Search

Study Objectives: To determine the prevalence of occult sleep disordered breathing (SDB) and describe the relationship between classic SDB symptoms (e.g., loud snoring) and occult SDB in older veterans with insomnia., Methods: We analyzed baseline survey and in-home sleep study data for 435 veterans (mean age = 72.0 years [SD 8.0]) who had no known history of SDB, met International Classification of Sleep Disorders 2(nd) Edition criteria for insomnia, and were enrolled in a behavioral intervention trial for insomnia. Variables of interest included apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15, age, race/ethnicity, marital status, body mass index (BMI), insomnia subtype (i.e., onset, maintenance, or terminal), self-reported excessive daytime sleepiness, snoring, and witnessed breathing pause items from the Berlin Questionnaire. We computed the frequency of AHI ≥ 15 and assessed whether each classic SDB symptom was associated with an AHI ≥ 15 in 4 separate multivariate logistic regression models., Results: Prevalence of AHI ≥ 15 was 46.7%. Excessive daytime sleepiness (adjusted odds ratio 1.63, 95% CI 1.02, 2.60, p = 0.04), but not snoring loudness, snoring frequency, or witnessed breathing pauses was associated with occult SDB (AHI ≥ 15). Insomnia subtypes were not significantly associated with occult SDB (p > 0.38)., Conclusions: In our sample of older veterans with insomnia, nearly half had occult SDB, which was characterized by reported excessive daytime sleepiness, but not loud or frequent snoring or witnessed breathing pauses. Insomnia subtype was unrelated to the presence of occult SDB.

The Mini-Mental State Examination is a widely used cognitive screening measure. The purpose of the present study was to assess how 5 specific clusters of Mini-Mental State Examination items (ie, subscores) correlate with and predict specific areas of daily functioning in dementia patients, 61 patients with varied forms of dementia were administered the Mini-Mental State Examination and an observation-based daily functional test (the Direct Assessment of Functional Status). The results revealed that the orientation and attention subscores of the Mini-Mental State Examination correlated most significantly with most functional domains. The Mini-Mental State Examination language items correlated with all but the shopping and time orientation tasks, while the Mini-Mental State Examination recall items correlated with the Direct Assessment of Functional Status time orientation and shopping tasks. Stepwise regression analyses found that among the Mini-Mental State Examination subscores, orientation was the single, best independent predictor of daily functioning.

Objective: To develop and test the effectiveness of a 5-item version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) in screening for depression in a frail community-dwelling older population., Design: A cross-sectional study., Setting: A geriatric outpatient clinic at the Sepulveda VA Medical Center, Sepulveda, California., Participants: A total of 74 frail outpatients (98.6% male, mean age 74.6) enrolled in an ongoing trial., Measurements: Subjects had a comprehensive geriatric assessment that included a structured clinical evaluation for depression with geropsychiatric consultation. A 5-item version of the GDS was created from the 15-item GDS by selecting the items with the highest Pearson chi2 correlation with clinical diagnosis of depression. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for the 15-item GDS and the new 5-item scale., Results: Subjects had a mean GDS score of 6.2 (range 0-15). Clinical evaluation found that 46% of subjects were depressed. The depressed and not depressed groups were similar with regard to demographics, mental status, educational level, and number of chronic medical conditions. Using clinical evaluation as the gold standard for depression, the 5-item GDS (compared with the 15-item GDS results shown in parentheses) had a sensitivity of .97 (.94), specificity of .85 (.83), positive predictive value of .85 (.82), negative predictive value of .97 (.94), and accuracy of .90 (.88) for predicting depression. Significant agreement was found between depression diagnosis and the 5-item GDS (kappa = 0.81). Multiple other short forms were tested, and are discussed. The mean administration times for the 5- and 15-item GDS were .9 and 2.7 minutes, respectively., Conclusions: The 5-item GDS was as effective as the 15-item GDS for depression screening in this population, with a marked reduction in administration time. If validated elsewhere, it may prove to be a preferred screening test for depression.

