Search

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of anterior segment OCT (AS-OCT) screening for detecting gonioscopically narrow angles., Design: Population-based cross-sectional study., Participants: A stratified random sample of individuals aged ≥ 60 years, selected from a door-to-door census performed in low-lying Nepal., Testing: Participants underwent AS-OCT, posterior segment OCT, and intraocular pressure (IOP) testing in the community. Those meeting referral criteria in either eye were invited to have a comprehensive eye examination including gonioscopy. Referral criteria included (i) the lowest 2.5% of AS-OCT measurements, (ii) retinal OCT results suggestive of glaucomatous optic neuropathy, diabetic retinopathy, or age-related macular degeneration, and (iii) elevated IOP., Main Outcome Measures: Sensitivity and specificity of 5 semiautomated AS-OCT parameters relative to gonioscopically narrow angles, defined as the absence of visible trabecular meshwork for ≥ 180° on nonindentation gonioscopy., Results: Of 17 656 people aged ≥ 60 years enumerated from 102 communities, 12 633 (71.6%) presented for AS-OCT testing. Referral was recommended for 697 participants based on AS-OCT criteria and 2419 participants based on other criteria, of which 858 had gonioscopy performed by a glaucoma specialist. Each of the 5 AS-OCT parameters offered good diagnostic information for predicting eyes with gonioscopically narrow angles, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.85 to 0.89. The angle opening distance at 750 μm from the scleral spur (AOD750) provided the most diagnostic information, providing an optimal sensitivity of 87% (95% confidence interval [CI], 75%-96%) and specificity of 77% (71%-83%) at a cutpoint of 367 μm, and a sensitivity of 65% (95% CI, 54%-74%) when specificity was constrained to 90% (cutpoint, 283 μm)., Conclusions: On AS-OCT, the AOD750 parameter detected approximately two-thirds of cases of gonioscopically narrow angles when test specificity was set to 90%. Although such a sensitivity may not be sufficient when screening solely for narrow angles, AS-OCT requires little additional effort if posterior segment OCT is already being performed and thus could provide incremental benefit when performing OCT-based screening., Financial Disclosure(s): The authors have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article., (Copyright © 2023 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The aim of this study is to analyze the distribution of visual field (VF) mean defect (MD) in six subgroups of glaucoma patients at baseline and follow-up., Methods: We assessed glaucoma patients treated in a Spanish tertiary care setting with a follow-up of at least 10 months. We have included 1036 visual fields and the following glaucoma subtypes: open-Angle Glaucoma (OAG); Angle-Closure Glaucoma (ACG); Congenital Glaucoma (CG); Ocular hypertension (OHT); Pseudoexfoliative Glaucoma (PSXG); Pigmentary Glaucoma (PG). We have calculated the baseline MD and the progression MD. We have stratified the MD progression in slow (MD rate > -0.5 dB/year); moderate (MD rate between -0.5 and -1 dB/year) fast (MD rate between -1 and -2 dB/year) and catastrophic (<-2 dB/year) progression and their glaucoma subtype., Results: The glaucoma types with the worse baseline MD were CG and PG. We found significant differences after comparing the baseline MD of CG and OAG, ACG, OHT and between PG and OHT. Concerning the MD progression rate: OAG 73.54% showed slow MD progression rate; 9.85% fast; 7.3% moderate and 9.3% catastrophic. ACG 82.22% slow; 8.89% moderate; 2.22% fast and 6.67% catastrophic. CG 68.83% slow; 9.09% fast; 7.79% moderate and 14.29% catastrophic. OHT 88.6% slow; 6.14% moderate; 4.39% fast and 0.88% catastrophic. PSXG 63.24% slow, 13.24% moderate; 8.8% fast and 14.7% catastrophic. PG 89.29% slow; 3.57% moderate and 7.1% fast., Conclusions: The CG requires special attention because of its aggressive presentation and progression., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Prcis: This systematic review has revealed that variable definitions of glaucoma continue to be used in prevalence studies, despite the introduction of the International Society of Geographic and Epidemiologic Ophthalmology (ISGEO) criteria., Purpose: To systematically review diagnostic criteria and examinations performed in glaucoma prevalence studies over time and determine the quality of reporting. Accurate estimates of glaucoma prevalence are crucial to inform resource allocation. However, diagnosis of glaucoma