Search

Aims: One of the primary determinants of blood flow in regional vascular beds is perfusion pressure. Our aim was to investigate if reduction in blood pressure during the treatment of decompensated heart failure would be associated with worsening renal function (WRF). Our secondary aim was to evaluate the prognostic significance of this potentially treatment-induced form of WRF., Methods and Results: Subjects included in the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness (ESCAPE) trial limited data were studied (386 patients). Reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) was greater in patients experiencing WRF (-10.3 ± 18.5 vs. -2.8 ± 16.0 mmHg, P < 0.001) with larger reductions associated with greater odds for WRF (odds ratio = 1.3 per 10 mmHg reduction, P < 0.001). Systolic blood pressure reduction (relative change > median) was associated with greater doses of in-hospital oral vasodilators (P ≤ 0.017), thiazide diuretic use (P = 0.035), and greater weight reduction (P = 0.023). In patients with SBP-reduction, WRF was not associated with worsened survival [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.76, P = 0.58]. However, in patients without SBP-reduction, WRF was strongly associated with increased mortality (adjusted HR = 5.3, P < 0.001, P interaction = 0.001)., Conclusion: During the treatment of decompensated heart failure, significant blood pressure reduction is strongly associated with WRF. However, WRF that occurs in the setting of SBP-reduction is not associated with an adverse prognosis, whereas WRF in the absence of this provocation is strongly associated with increased mortality. These data suggest that WRF may represent the final common pathway of several mechanistically distinct processes, each with potentially different prognostic implications.

Background: Worsening renal function (WRF) commonly complicates the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure. Despite considerable investigation in this area, it remains unclear to what degree WRF is a reflection of treatment- versus patient-related factors. We hypothesized that if WRF is significantly influenced by factors intrinsic to the patient, then WRF during an index hospitalization should predict WRF during subsequent hospitalization., Methods: Consecutive admissions to the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania with a discharge diagnosis of congestive heart failure were reviewed. Patients with >1 hospitalization were retained for analysis., Results: In total, 181 hospitalization pairs met the inclusion criteria. Baseline patient characteristics demonstrated significant correlation between hospitalizations (P ≤ .002 for all) but minimal association with WRF. In contrast, variables related to the aggressiveness of diuresis were weakly correlated between hospitalizations but significantly associated with WRF (P ≤ .024 for all). Consistent with the primary hypothesis, WRF during the index hospitalization was strongly associated with WRF during subsequent hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] 2.7, P = .003). This association was minimally altered after controlling for traditional baseline characteristics (OR 2.5, P = .006) and in-hospital treatment-related parameters (OR 2.8, P = .005)., Conclusions: A prior history of WRF is strongly associated with subsequent episodes of WRF, independent of in-hospital treatment received. These results suggest that baseline factors intrinsic to the patient's cardiorenal pathophysiology have substantial influence on the subsequent development of WRF., (Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Worsening renal function (RF) and improved RF during the treatment of decompensated heart failure have traditionally been thought of as hemodynamically distinct events. We hypothesized that if the pulmonary artery catheter-derived measures are relevant in the evaluation of cardiorenal interactions, the comparison of patients with improved versus worsening RF should highlight any important hemodynamic differences. All subjects in the Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness trial limited data set with admission and discharge creatinine values available were included (n = 401). No differences were found in the baseline, final, or change in pulmonary artery catheter-derived hemodynamic variables, inotrope and intravenous vasodilator use, or survival between patients with improved versus worsening RF (p = NS for all). Both groups were equally likely to be in the bottom quartile of cardiac index (p = 0.32), have a 25% improvement in cardiac index (p = 0.97), or have any worsening in cardiac index (p = 0.90). When patients with any significant change in renal function (positive or negative) were compared to those with stable renal function, strong associations between variables such as a reduced cardiac index (odds ratio 2.2, p = 0.02), increased intravenous inotrope and vasodilator use (odds ratio 2.9, p <0.001), and worsened all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.8, p = 0.01) became apparent. In contrast to traditionally held views, the patients with improved RF and those with worsening RF had similar hemodynamic parameters and outcomes. Combining these groups identified a hemodynamically compromised population with significantly worse survival than patients with stable renal function. In conclusion, the changes in renal function, regardless of the direction, likely identify a population with an advanced disease state and a poor prognosis., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Worsening renal function (WRF) during the treatment of decompensated heart failure, frequently defined as an absolute increase in serum creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dl, has been reported as a strong adverse prognostic factor in several studies. We hypothesized that this definition of WRF is biased by baseline renal function secondary to the exponential relationship between creatinine and renal function. Methods: We reviewed consecutive admissions with a discharge diagnosis of heart failure. An increase in creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dl (WRFCREAT) was compared to a decrease in GFR ≥20% (WRFGFR). Results: Overall, 993 admissions met eligibility. WRFCREAT occurred in 31.5% and WRFGFR in 32.7%. WRFCREAT and WRFGFR had opposing relationships with baseline renal function (OR = 1.9 vs. OR = 0.51, respectively, p < 0.001). Both definitions had similar unadjusted associations with death at 30 days [WRFGFR OR = 2.3 (95% CI 1.1–4.8), p = 0.026; WRFCREAT OR = 2.1 (95% CI 1.0–4.4), p = 0.047]. Controlling for baseline renal insufficiency, WRFGFR added incrementally in the prediction of mortality (p = 0.009); however, WRFCREAT did not (p = 0.11). Conclusions: WRF, defined as an absolute change in serum creatinine, is heavily biased by baseline renal function. An alternative definition of WRF should be considered for future studies of cardio-renal interactions. Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]