Search

Objective: To develop international consensus-based recommendations for early referral of individuals with suspected polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR)., Methods: A task force including 29 rheumatologists/internists, 4 general practitioners, 4 patients and a healthcare professional emerged from the international giant cell arteritis and PMR study group. The task force supplied clinical questions, subsequently transformed into Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome format. A systematic literature review was conducted followed by online meetings to formulate and vote on final recommendations. Levels of evidence (LOE) (1-5 scale) and agreement (LOA) (0-10 scale) were evaluated., Results: Two overarching principles and five recommendations were developed. LOE was 4-5 and LOA ranged between 8.5 and 9.7. The recommendations suggest that (1) each individual with suspected or recently diagnosed PMR should be considered for specialist evaluation, (2) before referring an individual with suspected PMR to specialist care, a thorough history and clinical examination should be performed and preferably complemented with urgent basic laboratory investigations, (3) individuals with suspected PMR with severe symptoms should be referred for specialist evaluation using rapid access strategies, (4) in individuals with suspected PMR who are referred via rapid access, the commencement of glucocorticoid therapy should be deferred until after specialist evaluation and (5) individuals diagnosed with PMR in specialist care with a good initial response to glucocorticoids and a low risk of glucocorticoid related adverse events can be managed in primary care., Conclusions: These are the first international recommendations for referral of individuals with suspected PMR, which complement the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology management guidelines for established PMR., Competing Interests: Competing interests: KKK: Research grants from Independent Research Fund Denmark, Danish Rheumatic Association and Central Denmark Region unrelated to this project. SES: Research grants from Rheumatology Research Foundation, Bristol Myers Squibb Foundation. Clinical trial support from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline; Consulting fees from Sanofi (funds toward research support); Data Safety Monitoring Board on MINT trial, Advisory Board for Sanofi (funds toward research support). E-MH: Has received grants unrelated to this manuscript from Novo Nordic Foundation, Roche, Novartis; Personal fees from AbbVie, Sanofi, SOBI, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Union Chimique Belge. AD: Consulting fees from Sanofi; Participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Sanofi; Board member Vasculitis Foundation. LN: Has received Honorarium from Abbvie; Trustee of the charity PMR-GCA Scotland. SM: Consulting fees from Astrazeneca; Honoraria from Vifor. KJW: Grants from Eli Lilly, Kiniksa, BMS; Consulting fees from Amgen, Sanofi. Honoraria from Amgen. CP: Consulting fee from Pfizer. MP: Consulting fee from Novartis; Clinical trial participant for Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca. HIK: Honoraria from Roche, eTherapeutic Guidelines Australia; Board member Australian Rheumatology Association; Clinical trials for Roche, Abbvie, Sun, Emerald, Novartis, Biogen, Sanofi, Syneos. CEO: Consultancy for Abbvie; Speaking honoraria from Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis and Roche; Advisory board for Abbvie. WAS: Has received honoraria from Abbvie, Chugai, GlaxoSmithKline, Medac, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi ; Support for attending meetings/travel from Abbvie, Chugai, GlaxoSmithKline, Medac, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi; Participated in advisory board from Abbvie, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi; Principle investigator of phases 2 and 3 studies sponsored by Abbvie, GlaxoSmithKlinie, Novartis and Sanofi. EBrouwer: As an employee of the UMCG received a speaker fee for a talk on GCA at a post EULAR symposium in the Netherlands in 2023 which was paid to the UMCG; As an employee of the UMCG received grants from the Dutch Arthritis Society DAS and the EU/EFPIA/Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking Immune-Image grant no 831514 which were paid to the UMCG. SM: Consultancy on behalf of her institution for Roche/Chugai, Sanofi, AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Pfizer; Investigator on clinical trials for Sanofi, GSK, Sparrow; speaking/lecturing on behalf of her institution for Roche/Chugai, Vifor, Pfizer, UCB, Novartis and AbbVie; chief investigator on STERLING-PMR trial, funded by NIHR; patron of the charity PMRGCAuk. No personal remuneration was received for any of the above activities. Support from Roche/Chugai to attend EULAR2019 in person and from Pfizer to attend ACR Convergence 2021 virtually. SM is supported in part by the NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre. VD-P has received honorarium from Abbvie, Chugai, Novartis, BMS, Support for attending meetings/travel from Novartis; Participated in advisory borad from Abbvie, Novartis. All other authors have no competing interests., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ on behalf of EULAR.)

