Search

Objective: We aimed to summarize the clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic features of various molecular subtypes of diffuse gliomas (DGs) in the Chinese population., Methods: In total, 1,418 patients diagnosed with DG between 2011 and 2017 were classified into 5 molecular subtypes according to the 2016 WHO classification of central nervous system tumors. The IDH mutation status was determined by immunohistochemistry and/or DNA sequencing, and 1p/19q codeletion was detected with fluorescence in situ hybridization. The median clinical follow-up time was 1,076 days. T-tests and chi-square tests were used to compare clinicopathological characteristics. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used to evaluate prognostic factors., Results: Our cohort included 15.5% lower-grade gliomas, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted (LGG-IDHm-1p/19q); 18.1% lower-grade gliomas, IDH-mutant (LGG-IDHm); 13.1% lower-grade gliomas, IDH-wildtype (LGG-IDHwt); 36.1% glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (GBM-IDHwt); and 17.2% glioblastoma, IDH-mutant (GBM-IDHm). Approximately 63.3% of the enrolled primary gliomas, and the median overall survival times for LGG-IDHm, LGG-IDHwt, GBM-IDHwt, and GBM-IDHm subtypes were 75.97, 34.47, 11.57, and 15.17 months, respectively. The 5-year survival rate of LGG-IDHm-1p/19q was 76.54%. We observed a significant association between high resection rate and favorable survival outcomes across all subtypes of primary tumors. We also observed a significant role of chemotherapy in prolonging overall survival for GBM-IDHwt and GBM-IDHm, and in prolonging post-relapse survival for the 2 recurrent GBM subtypes., Conclusions: By controlling for molecular subtypes, we found that resection rate and chemotherapy were 2 prognostic factors associated with survival outcomes in a Chinese cohort with DG., Competing Interests: No potential conflicts of interest are disclosed., (Copyright © 2022 Cancer Biology & Medicine.)

According to the 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system, detecting 1p/19q co-deletion became essential in clinical neuropathology for gliomas with oligodendroglioma-like morphology. Here, we assessed genomic profiles of glioblastoma in 80 cases including 1p/19q status using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH), and/or whole exome sequencing (WES). Paraffin-embedded tumor tissues were subjected to FISH analysis, and the corresponding frozen tissues from the same tumors were evaluated for aCGH and/or WES for 1p/19q co-deletion and other genetic parameters, which included IDH1-R132H, ATRX, TP53, CIC, and NOTCH1 mutations and MGMT methylation status. We also evaluated correlations between 1p/19q co-deletion status and molecular markers or clinical outcomes. The FISH analyses revealed 1p/19q co-deletion in two cases, isolated deletion of 1p in six cases, and 19q in two cases, whereas the aCGH and WES results showed isolated deletion of 19q in four cases and 19 monosomy in only one case. Eleven cases showed discordant 1p/19q results between aCGH/WES and FISH analysis, and in most of them, 1p and/or 19q deletion on FISH analysis corresponded to the partial deletions at 1p36 and/or 19q13 on aCGH/WES. Our cohort exhibited IDH1-R132H mutations (5.4%), MGMT promotor methylation (34.6%), and mutations in ATRX (9.5%), TP53 (33.3%), and NOTCH1 (3.8%) but not in CIC (0%). In addition, MGMT methylation and ATRX mutation were significantly associated with clinical prognosis. In glioblastomas, partial deletions of 1p36 and/or 19q13 were uncommon, some of which appeared as 1p and/or 19q deletions on FISH analysis.