comprises inherently subjective examinations and the cross-sectional nature of prevalence studies precludes monitoring for progression., Methods: A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus was performed to examine diagnostic protocols used by glaucoma prevalence studies and evaluate uptake of the ISGEO criteria, introduced in 2002 to standardize glaucoma diagnosis in prevalence studies. Detection bias and compliance with the Strengthening Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were evaluated., Results: Ten thousand five hundred forty-four articles were identified. After deduplication, 5589 articles were screened, yielding 136 articles pertaining to 123 studies. An absence of data in many countries was identified. Ninety-two percent of studies stated diagnostic criteria, and 62% used the ISGEO criteria since their publication. Weaknesses of the ISGEO criteria were identified. Temporal variations in the performance of various examinations were observed, including heterogeneity in angle assessment. Mean STROBE compliance was 82% (range 59-100%); 72 articles had a low risk of detection bias, 4 had a high risk, and 60 had some concerns., Conclusion: Heterogeneous diagnostic definitions persist in glaucoma prevalence studies, despite introduction of the ISGEO criteria. Standardization of criteria remains imperative and the development of new criteria represent a valuable opportunity to achieve this goal. In addition, methods of determining diagnoses are poorly reported, suggesting a need for improvement in study conduct and reporting. Accordingly, we propose the Reporting of quality Of GlaUcoma Epidemiological Studies (ROGUES) Checklist. We have also identified a need for further prevalence studies in regions with limited data and to update Australian angle closure glaucoma prevalence. Design and reporting of future studies can be informed by this review's insights into diagnostic protocols previously used., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the potential association between glaucoma and fecal calprotectin. Methods: A total of 144 glaucomatous patients and 66 healthy controls were enlisted for this study. The fecal calprotectin was assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: The median fecal calprotectin levels were significantly elevated in glaucoma (73.67 vs 41.97 μg/g; p < 0.001), primary angle-closure glaucoma (76.85 μg/g; p < 0.001) and primary open-angle glaucoma (69.29 μg/g; p = 0.016) groups compared with controls. A notable proportion of the glaucoma (24%; p < 0.001), primary angle-closure glaucoma (21%; p < 0.001) and primary open-angle glaucoma (24%; p < 0.001) subgroups exhibited highly abnormal fecal calprotectin levels (≥250 μg/g). Conclusion: Elevated fecal calprotectin might indicate potential intestinal inflammation in glaucoma.

The prevalence of glaucoma has seasonal variation in population, but the role of ambient temperature and its variation remains unclear in this seasonal trend. So, we conducted a time-stratified case-crossover study to examine the association of ambient temperature and temperature change between neighboring days (TCN) with the risk of acute glaucoma. Data on meteorological parameters and glaucoma outpatient visit between 2015 and 2021 covered all districts of Shanghai. Conditional logistic regression with distributed lag nonlinear model was applied to estimate the association of temperature or TCN with the risk of acute glaucoma. A total of 7,746 patients diagnosed with acute primary angle-closure glaucoma (APACG) were included in this analysis. We observed a significant increase in the risk of acute glaucoma with cold temperature and temperature drop. Compared with the referent temperature (32℃), moderate low (12 °C) and extreme low (4 °C) temperature exposures were associated with higher risk of acute glaucoma outpatient visit, with the highest cumulative OR of 1.46 (95% CI: 1.11, 1.91) and 1.50 (95% CI: 1.09, 2.06) over lag 0-2 days. Temperature drop (TCN =  - 4 °C) also increases the risk of acute glaucoma (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.67) over lag 0-7 days, comparing with no temperature change. Patients of female and above age 65 were more vulnerable to cold exposure and temperature drop. This case-crossover study provided novel and robust individual-level evidence that low ambient temperature and temperature drop significantly increase the acute glaucoma risk. The findings provide protective strategies for glaucoma patient, especially for female and the old, under cold exposure and sudden