, but clinicians should be aware of the risks. We aim to provide clinicians with case‐based strategies for reproductive counseling in FSHD, as well as recommendations for pregnancy and delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published data on the relationship between pregnancy outcomes of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in translocation carriers have implicated inconclusive results. To identify potentially eligible reports, an electronic search was conducted in several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane. Pooled odd ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (Cis) were estimated based on a random-effect model to evaluate the strength of association between PGD and successful pregnancy outcome in translocation carriers. A total of six cohort studies were included in the current study. The meta-analysis of these studies revealed that the PGD method was associated with an increased successful pregnancy outcome of translocation carriers (OR = 8.58; 95%CI: 1.40–52.76). In subgroup analysis, there was no significant association according to the chromosomal translocation carrier origin and the type of translocated chromosomes, as well as country. In developed countries, the pregnancy outcome of PGD was significantly improved in translocation carriers (OR = 21.79; 95%CI: 1.93–245.52). The current meta-analysis demonstrated that the PGD method is associated with successful pregnancy outcome in both types of reciprocal and Robertsonian translocation carriers, especially in developed countries.

The study provides a systematic overview of research on the social implications of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). The analysis focuses on empirical studies that provide insights into its heterogeneous fields of application and the concrete experiences of its users. The literature review shows that three areas of concern and controversial topics are particularly relevant for a social-scientific evaluation of PGD. Firstly, we present attitudes towards and assessments of PGD based on an ongoing expansion and transformation of its fields of application. This process includes not only more and more disorders and disease risks but also applications that are not disease-related. Secondly, there is evidence of significant gender asymmetries and financial concerns regarding the use of and access to PGD. Thirdly, the empirical studies point to a shift in normative expectations towards the idea of “genetic reproductive responsibility” and possible discriminatory consequences for individuals and families with diseases and disabilities.

This paper is intended to discuss some of the scientific and ethical issues that are created by increased research efforts towards earlier diagnosis, as well as to treatment of, human prion diseases (and related dementias), including the resulting consequences for individuals, their families, and society. Most patients with prion disease currently are diagnosed when they are about 2/3 of the way through their disease course (Geschwind et al., 2010a; Paterson et al., 2012b), when the disease has progressed so far that even treatments that stop the disease process would probably have little benefit. Although there are currently no treatments available for prion diseases, we and others have realized that we must diagnose patients earlier and with greater accuracy so that future treatments have hope of success. As approximately 15% of prion diseases have a autosomal dominant genetic etiology, this further adds to the complexity of ethical issues, particularly regarding when to conduct genetic testing, release of genetic results, and when or if to implement experimental therapies. Human prion diseases are both infectious and transmissible; great care is required to balance the needs of the family and individual with both public health needs and strained hospital budgets. It is essential to proactively examine and address the ethical issues involved, as well as to define and in turn provide best standards of care.

Recent advancements in reproductive genetics have resulted in the availability of an extraordinary amount of new and detailed information for patients and providers. Whereas this information can inform many who are facing difficult clinical decisions, it can also introduce complex and uncertain choices. Expanded carrier screening and preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy are important examples of new genetic techniques that are now widely used in reproductive medicine. This paper will explore these techniques through a medical-legal prism to better understand the opportunities and obligations incumbent on both patients and providers in this new age of genetic diagnosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The aim of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) on embryos produced in vitro is to identify the embryos without genetic or chromosomal defect from those embryos that will develop the genetic disease or are chromosomally abnormal. In case of PGD for structural chromosome indication (PGR-SR), the normal/balanced embryos are transferred in the maternal uterus. This protocol is valid and widely applied for autosomal chromosome translocation. But which embryo should be transferred after preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD-SR) for X-3 reciprocal translocation in male patient? Case presentation The female patient was 26 years old with normal 46,XX karyotype. The male patient had a karyotype with balanced translocation 46,Y,t(X;3)(p11.2;p14)mat, inherited from the mother. The female patient underwent two cycles of ovarian stimulation. In the first cycle, the metaphase II oocytes were vitrified, while in the second cycle they were used as fresh. ICSI was performed on vitrified/warmed and fresh oocytes. Embryos were biopsied at blastocyst stage. Chromosomal analysis was performed by Next Generation Sequencing. Eleven blastocysts were biopsied from 23 vitrified/warmed and fresh metaphase II oocytes. Two embryos were diagnosed 46,XY; two embryos were diagnosed 46,XX; four embryos were diagnosed with unbalanced translocations and three embryos were diagnosed aneuploid. We knew that the two embryos diagnosed as 46,XX inherited the balanced translocation from the father and the two embryos diagnosed as 46,XY had a normal karyotype. It was explain to the couple that the phenotype of balanced translocated female embryos cannot be predicted because of the random inactivation of X chromosome and that could also occur on the der(X). The couple asked to have a 46,XY embryo transferred. Clinical pregnancy was obtained and non invasive prenatal test confirmed PGD-SR result. Conclusions Proposing PGD-SR for gonosome-autosome reciprocal translocation implies the risk to exclude balanced translocated female embryos with a normal phenotype for transfer because the early and late normal development at post-natal stage cannot be predicted based on the only chromosomal analysis.