Objectives: To determine whether preventive in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) prevents functional decline in community-dwelling older persons with different baseline functional status: (1) without any basic activities of daily living (BADL) dependency at baseline; and (2) without any instrumental ADL (IADL) and basic ADL dependency at baseline., Design: Subgroup analyses of a 3-year randomized controlled trial., Setting: The city of Santa Monica, California., Participants: Participants came from the original population (n = 414) of community-living older persons aged 75 years and older who participated in a trial testing the effectiveness of annual preventive in-home CGA. For the first subgroup analysis, we excluded subjects (n = 27) who were dependent in one or more BADL before randomization (final sample size, n = 387); for the second subgroup analysis, we excluded 93 additional subjects who were dependent in one or more IADL before randomization (final sample size, n = 294)., Intervention: Annual preventive in-home CGA, with quarterly home visits by gerontologic nurse practitioners, for 3 years., Measurements: Functional status data were collected through yearly in-home interviews by independent observers. Subjects were classified as (1) independent in both BADL and IADL, (2) dependent in IADL but independent in BADL, or (3) dependent in both IADL and BADL., Results: In both subgroup analyses, there was no difference in survival between intervention and control subjects. In the subgroup with no BADL impairment at baseline, intervention subjects spent significantly fewer days dependent in both BADL and IADL during each year of the study (5 days vs 14 days, P = .022; 13 vs 33, P = .016; and 19 vs 44, P = .014 for years 1, 2, and 3, respectively) and over all 3 years combined (36 days vs 92 days, P = .016) in bivariate analyses. In multivariate analyses, the intervention reduced time spent in complete (BADL and IADL) dependency (P = .028). In the subgroup of subjects without any IADL or BADL impairment at baseline, no significant differences were apparent in the number of days spent in complete independence and days spent in complete dependency. Intervention group subjects spent more days in partial dependency during Year 1 (24 days vs 9 days, P = .021), but the difference was not significant during Year 2 (47 vs 29, P = .088), Year 3 (49 vs 41, P = .370), and over all 3 years combined (120 vs 79, P = .123) as well as in multivariate analysis (P = .062)., Conclusion: These findings support the hypothesis that in-home preventive visits delay the onset of disability in people without initial BADL impairment. Further studies in larger samples are needed to determine optimal intervention strategies and effectiveness among well functioning older people.

Objective: To examine the association between chronic illness and functional status change during a 3-year period in older people enrolled in an in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and preventive care program., Design: Secondary analysis of data from a longitudinal cohort study., Setting: Santa Monica, California., Participants: Two hundred two community-dwelling older persons (mean age at baseline was 81 years, 70% were women, and 72% reported good health) randomized to the intervention group in a trial of in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment and preventive care., Measurements: We studied 13 common chronic illnesses/conditions determined clinically from an annual comprehensive evaluation by gerontologic nurse practitioners (GNPs) in consultation with study geriatricians. These target conditions included hypertension, osteoarthritis, coronary artery disease, obesity, undernutrition, urinary incontinence, sleep disorders, falls, gait/balance disorders, hearing and vision deficits, depression, and unsafe home environment. The dependent variable was functional change as measured by instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and basic activities of daily living (BADL) assessed at baseline and annually for 3 years by independent research personnel. Potential confounding variables, including comorbid conditions and other subject characteristics, were controlled for in the analyses., Results: Although functional status was similar at baseline, the presence of certain target conditions in this sample was associated significantly with functional decline in IADL and BADL during the 3-year period. Four conditions (gait/balance disorders, depression, unsafe home environment, and coronary artery disease) were associated with significant declines in IADL, and four conditions (gait/balance disorders, depression, hypertension, and urinary incontinence) were associated with significant declines in BADL. Conversely, subjects with obesity had no significant change in IADL or BADL throughout the study period and had less decline in IADL compared with nonobese subjects., Conclusions: Certain chronic conditions, particularly gait/balance disorders and depression, are associated with significant decline in functional status in older persons who receive CGA. These findings may help identify older persons at risk for greatest functional decline despite participation in CGA and may also suggest the need for more effective intervention strategies in these individuals.

Objectives: To describe the process of care of a program of in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and to determine: (1) if there are major findings in all domains of CGA (medical, functional, mental health, and social/ environmental), (2) if there is a continued clinical yield when CGA is repeated annually, and (3) factors that affect patient adherence with recommendations from CGA., Design: Descriptive prospective study of subjects allocated to the intervention group of a 3-year randomized trial of preventive in-home CGA., Setting: Homes of participants living in an urban setting., Participants: Persons aged 75 years or older and living at home who received the intervention (N = 202 subjects, mean age 80.8 years, 70% female, 95% white, 64% living alone)., Intervention: Annual in-home CGA and quarterly home visits by gerontologic nurse practitioners for 3 years., Measurements: Detailed data were collected prospectively on clinical problems detected by CGA, and specific recommendations were made for these problems using an instrument developed explicitly for this project to study the CGA process. Subject adherence with these recommendations was also recorded., Results: Major problems were identified in all domains of CGA; the most common problems were medical. In the first year, 76.7% of subjects had at least one major problem identified that was either previously unknown or suboptimally treated. One-third of subjects had additional major problems identified during the second and third years. A constant number of therapeutic and preventive recommendations was made each year (11.5 per subject annually). Subject adherence varied by type of recommendation (ANOVA, F = 108.4, P < .001); adherence was better for referrals to a physician than for referrals to a non-physician professional or community service or for recommendations involving self-care activities (Scheffe's test, P < .001)., Conclusion: In these community-dwelling older people, there was a continued yield of problems identified and recommendations made when CGA was repeated annually for 3 years, supporting the practice of repeat CGA in older people in the community. Subject adherence with recommendations from CGA varied by type of recommendation, but further work is needed to determine additional factors that affect this adherence and to determine the association between the yield of CGA (i.e., problems identified, recommendations given and adherence with these recommendations) and important clinical outcomes.