temperature decline., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose of Review: It was not until the nineteen nineties that there was scientific evidence for the primary treatment concept of glaucoma, lowering intraocular pressure. The treatment concept of lowering intraocular pressure is now proven by randomized controlled clinical trials (landmark studies). This review provides an overview of the follow-up studies to these landmark studies from the last 18 months., Recent Findings: The 20-year data of the ocular hypertension treatment study showed a 49% incidence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The data of this landmark study was used for developing different machine learning algorithms. Bilateral disease, disc hemorrhages, and higher intraocular pressure (IOP) were risk factors for visual field deterioration in the United Kingdom Glaucoma Treatment Study. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Trial and the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study identified demographic factors, comorbidity, and clinical variables associated with visual field damage. Analysis was performed on Chinese subsets from the Laser in Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension Study (LiGHT). Looking at all the follow-up studies to the tube shunt landmark studies, preoperative IOP, neovascular glaucoma, Ahmed implantation, and younger age were predictors of failure. A follow-up study to the Effectiveness in Angle-Closure Glaucoma in Lens Extraction Study showed that patients were ten times more likely to maintain a drop-free target IOP after lens extraction than after laser iridotomy. A superior location for iridotomy results in significantly more significant angle widening than temporal or nasal locations, as shown by a follow-up study to the Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention Trial using OCT and gonioscopy., Summary: The number of published follow-up studies to the landmark studies in glaucoma show the ongoing development of clinical questions in management of glaucoma., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Secondary uveitic glaucoma is a serious sight-threatening complication of intraocular inflammation (uveitis). It develops in approximately 10-20% of patients with uveitis (although this figure may be higher depending on the type of inflammation). It is more commonly associated with chronic forms of uveitis, especially anterior uveitis. Elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP) and the development of secondary glaucoma arise as a direct or indirect consequence of uveitis, and may develop further in association with therapy for intraocular inflammation. Several types of uveitic glaucoma are distinguished according to the mechanism of development: open-angle secondary glaucoma (including steroid-induced secondary glaucoma), angle-closure secondary glaucoma, and a combination of both. It is necessary to determine the pathogenesis of uveitis and target the treatment of the inflammatory process according to it. Subsequently, it is necessary to determine the type of secondary glaucoma, which influences the choice of therapy. Compensation for IOP should be achieved as quickly as possible, before irreversible damage to the optic nerve and visual field occurs. In the first instance, we choose conservative pharmacological therapy. However, this therapy fails more often in secondary uveitic glaucoma than in primary open-angle glaucoma. For this reason, surgical or laser therapy is necessary for refractory glaucoma. Trabeculectomy remains the gold standard in surgical therapy for secondary uveitic glaucoma, but other surgical techniques can also be used (Ahmed drainage implants, goniotomy in the paediatric population, surgical iridectomy, and synechiae for angle closure etc.). The choice of method is individualised according to the clinical findings of the patient and previous ocular procedures. However, the main factor influencing the success and efficacy of filtration surgery is adequate therapy and control of the intraocular inflammatory process.

