Search

Satellite orbit information is crucial for ensuring that global navigation satellite systems (GNSSs) provide appropriate positioning, navigation and timing services. Typically, users can obtain access to orbit information of a specific accuracy level from navigation messages or precise ephemeris products. Without this information, a system will not be able to provide normal service. In response to this problem, initial orbit information of a certain level of precision must be obtained to support subsequent applications, such as broadcasting or precise ephemeris calculations, thereby ensuring the successful subsequent operation of the navigation system. One of two ways to calculate the initial orbit of a GNSS satellite is to utilize ground tracking stations to observe satellite vector information in the geocentric inertial system; the second way is to utilize GNSS range observations and known orbit information from other satellites. For the second approach, some researchers use the Bancroft algorithm combined with receiver clock offset to determine the initial orbit of GNSS satellites. Because this method requires an additional known receiver clock offset, we study the dependence of the Bancroft algorithm on clock offset in GNSS orbit determination. By assessing the impact of errors of different magnitude on the accuracy of the orbit results, we obtain experimental conclusions. After comprehensively analyzing various errors, we determine the accuracy level that the Bancroft algorithm can achieve for orbit determination without considering receiver clock correction. Dual-frequency and single-frequency pseudorange data from International GNSS Service stations are used in orbit determination experiments. When a small receiver clock offset is considered and no correction is made, the deviations in the calculated satellite positions in three dimensions are approximately 979.3 and 1118.1 m (dual and single frequency); with a satellite clock offset, these values are approximately 928.8 and 1062.7 m (dual and single frequency). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A synthesis of two prevailing global navigation satellite system positioning technologies, namely the precise point positioning and the network-based real-time kinematic, results in the emergence of the PPP-RTK, enabling single-receiver users to achieve high positioning accuracy with reasonable timeliness through integer ambiguity resolution. The realization of PPP-RTK needs to accomplish two sequential tasks. The first task is to determine a class of corrections including, among others, the satellite phase biases (SPBs) at the network level. With these corrections, the second task, then, is to solve for the ambiguity-fixed, absolute position at the user level. In this contribution, we revisit three variants (geometry-free, geometry-fixed and geometry-plus-satellite-clock-fixed) of the undifferenced and uncombined PPP-RTK network model and then point out their implications for practical use. We also carry out a case study using multi-day, dual-frequency global positioning system data from the crustal movement observation network of China stations, aiming to figure out what are the most appropriate linear combinations of the SPBs to be transmitted to the users from the viewpoint of decorrelation, and to assess the static and kinematic positioning performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Care should be taken to minimize the adverse impact of differential code biases (DCBs) on global navigation satellite systems (GNSS)-derived ionospheric information determinations. For the sake of convenience, satellite and receiver DCB products provided by the International GNSS Service (IGS) are treated as constants over a period of 24 h (Li et al. (2014)). However, if DCB estimates show remarkable intra-day variability, the DCBs estimated as constants over 1-day period will partially account for ionospheric modeling error; in this case DCBs will be required to be estimated over shorter time period. Therefore, it is important to further gain insight into the short-term variation characteristics of receiver DCBs. In this contribution, the IGS combined global ionospheric maps and the German Aerospace Center (DLR)-provided satellite DCBs are used in the improved method to determine the multi-GNSS receiver DCBs with an hourly time resolution. The intra-day stability of the receiver DCBs is thereby analyzed in detail. Based on 1 month of data collected within the multi-GNSS experiment of the IGS, a good agreement within the receiver DCBs is found between the resulting receiver DCB estimates and multi-GNSS DCB products from the DLR at a level of 0.24 ns for GPS, 0.28 ns for GLONASS, 0.28 ns for BDS, and 0.30 ns for Galileo. Although most of the receiver DCBs are relatively stable over a 1-day period, large fluctuations (more than 9 ns between two consecutive hours) within the receiver DCBs can be found. We also demonstrate the impact of the significant short-term variations in receiver DCBs on the extraction of ionospheric total electron content (TEC), at a level of 12.96 TECu (TEC unit). Compared to daily receiver DCB estimates, the hourly DCB estimates obtained from this study can reflect the short-term variations of the DCB estimates more dedicatedly. The main conclusion is that preliminary analysis of characteristics of receiver DCB variations over short-term intervals should be finished prior to estimate daily multi-GNSS receiver DCB products. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A joint-processing model for multi-GNSS (GPS, GLONASS, BDS and GALILEO) precise point positioning (PPP) is proposed, in which raw code and phase observations are used. In the proposed model, inter-system biases (ISBs) and GLONASS code inter-frequency biases (IFBs) are carefully considered, among which GLONASS code IFBs are modeled as a linear function of frequency numbers. To get the full rank function model, the unknowns are re-parameterized and the estimable slant ionospheric delays and ISBs/IFBs are derived and estimated simultaneously. One month of data in April, 2015 from 32 stations of the International GNSS Service (IGS) Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) tracking network have been used to validate the proposed model. Preliminary results show that RMS values of the positioning errors (with respect to external double-difference solutions) for static/kinematic solutions (four systems) are 6.2 mm/2.1 cm (north), 6.0 mm/2.2 cm (east) and 9.3 mm/4.9 cm (up). One-day stabilities of the estimated ISBs described by STD values are 0.36 and 0.38 ns, for GLONASS and BDS, respectively. Significant ISB jumps are identified between adjacent days for all stations, which are caused by the different satellite clock datums in different days and for different systems. Unlike ISBs, the estimated GLONASS code IFBs are quite stable for all stations, with an average STD of 0.04 ns over a month. Single-difference experiment of short baseline shows that PPP ionospheric delays are more precise than traditional leveling ionospheric delays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Because of the frequency division multiple access (FDMA) technique, Russian global navigation satellite system (GLONASS) observations suffer from pseudo-range inter-channel biases (ICBs), which adversely affect satellite clock offset estimation. In this study, the GLONASS pseudo-range ICB is treated in four different ways: as ignorable parameters (ICB-NONE), polynomial functions of frequency (ICB-FPOL), frequency-specific parameters (ICB-RF), and satellite-specific parameters (ICB-RS). Data from 110 international global navigation satellite system (GNSS) service stations were chosen to obtain the ICBs and were used for satellite clock offset estimation. The ICBs from the different schemes varied from −20 ns to 80 ns. The ICB-RS model yielded the best results, improving the clock offset accuracy from 300 ps to about 100 ps; it could improve the GLONASS precise point positioning (PPP) accuracy and the converging time by approximately 50% and 30%, respectively. Along similar lines, we introduced the GPS-ICB parameters in the process of GPS satellite clock estimation and GPS/GLONASS PPP, as ICBs may exist for GPS because of different chip shape distortions among GPS satellites. This possibility was found to be the case. Further, the GPS-ICB magnitude ranged from −2 ns to 2 ns, and the estimated satellite clock offsets could improve the accuracy of the GPS and combined GPS/GLONASS PPP by 10%; it also accelerated the converging time by more than 15% thanks to the GPS-ICB calibration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The performance of real-time (RT) precise positioning can be improved by utilizing observations from multiple Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) instead of one particular system. Since the end of 2012, BeiDou, independently established by China, began to provide operational services for users in the Asia-Pacific regions. In this study, a regional RT precise positioning system is developed to evaluate the performance of GPS/BeiDou observations in Australia in providing high precision positioning services for users. Fixing three hourly updated satellite orbits, RT correction messages are generated and broadcasted by processing RT observation/navigation data streams from the national network of GNSS Continuously Operating Reference Stations in Australia (AUSCORS) at the server side. At the user side, RT PPP is realized by processing RT data streams and the RT correction messages received. RT clock offsets, for which the accuracy reached 0.07 and 0.28 ns for GPS and BeiDou, respectively, can be determined. Based on these corrections, an accuracy of 12.2, 30.0 and 45.6 cm in the North, East and Up directions was achieved for the BeiDou-only solution after 30 min while the GPS-only solution reached 5.1, 15.3 and 15.5 cm for the same components at the same time. A further improvement of 43.7, 36.9 and 45.0 percent in the three directions, respectively, was achieved for the combined GPS/BeiDou solution. After the initialization process, the North, East and Up positioning accuracies were 5.2, 8.1 and 17.8 cm, respectively, for the BeiDou-only solution, while 1.5, 3.0, and 4.7 cm for the GPS-only solution. However, we only noticed a 20.9% improvement in the East direction was obtained for the GPS/BeiDou solution, while no improvements in the other directions were detected. It is expected that such improvements may become bigger with the increasing accuracy of the BeiDou-only solution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• The inappropriate method of separating pseudorange bias into a purely receiver-dependent part or purely satellite-dependent part in mixed network is proved. • A simplified algorithm of the clock offset estimation with pseudorange bias correction is derived. • The pseudorange bias is used to improve the accuracy and performance of precise point position. The pseudorange bias inconsistencies are notably originating primarily from the individual chip shape distortions in the ranging signals, these distortions cause different shifts of the correlator's tracking point for receivers, as a result giving rise to a different pseudorange bias for each pseudorange observation. The different bias should be properly dealt with in the process of satellite clock offset estimation when receivers of mixed types are used. In this work, using observations from 140 international global navigation satellite system (GNSS) service stations, the pseudorange bias was calculated, and the effect of inconsistent biases on satellite clock offset estimation from different receiver networks was investigated. The inconsistencies between the GPS satellites were ranging from −6 ns to 4 ns. For GALILEO and BDS, the biases are significant, ranging from −20 ns to 40 ns and −60 ns to 40 ns, respectively. The biases of the individual satellites are receiver-related and statistically stable from day to day. The influence of pseudorange bias was strikingly noticeable, and can improve the accuracy of the estimated clock offset by several ps for GPS; and by more than 15 ps for GALILEO and BDS after considering bias inconsistencies. Furthermore, owing to the pseudorange bias correction, the convergence and positioning performance have improved significantly, with an improvement of more than 12 % for the static precise point position (PPP), and more than 10 % for the kinematic PPP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]