Search

Purpose: The use of partial nephrectomy and other kidney sparing approaches in national databases lags far behind practice patterns at major academic centers. The reasons and impact of this disparity are largely unknown. We examined the trend in kidney sparing approaches in a community based health care system to examine associated factors and impact on renal function. Materials and Methods: We evaluated the records of all patients who underwent intervention for suspicious renal lesions at a single health care system between 1998 and 2010. Demographic, pathological and functional data were collected in an institutional review board approved database. Results: During the 12 study years a kidney sparing approach was used in 35% of patients with localized renal tumors. A clear increase in the proportion of patients undergoing a kidney sparing approach was observed, including 11%, 23% and 49% during successive 4-year periods. A kidney sparing approach was used in 81% of patients with tumors 4 cm or less during 2009 to 2010. Although high volume (greater than 20 cases annually), more recently graduating (2001 or later) and fellowship trained surgeons had higher kidney sparing approach use overall (each p <0.03), the proportion of patients who underwent a kidney sparing approach increased with time in all study groups (p <0.0001). The renal functional loss in patients who underwent a kidney sparing approach and radical nephrectomy was 2% and 30%, respectively (p <0.001). Conclusions: The kidney sparing approach rate in a community based health care system can approach rates at major academic centers. This practice pattern appears related to the addition of recent graduates and urological oncologists but also to a change in long-standing practice patterns of other community urologists. These data suggest that the use of kidney sparing approaches nationwide and the associated renal functional benefits may continue to increase. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of radius, exophytic/endophytic, nearness to collecting system/sinus, anterior/posterior, and location relative to polar lines (RENAL), preoperative aspects and dimensions used for anatomical classification (PADUA), contact surface area (CSA), and preoperative assessment of volume preservation (PAVP) nephrometry scores in predicting postoperative renal functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy (PN). Few studies have compared the accuracy of tumor complexity systems directly in the same set of PN patients.Materials and Methods: Patients treated with robotic, laparoscopic, or open PN having available imaging (n = 344) were examined. The ability of 4 systems to predict nadir estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR [median postoperative day 1]) and new baseline eGFR (median: 0.95 year) was analyzed using univariable and multivariable models.Results: Median preoperative, nadir, and new baseline eGFR were 79 (interquartile range [IQR]: 63-97), 65 (IQR: 47-85), and 80 (IQR: 63-99) mL/min/1.73 m2. Multivariable models incorporating RENAL, PADUA, CSA, or PAVP were similarly predictive of postoperative renal function (nadir eGFR: R2 = 0.683-0.688, new baseline eGFR: R2 = 0.775). In univariable analysis, all 4 complexity systems were predictors of nadir GFR (each P < .05), with RENAL (P = .045), CSA (P = .027), and PAVP (P = .012) also significantly predicting nadir eGFR in multivariable models. No complexity system was significantly associated with new baseline eGFR in multivariable analysis, with only RENAL (P = .023) and PAVP (P = .049) having a statistically significant association in univariable analysis.Conclusion: RENAL, PADUA, CSA, and PAVP are all predictors of early postoperative renal function. RENAL and PAVP provided the greatest predictive ability for later renal functional outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate whether surgeon factors, such as training and experience, have a strong impact on selection of surgical approach for treating renal cancers. Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) has become the reference standard for tumors that are amenable to such an approach. Tumor size and configuration are important predictors of usage of NSS. The RENAL nephrometry score (RNS) has been developed to standardize reporting of tumor complexity, but the performance of this method within individual surgeons'' practices, particularly in the community-based setting, has not been evaluated previously. Methods: Clinical data and RNS were collected retrospectively for 300 cases performed by 5 different surgeons with varying NSS usage rates (31-74%). Results: Mean RNS for patients undergoing NSS (6.0) and radical nephrectomy (RN) (9.3) differed significantly (P <.0001), as did tumor size (2.8 vs 6.3 cm, P <.0001). RNS was a better predictor of surgery type (R 2 = .55) than was tumor size (R 2 = .43) for all 5 surgeons. In univariable analysis, individual surgeon, surgery year, glomerular filtration rate, tumor size, RNS, and each RNS component predicted NSS vs RN (each P <.05). In multivariable analysis, surgeon, tumor size, exophytic amount, and nearness to collecting system were independent predictors of NSS usage (P <.001). Conclusion: Despite significant variation in NSS usage by individual surgeons at a community-based health system, RNS appears to be valid for both low and high usage. With increasing usage of NSS worldwide, RNS appears to reflect current patterns and may inform future practice for surgeons of all backgrounds. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]