Search

Disrupted brain structures and several life environmental factors have been shown to influence depression and anxiety, but their interactions with anxiety and depression remain elusive. Genome‐wide association study datasets of 15 brain structure longitudinal changes (N = 15,640) were obtained from the published study. Genotype and phenotype‐related data of depression, anxiety, and life environmental factors (including smoking, alcohol drinking, coffee intake, maternal smoking, physical activity, vitamin D, insomnia, sleep duration, and family satisfaction) were collected from UK Biobank. We calculated the polygenic risk scores (PRS) of 15 brain structure changes and then conducted linear regression analyses to explore the interactions of brain structure changes and life environmental factors on depression and anxiety using 15 brain structure change‐related PRS, life environmental factors and interactions of them as instrumental variables, and depression score or anxiety score as outcomes. Sex stratification in all analyses was performed to reveal sex‐specific differences in the interactions. We found 14 shared interactions related to both depression and anxiety in total sample, such as alcohol drinking × cerebellum white matter 3 (WM; beta = −.003, p =.018 for depression; beta = −003, p =.008 for anxiety) and maternal smoking × nucleus accumbens 2 (beta =.088, p =.002 for depression; beta =.070, p =.008 for anxiety). We also observed sex‐specific differences in the interactions, for instance, alcohol drinking × cerebellum WM 3 was negatively associated with depression and anxiety in males (beta = −.004, p =.020 for depression; beta = −.005, p =.002 for anxiety). Our study results reveal the important interactions between brain structure changes and several life environmental factors on depression and anxiety, which may help to explore the pathogenesis of depression and anxiety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The role of neurological proteins in the development of bipolar disorder (BD) and schizophrenia (SCZ) remains elusive now. The current study aims to explore the potential genetic correlations of plasma neurological proteins with BD and SCZ. Methods: By using the latest genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data of BD and SCZ (including 41,917 BD cases, 11,260 SCZ cases, and 396,091 controls) derived from the Psychiatric GWAS Consortium website (PGC) and a recently released GWAS of neurological proteins (including 750 individuals), we performed a linkage disequilibrium score regression (LDSC) analysis to detect the potential genetic correlations between the two common psychiatric disorders and each of the 92 neurological proteins. Two-sample Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis was then applied to assess the bidirectional causal relationship between the neurological proteins identified by LDSC, BD and SCZ. Results: LDSC analysis identified one neurological protein, NEP , which shows suggestive genetic correlation signals for both BD (coefficient = −0.165, p value = 0.035) and SCZ (coefficient = −0.235, p value = 0.020). However, those association did not remain significant after strict Bonferroni correction. Two sample MR analysis found that there was an association between genetically predicted level of NEP protein, BD (odd ratio [OR] = 0.87, p value = 1.61 × 10−6) and SCZ (OR = 0.90, p value = 4.04 × 10−6). However, in the opposite direction, there is no genetically predicted association between BD, SCZ, and NEP protein level. Conclusion: This study provided novel clues for understanding the genetic effects of neurological proteins on BD and SCZ. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although previous genome-wide association studies (GWASs) on post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have identified multiple risk loci, how these loci confer risk of PTSD remains unclear. Through the FUSION pipeline, we integrated two human brain proteome reference datasets (ROS/MAP and Banner) with the PTSD GWAS dataset, respectively, to conduct a proteome-wide association study (PWAS) analysis. Then two transcriptome reference weights (Rnaseq and Splicing) were applied to a transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) analysis. Finally, the PWAS and TWAS results were investigated through brain imaging analysis. In the PWAS analysis, 8 and 13 candidate genes were identified in the ROS/MAP and Banner reference weight groups, respectively. Examples included