Glaucoma is the largest cause of irreversible blindness with a multifactorial genetic etiology. This study explores novel genes and gene networks in familial forms of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG) to identify rare mutations with high penetrance. Thirty-one samples from nine MYOC -negative families (five POAG and four PACG) underwent whole-exome sequencing and analysis. A set of prioritized genes and variations were screened in an independent validation cohort of 1536 samples and the whole-exome data from 20 sporadic patients. The expression profiles of the candidate genes were analyzed in 17 publicly available expression datasets from ocular tissues and single cells. Rare, deleterious SNVs in AQP5, SRFBP1, CDH6 and FOXM1 from POAG families and in ACACB, RGL3 and LAMA2 from PACG families were found exclusively in glaucoma cases. AQP5, SRFBP1 and CDH6 also revealed significant altered expression in glaucoma in expression datasets. Single-cell expression analysis revealed enrichment of identified candidate genes in retinal ganglion cells and corneal epithelial cells in POAG; whereas for PACG families, retinal ganglion cells and Schwalbe's Line showed enriched expression. Through an unbiased exome-wide search followed by validation, we identified novel candidate genes for familial cases of POAG and PACG. The SRFBP1 gene found in a POAG family is located within the GLC1M locus on Chr5q. Pathway analysis of candidate genes revealed enrichment of extracellular matrix organization in both POAG and PACG.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare the patterns of visual field (VF) defects in primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) to control groups of eyes with high-tension glaucoma (HTG) and normal-tension glaucoma (NTG)., Methods: Forty-eight eyes with PACG were enrolled, and control eyes with HTG and NTG matched for age, sex, and mean deviation of VF defect were selected. VF tests were performed using the 24-2 program of the Humphrey field analyzer. VF defects were classified into six patterns with the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study classification system and were categorized into three stages (early, moderate, and advanced). Each hemifield was divided into five regions according to the Glaucoma Hemifield Test (GHT). The mean total deviation (TD) of each GHT region was calculated., Results: Compared with HTG and NTG groups, the partial arcuate VF defects were more common in the PACG group. In the PACG group, the nasal GHT region in the inferior hemifield had the worst mean TD (-8.48 ± 8.62 dB), followed by the arcuate 1 (-7.81 ± 7.91 dB), arcuate 2 (-7.46 ± 7.43 dB), paracentral (-7.19 ± 7.98 dB), and central (-5.14 ± 6.24 dB) regions; the mean TD of the central region was significantly better than those for all other regions (all p &lt; 0.05). A similar trend was observed in the superior hemifield in the PACG group but not the VF hemifields of the HTG and NTG groups., Conclusion: Patterns of VF defect in PACG patients differ from those with HTG and NTG. This discrepancy might be due to the differences in the pathogenic mechanisms of glaucomatous optic neuropathy., (© 2023 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Purpose: To compare the plasma immune globulin and complement levels in different sorts of glaucoma to assess its association., Methods: Cohort study. Plasma samples were collected from 226 normal controls and 236 glaucoma patients included 92 with acute primary angle-closure glaucoma (APACG), 76 with chronic primary angle-closure glaucoma (CPACG), 68 with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). 163 glaucoma patients with high intraocular pressure(IOP) was classified as a subgroup. Six indexes were analyzed: C3, C4, CH 50 , IgA, IgG, and IgM., Results: There was a significant difference in C4, IgA, IgG, and IgM between patients with high IOP and normal controls groups( P  < 0.01). TheC4 (0.27 ± 0.69 g/L), IgA (3.11 ± 1.04 g/L), IgG (12.07 ± 1.92 g/L) and IgM (1.17 ± 0.49 g/L) were higher( P  < 0.05) in the high IOP groups compared with the normal controls (C4:0.25 ± 0.07 g/L, IgA: 2.54 ± 1.07 g/L, IgG: 11.21 ± 2.22 g/L, IgM:0.99 ± 0.41 g/L). There was a significant difference in age, C3, IgA, IgG, and IgM among the normal control, APACG, CPACG, and POAG. The C3 level in the APACG group (1.14 ± 0.16 g/L) was higher than normal group (1.06 ± 0.18 g/L). The IgA level was lower(P < 0.05) in the normal group (2.54 ± 1.07 g/L) compared with APACG (3.16 ± 0.97 g/L) and POAG group (2.91 ± 1.11 g/L). The IgG level of normal controls (11.21 ± 2.22 g/L) was lower (P < 0.05) than APACG group (12.15 ± 2.02 g/L) and CPACG group (11.95 ± 2.28 g/L). The IgM level was lower(P < 0.05) in the normal group (0.99 ± 0.41 g/L) compared with the APACG (1.24 ± 0.66 g/L) and CPACG group (1.17 ± 0.45 g/L)., Conclusions: The levels of the plasma expression of C3, IgA, IgG, IgM may be useful for discriminating the glaucoma patients and for assessing the progress of glaucoma in different sorts.

