Search

Background and Aims: Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists (GLP1-RA) has been associated with a reduction of major cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality on the basis of the results of cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOT). Several meta-analyses on this issue have been recently published; however, they were all restricted to CVOT, with the exclusion of all studies designed for other endpoints; moreover, other cardiovascular endpoints, such as atrial fibrillation and heart failure have not been fully explored., Methods and Results: A Medline search for GLP-1 receptor agonists (exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, albiglutide, dulaglutide, or semaglutide) was performed, collecting all randomized clinical trials with a duration ≥52 weeks, enrolling patients with type 2 diabetes, and comparing a GLP-1 receptor agonist with placebo or any other non-GLP-1 receptor agonist drug. We included 43 trials, enrolling 63,134 patients. A significant reduction of MACE (MH-OR 0.87 [0.83, 0.92]), all-cause mortality (MH-OR 0.89 [0.83, 0.96]), and a nonstatistical trend toward reduction of heart failure (MH-OR 0.93 [0.85, 1.01]) was observed - GLP1-RA did not increase the risk of atrial fibrillation (MH-OR 0.94 [0.84, 1.04])., Conclusion: The present meta-analysis confirms the favorable effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on major cardiovascular events, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, stroke, and possibly myocardial infarction. Conversely, the effects on heart failure remain uncertain. Available data on atrial fibrillation seems to exclude any major safety issues in this respect., Registration Number (prospero): CRD42018115577., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest BN is presently employee of Novo Nordisk; ID has received speaking fees from Novonordisk; FT has no conflicts of interest to declare; EM has received consultancy fees from Merck and Novartis speaking fees from Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli-Lilly, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Novartis and research grants from Merck, Novartis, and Takeda. GS has received speaking fees from Novo Nordisk, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Astra Zeneca, L-Nutra, Theras, Sanofi, Mundipharma, Omikron, and Novartis, and consultancy fees from Servier, Novo Nordisk, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Astra Zeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Sanofi, Amgem and GlaxoSmithKline; MM has received speaking fees from Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eli-Lilly, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Novartis and research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb. All the authors approved the final version of this manuscript. Dr. Matteo Monami is the person who takes full responsibility for the work as a whole, including the study design, access to data, and the decision to submit and publish the manuscript., (Copyright © 2020 The Italian Diabetes Society, the Italian Society for the Study of Atherosclerosis, the Italian Society of Human Nutrition and the Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP1-RA) has been associated with cholelithiasis in a previous meta-analysis. The publication of new trials suggests the need for an update. We collected trials with GLP1-RA vs. other therapies, calculating Mantel-Haenszel odds ratio (MH-OR, 95%CI). GLP1-RA significantly increased the risk of cholelithiasis (MH-OR 1.28 [1.11, 1.48])., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To conduct a meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials on the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)., Methods: A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane database and clinicaltrials.gov was performed to identify controlled trials (up to 15 June 2019) of GLP-1RAs with a cardiovascular endpoint. The principal endpoint of the present meta-analysis was MACE; secondary endpoints included myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, and hospitalization for heart failure. Mantel-Haenszel odds ratios (MH-ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for all outcomes., Results: In the seven trials included, all placebo-controlled, GLP-1RA treatment was associated with a reduction in MACE (MH-OR 0.87 [95% CI 0.81, 0.93]). Cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction and stroke were also reduced (MH-OR 0.88 [95% CI 0.80, 0.96], MH-OR 0.90 [95% CI 0.82, 0.98], MH-OR 0.91 [95% CI 0.84, 0.98] and MH-OR 0.86 [95% CI 0.77, 0.97], respectively). Results for hospitalization for heart failure were not statistically significant (MH-OR 0.93 [95% CI 0.83, 1.04]). The meta-analyses of patient subgroups showed a significant reduction in MACE with GLP-1RAs, irrespective of gender, advanced age and obesity., Conclusions: GLP-1RAs are associated with a reduction in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in high-risk patients with diabetes. This effect does not appear to be moderated by gender or body mass index. The possibility of different effects of GLP-1RAs between patients in primary and secondary prevention merits further investigation., (© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Aims: The aim of the present meta-analysis is the identification of the characteristics of patients, which predict the efficacy on HbA1c of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA)., Methods: A Medline and Embase search for "exenatide" OR "liraglutide" OR "albiglutide" OR "dulaglutide" OR "lixisenatide" was performed, collecting randomized clinical trials (duration > 12 weeks) up to September 2016, comparing GLP-1 RA at the maximal approved dose with placebo or active drugs. Furthermore, unpublished studies were searched in the www.clinicaltrials.gov register. For meta-analyses, the outcome considered were 24- and 52-week HbA1c. Separate analyses were performed, whenever possible, for subgroups of trials based on several inclusion criteria. In addition, meta-regression analyses were performed for comparisons for which 10 or more trails were available., Results: A total of 92 trials fulfilling the inclusion criteria were identified. In placebo-controlled trials (n = 41), the 24-week mean reduction of HbA1c with GLP-1 RA was - 0.75 [- 0.87; - 0.63]%. Shorter-acting molecules appear to be more effective in patients with lower fasting glucose, whereas longer-acting agents in patients with higher fasting hyperglycaemia. Obesity and duration of diabetes do not seem to moderate the efficacy of GLP-1 RA, whereas in non-Caucasians and older patients liraglutide could be less effective. At 52 weeks, only 9 placebo-controlled trials were available for preventing any reliable analyses., Conclusions: Using a variety of approaches (meta-analyses of subgroup of trials, meta-regression, systematic review of subgroup analyses in individual trials, and meta-analyses of subgroups of patients), we identified some putative predictors of efficacy of GLP-1 RA, which deserve further investigation.