Abstract Background Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is a powerful tool for preventing the transmission of Mendelian disorders from generation to generation. However, PGD only can identify monogenically inherited diseases, but not other potential monogenic pathologies. We aimed to use PGD to deliver a healthy baby without congenital FVII deficiency or other common Mendelian diseases in a couple in which both individuals carried a deleterious mutation in the F7 gene. Methods After both members of the couple were confirmed to be carriers of the F7 gene mutation by Sanger sequencing, expanded carrier screening (ECS) for 623 recessive inheritance diseases was performed to detect pathological mutations in other genes. PGD and preimplantational genetic screening (PGS) were employed to exclude monogenic disorders and aneuploidy for their embryos. Results ECS using targeted capture sequencing technology revealed that the couple carried the heterozygous disease-causative mutations c.3659C > T (p.Thr1220Ile) and c.3209G > A (p.Arg1070Gln) in the CFTR gene. After PGD and PGS, one of their embryos that was free of congenital FVII deficiency, cystic fibrosis (CF) and aneuploidy was transferred, resulting in the birth of a healthy 3200 g male infant. Conclusion We successfully implemented PGD for congenital FVII deficiency and PGD after ECS to exclude CF for the first time to the best of our knowledge. Our work significantly improved the reproductive outcome for the couple and provides a clear example of the use of ECS combined with PGD to avoid the delivery of offspring affected not only by identified monogenically inherited diseases but also by other potential monogenic pathologies and aneuploidy.

Background: Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) encompasses methods that allow embryos to be tested for severe inherited conditions or for chromosome abnormalities, relevant to embryo health and viability. In order to obtain embryonic genetic material for analysis, a biopsy is required, involving the removal of one or more cells. This invasive procedure greatly increases the costs of PGT and there have been concerns that embryo viability could be compromised in some cases. The recent discovery of DNA within the blastocoele fluid (BF) of blastocysts and in spent embryo culture media (SCM) has led to interest in the development of non-invasive methods of PGT (niPGT).Objective and Rationale: This review evaluates the current scientific evidence regarding non-invasive genetic assessment of preimplantation embryos. The success of different PGT methodologies in collecting and analysing extra-embryonic DNA is evaluated, and consideration is given to the potential biological and technical hindrances to obtaining a reliable clinical diagnosis.Search Methods: Original research and review papers concerning niPGT were sourced by searching PubMed and Google Scholar databases until July 2019. Searches comprised the keywords: 'non-invasive'; 'cell-free DNA'; 'blastocentesis'; 'blastocoel fluid'; 'spent culture media'; 'embryo culture medium'; 'preimplantation genetic testing'; 'preimplantation genetic diagnosis'; 'preimplantation genetic screening'; and 'aneuploidy'.Outcomes: Embryonic DNA is frequently detectable in BF and SCM of embryos produced during IVF treatment. Initial studies have achieved some success when performing cytogenetic and molecular genetic analysis. However, in many cases, the efficiency has been restricted by technical complications associated with the low quantity and quality of the DNA. Reported levels of ploidy agreement between SCM/BF samples and biopsied embryonic cells vary widely. In some cases, a discrepancy with respect to cytogenetic data obtained after trophectoderm biopsy may be attributable to embryonic mosaicism or DNA contamination (usually of maternal origin). Some research indicates that aneuploid cells are preferentially eliminated from the embryo, suggesting that their DNA might be over-represented in SCM and BF samples; this hypothesis requires further investigation.Wider Implications: Available data suggest that BF and SCM samples frequently provide DNA templates suitable for genetic analyses, offering a potential means of PGT that is less expensive than traditional methods, requires less micromanipulation skill and poses a lower risk to embryos. Critically, DNA isolation and amplification protocols must be optimised to reproducibly obtain an accurate clinical diagnosis, whilst minimising the impact of confounding factors such as contamination. Further investigations are required to understand the mechanisms underlying the release of embryonic DNA and to determine the extent to which this material reflects the true genetic status of the corresponding embryo. Currently, the clinic al potential of niPGT remains unknown. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neurodevelopmental disorders are characterized by developmental deficits in cognition, language, behavior, and/or motor skills that result in impairments in personal, social, academic, and/or occupational functioning. Among chronic diseases in the pediatric age period (between 3-17 years of age), the most common reason for applying to primary healthcare services is neurodevelopmental disorders. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is one of them. Copy number variations (CNVs) are recommended as the first-line genetic test for ASD in guidelines. When the data of 11 studies examining CNVs are examined, it has a diagnostic rate of 1.5-20.5% (average 8.1%) in the diagnosis of ASD. Among these CNVs, variants of uncertain significance are most challenging conditions. In this case, it should be evaluated whether the detected variant relevantly associated with phenotype, whether there are previously reported cases involving a similar region, whether the breakpoints match, whether it is de novo/familial, whether it is related to SNVs in the same gene. In a meta-analysis study investigating the Exome Sequencing method, which included ASD cases, the diagnosis rate was found to be 8-26% (average 15%). As a conclusion genetic tests and genetic counseling providing information about the risk of other individuals in the family, risk of recurrence, preimplantation genetic diagnosis and prenatal diagnosis is important for family planning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The evaluation of embryo viability is typically based on morphologic and morphometric grading systems, which are known to be heavily affected by differences in subjective judgement. A significant proportion of euploid embryos do not implant even when the endometrium is normal, despite the wide incorporation of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. The need to improve reproductive outcomes following assisted reproductive treatments is culminating in the emergence of new research and technology with the potential to enhance embryo selection. The assessment of mitochondrial DNA content as a predictor of embryo viability has gained increasing attention among numerous promising approaches. As is common with new tools, this attention has led to both inflated expectations and serious disillusionment. Here we gather evidence to establish the true clinical applicability of this method. Controversy continues to surround this topic, adding both interest and confusion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Primary ciliary dyskinesia is a genetically heterogeneous autosomal recessive disorder with variable clinical manifestations, including chronic rhinosinusitis, otitis media, bronchitis, pneumonia, bronchiectasis, situs inversus totalis, reduced fertility in female patients and male infertility. The condition occurs as a result of abnormal ciliary structure and function. It is presented in early life with an estimated incidence of approximately 1/16,000–20,000. About 50% of the affected patients have situs inversus totalis leading to Kartagener syndrome (MIM: 244400). So far more than 19 causative genes have been associated with primary ciliary dyskinesia. Case report: Here we are presenting Kartagener syndrome in a consanguineous Kuwaiti family with a novel pathogenic DNAH5 gene mutation; namely c.9864dupA; [p.Pro3289ThrfsStop52], which is predicted to result in protein truncation. In this family several homozygous individuals showed variable disease manifestations. Conclusion: Molecular test helped in confirmation of the clinical diagnosis and in providing better management of the affected family members, which in turn could significantly improve overall quality of their life. Consequently, preimplantation genetic diagnosis, which is the most acceptable procedure in the Islamic countries, was offered to the heterozygous-carrier couple in order to prevent recurrence of the disease in their future generations.

