Search

We present the results of relocating 17,544 hypocenters determined from data recorded during the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake sequence, during the interval between April 14, 2016, and August 31, 2016. For this, we used a double-difference relocation method to constrain high-resolution hypocenter locations by cross-correlation differential times as well as the NIED Hi-net catalog differential times. The sequence included two large events (on 14 April: M 6.5 and on 16 April: M 7.3) that occurred in a complicated region where the Hinagu and Futagawa faults meet. By comparing these high-resolution earthquake locations in three different periods [(P1) between 2001 and 2012; (P2) between M 6.5 and M 7.3; and (P3) between M 7.3 and August 31, 2016], we present the significant seismicity after the mainshock relative to the background seismicity. Events during the Kumamoto Earthquake sequence occurred generally within the same sites of known faults and background seismicity. For an example, the seismicity during period P2 formed a sharp linear shape along the northern part of the Hinagu fault for about 20 km. A series of linear seismicity events occurred during period P3 along the Futagawa fault to the east (for about 28 km), in the northern part of the Aso caldera, and in the Oita region around the Beppu-Haneyama fault zone. These events also extended to the mid- and southern parts of the Hinagu fault zone and were shaped only after the M7.3 event. Moreover, high-resolution hypocenter locations also allowed us to identify some clusters of events that occurred in regions where background seismicity has not been confirmed. For instance, activity on the northwestern edge of the Aso caldera and in small areas within the Beppu-Haneyama fault zone became apparent with new seismic activity. We also demonstrate herein the absence of seismicity between the northeast extension of the Futagawa fault zone and the Aso caldera region, which became clearly shown after the M7.3 event. This low-seismicity region is located at the boundary of the low- and high-velocity structures and different focal mechanisms, but is also close to the maximum slip area of the M7.3 event. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We have generated a high-resolution catalog called the “Japan Unified hIgh-resolution relocated Catalog for Earthquakes” (JUICE), which can be used to evaluate the geometry and seismogenic depth of active faults in Japan. We relocated > 1.1 million hypocenters from the NIED Hi-net catalog for events which occurred between January 2001 and December 2012, to a depth of 40 km. We apply a relative hypocenter determination method to the data in each grid square, in which entire Japan is divided into 1257 grid squares to parallelize the relocation procedure. We used a double-difference method, incorporating cross-correlating differential times as well as catalog differential times. This allows us to resolve, in detail, a seismicity distribution for the entire Japanese Islands. We estimated location uncertainty by a statistical resampling method, using Jackknife samples, and show that the uncertainty can be within 0.37 km in the horizontal and 0.85 km in the vertical direction with a 90% confidence interval for areas with good station coverage. Our seismogenic depth estimate agrees with the lower limit of the hypocenter distribution for a recent earthquake on the Kamishiro fault (2014, Mj 6.7), which suggests that the new catalog should be useful for estimating the size of future earthquakes for inland active faults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In view of significant discrepancy between the slip models of the 2009 April 6 L'Aquila, (Italy) earthquake based on seismic waveforms or geodetic data, a new inversion strategy is proposed to constrain the coseismic rupture model and early post-seismic afterslip model of this earthquake. Both models were jointly inverted simultaneously from the near-source strong ground motion recordings, teleseismic P waves, long-period Rayleigh waves, GPS displacement vectors and InSAR line-of-sight displacement image. The deformations are mapped onto the fault with strike 140° and dip 50° to the southwest. The coseismic period here represents the first 10 s after the rupture initiation, when over 99 per cent of our total seismic moment (3.07 × 1018 Nm) is already released in our preferred coseismic model. Most coseismic slip occurs in a small rupture area of approximately 16 km along strike and in a depth range of 3–10 km. The average slip is 0.45 m; peak slip reaches about 0.90 m. Our result reveals that L'Aquila rupture has a lag of 0.6 s before it first propagates updip to break an asperity equivalent to an Mw 5.7. And then the rupture propagates along strike to break a large patch located about 8.0 km along strike and 4.0 km updip from the hypocentre. The weighted average of the rise time and slip velocity are 0.71 s and 0.77 m s−1, respectively. Our estimate of radiated seismic energy is 1.67 × 1013 J, yielding an energy to seismic moment ratio of 0.55 × 10−5, considerably smaller than the global average for shallow earthquakes. The early post-seismic period here represents the time window from 10 s to about first day. During this period, our preferred post-seismic model has an accumulated seismic moment of 6.0 × 1017 Nm, equivalent to an Mw of 5.8. The afterslip distribution features two separated high slip fault patches, locating either near the hypocentre or the region with peak coseismic slip. Their locations only partially overlap with the fault patches with significant afterslip after the first day. In particular, the slip distribution of the shallower patch is quantitatively consistent with the Amoruso and Crescentini’ diffusive afterslip model. Therefore, the coseismic rupture of the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake was following by a slow-slip event with significant moment release in first hour. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]