Search

Long-term changes in characteristics of the geomagnetic field may signal evolutionary changes within the Earth's interior. Among these long-term variations, the magnetic field reversal rate is probably the best known and most frequently used parameter to evaluate concomitant changes in the Earth's core. Although the reversal rate is well known for the last 150 Ma and reasonably constrained back to 300 Ma, knowledge of the early Paleozoic and earlier times is limited. Hence, the haunting question is whether the reversal pattern for the last 300 Myr is a good representation of the field behavior over a much longer interval. A paleomagnetic study of Upper Ediacaran sediments from the Zigan Fm. (Baltica in the western South Urals) revealed a high-temperature, dual-polarity component that is of primary origin ( Levashova et al., 2013 ). In this paper, we present the results of a magnetostratigraphic study from the same sections that can be summed up as follows: 1) >30 magnetozones are found in the ca. 110 meters thick composite section of the Zigan Fm.; 2) A similar reversal pattern was reported from Upper Ediacaran sediments from the White Sea coast (North Russia) and SW Siberia but has never been found in clastic rocks of any other age; 3) The reversal pattern in three remote Ediacaran sections could not result from remagnetization or extremely slow sedimentation; 4) The reversal rate in the Late Ediacaran exceeded 20 reversals per million years; 5) The field appears to behave in a bipolar fashion during the period of hyperactivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We studied Upper Permian redbeds from two areas, one between the Urals and the Volga River in the southeastern part of Baltica and the other in north Kazakhstan within the Ural-Mongol belt, which are about 900 km apart; a limited collection of Lower-Middle Triassic volcanics from north Kazakhstan was also studied. A high-temperature component that shows rectilinear decay to the origin was isolated from most samples of all three collections. For the Late Permian of north Kazakhstan, the area-mean direction of this component is D= 224.3°, I=−56.8°, k= 161, α95= 2.7°, N= 18 sites, palaeopole at 53.4°N, 161.3°E; the fold test is positive. The Triassic result ( D= 55.9°, I=+69.1°, k= 208, α95= 4.2°, N= 7 sites, pole at 57.0°N, 134.1°E) is confirmed by a positive reversal test. The corresponding palaeomagnetic poles from north Kazakhstan show good agreement with the APWP for Baltica, thus indicating no substantial motion between the two areas that are separated by the Urals. Our new mean Late Permian direction for SE Baltica ( D= 42.2°, I= 39.2°, k= 94, α95= 3.5°, N= 17 sites; palaeopole at 45.6°N, 170.2°E) is confirmed as near-primary by a positive tilt test and the presence of dual-polarity directions. The corresponding pole also falls on the APWP of Baltica, but is far-sided with respect to the coeval reference poles, as the observed mean inclination is shallower than expected by 13°± 4°. In principle, lower-than-expected inclinations may be attributed to one or more of the following causes: relative tectonic displacements, quadrupole and octupole terms in the geomagnetic field, higher-order harmonics (incl. secular variation) of the same field, random scatter, non-removed overprints, or inclination error during remanence acquisition and/or diagenetic compaction. Our analysis shows that most mechanisms from the above list cannot explain the observed pattern, leaving as the most likely option that it must be accounted for by inclination shallowing. Comparison with selected coeval results from eastern Baltica (all within Russia) shows that all of them are biased in the same way. This implies that they cannot be used for analysis of geomagnetic field characteristics, such as non-dipole contributions, without a more adequate knowledge of the required correction for inclination shallowing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The Ural–Mongol belt (UMB), between Siberia, Baltica and Tarim, is widely recognized as the locus of Asia''s main growth during the Paleozoic, but its evolution remains highly controversial, as illustrated by the disparate paleogeographic models published in the last decade. One of the largest tectonic units of the UMB is the Kokchetav–North Tien Shan Domain (KNTD) that stretches from Tarim in the south nearly to the West Siberian Basin. The KNTD comprises several Precambrian microcontinents and numerous remnants of Early Paleozoic island arcs, marginal basins and accretionary complexes. In Late Ordovician time, all these structures had amalgamated into a single contiguous domain. Its paleogeographic position is of crucial importance for elucidating the Paleozoic evolution of the UMB in general and of the Urals in particular. The Aral Formation, located in Kyrgyzstan in the southern part of the KNTD, consists of a thick Upper Devonian (Frasnian) basalt–andesite sequence. Paleomagnetic data show a dual-polarity characteristic component (Dec/Inc=286°/+56°, α 95 =9°, k =21, N =15 sites). The primary origin of this magnetization is confirmed by a positive test on intraformational conglomerates. We combine this result with other Paleozoic data from the KNTD and show its latitudinal motion from the Late Ordovician to the end of the Paleozoic. The observed paleolatitudes are found to agree well with the values extrapolated from Baltica to a common reference point (42.5°N, 73°E) in our sampling area for the entire interval; hence coherent motion of the KNTD and Baltica is strongly indicated for most of the Paleozoic. This finding contradicts most published models of the UMB evolution, where the KNTD is separated from Baltica by a rather wide Ural Ocean containing one or more major plate boundaries. An exception is the model of Şengör and Natal''in [A.M.C. Şengör, B.A. Natal''in, Paleotectonics of Asia: fragments of a synthesis, in: A. Yin and M. Harrison (eds.), The tectonic evolution of Asia, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996) 486–640], in which coherent paleolatitudinal motion of Baltica and the KNTD is hypothesized — the latter as part of the Kipchak Arc. We suggest a parallel hypothesis, which explains coherent motion of the KNTD and Baltica. In particular, we argue that if a basin with oceanic crust ever existed between the KNTD and Baltica, it was a narrow one without (significant) active spreading in Middle to Late Paleozoic time. Notably, the paleogeographic position of Siberia during the Middle Paleozoic and hence, the width of the Khanty–Mansi Ocean between Siberia, on the one hand, and Baltica–KNTD, on the other hand, remains largely unconstrained, because of the paucity of high-quality Silurian, Devonian and Carboniferous paleomagnetic results from Siberia. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Most of Kazakhstan belongs to the central part of the Eurasian Paleozoic mobile belts for which previously proposed tectonic scenarios have been rather disparate. Of particular interest is the origin of strongly curved Middle and Late Paleozoic volcanic belts of island-arc and Andean-arc affinities that dominate the structure of Kazakhstan. We undertook a paleomagnetic study of Carboniferous to Upper Permian volcanics and sediments from several localities in the Ili River basin between the Tien Shan and the Junggar–Alatau ranges in southeast Kazakhstan. Our main goal was to investigate the Permian kinematic evolution of these belts, particularly in terms of rotations about vertical axes, in the hope of deciphering the dynamics that played a role during the latest Paleozoic deformation in this area. This deformation, in turn, can then be related to the amalgamation of this area with Baltica, Siberia, and Tarim in the expanding Eurasian supercontinent. Thermal demagnetization revealed that most Permian rocks retained a pretilting and likely primary component, which is of reversed polarity at three localities and normal at the fourth. In contrast, most Carboniferous rocks are dominated by postfolding reversed overprints of probably “mid-Permian” age, whereas presumably primary components are isolated from a few sites at two localities. Mean inclinations of primary components generally agree with coeval reference values extrapolated from Baltica, whereas declinations from primary as well as secondary components are deflected counterclockwise (ccw) by up to ∼90°. Such ccw rotated directions have previously also been observed in other Tien Shan sampling areas and in the adjacent Tarim Block to the south. However, two other areas in Kazakhstan show clockwise (cw) rotations of Permian magnetization directions. One area is located in the Kendyktas block about 300 km to the west of the Ili River valley, and the other is found in the Chingiz Range, to the north of Lake Balkhash and about 400 km to the north of the Ili River valley. The timing of the ccw as well as cw rotations is clearly later than the disappearance of any marine basins from northern Tarim, the Tien Shan and eastern Kazakhstan, so that the rotations cannot be attributed to island-arc or Andean-margin plate settings — instead we attribute the rotations to large-scale, east–west (present-day coordinates), sinistral wrenching in an intracontinental setting, related to convergence between Siberia and Baltica, as recently proposed by Natal''in and Şengör [Natal''in, B.A., and Şengör, A.M.C., 2005. Late Palaeozoic to Triassic evolution of the Turan and Scythian platforms: the pre-history of the palaeo-Tethyan closure, Tectonophysics, 404, 175–202.]. Our previous work in the Chingiz and North Tien Shan areas on Ordovician and Silurian rocks suggested relative rotations of ∼180°, whereas the Permian declination differences are of the order of 90° between the two areas. Thus, we assume that about 50% of the total post-Ordovician rotations are of pre-Late Permian age, with the other half of Late Permian–earliest Mesozoic age. The pre-Late Permian rotations are likely related to oroclinal bending during plate boundary evolution in a supra-subduction setting, given the calc-alkaline character of nearly all of the pre-Late Permian volcanics in the strongly curved belts. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Conflicting paleogeographic reconstructions of the Ural–Mongol fold belt have been developed over the past decade; very few of them, however, have been based on paleomagnetic data, which still remain scarce. The Chingiz Range in northeastern Kazakhstan provides an opportunity to evaluate the tectonic evolution of the central part of this belt through extensive paleomagnetic studies. In this paper, we report the results from Upper Cambrian andesites and Lower Ordovician tuffaceous sandstones within the Chingiz Range. A high-temperature component (HTC), decaying to the origin, is isolated from Upper Cambrian rocks at eight sites with an easterly and low-intermediate upward direction. This component passes the tilt test and is likely primary. A HTC is also isolated from Lower Ordovician rocks at 11 sites. These site means exhibit a shallow-inclination girdle distribution within the southeast quadrant, likely due to net rotations within the complex structure studied. The inclination-only tilt test is positive, and the best grouping of data is observed at 100% untilting. Also included in our paleolatitudinal analyses are new middle and late Paleozoic paleolatitudes from nearby parts of the Chingiz Range as well as published paleomagnetic data from central and east Kazakhstan. We favor normal polarity of the early Paleozoic results of this paper and conclude that the study area moved northward throughout the Paleozoic. The observed paleolatitudes generally fit the Siberian reference data and hence indicate coherent latitudinal motion of the Boshekul–Chingiz tectonic zone and the Siberian plate. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Paleomagnetic results on thick lava series are among the most important sources of information on the characteristics of ancient geomagnetic fields. Most paleo-secular variation data from lavas (PSVL) are of late Cenozoic age. There are far fewer results from lavas older than 5 Ma. The Central Asia Orogenic Belt that occupies several million square kilometers in Asia is probably the world’s largest area of Paleozoic volcanism and is thus an attractive target for PSVL studies. We studied a ca. 1700 m thick lava pile in eastern Kazakhstan of Early Permian age. Magmatic zircons, successfully separated from an acid flow in this predominantly basaltic sequence, yielded an Early Permian age of 286.3 ± 3.5 Ma. Oriented samples were collected from 125 flows, resulting in 88 acceptable quality flow-means ( n ⩾ 4 samples, radius of confidence circle α 95 ⩽ 15°) of the high-temperature magnetization component. The uniformly reversed component is pre-tilting and arguably of a primary origin. The overall mean direction has a declination = 242.0° and an inclination = −56.2° ( k = 71.5, α 95 = 1.8°; N = 88 sites; pole at 44.1°N, 160.6°E, A 95 = 2.2°). Our pole agrees well with the Early Permian reference data for Baltica, in accord with the radiometric age of the lava pile and geological views on evolution of the western part of the Central Asia Orogenic Belt. The new Early Permian result indicates a comparatively low level of secular variation especially when compared to PSVL data from intervals with frequent reversals. Still, the overall scatter of dispersion estimates that are used as proxies for SV magnitudes, elongation values and elongation orientations for PSVL data is high and cannot be fitted into any particular field model with fixed parameters. Both observed values and numerical simulations indicate that the main cause for the scatter of form parameters (elongation values and elongation orientations) is the too small size of collections. Dispersion estimates (concentration parameter and standard angular deviation) are more robust, and their scatter stems from other sources, which may include non-stochastic features of datasets like clusters, loops etc., or non-stationary behavior of secular variation magnitude over time intervals of many million years. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The Kazakhstan orocline, a horseshoe-shaped belt with volcanic arcs of Devonian (external) and late Paleozoic (internal) age, is thought to have formed as a result of convergence between the cratons of Siberia, Baltica and Tarim leading to the amalgamation of Eurasia. Paleomagnetic and geologic data indicate that in the Middle Devonian the arc, which is now strongly curved, was nearly straight near the northwest–southeast trending volcanic margin of a Kazakhstania continent. To constrain the age of oroclinal bending we conducted a paleomagnetic study of Late Carboniferous to Late Permian subduction-related volcanics from the middle (NW) and north-eastern (NE) limbs of the orocline. Our new results indicate that the rotation of the middle arm of the orocline was essentially completed by the earliest Permian, while the NE arm probably was still ∼50° short of its final orientation with respect to Baltica. The rotation of, or rotation within, the NE arm was completed by the Late Permian. The paleomagnetic data constraining the timing and rotation patterns lead us to propose the following scenario for the bending of the Kazakhstan orocline. The orogenic deformation scenario began in the Late Devonian when an initial collision with Tarim pinned Kazakhstania''s southern corner, while a dextral shear motion and a considerable clockwise rotation of Siberia dragged its northern end. Relative convergence between Siberia and Tarim caused initial buckling of the Kazakhstania continental element trapped between them, subdividing the belt into three (SW, NW, NE) segments. Continued subduction under the established limbs of the orocline with an estimated outward-directed subduction velocity of well less than 1 cm/yr gradually led to closure of the intervening Junggar–Balkhash oceanic basin and tightening of the orocline. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]