Purpose: Evaluate the benefit of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]-fluoro-D-glucose ([ 18 F] FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for the therapeutic assessment of Abatacept (ABA) as first-line therapy in early-onset polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) patients., Methods: This was an ancillary study of ALORS trial (Abatacept in earLy Onset polymyalgia Rheumatica Study) assessing the ability of ABA versus placebo to achieve low disease activity (C-Reactive Protein PMR activity score (CRP PMR-AS) ≤ to 10) without glucocorticoid (GC) at week 12 in patients with early-onset PMR. The patients underwent [ 18 F] FDG PET/CT at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Responses to treatments were evaluated according to CRP PMR-AS, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) PMR-AS, Clin PMR-AS, and CRP-Imputed (Imput-CRP) PMR-AS. Quantitative score by maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and combined qualitative scores according to liver uptake (Leuven, Leuven/Groningen, and Besançon Scores) were used for assessment of [ 18 F] FDG uptake in regions of interest (ROI) usually affected in PMR. Student's t-test was applied to evaluate the clinical, biological, and [ 18 F] FDG uptake variation difference in ABA and placebo groups between W0 and W12. Subgroup analysis by GC rescue was performed., Results: At W12, there was no significant difference according to SUVmax between the ABA and the placebo groups in all ROI. Subgroup analysis according to GC administration demonstrated a significant (p 0.047) decrease in SUVmax within the left sternoclavicular joint ROI in the ABA group (- 0.8) compared to the placebo group (+ 0.6) without GC rescue. Other results did not reveal any significant difference between the ABA and placebo groups. According to combined qualitative scores, there was no significant difference between ABA and placebo groups for the direct comparison analysis and subgroup analysis according to GC rescue., Conclusion: [ 18 F] FDG PET/CT uptake did not decrease significantly after ABA compared to placebo in anatomical areas usually affected in PMR patients. These results are correlated with the clinical-biological therapeutic assessment., Clinical Trial Registration: The study was approved by the appropriate ethics committee (CPP Sud-Est II Ref CPP: 2018-33), and all patients gave their written informed consent before study enrollment. The protocol was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03632187)., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: The C reactive protein polymyalgia rheumatica activity score (CRP-PMR-AS) is a composite index that includes CRP levels and was developed specifically for PMR. As treatments such as interleukin-6 antagonists can normalise CRP levels, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) of PMR-AS, the clinical (clin)-PMR-AS and the imputed-CRP (imp-CRP)-PMR-AS have been developed to avoid such bias. Our primary objective was to measure the correlation of these activity scores. Our secondary objective was to evaluate the concordance between different cutoffs of the PMR-ASs., Method: Data from the Safety and Efficacy of tocilizumab versus Placebo in Polymyalgia rHeumatica With glucocORticoid dEpendence (SEMAPHORE) trial, a superiority randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial, were subjected to post hoc analysis to compare the efficacy of tocilizumab versus placebo in patients with active PMR. The CRP-PMR-AS, ESR-PMR-AS, clin-PMR-AS and imp-CRP-PMR-AS were measured at every visit. The concordance and correlation between these scores were evaluated using kappa correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman correlations, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and scatter plots., Results: A total of 101 patients were included in the SEMAPHORE trial, and 100 were analysed in this study. The correlation between the PMR-ASs was excellent, as the ICC and kappa were >0.85 from week 4 until week 24 (CRP-PMR-AS ≤10 or >10). Bland-Altman plots revealed that the differences between the CRP-PMR-AS and the other threescores were low. The cut-off values for the clin-PMR-AS were similar to those for the CRP-PMR-AS 86% of the time., Conclusion: The correlation between all the PMR-ASs was excellent, reflecting the low weight of CRP. In clinical trials using drugs that have an impact on CRP, the derived activity scores can be used., Trial Registration Number: NTC02908217., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Medium-dose glucocorticoids can improve symptoms in nearly all patients with polymyalgia rheumatica. According to its good safety profile, abatacept could be used instead of glucocorticoids in early polymyalgia rheumatica. We aimed to determine whether the efficacy of abatacept is sufficient to justify larger studies in early polymyalgia rheumatica., Methods: To evaluate whether abatacept allows low disease activity without glucocorticoids in early polymyalgia rheumatica, we conducted a proof-of-concept, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial. Participants were recruited from five centres in France (in Brest, Le Mans, Morlaix, Dinan and Saint Malo, and Strasbourg) and were included if they had recent-onset (<6 months) polymyalgia rheumatica with a C-reactive protein (CRP) polymyalgia rheumatica activity score (PMR-AS) of more than 17 without any signs or symptoms of giant cell arteritis (clinical and [ 18 F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT evaluation). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive weekly subcutaneous abatacept (125 mg) or matching placebo, with glucocorticoid rescue therapy allowed in cases of high disease activity, for 12 weeks, and then glucocorticoid treatment based on disease activity, until week 36. Investigators, patients, outcome assessors, and sponsor personnel were masked to group assignments. The primary endpoint was low disease activity (CRP PMR-AS ≤10) at week 12 without glucocorticoids and without rescue treatment. The study was powered to demonstrate a 60% difference in response rates between groups. Open-ended adverse events were collected at each visit by clinicians and were categorised following system organ class classification after study completion. The ALORS trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03632187., Findings: 34 patients (22 women and 12 men) were randomly assigned between Dec 13, 2018, and Oct 21, 2021. All patients who had been randomly assigned were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was reached by eight (50%) of 16 patients in the abatacept group and four (22%) of 18 patients in the placebo group (relative risk 2·2 [0·9-5·5]); crude p=0·15; adjusted p=0·070). Eight (50%) patients in the abatacept and 15 (83%) in the placebo group had adverse events. Four patients (one [6%] in the abatacept group and three [17%] in the placebo group) had serious adverse events. There were no deaths or new safety concerns., Interpretation: This study suggests that the effect of abatacept alone is not strong enough to justify larger studies in early polymyalgia rheumatica. This is only a first step in deciding whether a larger study should be conducted in early polymyalgia rheumatica and does not exclude a potential effect of abatacept in glucocorticoid-dependent polymyalgia rheumatica., Funding: BMS Pharma France., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests ASa reports work from speakers bureaus for speakers bureau for AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Galapagos, Lilly, Novartis, Nordic, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, Sanofi, and Union Chimique Belge (UCB); and grants or research support from AbbVie, BMS, Lilly, and Novartis. GC-A reports work from speakers bureaus for AbbVie, BMS, Chugai, Lilly, and Novartis. AT reports work from speakers bureaus for Galapagos and BMS. RF reports work from speakers bureaus for Amgen, BMS, Galapagos, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Medac, MSD, Nordic, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and UCB. SJ-J reports work from speakers bureaus for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Galapagos, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, Novartis, MSD, GSK, and Sanofi. TM reports funding from AbbVie, Amgen, Chugaï, Lilly, Mylan, Novartis, and Pfizer. VD-P reports grants and research support from BMS. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Prognosis data on giant-cell arteritis (GCA)-associated aortitis are scarce and heterogeneous. The aim of this study was to compare the relapses of patients with GCA-associated aortitis according to the presence of aortitis on CT-angiography (CTA) and/or on FDG-PET/CT., Methods: This multicenter study included GCA patients with aortitis at diagnosis; each case underwent both CTA and FDG-PET/CT at diagnosis. A centralized review of image was performed and identified patients with both CTA and FDG-PET/CT positive for aortitis (Ao-CTA+/PET+); patients with positive FDG-PET/CT but negative CTA for aortitis (Ao-CTA-/PET+), and patients solely positive on CTA., Results: Eighty-two patients were included with 62 (77%) of female sex. Mean age was 67±8 years; 64 patients (78%) were in the Ao-CTA+/PET+ group; 17 (22%) in the Ao-CTA-/PET+ group and 1 had aortitis only on CTA. Overall, 51 (62%) patients had at least one relapse during follow-up: 45/64 (70%) in the Ao-CTA+/PET+ group and 5/17 (29%) in the Ao-CTA-/PET+ group (log rank, p = 0.019). In multivariate analysis, aortitis on CTA (Hazard Ratio 2.90, p = 0.03) was associated with an increased risk of relapse., Conclusion: Positivity of both CTA and FDG-PET/CT for GCA-related aortitis was associated with an increased risk of relapse. Aortic wall thickening on CTA was a risk factor of relapse compared with isolated aortic wall FDG uptake., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Authors have no conflict of interest for this study., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the diagnosis performances of halo and compression signs alone and combined, assessed by a high frequency 22-MHz probe, and test their agreement in giant cell arteritis (GCA)., Methods: In this cross-sectional study on patients suspected with GCA, halo sign was defined as hypo or iso-echogenic circumferential aspect of the vessel wall in transverse or longitudinal view; and compression sign was defined as visibility of the vessel wall upon transducer-imposed compression of the artery. Agreement of the two signs was tested using the Cohen's kappa statistic., Results: A total of 80 patients (50% women) were included with a mean age of 74.4 years. Twenty participants (25%) were ultimately treated for GCA. Halo and compression signs have respective prevalences of 35% and 48%, with respective sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 80% for the halo sign; and 85% and 65% for the compression sign. The kappa coefficient for the global agreement of the two signs was 0.67 (95% confident interval: 0.54-0.85). Combination of the two signs give a sensitivity of 80% and a specificity of 81.7%., Conclusion: Halo and compression signs assessed by a high frequency probe, show a good level of agreement for the diagnosis of GCA and improve ultrasound specificity when combined together., (© 2022. Società Italiana di Ultrasonologia in Medicina e Biologia (SIUMB).)

