Search

BackgroundThe strength of evidence supporting the validity of gene-disease relationships is variable. Hereditary cancer has the additional complexity of low or moderate penetrance for some confirmed disease-associated alleles.MethodsTo promote national consistency in interpretation of hereditary cancer/tumour gene test results, we requested opinions of representatives from Australian Family Cancer Clinics regarding the clinical utility of 157 genes initially collated for a national research project. Viewpoints were sought by initial survey, face-to-face workshop and follow-up survey. Subsequent review was undertaken by the eviQ Cancer Genetics Reference Committee, a national resource providing evidence-based and consensus-driven cancer treatment protocols.ResultsGenes were categorised by clinical actionability as: relevant for testing on presentation of common cancer/tumour types (n=45); relevant for testing in the context of specific rare phenotypes (n=74); insufficient clinical utility (n=34) or contentious clinical utility (n=3). Opinions for several genes altered during the study time frame, due to new information.ConclusionThrough an iterative process, consensus was achieved on genes with clinical utility for hereditary cancer/tumour conditions in the Australian setting. This study highlighted need for regular review of gene-disease lists, a role assumed in Australia for hereditary cancer/tumour predisposition genes by the eviQ Cancer Genetics Reference Committee.

In patients with early breast cancer, personal and tumour characteristics other than family history are increasingly used to prompt genetic testing to guide women’s cancer management (treatment-focused genetic testing, ‘TFGT’). Women without a known strong family history of breast and/or ovarian may be more vulnerable to psychological sequelae arising from TFGT. We compared the impact of TFGT in women with (FH+) and without (FH−) a strong family history on psychological adjustment and surgical decisions. Women aged

First reported in 1999, germline runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) mutations are a well-established cause of familial platelet disorder with predisposition to myeloid malignancy (FPD-MM). We present the clinical phenotypes and genetic mutations detected in 10 novel RUNX1-mutated FPD-MM families. Genomic analyses on these families detected 2 partial gene deletions, 3 novel mutations, and 5 recurrent mutations as the germline RUNX1 alterations leading to FPD-MM. Combining genomic data from the families reported herein with aggregated published data sets resulted in 130 germline RUNX1 families, which allowed us to investigate whether specific germline mutation characteristics (type, location) could explain the large phenotypic heterogeneity between patients with familial platelet disorder and different HMs. Comparing the somatic mutational signatures between the available familial (n = 35) and published sporadic (n = 137) RUNX1-mutated AML patients showed enrichment for somatic mutations affecting the second RUNX1 allele and GATA2. Conversely, we observed a decreased number of somatic mutations affecting NRAS, SRSF2, and DNMT3A and the collective genes associated with CHIP and epigenetic regulation. This is the largest aggregation and analysis of germline RUNX1 mutations performed to date, providing a unique opportunity to examine the factors underlying phenotypic differences and disease progression from FPD to MM.

