Search

Converting geochemical exploration data into information relevant to descriptive statistics of indicator elements facilitates gaining the knowledge of spatial and genetic relationships between mineralization and elemental dispersion patterns. This allows obtaining insights into alternatives to exploration strategies aiming at vectoring toward undiscovered mineral deposit sites. In this regard, shaping geochemical data for better understanding of their underlying patterns and extraction of information about ore deposition-related anomalies are challenging issues. To better extraction of the information from the geochemical data, we adapted the "information value" concept to quantify the significance of geochemical anomaly classes as spatial proxies of mineral deposits. To illustrate and evaluate the procedure proposed, a dataset of porphyry-Cu exploration was used to delineate exploration targets in the Baft district, Kerman province, Iran. Through this, geochemical models of information values were created for ore deposition-related elements. Then, the geochemical models were combined to produce an information value-based multi-element geochemical signature aiming at utilizing the prediction ability of every indicator element in a single model. Through the combination, spatial patterns of geochemical signals around mineral deposits are revealed that makes it easier to explore undiscovered deposit sites. We also applied fuzzy operators, as common and alternative practices, to integrate values of the same indicator elements for comparison purpose. The results demonstrated that the model of information value-based multi-element geochemical signature is an efficient geochemical proxy, over those geochemical models generated by the application of fuzzy operators, for exploration targeting. • Information value (IV) concept is adapted for geochemical anomaly modeling. • The IV is applied to introduce enhanced geochemical signatures. • The enhanced geochemical model is a derived multi-element indicator. • The IV facilitates converting geochemical data to exploration insight. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• An efficient geochemical evidence layer was generated. • The layer was used as a response to ore deposition processes. • The layer was applied for mineral exploration targeting. Recognition of mineralization-related geochemical footprints and modeling their multi-element dispersion patterns are important aspects to consider when "vectoring" toward undiscovered ore deposits. The collection, analysis, and interpretation of stream sediment geochemical data together make an exploration method that has proven to be successful at the district scale mineral exploration targeting. Identifying the possible sources of stream sediment geochemical anomalies and mapping evidence (i.e., footprints) of the underlying ore-forming processes, however, are not trivial tasks. This is because stream sediment samples represent transported material reflecting the entire geology upstream from the sample locations. Furthermore, indicator element distribution patterns are commonly strongly affected by local factors such as regolith, topographic gradient, vegetation density, and/or climate. Therefore, there is a need for finding a better geochemical anomaly separation method regarding the nature of geochemical data obtained from the area sampled. The main objectives of this study were (1) evaluating and comparing the spatial U-statistic and concentration–area fractal modeling methods of anomaly identification, both amenable to spatial analysis, for recognizing geochemical footprints of porphyry copper mineralization, and (2) measuring their performance in the context of district-scale exploration targeting in an area located in southeast Iran. Subsequently, the methods were first evaluated on a dataset of element contents to decompose anomalous populations. Finally, the geochemical model that proved more efficient with respect to predicting the known mineral deposits was integrated with additional evidence maps to delineate exploration targets. Our evaluation of the resulting geochemical targeting model demonstrated that the targets derived from this method are robust and worthy of follow-up exploration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]