In families at risk from monogenic diseases affected offspring, it is fundamental the development of a suitable Double Factor Preimplantation Genetic Testing (DF-PGT) method for both single-gene analysis and chromosome complement screening. Aneuploidy is not only a major issue in advanced-maternal-age patients and balanced translocation carriers, but also the aneuploidy rate is extremely high in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), even in young donors. To adequate NGS technology to the DF-PGT strategy four different whole genome amplification systems (Sureplex, MALBAC, and two multiple displacement amplification systems-MDA) were tested using TruSight One panel on cell lines and blastocyst trophectoderm biopsies-TE. Embryo cytogenetic status was analyzed by Nexus software. Sureplex and MALBAC DNA products were considered not suitable for PGT diagnosis due to inconsistent and poor results on Trusight one (TSO) panel. Results obtained with both MDA based methods (GEH-MDA and RG-MDA) were appropriate for direct mutation detection by TSO NGS platform. Nevertheless, RG-MDA amplification products showed better coverage and lower ADO rates than GEH-MDA. The present work also demonstrates that the same TSO sequencing data is suitable not only for the direct mutation detection, but also for the indirect mutation detection by linkage analysis of informative SNPs. The present work also demonstrates that Nexus software is competent for the detection of CNV by using with TSO sequencing data from RG-MDA products, allowing for the whole cytogenetic characterization of the embryos. In conclusion, successfully development of an innovative and promising DF-PGT strategy using TSO-NGS technology in TE biopsies, performed in-house in a single laboratory experience, has been done in the present work. Additional studies should be performed before it could be used as a diagnostic alternative in order to validate this approach for the detection of chromosomal aneuploidies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Question: Can a second round of biopsy, vitrification and chromosomal testing provide a valid diagnosis where the first attempt fails?Summary Answer: The risk of inconclusive chromosomal-assessment after trophectoderm biopsy was 2.5% but a further biopsy and vitrification-warming appeared not to impair the competence of euploid blastocysts.What Is Known Already: The increasing implementation of multicell trophectoderm biopsy has significantly reduced the risk of inconclusive diagnosis after preimplantation-genetic-testing (PGT). Yet, few reports have defined the variables that influence the risk of failure or described the technical and clinical outcomes after re-biopsy.Study Design, Size, Duration: Retrospective multicenter study involving 8990 blastocyst biopsies conducted between April 2013 and September 2017 at six IVF centers but analyzed at a single genetic laboratory. A total of 206 blastocysts were successfully re-biopsied after warming and re-expansion, then re-vitrified. And 49 of these blastocysts were diagnosed euploid and used in single-embryo-transfers (SETs). Logistic regression analyses were conducted.Participants/materials, Setting, Methods: A total of 3244 PGT-for-aneuploidies (PGT-A) cycles with a freeze-all approach, vitrification and qPCR-based analysis were performed by 2687 consenting couples. DNA amplification failure (AF) or non-concurrent data resulted in inconclusive diagnoses. In case of DNA amplification, the cellularity of the biopsy was estimated according to a previously validated method. Euploid SETs were performed. Clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, live birth rates (LBR) and perinatal outcomes were monitored.Main Results and the Role Of Chance: Overall, 2.5% of trophectoderm biopsies resulted in an inconclusive diagnosis (N = 228/8990). Specifically, 2% (N = 176/8990) resulted in AF and 0.5% (N = 52/8990) in non-concurrent results. The only parameters significantly associated with inconclusive diagnoses were the IVF center and the embryo age (days) at biopsy. Among samples with successful amplification, the number of cells in the biopsy and the day of biopsy were critical to limit non-concurrent results. In total, 213 blastocysts with an inconclusive diagnosis were warmed for re-analysis and the survival rate was 96.7% (N = 206/213). The euploidy rate in blastocysts biopsied twice was 51.9% (N = 107/206) and the euploid embryos were re-vitrified. Overall, 49 euploid embryos were warmed for replacement and all survived. The LBR after SET was 38.8% (N = 19/49). No minor/major obstetrical/perinatal complication was reported.Limitations, Reasons For Caution: A single aneuploidy-testing method was adopted in this retrospective analysis. A more powered report of the clinical and obstetrical/perinatal outcomes after re-biopsied and re-vitrified blastocysts euploid SET requires a larger sample size.Wider Implications Of the Findings: It is important to re-biopsy and re-vitrify undiagnosed blastocysts since healthy live births can result from them.Study Funding/competing Interest(s): None.Trial Registration Number: None. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To assess whether embryonic DNA isolated from blastocyst culture conditioned medium (BCCM) combined with blastocoel fluid (BF) could be used for blastocyst stage non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for chromosomal aneuploidy (non-invasive preimplantation genetic screening, NIPGS). Patients: 47 embryos from 35 patients undergoing IVF. Interventions: DNA analysis of combined BCCM plus BF in comparison with trophectoderm (TE) biopsy and/or whole blastocyst (WB)using next generation sequencing (NGS). Results: Embryonic DNA was successfully amplified in 47/47 NIPGS samples (28 frozen-thawed and 19 fresh culture samples) ranging from 6.3 to 44.0 ng/μl. For frozen-thawed embryos, the concordance rate for whole chromosome copy number per sample was equivalent between NIPGS vs. TE biopsy, NIPGS vs. WB and TE vs. WB samples taken from the same embryo was 87.5%; 96.4% and 91.7% respectively (P>0.05), and the rate of concordance per single chromosome was 99.3%, 99.7% and 99.7%, respectively (P>0.05). In fresh cases (Day 4 to Day 5/6 culture), the concordance rate for whole chromosome copy number per sample between NIPGS vs. TE samples taken from the same embryo was 100%, and the rate of concordance per single chromosome was 98.2% (P>0.05). Conclusions: A combination of BCCM and BF contains sufficient embryonic DNA for whole genome amplification and accurate aneuploidy screening. Our findings suggest that aneuploidy screening using BCCM combined with BF could potentially serve as a novel NIPGS approach for use in human IVF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The revised guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma recommend that genetic counseling regarding reproductive options, including preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), be considered for all RET mutation carriers of reproductive age to avoid the transmission of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2). However, the high complexity and cost of PGD have hindered its widespread use. Thus, it is necessary to establish a simple and relatively inexpensive method to facilitate the PGD of MEN2. Patients and Methods: A customized Nimblegen EZ sequence capture array was designed to capture the targeted regions, including the RET gene, and 1Mb range on each side of the RET gene. Targeted, capture-based next-generation sequencing of three members of one family with MEN2A (the couple and the paternal father) was conducted to identify the informative markers. The diagnosis of the embryos was achieved through haplotype analysis based on informative markers and causative mutation. Results: Based on the sequencing results, 173 informative markers were detected, which were sufficient for the subsequent use for PGD. Seven informative markers and the causative mutation (RETC634Y) were selected and subjected to Sanger sequencing. Through haplotype analysis, four embryos without inheritance of the mutation haplotype of the RET gene were diagnosed as unaffected. One unaffected embryo was transferred, with one healthy baby born at 38 gestational weeks. Conclusions: Targeted, capture-based next-generation sequencing for identification of informative markers together with Sanger sequencing is an easy and efficient method for the PGD of monogenic diseases such as MEN2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The use of assisted reproductive technology (ART) has been reported to increase the incidence of monozygotic twinning (MZT) compared with the incidence following natural conception. It has been hypothesized that splitting of the inner cell mass (ICM) through a small zona hole may result in MZT. In this study, using a cohort of patients undergoing preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening (PGD/PGS), we compared the clinical and neonatal outcomes of human 8-shaped blastocysts hatching with ICM incarceration with partially or fully hatched blastocysts, and attempted to verify whether this phenomenon increases the incidence of MZT pregnancy or negatively impact newborns. Methods: This retrospective study included 2059 patients undergoing PGD/PGS between March 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015. Clinical and neonatal outcomes were only collected from patients who received a single blastocyst transfer after PGD/PGS (n = 992). A 25- to 30-μm hole was made in the zona of day 3 embryos by laser. The blastocysts were biopsied and vitrified on day 6. The biopsied trophectoderm (TE) cells were analyzed using different genetic methods. One tested blastocyst was thawed and transferred to each patient in the subsequent frozen embryo transfer cycle. All the biopsied blastocysts were divided into three types: 8-shaped with ICM incarceration (type I), partially hatched without ICM incarceration (type II), and fully hatched (type III). ICM/TE grading, clinical and neonatal outcomes were compared between the groups. Results: The percentage of grade A ICMs in type I blastocysts (22.2%) was comparable to that in type III blastocysts (20.1%) but higher than that in type II blastocysts (4.5%). The percentage of grade A TEs in type I blastocysts (4.2%) was comparable to that in type II (3.6%) but lower than that in type III (13.5%). There were no significant differences in clinical pregnancy, MZT pregnancy, miscarriage, live birth, MZT births, and neonatal outcomes between the groups. Conclusions: Compared to partially and fully hatched blastocysts, 8-shaped blastocysts with ICM incarceration showed relatively higher ICM and lower TE grades. ICM incarceration in 8-shaped blastocysts does not increase the incidence of MZT and has no negative effects on newborns in PGD/PGS patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Editorial summary The advent of mitochondrial replacement techniques poses many scientific, regulatory, and ethical questions. Previous studies suggest good safety and efficacy profiles of these techniques, but challenges remain for clinical implementation and international consensus is needed on the regulation of these approaches.