Background and Methods: The prevention of disability in elderly people poses a challenge for health care and social services. We conducted a three-year, randomized, controlled trial of the effect of annual in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment and follow-up for people living in the community who were 75 years of age or older. The 215 people in the intervention group were seen at home by gerontologic nurse practitioners who, in collaboration with geriatricians, evaluated problems and risk factors for disability, gave specific recommendations, and provided health education. The 199 people in the control group received their regular medical care. The main outcome measures were the prevention of disability, defined as the need for assistance in performing the basic activities of daily living (bathing, dressing, feeding, grooming, transferring from bed to chair, and moving around inside the house) or the instrumental activities of daily living (e.g., cooking, handling finances and medication, housekeeping, and shopping), and the prevention of nursing home admissions., Results: At three years, 20 people in the intervention group (12 percent of 170 surviving participants) and 32 in the control group (22 percent of 147 surviving participants) required assistance in performing the basic activities of daily living (adjusted odds ratio, 0.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.2 to 0.8; P = 0.02). The number of persons who were dependent on assistance in performing the instrumental activities of daily living but not the basic activities did not differ significantly between the two groups. Nine people in the intervention group (4 percent) and 20 in the control group (10 percent) were permanently admitted to nursing homes (P = 0.02). Acute care hospital admissions and short-term nursing home admissions did not differ significantly between the two groups. In the second and third years of the study, there were significantly more visits to physicians among the participants in the intervention group than among those in the control group (mean number of visits per month, 1.41 in year 2 and 1.27 in year 3 in the intervention group, as compared with 1.11 and 0.92 visits, respectively, in the control group; P = 0.007 and P = 0.001, respectively). The cost of the intervention for each year of disability-free life gained was about $46,000., Conclusions: A program of in-home comprehensive geriatric assessments can delay the development of disability and reduce permanent nursing home stays among elderly people living at home.

Objectives: To study the cooperation of primary care physicians with a community-based prevention and health promotion program for older persons, to study physician factors related to cooperation, and to determine any relationship between physician cooperation and patient adherence to program recommendations and patient satisfaction with health care., Design and Setting: A survey administered in subjects' homes and physicians' offices in Santa Monica, California., Participants: Patients (n = 81) were intervention group subjects in a 3-year, randomized, controlled trial of in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment paired with prevention and health promotion. Physicians (n = 50) were selected if they had been contacted at least once by a study nurse practitioner about one of these patients., Measurements: Physician cooperation was rated by study nurse practitioners. Physicians were interviewed to identify factors associated with cooperation. Patients' satisfaction with health care and adherence were measured prospectively throughout the 3-year program., Main Results: Physicians exhibiting better cooperation had fewer years in practice (P = .03) and were more likely to discuss the program with their patients (P = .005), see benefit for their patients from the program (P = .02), and rate program information as useful (P = .002). Higher physician cooperation did not predict higher patient satisfaction (P = .23) but did predict higher patient adherence to program recommendations (P = .02)., Conclusions: Physicians rated as cooperative were more likely to have a positive appraisal of the program, and their patients had higher adherence to program recommendations. These findings suggest that strategies for increasing primary care physician cooperation might improve effectiveness of similar community-based prevention and health promotion programs.

Controlled trials in a number of countries have documented benefits from different types of in-home assessment and treatment programs for various subgroups of elderly persons. We have developed a program to test, using a randomized controlled design, the concepts of in-home comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) coupled with follow-up, health education, and preventive care in an urban United States community. The intervention includes yearly in-home CGA by geriatric nurse practitioners (GNPs), who provide, following discussions with physician geriatricians, lists of specific recommendations for health and well-being enhancement. The GNPs provide follow-up visits quarterly and regular telephone contacts to improve compliance. We recruited for our trial 414 home-living subjects aged 75 years and over, 215 randomized to the intervention group and 199 to the control group. Subjects were generally representative of the overall elderly population of the city of Santa Monica, a seaside suburb of Los Angeles. Extensive baseline data (medical, functional, psychosocial and environmental) were collected from subjects prior to randomization, using validated instruments whenever possible. Follow-up data were collected from each subject every 4 months by trained research assistants throughout the 3-year intervention follow-up period. Our study was designed to assess effects of the intervention on the hypothesized outcomes of health status, functional status, psychosocial parameters, and service utilization. Careful documentation of the intervention will enhance our ability to make process-outcome comparisons. Preliminary analysis reveals that the in-home CGA uncovered many important health deficits for most subjects resulting in a number of substantial recommendations. We are confident that when it is completed, this study will succeed in answering important remaining questions about the feasibility and effectiveness of establishing a geriatric in-home prevention and health promotion program in the United States based on principles of CGA.