Search

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the quality of life (QoL) of medically treated versus surgically treated primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients attending Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria., Methods: The study was a hospital-based, comparative cross-sectional study. Consecutive consenting POAG participants who met the inclusion criteria were recruited until the sample size was achieved. QoL of all participants was assessed using the glaucoma QoL-15 and National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) questionnaires. Analysis was done using the IBM statistical package for the social sciences version 25.0., Results: The study involved 81 participants who were only on medical treatment for POAG and 81 age- and sex-matched POAG participants who had trabeculectomy surgery. Surgically treated participants had a lower mean intraocular pressure 11.68 mmHg when compared to the medically treated participants 14.82 mmHg. Medically treated participants however had a better overall mean glaucoma QoL using the glaucoma QoL-15 (medical 34.36 ± 10.4, surgical 39.11 ± 13.9 P = 0.015) and NEI-VFQ-25 questionnaires (medical 68.32 ± 15.0, surgical 62.44 ± 18.8 P = 0.029). Controlling for the severity of glaucoma using the glaucoma QoL-15 questionnaire, medically treated participants had a better QoL only among participants with severe POAG (medical 49.13 ± 5.9, surgical 54.06 ± 4.6 P = 0.003). While using the NEI-VFQ-25 questionnaire, medically treated participants had a significantly better QoL only among participants with moderate (medical 74.70 ± 6.6, surgical 67.07 ± 15.6 P = 0.012) and severe POAG (medical 54.52 ± 6.3, surgical 45.51 ± 10.0 P = 0.004)., Conclusion: The study demonstrated that although participants that had trabeculectomy had a lower mean intraocular pressure, their overall mean QoL was reduced compared to the medically treated participants., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2022 Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology.)

Purpose: To assess the technique of eye drop instillation and its determinants among patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) attending a Nigerian tertiary hospital., Methods: This study was a cross-sectional observational study conducted among 130 participants. Systematic sampling technique was used. Inclusion criteria were the presence of POAG, in individuals ≥ 18 years, and self-instilling their ocular hypotensive medications for at least 6 months. Demographic data and clinical characteristics were obtained using an interviewer-administered questionnaire and clinical examination. All participants underwent eye drop instillation of sterile water. Administration techniques were observed and graded using a comprehensive grading scheme. Patients with poor techniques were educated. Determinants of poor eye drop administration technique were also explored., Results: One hundred and thirty patients with POAG were studied. The mean age was 57.13 ± 13.20 years, and 63% percent of the participants had poor eye drop administration technique. On multivariate analysis, previous eye drop instillation education significantly influenced eye drop instillation technique (p = 0.02; OR = 3.230; 95% CI = 1.173-8.896). Among the participants, 47 (36%) touched the globe, 128 (98.5%) did not wash their hands, and 126 (97%) did not occlude the punctum. Sequel to the training, mean score of subjects improved from 2.8 ± 1.1 to 4.1 ± 1.3 (p value < 0.001)., Conclusion: This study demonstrated that a high proportion of POAG patients had poor eye drop instillation technique despite long-term self-use of topical medication. Thus, this aspect of therapy deserves periodic scrutiny by the clinician., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)

Purpose: To compare the prevalences of diabetic retinopathy in diabetes mellitus patients, with and without primary open-angle glaucoma, with a view to determine if glaucoma is a risk factor for the development of diabetic retinopathy., Methods: Cross-sectional, comparative study consisting of 86 diabetic patients with glaucoma matched with 86 diabetic patients without glaucoma. The two groups were matched by age, sex and duration of diabetes mellitus. Demographic data were obtained via patient medical records and self-administered questionnaires. Participants underwent a standardized examination protocol including blood pressure measurement and ocular examination. Main outcome measure was the presence of diabetic retinopathy., Results: Two hundred and ninety-two eyes (144 glaucomatous eyes and 148 non-glaucomatous eyes) of 172 participants with diabetes mellitus were assessed. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among 86 participants with glaucoma comorbidity was 23.6%, while the prevalence among 86 non-glaucomatous participants was 33.8% (p = 0.06). After the regression analysis, controlling for systemic and ocular risk factors for diabetic retinopathy, the odds of developing diabetic retinopathy were significantly higher in the glaucomatous eyes compared with eyes without glaucoma (OR: 2.75; p = 0.03; 95% CI: 1.10-6.87)., Conclusion: This study demonstrated that glaucomatous diabetic eyes were almost three times more likely to develop diabetic retinopathy compared to non-glaucomatous diabetic eyes. Prospective studies may be required to establish a risk-cause relationship. Ocular perfusion pressure control should be considered in patients with diabetes mellitus and glaucoma.