Translocation is one of the more common structural rearrangements of chromosomes, with a prevalence of 0.2%. The two most common types of chromosomal translocations, Robertsonian and reciprocal, usually result in no obvious phenotypic abnormalities when balanced. However, these are still associated with reproductive risks, such as infertility, spontaneous abortion and the delivery of babies with mental retardation or developmental delay. In recent years, array-based whole-genome amplification (WGA) technologies, including microarray comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH; aCGH) and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) micro-arrays, have enabled the screening of every chromosome for whole-chromosome aneuploidy and segmental imbalance. These techniques have been shown to have clinical application for translocation carriers. Promising studies have indicated that array-based PGD of translocation carriers can lead to transfer pregnancy rates of 45–70% [2]. In addition to genetic testing techniques, the embryo biopsy stage (polar body, cleavage embryo or blastocyst) and the mode of embryo transfer (fresh or frozen embryos) can affect the outcome of PGD. It is now generally recommended that blastomere biopsy should be replaced by blastocyst biopsy to avoid a high mosaic rate and biopsy-related damage to cleavage-stage embryos, which might affect embryo development. However, more clinical data are required to confirm that the technique of SNP array-based PGD (SNP-PGD) combined with trophectoderm (TE) biopsy and frozen embryo transfer (FET) is superior to traditional FISH-PGD combined with Day 3 (D3) blastomere biopsy and fresh embryo transfer.

Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is the most common adult muscular dystrophy and presents an autosomal dominant inheritance. A reproductive option for the families affected is preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). One limitation of this option is the nonoptimal response to ovarian stimulation of the women with DM1, although controversial results exist regarding this subject. In this study, we have analyzed the results of the PGD program applied to DM1 at our institution. A total of 35 couples have been included in our program since 2010, and 59 cycles have been performed. The percentage of transfers per cycle was 64.4% and the live birth rate per cycle was 18.6%. Interestingly, statistically significant differences were observed for the clinical results in the group of couples with an affected female versus the group with an affected male or versus a group of couples with different referral reasons. Specifically, both the percentage of mature oocytes out of the total oocytes retrieved and the percentage of fertilization were considerably lower in the group of DM1 females. Our findings would suggest the possibility of achieving less favourable PGD outcomes in women with DM1 in comparison with other pathologies, although the underlying mechanism remains unknown. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Is the timing of vitrification after trophectoderm (TE) biopsy associated with successful implantation and pregnancy after the embryo transfer of blastocysts subjected to preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? In this retrospective cohort study, 1329 blastocysts from 223 patients were subjected to TE biopsy for performing array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) tests. The PGS and frozen blastocyst transfer (FET) cycles were performed from December 2012 to May 2015. Only the good quality and expanded blastocysts on day 5 or 6 were selected for biopsy. After TE biopsy, the re-expansion grades relative to the original blastocoel were (1) collapsed blastocysts (CB), (2) 3/4 re-expansion but not full expansion (RE), and (3) full re-expansion or hatching (FE). All biopsied blastocysts were subjected to vitrification within 0.5–6 h after biopsy; the time intervals between TE biopsy and vitrification and the expansion grades at the time of vitrification were recorded. By combining two factors, namely the expansion grades and culture intervals between biopsy and vitrification, the patients were further divided into four groups, namely CB with a < 3 h culture interval (n = 34 cycles, Group I), RE and FE blastocysts with a < 3 h culture interval (n = 10 cycles, Group II); CB blastocysts with a ≥ 3 h culture interval (n = 6 cycles, Group III); and RE or FE blastocysts with a ≥ 3 h culture interval (n = 173 cycles, Group IV). The implantation (63.7%, 179/281) and clinical pregnancy (74.0%, 128/173) rates in Group IV were significantly higher than those in Group I (45.3%, 24/53; 50.0%, 17/34; P = 0.012 and 0.005, respectively). According to our findings, optimal vitrification timing > 3 hours to enable blastocysts to reach RE or FE provides improved implantation and pregnancy rates after FET. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several ethical aspects in the management of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) are still controversial, including family planning and testing for disease presence in at-risk individuals. We performed an online survey aiming to assess the opinion and current clinical practice of European pediatric and adult nephrologists, as well as geneticists. A total of 410 clinicians (53% male, mean (SD) age of 48 (10) years) responded, including 216 pediatric nephrologists, 151 adult nephrologists, and 43 clinical geneticists. While the 3 groups agreed to encourage clinical testing in asymptomatic ADPKD minors and adults, only geneticists would recommend genetic testing in asymptomatic at-risk adults (P<0.001). Statistically significant disagreement between disciplines was observed regarding the ethical justification of prenatal genetic diagnosis, termination of pregnancy and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for ADPKD. Particularly, PGD is ethically justified according to geneticists (4.48 (1.63)), whereas pediatric (3.08 (1.78); P<0.001) and adult nephrologists (3.66 (1.88); P<0.05) appeared to be less convinced. Our survey suggests that most clinicians support clinical testing of at-risk minors and adults in ADPKD families. However, there is no agreement for genetic testing in asymptomatic offspring and for family planning, including PGD. The present data highlight the need for a consensus among clinicians, to avoid that ADPKD families are being given conflicting information. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Translocation heterozygotes have an increased risk of producing gametes with unbalanced chromosome content. This often leads to reproductive problems such as infertility, repeated miscarriages or birth of an affected child. To increase the chances of having a healthy live-born child, translocation heterozygotes often opt for preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a correlation between chromosome segregation in spermatozoa from translocation heterozygotes and the number of balanced embryos produced during PGD that may be used to predict the PGD outcome. Ten male reciprocal translocation heterozygotes that went through PGD at a Stockholm PGD centre were included. We analysed 1000 spermatozoa from each patient and between 3 and 29 embryos from the total of PGD cycles that the couples went through. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of spermatozoa and embryos was performed with the same DNA probes. We found that the proportion of balanced spermatozoa was much higher than the proportion of balanced embryos during PGD. Our results indicate that a sperm FISH analysis prior to PGD is not a reliable predictor of the PGD outcome. PGD is a valuable reproductive alternative for translocation heterozygotes with reproductive problems and should be offered to these couples. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Novel next-generation sequencing procedures have rapidly emerged into the preimplantation genetic screening framework. This work presents the design and validation of a new low-coverage whole-genome sequencing assay for aneuploidy detection in single blastomeres and trophectodermal samples from preimplantation embryos. The validation ensures analytical sensitivity, specificity, robustness, precision, limit of detection, resolution, and reproducibility. Specific parameters to measure the performance are defined, and the results are compared with a standardized array-based method to stablish the concordance. From the single cell genomics point of view, the main novelties are the length of reads of the libraries (150 nucleotides) together with a paired-end strategy and the design of an original algorithm and copy number viewer. A total of 129 samples were included in six experimental runs using a MiSeq Illumina platform. Samples included: single amniocytes, single blastomeres (cleavage-stage embryos), trophectoderm samples (blastocyst), and diluted DNA. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated per chromosome yielding 96% and 99%, respectively. The percentage of concordant samples was 98.2% and all of the aneuploid samples were confirmed. In conclusion, the validation yields highly reliable and reproducible results, representing an accurate and cost-effective strategy for the routine detection of aneuploidy in human embryos. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) relates exclusively to in vitro fertilisation techniques (IVF) that aim to prevent transmission of a serious genetic abnormality to the child. The genetic characteristics of the embryo created through IVF are analysed, and only the embryos free of the genetic abnormality are implanted in the womb. Performed worldwide since 1990, this technique has raised many legal and ethical debates due to the very wide variations of lawgiving between countries. This is shown by the report of the UNESCO IBC (2003), which described the techniques and the issues raised by preimplantation genetic diagnosis. In this article, the authors present the differences between prenatal diagnosis and preimplantation genetic diagnosis, the French legislation, then the range of legislation in Europe and finally the position of the European Court of Human Rights which sanctioned Italy and Latvia for refusing access to PGD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article focuses on problem associated with parents choosing negative traits for their children and diagnostic technologies like preimplantation genetic diagnostics and editing technologies like CRISPR. It mentions mechanics of the wrongful selection cause of action and importation of legal mechanisms such as qui tam to make the cause of action more palatable to many stakeholders. It also mentions draft civil jury instructions in artificial reproductive technologies (ART).