Glaucoma is the second leading cause of blindness in India. Despite advances in diagnosing and managing glaucoma, there is a lack of India-specific clinical guidelines on glaucoma. Ophthalmologists often refer to the European Glaucoma Society (EGS) and Asia-Pacific Glaucoma Society (APGS) guidelines. A group of glaucoma experts was convened to review the recently released EGS guideline (fifth edition) and the APGS guideline and explore their relevance to the Indian context. This review provides the salient features of EGS and APGS guidelines and their utility in Indian scenario. Glaucoma diagnosis should be based on visual acuity and refractive errors, slit-lamp examination, gonioscopy, tonometry, visual field (VF) testing, and clinical assessment of optic nerve head, retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), and macula. The intraocular pressure target must be individualized to the eye and revised at every visit. Prostaglandin analogues are the most effective medications and are recommended as the first choice in open-angle glaucoma (OAG). In patients with cataract and primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG), phacoemulsification alone or combined phacoemulsification and glaucoma surgery are recommended. Trabeculectomy augmented with antifibrotic agents is recommended as the initial surgical treatment for OAG. Laser peripheral iridotomy and surgery in combination with medical treatment should be considered in high-risk individuals aged <50 years. In patients with phakic and PACG, phacoemulsification alone or combined phacoemulsification and glaucoma surgery are recommended. Visual acuity, VF testing, clinical assessment of the optic disc and RNFL, and tonometry are strongly recommended for monitoring glaucoma progression., Competing Interests: None

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in the iris and angle parameters in psuedoexfoliation syndrome (PXF) and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG) using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT)., Methods: Patients with PXF or PXG were compared using ASOCT with primary open-angle glaucoma POAG eyes as controls in this noninterventional comparative study conducted at a tertiary eye care center in East India. All angle parameters, TM length, and iris thickness were analyzed from the enhanced depth imaging (EDI) single scans obtained. Quadrant scans were used for the calculation of iris volume using a custom-built in-house software. In particular, the software performs multiple operations including edge detection, connected components, and thresholding to localize and segment the iris. Differences in the iris volume/thickness and TM length in PXF and PXG with POAG were analyzed., Results: A total of 225 eyes were included, which included 75 PXG and 98 PXF cases and 52 POAG with a mean age of 67 ± 9.7 years at presentation. The algorithm repeatability and reproducibility was also established with correlation coefficients more than 99% which was substantiated with Bland-Altman plots. The iris volume (calculated in 197 images of 225 eyes) did not differ significantly in PXF and PXG eyes, although both had significantly greater volume compared to POAG eyes. The iris volume or other angle parameters including TM length did not correlate with clinical variables such as IOP, age, or visual field indices., Conclusion: Iris parameters or TM length do not explain pathogenesis of glaucoma in pseudoexfoliation., Competing Interests: None

Background: Population-based screening was essential for glaucoma management. Although various studies have investigated the cost-effectiveness of glaucoma screening, policymakers facing with uncontrollably growing total health expenses were deeply concerned about the potential financial consequences of glaucoma screening. This present study was aimed to explore the impact of glaucoma screening with artificial intelligence (AI) automated diagnosis from a budgetary standpoint in Changjiang county, China., Methods: A Markov model based on health care system's perspective was adapted from previously published studies to predict disease progression and healthcare costs. A cohort of 19,395 individuals aged 65 and above were simulated over a 15-year timeframe. Fur illustrative purpose, we only considered primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG) in this study. Prevalence, disease progression risks between stages, compliance rates were obtained from publish studies. We did a meta-analysis to estimate diagnostic performance of AI automated diagnosis system from fundus image. Screening costs were provided by the Changjiang screening programme, whereas treatment costs were derived from electronic medical records from two county hospitals. Main outcomes included the number of PACG patients and health care costs. Cost-offset analysis was employed to compare projected health outcomes and medical care costs under the screening with what they would have been without screening. One-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to quantify uncertainties around model results., Results: Among people aged 65 and above in Changjiang county, it was predicted that there were 1940 PACG patients under the AI-assisted screening scenario, compared with 2104 patients without screening in 15 years' time. Specifically, the screening would reduce patients with primary angle closure suspect by 7.7%, primary angle closure by 8.8%, PACG by 16.7%, and visual blindness by 33.3%. Due to early diagnosis and treatment under the screening, healthcare costs surged dramatically to $107,761.4 dollar in the first year and then were constantly declining over time, while without screening costs grew from $14,759.8 in the second year until peaking at $17,900.9 in the 9th year. However, cost-offset analysis revealed that additional healthcare costs resulted from the screening could not be offset by decreased disease progression. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year accumulated incremental costs of screening versus no screening were estimated to be $396,362.8, $424,907.9, and $434,903.2, respectively. As a result, the incremental cost per PACG of any stages prevented was $1464.3., Conclusions: This study represented the first attempt to address decision-maker's budgetary concerns when adopting glaucoma screening by developing a Markov prediction model to project health outcomes and costs. Population screening combined with AI automated diagnosis for PACG in China were able to reduce disease progression risks. However, the excess costs of screening could never be offset by reduction in disease progression. Further studies examining the cost-effectiveness or cost-utility of AI-assisted glaucoma screening were needed.