ADK (pPWAS-ROS/MAP = 3.00 × 10−5) and C3orf18 (pPWAS-Banner = 7.07 × 10−31). Moreover, the TWAS also detected multiple candidate genes associated with PTSD in two different reference weight groups, including RIMS2 (pTWAS-Splicing = 3.84 × 10−2), CHMP1A (pTWAS-Rnaseq = 5.09 × 10−4), and SIRT5 (pTWAS-Splicing = 4.81 × 10−3). Further comparison of the PWAS and TWAS results in different populations detected the overlapping genes: MADD (pPWAS-Banner = 4.90 × 10−2, pTWAS-Splicing = 1.23 × 10−2) in the total population and GLO1(pPWAS-Banner = 4.89 × 10−3, pTWAS-Rnaseq = 1.41 × 10−3) in females. Brain imaging analysis revealed several different brain imaging phenotypes associated with MADD and GLO1 genes. Our study identified multiple candidate genes associated with PTSD in the proteome and transcriptome levels, which may provide new clues to the pathogenesis of PTSD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cumulative evidence shows that gut microbiome can influence brain function and behavior via the inflammatory processes. However, the role of interaction between gut dysbiosis and C-reactive protein (CRP) in the development of anxiety and depression remains to be elucidated. In this study, a total of 3321 independent single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci associated with gut microbiome were driven from genome-wide association study (GWAS). Using individual level genotype data from UK Biobank, we then calculated the polygenetic risk scoring (PRS) of 114 gut microbiome related traits. Moreover, regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the possible effect of interaction between gut microbiome and CRP on the risks of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (N = 113,693) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) (N = 114,219). At last, 11 candidate CRP × gut microbiome interaction with suggestive significance was detected for PHQ-9 score, such as F_Ruminococcaceae (β = − 0.009, P = 2.2 × 10–3), G_Akkermansia (β = − 0.008, P = 7.60 × 10–3), F_Acidaminococcaceae (β = 0.008, P = 1.22 × 10–2), G_Holdemanella (β = − 0.007, P = 1.39 × 10–2) and O_Lactobacillales (β = 0.006, P = 1.79× 10–2). 16 candidate CRP × gut microbiome interaction with suggestive significance was detected for GAD-7 score, such as O_Bacteroidales (β = 0.010, P = 4.00× 10–4), O_Selenomonadales (β = − 0.010, P = 1.20 × 10–3), O_Clostridiales (β = 0.009, P = 2.70 × 10–3) and G_Holdemanella (β = − 0.008, P = 4.20 × 10–3). Our results support the significant effect of interaction between CRP and gut microbiome on the risks of anxiety and depression, and identified several candidate gut microbiomes for them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Comparing with the general population, the pain in depression patients has more complex biological mechanism. We aim to explore the etiological mechanism of pain in depression patients from the perspective of genetics. Utilizing the UK Biobank samples with self-reported depression status or PHQ score ≥10, we conducted genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of seven pain traits (N = 1,133–58,349). Additionally, we used FUSION pipeline to perform proteome-wide association study (PWAS) and transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) by integrating GWAS summary data with two different proteome reference weights (ROS/MAP and Banner) and Rnaseq gene expression reference weights, respectively. GWAS identified 3 significant genes associated with different pain traits in depression patients, including TRIOBP (P GWAS = 4.48 × 10−8) for stomach or abdominal pain, SLC9A9(P GWAS = 2.77 × 10−8) for multisite chronic pain (MCP) and ADGRF1 (P GWAS = 1.51 × 10−8) for neck or shoulder pain. In addition, PWAS and TWAS analysis also identified multiple candidate genes associated with different pain traits in depression patients, such as TPRG1L (P PWAS-Banner = 3.38 × 10−2) and SIRPA (P PWAS-Banner = 3.65 × 10−2) for MCP, etc. Notably, when comparing the results of PWAS and TWAS analysis, we found overlapping candidate genes in these pain traits, such as GSTM3 (P PWAS - Banner = 3.38 × 10−2, P TWAS = 6.92 × 10−3) in the stomach or abdominal pain phenotype, ATG7 (P PWAS - Rosmap = 3.15 × 10−2, P TWAS = 2.98 × 10−2) in the MCP, etc. We identified multiple novel candidate genes for pain traits in depression patients from different perspectives of genetics, which provided novel clues for understanding the genetic mechanisms underlying the pain in depression patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rare variants are believed to play a substantial role in the genetic architecture of mental disorders, particularly in coding regions. However, limited evidence supports the impact of rare variants on anxiety. Using whole-exome sequencing data from 200,643 participants in the UK Biobank, we investigated the contribution of rare variants to anxiety. Firstly, we computed genetic risk score (GRS) of anxiety utilizing genotype data and summary data from a genome-wide association study (GWAS) on anxiety disorder. Subsequently, we identified individuals within the lowest 50% GRS, a subgroup more likely to carry pathogenic rare variants. Within this subgroup, we classified individuals with the highest 10% 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7) score as cases (N = 1869), and those with the lowest 10% GAD-7 score were designated as controls (N = 1869). Finally, we conducted gene-based burden tests and single-variant association analyses to assess the relationship between rare variants and anxiety. Totally, 47,800 variants with MAF ≤0.01 were annotated as non-benign coding variants, consisting of 42,698 nonsynonymous SNVs, 489 nonframeshift substitution, 236 frameshift substitution, 617 stop-gain and 40 stop-loss variants. After variation aggregation, 5066 genes were included in gene-based association analysis. Totally, 11 candidate genes were detected in burden test, such as RNF123 (P Bonferroni adjusted = 3.40 × 10−6), MOAP1 (P Bonferroni adjusted = 4.35 × 10−4), CCDC110 (P Bonferroni adjusted = 5.83 × 10−4). Single-variant test detected 9 rare variants, such as rs35726701(RNF123)(P Bonferroni adjusted = 3.16 × 10−10) and rs16942615(CAMTA2) (P Bonferroni adjusted = 4.04 × 10−4). Notably, RNF123 , CCDC110 , DNAH2 , and CSKMT gene were identified in both tests. Our study identified novel candidate genes for anxiety in protein-coding regions, revealing the contribution of rare variants to anxiety. • We investigated the rare variants for anxiety among 3738 European individuals with lower anxiety GWAS-derived polygenic risk. • Gene-based burden test revealed 11 candidate genes for anxiety, such as RNF123 , DNAH2 and CCDC110. • Single variant association analysis detected 9 rare variants for anxiety, such as rs35726701(RNF123) and rs16942615(CAMTA2). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous genetic studies of anxiety and depression were mostly based on independent phenotypes. This study aims to investigate the shared and specific genetic structure between anxiety and depression. To identify the underlying factors of Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and their combined scale (joint scale), we employed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using the eigenvalue of parallel analysis. Subsequently, we conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for these factors. In addition, we utilized LD Score Regression (LDSC) to determine the genetic correlations between the identified factors and four common mental disorders, three sleep phenotypes, and other traits that have been previously linked to anxiety and depression. The EFA uncovered two factors for the GAD-7 scale, namely nervousness and disturbance, two factors for the PHQ-9 scale, namely negative affect and sleep/appetite disturbance, and four factors for the joint scale, specifically nervousness, anhedonia, sleep/appetite disturbance, and fidget. We identified two genome-wide significant genomic loci, with overlap across GAD-7 factor 1 and joint scale factor 1: rs148579586 (P GAD-7 = 1.365 × 10−09, P Joint scale = 1.434 × 10–09) and rs201074060 (P GAD-7 = 3.672 × 10−09, P Joint scale = 3.824 × 10−09). Genetic correlations in factors ranged from 0.722 to 1.000 (all p < 1.786 × 10−03) with 27 of 28 correlations being significantly smaller than one. The genetic correlations with external phenotypes showed small variation across the eight factors. Unidimensional structures can provide more precise scores, which can aid in identifying the shared and specific genetic associations between anxiety and depression. This is a crucial step in characterizing the genetic structure of these conditions and their co-occurrence. • We used EFA to identify potential factors for GAD-7, PHQ-9 and the joint scale. • we found common and specific genetic structures between anxiety and depression. • Single-dimensional structures can build more precise fractions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]