The multifactorial likelihood analysis method has demonstrated utility for quantitative assessment of variant pathogenicity for multiple cancer syndrome genes. Independent data types currently incorporated in the model for assessing BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants include clinically calibrated prior probability of pathogenicity based on variant location and bioinformatic prediction of variant effect, co-segregation, family cancer history profile, co-occurrence with a pathogenic variant in the same gene, breast tumor pathology, and case-control information. Research and clinical data for multifactorial likelihood analysis were collated for 1,395 BRCA1/2 predominantly intronic and missense variants, enabling classification based on posterior probability of pathogenicity for 734 variants: 447 variants were classified as (likely) benign, and 94 as (likely) pathogenic; and 248 classifications were new or considerably altered relative to ClinVar submissions. Classifications were compared with information not yet included in the likelihood model, and evidence strengths aligned to those recommended for ACMG/AMP classification codes. Altered mRNA splicing or function relative to known nonpathogenic variant controls were moderately to strongly predictive of variant pathogenicity. Variant absence in population datasets provided supporting evidence for variant pathogenicity. These findings have direct relevance for BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant evaluation, and justify the need for gene-specific calibration of evidence types used for variant classification., Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center Barretos Cancer Hospital. Grant Number: FINEP ‐ CT‐INFRA (02/2010) Breast Cancer Foundation of New Zealand Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Grant Number: PSR‐SIIRI‐701 Cancer Research UK. Grant Numbers: C8197/A16565, C5047/A8384, C1281/A12014, C12292/A11174, C1287/A10710, C1287/A10118, C1287/A16563, C5047/A10692, C5047/A15007 Department of Defence, USA. Grant Number: W81XWH‐10‐1‐0341 Helsinki University Hospital Research fund Scientific Foundation Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer Leiden University Medical Centre. Grant Number: Grant 30.925 Generalitat de Catalunya. Grant Numbers: PERIS_MedPerCan, URDCat, 2017SGR1282, 2017SGR496 Royal Society of New Zealand Cancer Council Victoria Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). Grant Number: Grant 017.008.022 Breast Cancer Research Foundation Cancer Foundation of Western Australia EU H2020. Grant Number: 634935 Fundación Mutua Madrileña Seventh Framework Programme. Grant Numbers: 634935, 223175, 633784 Cancer Council South Australia Government of Galicia. Grant Number: Consolidation and structuring program: IN607B Cancer Council Tasmania Italian Association of Cancer Research. Grant Number: 15547 Queensland Cancer Fund AstraZeneca National Institute of Health (USA). Grant Numbers: 1U19 CA148065‐01, CA128978, CA192393, 1U19 CA148537, P50 CA1162091, CA116167, 1U19 CA148112 Newcastle University Dutch Cancer Society KWF. Grant Numbers: KWF/Pink Ribbon‐11704, UL2012‐5649 National Institute for Health Research. Grant Number: Manchester Biomedical Research centre (IS‐BRC‐1215 National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq) Instituto de Salud Carlos III. Grant Numbers: FIS PI15/00355, FIS PI13/01711, CIBERONC, FIS PI16/01218, PI16/00563 French National Institute of Cancer National Breast Cancer Foundation National Health and Medical Research Council. Grant Numbers: ID1061778, ID1104808 Carlos III National Health Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enferemdades Raras. Grant Number: ACCI 2016: ER17P1AC7112/2018 Cancer Council NSW Deutsche Krebshilfe. Grant Numbers: (#110837, #70111850 Fondazione Pisa. Grant Number: Grant “Clinical characterization of BRCA 1/2 Mis

Background We report a kindred referred for molecular investigation of severe hemophilia A in a young female in which extremely skewed X‐inactivation was observed in both the proband and her clinically normal mother. Methods Bidirectional Sanger sequencing of all F8 gene coding regions and exon/intron boundaries was undertaken. Methylation‐sensitive restriction enzymes were utilized to investigate skewed X‐inactivation using both a classical human androgen receptor (HUMARA) assay, and a novel method targeting differential methylation patterns in multiple informative X‐chromosome SNPs. Illumina Whole‐Genome Infinium microarray analysis was performed in the case‐parent trio (proband and both parents), and the proband's maternal grandmother. Results The proband was a cytogenetically normal female with severe hemophilia A resulting from a heterozygous F8 pathogenic variant inherited from her similarly affected father. No F8 mutation was identified in the proband's mother, however, both the proband and her mother both demonstrated completely skewed X‐chromosome inactivation (100%) in association with a previously unreported 2.3 Mb deletion at Xp22.2. At least three disease‐associated genes (FANCB,AP1S2, and PIGA) were contained within the deleted region. Conclusions We hypothesize that true “extreme” skewing of X‐inactivation (≥95%) is a rare occurrence, but when defined correctly there is a high probability of finding an X‐chromosome disease‐causing variant or larger deletion resulting in X‐inactivation through a survival disadvantage or cell lethal mechanism. We postulate that the 2.3 Mb Xp22.2 deletion identified in our kindred arose de novo in the proband's mother (on the grandfather's homolog), and produced extreme skewing of X‐inactivation via a “cell lethal” mechanism. We introduce a novel multitarget approach for X‐inactivation analysis using multiple informative differentially methylated SNPs, as an alternative to the classical single locus (HUMARA) method. We propose that for females with unexplained severe phenotypic expression of an X‐linked recessive disorder trio‐SNP microarray should be undertaken in combination with X‐inactivation analysis.

Contains fulltext : 71384.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) We present prenatal and postnatal features of a patient with severe achondroplasia with developmental delay and acanthosis nigricans (SADDAN). Mutation analysis confirmed the clinical diagnosis by detecting the FGFR3 Lys650Met mutation. This case, one of only six with molecular analysis reported in the literature, confirms the severe morbidity and adds to the reports with early mortality associated with SADDAN. Clinical-radiological characteristics of all reported cases of SADDAN are reviewed and discussed.

