Search

The transport of classical neurotransmitters into synaptic vesicles generally relies on a H+ electrochemical gradient (∆μ H+). Synaptic vesicle uptake of glutamate depends primarily on the electrical component ∆ψ as the driving force, rather than the chemical component ∆pH. However, the vesicular glutamate transporters (VGLUTs) belong to the solute carrier 17 (SLC17) family, which includes closely related members that function as H+ cotransporters. Recent work has also shown that the VGLUTs undergo allosteric regulation by H+ and Cl−, and exhibit an associated Cl− conductance. These properties appear to coordinate VGLUT activity with the large ionic shifts that accompany the rapid recycling of synaptic vesicles driven by neural activity. Recent structural information also suggests common mechanisms that underlie the apparently divergent function of SLC17 family members, and that confer allosteric regulation. • Protons and chloride allosterically activate the VGLUTs • The VGLUTs exhibit an associated chloride conductance • Allosteric regulation coordinates glutamate transport with the SV cycle • The SLC17 family includes transporters with diverse activities • Structure of a bacterial homologue suggests the mechanism for allosteric activation [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Members of the solute carrier 17 (SLC17) family use divergent mechanisms to concentrate organic anions. Membrane potential drives uptake of the principal excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate into synaptic vesicles, whereas closely related proteins use proton cotransport to drive efflux from the lysosome. To delineate the divergent features of ionic coupling by the SLC17 family, we determined the structure of Escherichia coli D-galactonate/H+ symporter D-galactonate transporter (DgoT) in 2 states: one open to the cytoplasmic side and the other open to the periplasmic side with substrate bound. The structures suggest a mechanism that couples H+ flux to substrate recognition. A transition in the role of H+ from flux coupling to allostery may confer regulation by trafficking to and from the plasma membrane. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In contrast to temporal coding by synaptically acting neurotransmitters such as glutamate, neuromodulators such as monoamines signal changes in firing rate. The two modes of signaling have been thought to reflect differences in release by different cells. We now find that midbrain dopamine neurons release glutamate and dopamine with different properties that reflect storage in different synaptic vesicles. The vesicles differ in release probability, coupling to presynaptic Ca2+ channels and frequency dependence. Although previous work has attributed variation in these properties to differences in location or cytoskeletal association of synaptic vesicles, the release of different transmitters shows that intrinsic differences in vesicle identity drive different modes of release. Indeed, dopamine but not glutamate vesicles depend on the adaptor protein AP-3, revealing an unrecognized linkage between the pathway of synaptic vesicle recycling and the properties of exocytosis. Storage of the two transmitters in different vesicles enables the transmission of distinct signals. • Dopamine neurons release glutamate and dopamine with different probability • Coreleased glutamate and dopamine differ in coupling to presynaptic Ca2+ channels • Neurons make two types of synaptic vesicle that differ in response to stimulation • AP-3 is required specifically for formation of synaptic vesicles storing dopamine In this work on glutamate corelease by dopamine neurons, Silm et al. show that an individual neuron expresses two classes of synaptic vesicle that form through distinct mechanisms and transmit distinct information due to differences in frequency dependence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]