Foreword: The only time is now. Every "now" is unique. Responsible persons ask themselves, "How can I act well now?" The answers will differ for every person, because just as every situation is unique, so is every person different from every other person. But surely there must be some algorithm that will assist us in coming to the right answer. Unfortunately, no, for there is no right answer. There is only an answer that is as appropriate as we can conclude at that moment in that situation. No written guidelines can apply appropriately to every unique situation.Unfortunately we physicians have been suckled on a fallacy: "What's good for the goose is good for the gander." Phrased in medical terms, "normal findings are good, and abnormal findings are bad." This is too simple, and often wrong.Good clinicians know that care must be personalized for it to be optimal. So-called normal findings give rough guidance, sometimes applicable to groups, but frequently wrong for individuals. Consider intraocular pressure (IOP). A normal IOP of 15 mmHg good for some and bad for others, and an abnormal IOP of 30 mmHg is good for some and bad for others. We are so bombarded by the myth of the sanctity of the standard distribution curve that it is hard to think independently and specifically. Also, unfortunately, doctors are prone to decide for patients, often on the basis of normative data that is not relevant or important for the particular patient. That we do this is not surprising, as we want to help, and so we default to what seems to be the easy, safe (non-thinking) way, in which we do not have to hold ourselves accountable for the outcome.Somebody HAS to decide, or else we would be living in an anarchical world. Also true. And because none of us knows as much as we need to know to act appropriately, we seek advice from so-called "experts."For us to care for people well it is essential that we consider what others recommend. So we look to experts, as we should. However, experts are sometimes right and sometimes wrong. Remember that von Graefe in 1860 recommended surgical iridectomy for all glaucoma, Elliot recommended mustard plaster between the shoulders for glaucoma, Becker based treatment on tonographic findings, Weve reported 100% success with penetrating cyclodiathermy in glaucoma, Lichter advised against laser trabeculoplasty, many thought Cypass was great, and the investigators in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study indicated that an IOP usually around 12 mmHg was better than one usually around 20 mmHg. All wrong. What the authors of these guidelines have done excellently, is to provide a general framework on which ophthalmologists can hang pieces of evidence, so as to be able to evaluate the validity and the importance of that evidence. In doing this meticulously they have provided a valuable service to all ophthalmologists, none of whom individually have either the time or the skill to be fully informed. In their own practices the authors consider whether valid information is relevant for the particular person being considered. That process of considering relevance is essential, always. And relevance is based on the particular unique patient, unique doctor and unique situation. The only guideline the authors can provide in this regard is to remind us all to consider relevance with all patients in all situations, and from the patient's perspective. Even more important than the service to ophthalmologists is the benefit to patients that will result from thoughtful use of these guidelines.We need, also, to remember that diagnoses are generic, and that within every diagnosis there are differences. For example what does a diagnosis of primary open angle mean? Some of those affected will rapidly go blind despite the most thoughtful treatment and others will keep their sight even without treatment. What does a diagnosis of Chandler's Syndrome mean? In some, surgery works well, and, in others, poorly. So one never directs diagnosis and treatment at a condition, but rather at the person, the objective being the wellness of that person.The previous European Glaucoma Society Guidelines are used internationally. It is good that the EGS is again providing updated, useful information.The Guidelines are a practical, inspirational contribution., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: To compare functional staging classifications in Vietnamese patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and chronic primary angle closure glaucoma (PACG)., Methods: A retrospective cross-section study was conducted at a national setting. Two hundred seven eyes of 207 patients were recruited. Patients were tested with standard automated perimetry. Field loss was generally classified in four stages (normal, early, moderate, and severe), using four classification strategies: (1) Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson (HPA), (2) enhanced Glaucoma Staging System (eGSS), (3) modified Glaucoma Staging System (mGSS) and (4) the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS). AGIS as a standard method was used to judge the staging performance of the other three classifications in terms of agreement (Cohen Kappa-K) and association (Chi-Square Test-Cramer's V)., Results: The agreement between AGIS and mGSS (K = 0.687; p < 0.001) and HPA (K = 0.686; p < 0.001) was substantial while that between AGIS and eGSS was slight (K = 0.103; p < 0.001). The association between AGIS and mGSS (V = 0.748; p < 0.001) and HPA (V = 0.748; p < 0.001) was greater than eGSS (V = 0.594; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: MGSS and HPA showed stronger agreement and closer association with AGIS than eGSS. We recommend mGSS should be used in managing a glaucoma clinic because of its simplicity and convenience over HPA and AGIS.