Purpose: Little is known about the diagnostic concordance of images provided by ultrasound probes with emitting frequencies below or above 20 MHz for the diagnosis of giant cell arteritis (GCA)., Methods: We compared, using Cohen's kappa statistic, data obtained with an 18-MHz and a 22-MHz probe for the ultrasonographic evaluation of temporal arteries in 80 patients referred for suspected GCA., Results: The halo sign was found in 25% of cases with the 18-MHz probe and in 35% with the 22-MHz probe. The compression sign was positive in 42% of cases with the 18-MHz probe and 48% with the 22-MHz probe. GCA was finally diagnosed in 20 patients (25%). The kappa coefficient of agreement was 0.76 (P < .001) for the halo sign, and 0.75 (P < .001) for the compression sign., Conclusions: Images obtained by 18 MHz and 22-MHz frequency probes showed a good level of agreement for the diagnosis of GCA, but the 22-MHz probe yielded a correct diagnosis of GCA in 3 of the 7 patients in whom examination with the 18-MHz probe was negative., (© 2021 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: Few data are available on the epidemiology and management of GCA in real life. We aimed to address this situation by using health insurance claims data for France., Methods: This retrospective study used the Echantillon Généraliste de Bénéficiaires (EGB) database, a 1% representative sample of the French national health insurance system. The EGB contains anonymous data on long-term disease status, hospitalizations and reimbursement claims for 752 717 people. Data were collected between 2007 and 2015. The index date was defined as the date of the first occurrence of a GCA code. Demographics, comorbidities, diagnostic tests and therapies were analysed. Annual incidence rates were calculated, and incident and overall GCA cases were studied., Results: We identified 241 patients with GCA. The annual incidence was 7-10/100 000 people ⩾50 years old. Among the 117 patients with incident GCA, 74.4% were females, with mean age 77.6 years and mean follow-up 2.2 years. After the index date, 51.3% underwent temporal artery biopsy and 29.1% high-resolution Doppler ultrasonography. Among the whole cohort, 84.3% used only glucocorticoids. The most-prescribed glucocorticoid-sparing agent was methotrexate (12.0%)., Conclusion: The incidence of GCA in France is 7-10/100 000 people ⩾ 50 years old. Adjunct agents, mainly methotrexate, are given to only a few patients. The use of temporal artery biopsy in only half of the patients might reflect a shift toward the use of imaging techniques to diagnose GCA., (© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common vasculitis, and epidemiological data indicate a further increase in incidence over the last two decades. The disease predominates in individuals from Scandinavia and other Northern European countries. The impact of GCA on mortality remains unclear, although an increased risk of cardiovascular events has been reported. Most of the complications are related to the use of glucocorticoids to treat the disease. Recently introduced tools for diagnosing GCA include high-resolution Doppler ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), whose performance remains to be determined. Glucocorticoids constitute the mainstay of the treatment of GCA. Other drugs have been evaluated, including dapsone, hydroxychloroquine, methylprednisolone pulse therapy, azathioprine, cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, and methotrexate; however, the studies were methodologically flawed and produced conflicting results. No drug has been found effective in reducing glucocorticoid requirements. The role for biotherapies remains unclear, as the promising results obtained in open-label studies were not borne out by controlled trials.