1. Short- and long-term effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes.
- Author
-
Vigersky RA, Fonda SJ, Chellappa M, Walker MS, and Ehrhardt NM
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Computer Systems, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 physiopathology, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Weight Loss, Blood Glucose metabolism, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring methods, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 blood, Glycated Hemoglobin metabolism, Monitoring, Physiologic methods
- Abstract
Objective: To determine whether short-time, real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT-CGM) has long-term salutary glycemic effects in patients with type 2 diabetes who are not on prandial insulin., Research Design and Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial of 100 adults with type 2 diabetes who were not on prandial insulin. This study compared the effects of 12 weeks of intermittent RT-CGM with self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) on glycemic control over a 40-week follow-up period. Subjects received diabetes care from their regular provider without therapeutic intervention from the study team., Results: There was a significant difference in A1C at the end of the 3-month active intervention that was sustained during the follow-up period. The mean, unadjusted A1C decreased by 1.0, 1.2, 0.8, and 0.8% in the RT-CGM group vs. 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, and 0.2% in the SMBG group at 12, 24, 38, and 52 weeks, respectively (P = 0.04). There was a significantly greater decline in A1C over the course of the study for the RT-CGM group than for the SMBG group, after adjusting for covariates (P < 0.0001). The subjects who used RT-CGM per protocol (≥48 days) improved the most (P < 0.0001). The improvement in the RT-CGM group occurred without a greater intensification of medication compared with those in the SMBG group., Conclusions: Subjects with type 2 diabetes not on prandial insulin who used RT-CGM intermittently for 12 weeks significantly improved glycemic control at 12 weeks and sustained the improvement without RT-CGM during the 40-week follow-up period, compared with those who used only SMBG.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF