Search

In the Netherlands, the majority of hereditary paragangliomas (PGL) is caused by SDHD, SDHB and SDHAF2 mutations. Founder mutations in SDHD are particularly prevalent, but several SDHB founder mutations have also been described. Here, we describe an extended PGL family with a Dutch founder mutation in SDHB, c.201-4429_287-933del. The proband presented with apparently sporadic head and neck paraganglioma at advanced age. Subsequently, evaluation of the family identified several unaffected mutation carriers, asymptomatic and symptomatic PGL patients, and patients presenting with early-onset malignant pheochromocytoma. The calculated penetrance of the SDHB mutation in this kindred is lower than the risk suggested for SDHB mutations in the literature. This may represent a characteristic of this particular SDHB mutation, but may also be a reflection of the inclusion of relatively large numbers of asymptomatic mutation carriers in this family and adequate statistical correction for ascertainment bias. The low penetrance of SDHB mutations may obscure the hereditary nature of SDHB-linked disease and is important in the counseling of SDHB-linked patients. Risk estimates should preferably be based on the specific mutation involved., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Childhood brain tumours may be due to germline bi-allelic mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2. These mutations can also lead to colorectal neoplasia and haematological malignancies. Here, we review this syndrome and present siblings with early-onset rectal adenoma and papillary glioneural brain tumour, respectively, due to novel germline bi-allelic PMS2 mutations. Identification of MMR protein defects can lead to early diagnosis of this condition. In addition, assays for these defects may help to classify brain tumours for research protocols aimed at targeted therapies., (2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.)

Heterozygous fumarate hydratase (FH) germline mutations cause hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (HLRCC), an autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by multiple cutaneous piloleiomyomas, uterine leiomyomas and papillary type 2 renal cancer. The main objective of our study was to evaluate clinical and genetic data from families suspected of HLRCC on a nationwide level. All families referred for FH mutation analysis in the Netherlands were assessed. We performed FH sequence analysis and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Families with similar FH mutations were examined for haplotype sharing. In 14 out of 33 families, we identified 11 different pathogenic FH germline mutations, including 4 novel mutations and 1 whole-gene deletion. Clinical data were available for 35 FH mutation carriers. Cutaneous leiomyomas were present in all FH mutation carriers older than 40 years of age. Eleven out of 21 female FH mutation carriers underwent surgical treatment for symptomatic uterine leiomyomas at an average of 35 years. Two FH mutation carriers had papillary type 2 renal cancer and Wilms' tumour, respectively. We evaluated the relevance of our findings for clinical practice and have proposed clinical diagnostic criteria, indications for FH mutation analysis and recommendations for management., (© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.)

Aims: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is an established late precursor of sporadic invasive breast cancer and to a large extent parallels its invasive counterpart with respect to molecular changes and immunophenotype. Invasive breast cancers in germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers have a distinct "basal" and "luminal" immunophenotype, respectively, but the immunophenotype of their precursor lesions has hardly been studied, and this was the aim of this study., Methods: DCIS lesions of 25 proven BRCA1 and 9 proven BRCA2 germline mutation carriers and their 22 and 6, respectively, accompanying invasive lesions were stained by immunohistochemistry for oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2/neu, cytokeratin (CK)5/6, CK14, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and Ki67., Results: DCIS lesions in BRCA1 mutation carriers were mostly of the basal molecular type with low ER/PR/HER2 expression, while they frequently expressed CK5/6, CK14 and EGFR, and were mostly grade 3 and highly proliferative. DCIS lesions in BRCA2 mutation carriers were mostly of luminal molecular type with frequent expression of ER/PR, and infrequent expression of CK5/6, CK14 and EGFR, and they were mostly grade 3 and showed low proliferation. In BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers there was a high concordance between DCIS lesions and their concomitant invasive counterpart with regard to expression of individual markers as well as "molecular" subtype., Conclusions: Although the number of cases studied was low, DCIS lesions in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations carriers are usually of the basal and luminal molecular type, respectively, similar to their accompanying invasive cancers, thereby providing evidence that DCIS is a direct precursor lesion in these hereditary predisposed patients. This also suggests that crucial carcinogenetic events leading to these phenotypes in hereditary predisposed patients occur before the stage of invasion.

The two most common inherited forms of colorectal cancer are familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Simultaneous inheritance of both an APC gene mutation and a mismatch repair gene (for example, MLH1) mutation has never been described. In the present case report, we report rapidly progressive adenomatous polyposis in a 10 year old boy with a germline frame shift mutation in the APC gene and a germline splice site mutation in the MLH1 gene. Immunohistochemical investigations showed abnormal expression of beta-catenin in early adenomas with low grade dysplasia, attributed to the APC gene mutation. Subsequent loss of function of the MLH1 gene, as shown by absent immunostaining of its protein in adenomas with high grade dysplasia, may well have caused the rapid progression to high grade dysplasia in many of the adenomas.