The diffuse gliomas are primary central nervous system tumors that arise most frequently in the cerebral hemispheres of adults. They are currently classified as astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas or oligoastrocytomas and range in grade from II to IV. Glioblastoma (GBM), grade IV, is the highest grade and most common form. The diagnosis of diffuse gliomas has historically been based primarily on histopathologic features, yet these tumors have a wide range of biological behaviors that are only partially explained by morphology. Biomarkers have now become an established component of the neuropathologic diagnosis of gliomas, since molecular alterations aid in classification, prognostication and prediction of therapeutic response. Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations are frequent in grades II and III infiltrating gliomas of adults, as well as secondary GBMs, and are a major discriminate of biologic class. IDH mutant infiltrating astrocytomas (grades II and III), as well as secondary GBMs, are characterized by TP53 and ATRX mutations. Oligodendrogliomas are also IDH mutant, but instead are characterized by 1p/19q co-deletion and mutations of CIC, FUBP1, Notch1 and the TERT promoter. Primary GBMs typically lack IDH mutations and demonstrate EGFR, PTEN, TP53, PDGFRA, NF1 and CDKN2A/B alterations and TERT promoter mutations. Pediatric gliomas differ in their spectrum of disease from those in adults; high grade gliomas occurring in children frequently have mutations in H3F3A, ATRX and DAXX, but not IDH. Circumscribed, low grade gliomas, such as pilocytic astrocytoma, pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma and ganglioglioma, need to be distinguished from diffuse gliomas in the pediatric population. These gliomas often harbor mutations or activating gene rearrangements in BRAF., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and most aggressive primary malignant tumor of the central nervous system. Recently, researchers concluded that the "one-size-fits-all" approach for treatment of GBM is no longer valid and research should be directed toward more personalized and patient-tailored treatment protocols. Identification of the molecular and genomic pathways underlying GBM is essential for achieving this personalized and targeted therapeutic approach. Imaging genomics represents a new era as a noninvasive surrogate for genomic and molecular profile identification. This article discusses the basics of imaging genomics of GBM, its role in treatment decision-making, and its future potential in noninvasive genomic identification., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Glioblastoma is the most common and most aggressive diffuse glioma, associated with short survival and uniformly fatal outcome, irrespective of treatment. It is characterized by morphological, genetic and gene-expression heterogeneity. The current standard of treatment is maximal surgical resection, followed by radiation, with concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy. Due to the heterogeneity, most tumours develop resistance to treatment and shortly recur. Following recurrence, glioblastoma is quickly fatal in the majority of cases. Recent genetic molecular advances have contributed to a better understanding of glioblastoma pathophysiology and disease stratification. In this paper we review basic glioblastoma pathophysiology, with emphasis on clinically relevant genetic molecular alterations and potential targets for further drug development., (Copyright © 2013 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: Glioblastoma multiforme with an oligodendroglial component (GBMO) has been recognized in the World Health Organization classification-however, the diagnostic criteria, molecular biology, and clinical outcome of primary GBMO remain unclear. Our aim was to investigate whether primary GBMO is a distinct clinicopathological subgroup of GBM and to determine the relative frequency of prognostic markers such as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on 1p and/or 19q, O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation, and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation., Methods: We examined 288 cases of primary GBM and assessed the molecular markers in 57 GBMO and 50 cases of other primary GBM, correlating the data with clinical parameters and outcome., Results: GBMO comprised 21.5% of our GBM specimens and showed significantly longer survival compared with our other GBM (12 mo vs 5.8 mo, P = .006); there was also a strong correlation with younger age at diagnosis (56.4 y vs 60.6 y, P = .005). Singular LOH of 19q (P = .04) conferred a 1.9-fold increased hazard of shorter survival. There was no difference in the frequencies of 1p or 19q deletion, MGMT promoter methylation, or IDH1 mutation (P = .8, P = 1.0, P = 1.0, respectively)., Conclusions: Primary GBMO is a subgroup of GBM associated with longer survival and a younger age group but shows no difference in the frequency of LOH of 1p/19q, MGMT, and IDH1 mutation compared with other primary GBM.

Aims: To determine whether testing for isolated 1p or 19q losses, or as a codeletion, has any significance in the workup of glioblastomas (GBMs)., Methods: Upfront 1p/19q testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was done in 491 gliomas that were histologically diagnosed as GBMs. Outcomes were determined and measured against 1p/19q results., Results: Twenty-eight showed apparent 1p/19q codeletion by either FISH and/or PCR-based LOH, but only 1/26 showed codeletion by both tests. Over 90% of tumours with apparent codeletion by either FISH or LOH also had 10q LOH and/or EGFR amplification, features inversely related to true whole-arm 1p/19q codeletion. Furthermore, only 1/28 tumours demonstrated an R132H IDH1 mutation. Neither 1p/19q codeletion by FISH nor LOH had an impact on GBM survival. Isolated losses of 1p or 19q also had no impact on survival., Conclusions: These data suggest that (i) 1p/19q testing is not useful on gliomas that are histologically GBMs; (ii) codeletion testing should be reserved only for cases with compatible morphology; and (iii) EGFR, 10q, and IDH1 testing can help act as safeguards against a false-positive 1p/19q result., (© 2013 The Authors. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology © 2013 British Neuropathological Society.)

Abstract Background Molecular markers for classification of gliomas include isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations and codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q (1p/19q). While mutations in IDH enzymes result in the well‐characterized production of oncometabolite 2‐hydroxyglutarate, dysregulation of other metabolites in IDH tumors is less characterized. Similarly, the effects of 1p/19q codeletion on cellular metabolism are also unclear. Aim This study aimed to quantify changes in tumor metabolites in human glioma tissue as a function of both IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion. Methods and Results Deidentified human glioma tissue and associated clinical data were obtained from the Emory University Winship Cancer Institute tissue biobank from 14 patients (WHO grades II, III, and IV; seven female and seven male). Proton (1H) high‐resolution magic angle spinning (HR‐MAS) nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy data were acquired using a 600 MHz Bruker AVANCE III NMR spectrometer. Metabolite concentrations were calculated using LCModel. Differences in metabolite concentrations as a function of IDH mutation, 1p/19q codeletion, and survival status were determined using Mann–Whitney U tests. Concentrations of alanine, glutamine, and glutamate were significantly lower in glioma tissue with IDH mutations compared to tissue with IDH wildtype. Additionally, glutamate concentration was significantly lower in glioma tissue with 1p/19q codeletion compared to intact 1p/19q. Exploratory analysis revealed alanine concentration varied significantly as a function of survival status. Conclusions Given the emerging landscape of glioma treatments that target metabolic dysregulation, an improved understanding of altered metabolism in molecular sub‐types of gliomas, including those with IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion, is an important consideration for treatment stratification and personalized medicine.

Background: Glioma, the most common brain tumor, is a heterogeneous group of glia-derived tumors, the majority of which have characteristics of diffuse infiltration and immunosuppression. The LGALS protein family is a large class of sugar-binding proteins. Among them, LGALS3 has been reported to promote tumor development and progression in some cancers. However, the clinical significance and biological functions of LGALS3 in glioma remain virtually unknown. The purpose of our research is to detect LGALS3 expression and its prognostic value in glioma and reveal the relationship between its expression and the clinico/molecular-pathological features of patients and immune cell infiltration.Methods: LGALS3 protein expression was examined by immunohistochemistry. The mRNA expression data of LGALS3 was downloaded and analyzed from TCGA and Rembrandt datasets. The association between LGALS3 and glioma clinically relevant diagnostic/molecular markers (IDH, 1p19q, ATRX, MGMT, and TERT) was examined using the Chi-Squared (χ2) test. The correlation between LGALS3 expression and the infiltration of multiple intra-tumoral immune cell types, including B cells (CD20), T cells (CD4 and CD8), macrophages (CD68), and M2 tumor-associated macrophages (CD163), was evaluated by Spearman correlation analysis. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the Cox regression analysis were applied to evaluate the prognostic value of LGALS3 in glioma. The log-rank test was used to evaluate Kaplan-Meier results for significance.Results: Out of all 304 glioma cases, LGALS3 protein was expressed in 125 glioma cases (41.1%, 125/304), with 69.2% (9/13) in WHO I, 9.8% (8/82) in WHO II, 34.2% (26/76) in WHO III, and 61.7% (82/133) in WHO IV. The expression of LGALS3 was correlated with patient age, WHO grade, PHH3 (mitosis), Ki67 index, IDH, 1p/19q codeletion, and TERT promoter status. LGALS3 was an independent poor prognostic marker in diffusely infiltrating gliomas and was positively correlated with immune cell infiltration, particularly CD163+ tumor-associated macrophages in the TCGA dataset, Rembrandt dataset, and our SYSUCC cohort (R = 0.419, 0.627, and 0.724).Conclusion: LGALS3 was highly expressed in pilocytic astrocytoma, GBM, and IDH wild-type LGG. It served as a poor prognostic marker in diffusely infiltrating gliomas. Based on its prognostic significance and strong correlation with CD163+ TAMs, it may act as an important therapeutic target for human glioma.

ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical characteristics and prognostic value of TERTp and 1p/19q phenotype in DDP+TMZ concurrent chemoradiotherapy for newly diagnosed GBM with unmethylated MGMT promoter. MethodsA retrospective analysis was made in 73 newly diagnosed GBM with unmethylated MGMT promoter. All patients received DDP+TMZ. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics, adverse reactions, PFS and OS of patients with different TERTp and 1p/19q groups. ResultsAccording to TERTp, there were 30 cases of TERTp wt and 43 cases of TERTp mut. According to 1p/19q, 62 cases were non-deletion and 11 cases were deletion. There was no significant difference in clinical parameters between two groups（P＞0.05）. Up to 31st January 2019, 44 patients had recurrence, 17 with TERTp wt and 27 with TERTp mut. The median PFS was 12.0 and 10.0 months, respectively. The 1-year PFS rate was 33.6% and 27.2%. 22 patients died, 9 with TERTp wt and 13 with TERTp mut. The median OS was 20.0 and 19.0 months. The 1-year OS rate was 77.9% and 73.2%. There were 38 recurrences in 1p/19q non-deletion and 6 recurrences in deletion. The median PFS was 10.0 and 22.0 months respectively. The 1-year PFS rate was 20.4% and 60.0%. There were 19 deaths with 1p/19q non-deletion, 3 deaths in deletion, and the median OS was 18.0 and 23.0 months. The 1-year OS rates were 60.3% and 88.9%. There was a better trend in the efficacy for 1p/19q non-deletion than that of deletion. But the difference was not significant. ConclusionThe efficacy of TERTp wt is slightly higher than that of TERTp mut. The efficacy of 1p/19q deletion group is higher than that of non-deletion, but the difference is not statistically significant. 1p/19q may have potential prognostic value in newly diagnosed GBM with unmethylated MGMT promoter receiving DDP +TMZ concurrent chemoradiotherapy, which deserves further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Changes in MGMT promoter methylation, IDH1 and IDH2 mutation, and 1p/19q co-deletion status in gliomas between first and subsequent resections and their associated clinical factors are poorly described. In this study, we assayed these biomarkers in the clinical setting. Patients and methods: We used multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification to measure MGMT promoter methylation, IDH mutation status, and 1p/19q co-deletion in 45 paired tumor samples from patients undergoing resection and subsequent re-resections for gliomas. Results: Molecular changes were present in 20 patients (44%). At least one molecular characteristic changed over time in 89% of patients with primary grade III tumors. Gliomas with IDH wild-type and/or non-co-deleted were stable, but IDH1/2 mutation and/or co-deletion were sometimes lost at the time of recurrence. In a multivariate analysis, adjuvant radiotherapy alone was independently associated (P=0.02) with changes in molecular profile. Conclusion: Molecular biomarkers change in gliomas during the course of the disease, most often MGMT methylation status. These changes in genetic profiles are related to adjuvant treatment with radiotherapy alone, which might be important for individualized treatment planning over the disease course. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: This review summarizes the use of molecular diagnostics in glioma and its effect on the development of novel therapeutics and management decisions. Recent Findings: Genomic and proteomic profiling of brain tumors has provided significant expansion of our understanding of oncogenesis, characterization, and prognostication of brain tumors. Molecular markers such as MGMT, EGFR, IDH, 1p19q, ATRX, TERT, FGFR-TACC, and BRAF are now being used to classify brain tumors as well as influence management decisions. Several of these markers are also being used as therapeutic targets. Summary: We review the use of several molecular diagnostics in gliomas and discuss their impact on drug development and clinical trial design. In the future, molecular characterization based on a specific genomic, proteomic as well as transcriptomes for bioformatics analysis will provide clinicians the ability to rationally select drugs with actionable targets for each patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The treatment of patients with brain tumors has long been the domain of neurosurgery and radiotherapy but chemotherapy is now well established as an additional treatment option for many tumor entities in neuro-oncology. This is particularly true for patients with newly diagnosed and relapsing glioblastoma and anaplastic glioma as well as the treatment of medulloblastoma and primary lymphoma of the central nervous system (CNS). In addition to purely histopathological features, treatment decisions including those for chemotherapy are now based increasingly more on molecular tumor profiling. Within the group of gliomas these markers include the methylation status of the O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter and the 1p/19q status, which reflects the loss of genetic material on chromosome arms 1p and 19q. The presence of a 1p/19q codeletion is associated with a better prognosis and increased sensitivity to alkylating chemotherapy in patients with anaplastic