Aims: Results with GLP1-receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) on microvascular complications of diabetes are contrasting. In trials designed for cardiovascular outcomes, both liraglutide and semaglutide were associated with a relevant reduction in the incidence and progression of nephropathy. On the other hand, in the same trials, semaglutide was associated with an increased progression of retinopathy, and a similar trend was observed for liraglutide. This meta-analysis is aimed at assessing the effects of GLP-1RA on retinopathy and nephropathy., Methods: A Medline search for GLP-1 receptor agonists (exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, albiglutide, dulaglutide, or semaglutide) was performed, collecting all randomized clinical trials with a duration >11 weeks, enrolling patients with type 2 diabetes, and comparing a GLP-1 receptor agonist with placebo or any other non-GLP-1 receptor agonist drug., Results: Of the 113 trials fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 78 and 62 did not report information on retinopathy and nephropathy, respectively. Treatment with GLP1-RA was not associated with a significant increase in the incidence of retinopathy (MH-OR [95% CI] 0.92 [0.74-1.16]. p = 0.49). In subgroup analyses, GLP1-RA were associated with a lower risk of retinopathy in comparison with sulfonylureas. Cases of macular edema were reported only in nine trials with no sign of increased risk. GLP1-RA reduced the incidence of nephropathy with respect to comparators (MH-OR [95% CI] 0.74 [0.60-0.92]. p = 0.005). This difference was significant versus placebo, but not versus any class of active comparators., Conclusions: GLP1-RA appear to reduce the incidence and/or progression of nephropathy and to have no specific effect on retinopathy-with the notable exception of semaglutide, which could have a negative impact on the retina.

Aim: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) have been associated with an increased risk of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Prior meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials failed to show any significant increase of risk; however, those meta-analyses did not include the recently published cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOT) with GLP1-RA, which provide a substantial additional body of data. The aim of the present meta-analysis is to assess the effect of GLP1-RA on pancreatitis, pancreatic cancers and cholelithiasis., Materials and Methods: A Medline search for GLP-1 receptor agonists (exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, albiglutide, dulaglutide or semaglutide) was performed, collecting all randomized clinical trials with a duration >11 weeks, enrolling patients with type 2 diabetes and comparing a GLP-1 receptor agonist with placebo or any other non-GLP-1 receptor agonist drug., Results: Of the 113 trials fulfilling inclusion criteria, 13 did not report information on pancreatitis, whereas 72 reported no events in all treatment groups. The incidence of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer with GLP1-RA was not significantly different from that observed in comparator arms (MH-OR [95% CI] 0.93 [0.65-1.34], P = .71, and 0.94 [0.52-1.70], P = .84, respectively), whereas, a significantly increased risk of cholelithiasis (MH-OR [95% CI] 1.30 [1.01-1.68], P = .041) was detected., Conclusions: Presently available data confirm the safety of GLP-1 receptor agonists for pancreatitis. Conversely, therapy with those drugs is associated with an increased risk of cholelithiasis, which deserves further investigation., (© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)