Inheritance of germline mutations of BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes account for approximately 10% of ovarian carcinomas, but the characterization of these genetically determined cancers is incomplete. The objective of our study was to characterize the histologic features of ovarian carcinomas associated with germline mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2. Thirty-two ovarian carcinomas associated with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and 40 ovarian carcinomas from patients screened as negative for germline mutations were obtained from three centers. A gynecologic pathologist, blinded to mutation status, reviewed each case, with documentation of the histologic type, Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) grade, architectural and nuclear grade, Silverberg grade, and mitotic activity. All BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-associated cases were invasive serous carcinomas, and of these 50% were GOG grade 3, 41% had an architectural grade of 3 (predominant solid architecture), 84% a nuclear grade of 3, 72% a mitotic score of 3 (>25 mitoses per 10 HPF), and 75% a Silverberg grade of 3. The differences in histologic type (p = 0.001) and Silverberg grade (p = 0.002) between these tumors and the control group were statistically significant and remained so when comparisons between BRCA carriers and noncarriers were restricted to carcinomas of serous histology alone. Ovarian carcinomas associated with germline mutations of BRCA1/BRCA2 are, in this study, invasive serous carcinomas, with a statistically significant higher histologic grade than ovarian carcinomas without BRCA mutations when using the recently proposed Silverberg grading system.

Objectives: BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations increase the risk of ovarian and breast cancer. Fallopian tube cancer has occasionally been observed in breast-ovarian cancer families. At our family cancer clinic we recently encountered two cases of Fallopian tube cancer within two families harboring a BRCA1 germline mutation. To study the relationship between Fallopian tube cancer and BRCA1 mutations, a histopathological reevaluation and molecular analysis were performed., Methods: Medical and histopathological reports of the Fallopian tube cancer cases as well as archival tissue blocks were retrieved. The histopathological diagnoses were reevaluated. We investigated whether patients with Fallopian tube cancer had been carriers of a BRCA germline mutation. In addition we investigated whether loss of the wild-type allele had occurred in the tumor., Results: In 2 of 23 families with a known BRCA1 mutation from our family cancer clinic, a case of Fallopian tube cancer was reported. Histological reevaluation confirmed the diagnosis of Fallopian tube cancer in both cases. In one case Fallopian tube cancer may have been part of a multifocal primary malignancy. In both patients the presence of a BRCA1 mutation was confirmed in the germline. Furthermore, we showed loss of the wild-type BRCA1 allele in both tumors., Conclusions: These findings provide the first molecular evidence that Fallopian tube cancer may be due to germline mutations in BRCA1. This may have important consequences for the preferred method of prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 mutation carriers., (Copyright 2000 Academic Press.)

About 15% of patients with colorectal cancer have a positive family history: 5% have hereditary colorectal cancer (hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC), familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or some other hereditary syndrome), while in 10% no clear hereditary pattern can be recognized ('familial colorectal cancer'). In sporadic and in familial intestinal cancer, a demonstrable hereditary predisposition may undoubtedly exist. HNPCC is often characterized by microsatellite instability, i.e. an increased number of short DNA sequences in the DNA indicating a disorder in DNA repair and a mutation in a DNA 'mismatch repair' (MMR) gene. Indicative of hereditary bowel cancer on the basis of such an MMR gene mutation are: (a) presence of bowel cancer in > or = 3 relatives, (b) early age at the time of the diagnosis of 'bowel cancer', (c) multiple primary bowel tumours, (d) uterine cancer in the family and (e) bowel and uterine cancer in a woman. Recent data demand a new subdivision of hereditary bowel cancer, based upon both the clinical picture and the results of DNA-tests. The genetic alterations in colonic adenomas and carcinomas are known to a large extent. In future these insights may be important in clinical practice, such as a more individual determination of the patient's prognosis and accordingly, of the treatment and follow-up.

For families with a small number of cases of breast and/or ovarian cancer, limited data are available to predict the likelihood of genetic predisposition due to mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2. In 104 families with three or more affected individuals (average 3.8) seeking counselling at family cancer clinics, mutation analysis was performed in the open reading frame of BRCA1 and BRCA2 by the protein truncation test and mutation-specific assays. In 31 of the 104 families tested, mutations were detected (30%). The majority of these mutations (25) occurred in BRCA1. Mutations were detected in 15 out of 25 families (60%) with both breast and ovarian cancer and in 16 out of 79 families (20%) with exclusively cases of breast cancer. Thus, an ovarian cancer case strongly predicted finding a mutation (P < 0.001). Within the group of small breast-cancer-only families, a bilateral breast cancer case or a unilateral breast cancer case diagnosed before age 40 independently predicted finding a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation (P = 0.005 and P = 0.02, respectively). Therefore, even small breast/ovarian cancer families with at least one case of ovarian cancer, bilateral breast cancer, or a case of breast cancer diagnosed before age 40, should be referred for mutation screening.

Objectives: Our purpose was to determine the prevalence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations among patients from ovarian cancer families and to evaluate age at diagnosis, histologic diagnosis, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage in this group., Study Design: We reviewed 50 ovarian cancer patients from 30 ovarian cancer families and compared relevant clinical characteristics with those of a cancer registry reference group. BRCA1 (exons 2 to 24) and BRCA2 (exon 11) germline mutations were detected by a protein truncation test and sequencing of BRCA1 exon 2 (185delAG mutation) in 25 of the 30 families., Results: Ten (40%) of 25 families tested revealed a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Patients with ovarian cancer from the study group were young with an advanced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage at diagnosis and had a relatively high frequency of serous adenocarcinoma., Conclusion: Direct mutation analysis of BRCA1 and BRCA2 revealed a high frequency of germline mutations in ovarian cancer families. Some clinical characteristics of hereditary ovarian cancer may differ from those of sporadic disease.