The occurrence of malignant glaucoma several years after cataract surgery is a very rare delayed complication. An increasing myopic shift can be an early hint for the formation. A surgical intervention is often inevitable; however, intraocular pressure can also be successfully managed with conservative treatment as in the case described. Therefore, treatment should be adapted to the situation and individually decided how invasive the treatment must be and whether a vitrectomy is absolutely necessary.

With increasing longevity, patients are developing more and more chronic diseases that require treatment with medications. Yet, it is not fully understood the extent by which these systemic medications affect ocular structures and whether they may increase or decrease the risk of sight-threatening ocular diseases. This review provides a summary of reported associations between different systemic medications and the risk of developing glaucoma or experiencing disease progression. Medication classes covered in this review that are known to or may modulate the risk of open-angle glaucoma include corticosteroids, beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, metformin, statins, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, bupropion, postmenopausal hormones, and cannabinoids. Medication classes addressed in this review that may increase the risk of angle closure glaucoma include anticholinergics, adrenergic agonists, certain classes of antidepressants, sulfonamides, and topiramate.

A 19 years boy with a 2 years history of reduced and fluctuating vision along with change in pupillary shape and iris colour in his left eye presented to the glaucoma clinic. Ocular examination revealed distinct unilateral stretch holes, iris architecture changes and localized iris atrophy. Intraocular pressure was 16 mmHg in the right and 36 mmHg in the left eye. Gonioscopy of the left angle revealed broad based peripheral anterior synechiae at approximately 2 O'clock to 10 O'clock hours. The optic disc of the left eye had a vertical cup of 0.9 which manifest as superior and inferior arcuate scotoma. Specular microscopy showed unilateral abnormal endothelium with irregular cells of variable shape and size. To our knowledge, this is only the second reported case of iridocorneal endothelial syndrome in a male teenager.

Introduction: Glaucoma is characterised by progressive optic neuropathy and peripheral visual field loss. It affects 1% to 2% of white people aged over 40 years and accounts for 8% of new blind registrations in the UK. The main risk factor for glaucoma is raised intraocular pressure, but 40% of people with glaucoma have normal intraocular pressure and only 10% of people with raised intraocular pressure are at risk of optic-nerve damage. Glaucoma is more prevalent, presents earlier, and is more difficult to control in black people than in white populations., Methods and Outcomes: We conducted a systematic review and aimed to answer the following clinical questions: What are the effects of treatments for established primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, or both? What are the effects of lowering intraocular pressure in people with normal-tension glaucoma? What are the effects of treatment for acute angle-closure glaucoma? We searched: Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and other important databases up to May 2010 (Clinical Evidence reviews are updated periodically; please check our website for the most up-to-date version of this review). We included harms alerts from relevant organisations such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)., Results: We found 12 systematic reviews, RCTs, or observational studies that met our inclusion criteria. We performed a GRADE evaluation of the quality of evidence for interventions., Conclusions: In this systematic review we present information relating to the effectiveness and safety of the following interventions: laser trabeculoplasty (alone or plus topical medical treatment), topical medical treatments, and surgical trabeculectomy.

Tonography is helpful in the diagnosis of doubtful cases of chronic simple glaucoma. If also gives a good indication of the status of the disease in a given eye. The most useful miotic in the treatment of glaucoma is still pilocarpine. Carbachol is more potent but must be used in an anhydrous base ointment or in a solution of a wetting agent. DFP (diisopropyl fluorophosphate) produces undesirable side effects because of the hyperreactivity of the ciliary body and iris sphincter which it causes. These can be partly overcome by using pilocarpine first. Diamox is a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor that is effective when given orally. In many cases it produces at least a temporary lowering of tension in glaucomatous eyes, apparently by reducing the secretion of intraocular fluid. Its ultimate value in glaucoma remains to be seen. The cyclodiathermy operation which has been modified somewhat by Weekers has had a recent increase in use but the long-term results have been somewhat disappointing. The importance of early operation in narrow angle glaucoma is becoming more and more apparent. Following iridectomy the wound should be tightly sutured to insure the prompt reformation of the anterior chamber.