Search

Research using ciliates revealed early examples of epigenetic phenomena and continues to provide novel findings. These protozoans maintain separate germline and somatic nuclei that carry transcriptionally silent and active genomes, respectively. Examining the differences in chromatin within distinct nuclei of Tetrahymena identified histone variants and established that transcriptional regulators act by modifying histones. Formation of somatic nuclei requires both transcriptional activation of silent chromatin and large-scale DNA elimination. This somatic genome remodeling is directed by homologous RNAs, acting with an RNA interference (RNAi)-related machinery. Furthermore, the content of the parental somatic genome provides a homologous template to guide this genome restructuring. The mechanisms regulating ciliate DNA rearrangements reveal the surprising power of homologous RNAs to remodel the genome and transmit information transgenerationally.

The somatic nucleus of Oxytricha trifallax contains over 15,000 different chromosomes, most containing a single gene. Analysis of this 50 Mb genome uncovers novel regulatory strategies and adaptive potential when gene copy number and allelic frequency are no longer constrained by genetic linkage., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Transformation of Tetrahymena by microinjection of DNA was established 25 years ago. This rather labor-intensive technique has since been shelved, replaced by less time consuming and more efficient methods, electroporation and biolistics. Conjugative electroporation is the method of choice for introducing autonomously replicating, rDNA-based vectors into Tetrahymena. These are maintained as high-copy linear mini-chromosomes. Versatile expression cassettes in these vectors facilitate expression of most genes. Transformation efficiencies are sufficiently high to permit screens using expression libraries. Biolistic transformation is primarily used to introduce DNA for integration into the genome by homologous recombination. This technique has greatly enhanced strain engineering of Tetrahymena through facilitating the disruption of genes (creating targeted knockout cell lines) or epitope-tagging coding regions, allowing researchers to take full advantage of the sequenced genome. The presence of both germline and somatic nuclei in these cells requires different strategies to target DNA to the desired compartment. This presents challenges, including the need to engineer the polygenic macronuclear genome, which has nearly 50 copies of each gene. However, separate manipulation of functionally distinct genomes provides experimental opportunities, especially for the analysis of essential genes, by modifying the silent micronucleus then subsequently examining phenotypes in the next sexual generation. The flexibility to engineer strains as needed makes Tetrahymena a facile system with which to answer many biological questions., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Ciliated protozoa extensively remodel their somatic genomes during nuclear development, fragmenting their chromosomes and removing large numbers of internal eliminated sequences (IESs). The sequences eliminated are unique and repetitive DNAs, including transposons. Recent studies have identified transposase proteins that appear to have been domesticated and are used by these cells to eliminate DNA not wanted in the somatic macronucleus. This DNA elimination process is guided by meiotically produced small RNAs, generated in the germline nucleus, that recognize homologous sequences leading to their removal. These scan RNAs are found in complexes with PIWI proteins. Before they search the developing genome for IESs to eliminate, they scan the parental somatic nucleus and are removed from the pool if they match homologous sequences in that previously reorganized genome. In Tetrahymena, the scan RNAs target heterochromatin modifications to mark IESs for elimination. This DNA elimination pathway in ciliates shares extensive similarity with piRNA-mediated silencing of metazoans and highlights the remarkable ability of homologous RNAs to shape developing genomes.

The single-celled ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila possesses two versions of its genome, one germline, one somatic, contained within functionally distinct nuclei (called the micronucleus and macronucleus, respectively). These two genomes differentiate from identical zygotic copies. The development of the somatic nucleus involves large-scale DNA rearrangements that eliminate 15 to 20 Mbp of their germline-derived DNA. The genomic regions excised are dispersed throughout the genome and are largely composed of repetitive sequences. These germline-limited sequences are targeted for removal from the genome by a RNA interference (RNAi)-related machinery that directs histone H3 lysine 9 and 27 methylation to their associated chromatin. The targeting small RNAs are generated in the micronucleus during meiosis and then compared against the parental macronucleus to further enrich for germline-limited sequences and ensure that only non-genic DNA segments are eliminated. Once the small RNAs direct these chromatin modifications, the DNA rearrangement machinery, including the chromodomain proteins Pdd1p and Pdd3p, assembles on these dispersed chromosomal sequences, which are then partitioned into nuclear foci where the excision events occur. This DNA rearrangement mechanism is Tetrahymena's equivalent to the silencing of repetitive sequences by the formation of heterochromatin. The dynamic nuclear reorganization that occurs offers an intriguing glimpse into mechanisms that shape nuclear architecture during eukaryotic development.