Background: This year, germline predisposition to haematological malignancy (HM) debuts in the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia (Blood, 2016;127:2391). It has been 17 years since germline mutations in RUNX1 were found to lead to familial platelet disorder (FPD) with predisposition to myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukaemia (MDS/AML) (Nat Genet. 1999;23:166). Now, nearly 80 families have been reported with damaging germline mutations or deletions affecting RUNX1 function, associated with FPD, making it an increasingly significant clinical presence. Although thrombocytopenia and platelet dysfunction are present in almost all RUNX1 mutant carriers, we and others have observed that the predisposition to HM varies between family members, with respect to age at diagnosis and the type of malignancy, and in some cases RUNX1 mutation carriers have no apparent HM development over their lifespan. The reasons for this heterogeneity are currently unknown. Aims: We are conducting an international collaborative study examining RUNX1 mutated families. The aim of the research project is to classify the range of phenotypes correlated with RUNX1 mutations comprehensively (including non-malignant phenotypes such as skin disorders) and to determine if the type of RUNX1 mutation and the presence of other germline and acquired mutations in relevant HM genes correlate with the likelihood of HM development, or the type of HM that develops. Across all of our data we aim to analyse clinically relevant information that will be used to inform prognosis and clinical management in germline RUNX1 mutation carriers. Results:From a review of the literature for previously characterised RUNX1 mutant families most mutations are predicted to be loss-of-function, with the combination of frameshift, stopgain, splicing and deletion accounting for the majority of alterations (57, 70%) compared to missense mutations (22, Figure 1). The most common sites of mutation are R201 and R204, affected by both missense and stopgain (10 total), which lie within the nuclear localisation signal at the end of the RUNT domain (Figure 1). We also surveyed in detail 12 RUNX1 pedigrees with both novel and previously described missense, frameshift, stopgain and deletion mutations and found that, while all families developed myeloid malignancies, 6 families also had individuals who developed lymphoid malignancy (most often Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)) which was heritable in sub-families, and subject to anticipation (e.g see IV-5 and V-5 in Figure 2). Consistent with population genome wide association studies identifying RUNX1 as a susceptibility locus for psoriasis (J Autoimmun. 2015;64:66), we find that skin conditions (psoriasis, eczema) are common, and present in germline RUNX1 carriers in 50% of our families; most commonly observed in families with stopgain and frameshift mutations. Genomic analysis of selected samples confirms that mutation of the other RUNX1 allele is the most commonly acquired mutation in germline RUNX1 mutation carriers developing HM. Alterations of chromosomes 21 and 7 are also common. DNMT3A and PHF6 acquired mutations were the next most frequently observed in tumors and mutations in U2AF1 and ASXL1 in the blood of RUNX1 carriers without HM were observed, suggestive of pre-HM clonal expansion. Finally, in a family with a novel R169I RUNX1 mutation, a rare germline ASXL1 variant (E1102D, 1.0% in ExAC) was found in two RUNX1 carriers who developed early onset AML. This variant is also significantly enriched in an MDS cohort unselected for family history compared to the general population (HR 1.3, p=0.02), as well as ASXL1 N986S (0.1% in ExAC, HR 3.3, p=0.0002) suggesting they operate as germline HM risk modifiers. Interestingly RUNX1 and ASXL1 acquired mutations often co-occur in sporadic MDS/AML and our data suggests this collaboration may also occur at the germline level. Conclusions:Annotation of skin phenotypes co-existent with a family history of haematological malignancy may assist in identifying RUNX1 mutant families. Both acquired and germline mutations in known HM genes may modify germline RUNX1 driven HM penetrance and phenotype. Our data suggest that screening of RUNX1 germline mutation carriers for germline and acquired variants in other HM genes could provide an important tool for defining risk and requires further investigation. Disclosures Owen: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria, Research Funding; Lundbeck: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria. Godley:UpToDate: Honoraria; Onconova, Inc.: Research Funding.

Anophthalmia (no eye), microphthalmia (small eye) and associated ocular developmental anomalies cause significant visual handicap. In most cases the underlying genetic cause is unknown, but mutations in some genes, such as SOX2, cause ocular developmental defects, particularly anophthalmia, in a subset of patients. Here, we describe a four-generation family with a p.Asp123Gly mutation in the highly conserved partner-factor interaction region of the SOX2 protein, which is important for cell-specific actions of SOX2. The proband in this family has bilateral anophthalmia and several other family members have milder ocular phenotypes, including typical optic fissure coloboma. Expression studies indicate that Sox2 is expressed in the eye at the site of closure of the optic fissure during development. The SOX2 mutation in this family implicates the partner-factor interaction region of SOX2 in contributing to the specificity of SOX2 action in optic fissure closure. Our findings indicate that investigation of SOX2 in a broad range of eye anomaly patients aids in the determination of particular functions of SOX2 in development.