gliomas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diffuse gliomas are represented in the 2007 WHO classification as astrocytomas, oligoastrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas of grades II and III and glioblastomas WHO grade IV. Molecular data on these tumors have a major impact on prognosis and therapy of the patients. Consequently, the inclusion of molecular parameters in the WHO definition of brain tumors is being planned and has been forwarded as the 'ISN-Haarlem' consensus. We, here, analyze markers of special interest including ATRX, IDH and 1p/19q codeletion in a series of 405 adult patients. Among the WHO 2007 classified tumors were 152 astrocytomas, 61 oligodendrogliomas, 63 oligoastrocytomas and 129 glioblastomas. Following the concepts of the 'ISN-Haarlem', we rediagnosed the series to obtain 'integrated' diagnoses with 155 tumors being astrocytomas, 100 oligodendrogliomas and 150 glioblastomas. In a subset of 100 diffuse gliomas from the NOA-04 trial with long-term follow-up data available, the 'integrated' diagnosis had a significantly greater prognostic power for overall and progression-free survival compared to WHO 2007. Based on the 'integrated' diagnoses, loss of ATRX expression was close to being mutually exclusive to 1p/19q codeletion, with only 2 of 167 ATRX-negative tumors exhibiting 1p/19q codeletion. All but 4 of 141 patients with loss of ATRX expression and diffuse glioma carried either IDH1 or IDH2 mutations. Interestingly, the majority of glioblastoma patients with loss of ATRX expression but no IDH mutations exhibited an H3F3A mutation. Further, all patients with 1p/19 codeletion carried a mutation in IDH1 or IDH2. We present an algorithm based on stepwise analysis with initial immunohistochemistry for ATRX and IDH1-R132H followed by 1p/19q analysis followed by IDH sequencing which reduces the number of molecular analyses and which has a far better association with patient outcome than WHO 2007. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Individualized therapies are popular current concepts in oncology and first steps towards stratified medicine have now been taken in neurooncology through implementation of stratified therapeutic approaches. Knowledge about the molecular basis of brain tumors has expanded greatly in recent years and a few molecular alterations are studied routinely because of their clinical relevance. However, no single targeted agent has yet been fully approved for the treatment of glial brain tumors. In this review, we argue that multidisciplinary and integrated approaches are essential for translational research and the development of new treatments for patients with malignant gliomas, and we present a conceptual framework in which to place the components of such an interdisciplinary approach. We believe that this ambitious goal can be best realized through strong cooperation of brain tumor centers with local hospitals and physicians; such an approach enables close dialogue between expert subspecialty clinicians and local therapists to consider all aspects of this increasingly complex set of diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Over the past decade a series of trials of the EORTC Brain Tumor Group (BTG) has substantially influenced and shaped the standard-of-care of primary brain tumors. All these trials were coupled with biological research that has allowed for better understanding of the biology of these tumors. In glioblastoma, EORTC trial 26981/22981 conducted jointly with the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group showed superiority of concomitant radiochemotherapy with temozolomide over radiotherapy alone. It also identified the first predictive marker for benefit from alkylating agent chemotherapy in glioblastoma, the methylation of the O6-methyl-guanyl-methly-transferase (MGMT) gene promoter. In another large randomized trial, EORTC 26951, adjuvant chemotherapy in anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors was investigated. Despite an improvement in progression-free survival this did not translate into a survival benefit. The third example of a landmark trial is the EORTC 22845 trial. This trial led by the EORTC Radiation Oncology Group forms the basis for an expectative approach to patients with low-grade glioma, as early radiotherapy indeed prolongs time to tumor progression but with no benefit in overall survival. This trial is the key reference in deciding at what time in their disease adult patients with low-grade glioma should be irradiated. Future initiatives will continue to focus on the conduct of controlled trials, rational academic drug development as well as systematic evaluation of tumor tissue including biomarker development for personalized therapy. Important lessons learned in neurooncology are to dare to ask real questions rather than merely rapidly testing new compounds, and the value of well designed trials, including the presence of controls, central pathology review, strict radiology protocols and biobanking. Structurally, the EORTC BTG has evolved into a multidisciplinary group with strong transatlantic alliances. It has contributed to the maturation of neurooncology within the oncological sciences. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]