Extensive genome-wide rearrangements occur during somatic macronuclear development in Tetrahymena thermophila. These events are guided by RNA interference-directed chromatin modification including histone H3 lysine 9 methylation, which marks specific germ line-limited internal eliminated sequences (IESs) for excision. Several genes putatively involved in these developmental genome rearrangements were identified based on their proteins' localization to differentiating somatic nuclei, and here we demonstrate that one, LIA1, encodes a novel protein that is an essential component of the genome rearrangement machinery. A green fluorescent protein-Lia1 fusion protein exhibited dynamic nuclear localization during development that has striking similarity to that of the dual chromodomain-containing DNA rearrangement protein, Pdd1p. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments showed that Lia1p associates with Pdd1p and IES chromatin during macronuclear development. Cell lines in which we disrupted both the germ line and somatic copies of LIA1 (DeltaLIA1) grew normally but were unable to generate viable progeny, arresting late in development just prior to returning to vegetative growth. These mutant lines failed to properly form Pdd1p-containing nuclear structures and eliminate IESs despite showing normal levels of H3K9 methylation. These data indicate that Lia1p is required late in conjugation for the reorganization of the Tetrahymena genome.

Extensive DNA rearrangements occur during the differentiation of the developing somatic macronuclear genome from the germ line micronuclear genome of Tetrahymena thermophila. To identify genes encoding proteins likely to be involved in this process, we devised a cytological screen to find proteins that specifically localize in macronuclear anlagen (Lia proteins) at the stage when rearrangements occur. We compared the localization of these with that of the chromodomain protein, Pdd1p, which is the most abundant known participant in this genome reorganization. We show that in live cells, Pdd1p exhibits dynamic localization, apparently shuttling from the parental to the developing nuclei through cytoplasmic bodies called conjusomes. Visualization of GFP-tagged Pdd1p also highlights the substantial three-dimensional nuclear reorganization in the formation of nuclear foci that occur coincident with DNA rearrangements. We found that late in macronuclear differentiation, four of the newly identified proteins are organized into nuclear foci that also contain Pdd1p. These Lia proteins are encoded by primarily novel genes expressed at the beginning of macronuclear differentiation and have properties or recognizable domains that implicate them in chromatin or nucleic acid binding. Three of the Lia proteins also localize to conjusomes, a result that further implicates this structure in the regulation of DNA rearrangement.

The surprising discovery of a whole-genome duplication in the otherwise compact genome of Paramecium tetraurelia displays the early forces driving gene retention and loss.

Approximately 6000 DNA elements, totaling nearly 15 Mb, are coordinately excised from the developing somatic genome of Tetrahymena thermophila. An RNA interference (RNAi)-related mechanism has been implicated in the targeting of these germline-limited sequences for chromatin modification and subsequent DNA rearrangement. The excision of individual DNA segments can be inhibited if the homologous sequence is placed within the parental somatic nucleus, indicating that communication occurs between the parental and developing genomes. To determine how the DNA content of one nucleus is communicated to the other, we assessed DNA rearrangement occurring in wild-type cells that were mated to cells that contained the normally germline-limited M element within their somatic nuclei. M-element rearrangement was blocked in the wild-type cell even when no genetic exchange occurred between mating partners, a finding that is inconsistent with any genetic imprinting models. This inhibition by the parental somatic nucleus was rapidly established between 5 and 6 hr of conjugation, near or shortly after the time that zygotic nuclei are formed. M-element small RNAs (sRNAs) that are believed to direct its rearrangement were found to rapidly accumulate during the first few hours of conjugation before stabilizing to a low, steady-state level. The period between 5 and 6 hr during which sRNA levels stabilize correlates with the time after which the parental genome can block DNA rearrangement. These data lead us to suggest that homologous sRNAs serve as mediators to communicate sequence-specific information between the parental and developing genomes, thereby regulating genome-wide DNA rearrangement, and that these sRNAs can be effectively compared to the somatic genome of both parents.