Search

Objective: Functional hypothalamic amenorrhoea (FHA) is a consequence of low dietary intake as observed in two major pathophysiological conditions, anorexia nervosa and/or intensive physical exercise. The aim of the present study was to assess in women with FHA and normal body mass index (BMI) and apparently normal daily activities, the degree of impairment of GnRH secretion, its nutritional origin and its reversibility., Patients: Twelve women (22-35 years) with FHA not related with exercise and 12 age and BMI matched menstruating controls (NC) were studied. Six women with congenital hypothalamic hypogonadism (CHH), representative of complete gonadotrophin deficiency, were also enrolled for comparison., Design: Plasma oestradiol (E2) and androstenedione (A) levels were measured and the pulsatile profile of LH was studied. A GnRH agonist test, using 100 micrograms S/C of DTrp6 GnRH (Triptorelin) was performed (sampling every 2 h for 24 h). Dietary intake, body composition and nutritional markers (FT3, ferritin, retinol binding protein (RBP), SHBG, IGF-1 and leptin) were measured. All the women with FHA were advised to normalize their diet during four months. The same studies were performed if nutritional markers and body composition were normalized., Results: In FHA, mean plasma E2 and A levels were low. LH pulse frequency and amplitude were significantly reduced compared to NC (P < 0.005). FSH/LH ratio increased rapidly after triptorelin with a significant increase in plasma E2 levels between 18 and 24 h. In contrast, no response to triptorelin was observed in women with CHH. The fat body mass was lower and the lean body mass higher in FHA than in NC. Marked differences in nutritional intake were identified, with altered dietary composition. FHA consumed significantly less fat (P < 0.001) and less carbohydrate (P = NS) than the BMI-matched controls. Mean plasma levels of SHBG were increased whereas mean plasma levels of FT3, ferritin, RBP, IGF-1, and leptin were significantly decreased. Only three patients with FHA kept a balanced diet and improved their body composition after 4 months. LH pulsatile profile and response to triptorelin challenge were normalized in these patients., Conclusion: Mild dieting, close to normal but prolonged and characterized by an important fat restriction, is able to interfere with gonadotrophin secretion. Assessment of nutritional markers allows recognition of mild nutritional insufficiency as a common cause of FHAs. The gonadotrophin deficiency is partial and may be reversible after improvement of nutritional intake and body composition.

In functional hypothalamic amenorrhea (HA), it has been reported that administration of opioid receptor antagonists restores gonadotropin secretion and ovarian function. However, endogenous opioids may modulate gonadotropin secretion only in the presence of ovarian steroids. To further study these conflicting results, a group of nine women with secondary functional HA who wished to become pregnant were studied. The opiate antagonist naltrexone (Nal; 100 mg/day) was administered for two 30-day periods, starting on either day 22 (Nal 1) of a well characterized replacement regimen with estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P), or on day 22 (Nal 2) of the luteal phase induced by exogenous pulsatile GnRH administration (10 micrograms/pulse, iv, every 90 min). Plasma LH and FSH were measured every 10 min for 8 h before treatment and on day 12 of each treatment period (Nal 1, pulsatile GnRH, and Nal 2). Ovulation was monitored during each treatment. Plasma E2 levels were measured on days 12 and 22, and P levels on day 22 of each treatment. During exogenous E2 and P administration, plasma steroid levels reached luteal phase levels. However, during Nal 1, plasma E2 levels fell to prestudy levels and remained low. No follicular growth occurred, and the pulsatile study showed pretreatment frequency, amplitude, and mean plasma levels of LH. On day 12 of pulsatile GnRH administration, plasma E2 levels increased, and LH and FSH pulses followed each GnRH pulse during the frequent sampling study. Ovulation occurred in all women during pulsatile GnRH treatment. During Nal 2 treatment, plasma E2 levels returned to prestudy levels without follicular growth, and the pulsatile study was similar to those prior treatment and during Nal 1 administration. In conclusion, Nal, started during priming either with exogenous E2 and P treatment or gonadotropin stimulation induced by pulsatile GnRH administration, was unable when continued alone to initiate or maintain gonadotropin secretion in women with HA. Thus, the exclusive role of opioids in HA and the effect of Nal even in the presence of ovarian steroids are questionable.

Plasma bioactive (B) and immunoreactive (I) FSH and LH were measured every 10 min for 8 h in the same postmenopausal women in a three-phase study: 1) during normal pulsatile gonadotropin secretion (basal study; n = 8), 2) 8 h after a single injection of a GnRH antagonist (5 mg Nal-Glu, sc; n = 5), and 3) 21 days after a GnRH agonist injection (D-Trp6, 3.75 mg depot preparation, im; n = 7). I-FSH and I-LH were measured by monoclonal antibody immunoradiometric assays. B-FSH and B-LH were measured in selected samples with the immature rat granulosa cell and mouse interstitial cell assays, respectively. Significant pulsatility of B- and I-FSH and LH was demonstrated in the basal samples, but only the B/I ratio of LH was slightly elevated within the secretion peaks. After GnRH antagonist treatment, I-FSH decreased from a mean pretreatment level of 55.7 +/- 7.8 IU/L by 26% (P less than 0.001), and B-FSH from 313.8 +/- 61.9 IU/L by 44% (P less than 0.01). The B/I ratio decreased from 6.4 +/- 1.7 to 4.5 +/- 1.0 (P less than 0.05). After agonist treatment, the I- and B-FSH levels decreased by 92% and 83% (P less than 0.0001), respectively, but the B/I ratio increased to 17.3 +/- 4.7 (P less than 0.05). The concentrations of I- and B-LH decreased by 75% and 80%, respectively (P less than 0.001), after antagonist treatment. After agonist treatment, I-LH decreased by 92%, and B-LH by 93% (P less than 0.0001). No changes in the B/I ratios of LH were found after either treatment. In conclusion, no changes were found in the quality of circulating LH during the treatments, whereas the antagonist treatment decreased and the agonist treatment increased the B/I ratio of FSH. These findings provide further evidence that the qualitative responses of FSH and LH to treatment with the same GnRH analog are different, and that the suppressive mechanisms of GnRH antagonist and agonist action on gonadotropin secretion are different.

To determine if progesterone (P) does affect gonadotropin secretion by acting directly on the pituitary, six women with hypothalamic gonadotropin deficiency were studied. They were treated with 17 beta-estradiol (E2; 2 mg/day, orally) to induce P receptors and maintain constant plasma E2 levels during two 15-day periods separated by 1 month. GnRH was administered iv at a dose of 10 microgram/pulse every 90 min during the last 5 days of E2 treatment. Either P (400 mg/day) or a placebo was administered intravaginally in a cross-over randomized design during the 5 days of pulsatile GnRH therapy. A baseline study of pulsatile LH secretion was performed, with sampling performed every 10 min for 8 h. The sampling was then repeated on day 15 of each study period at the end of pulsatile GnRH administration. Plasma levels of E2 and P were measured every day during the 5 days of either GnRH and P or GnRH and placebo treatment. In the six patients, the observed apulsatile pattern of LH during the baseline study confirmed the diagnosis of complete gonadotropin deficiency. Plasma E2 levels were not significantly different at the time of each pulse analysis (288 +/- 61 vs. 252 +/- 77 pmol/L). The plasma P level achieved with the vaginal pessaries was 22 +/- 5 nmol/L. P treatment resulted in all cases in a significant increase in the mean plasma LH level (5.2 +/- 0.9 vs. 3.6 +/- 0.7 IU/L after GnRH plus placebo; P less than 0.001). Furthermore, LH pulse amplitude was significantly increased by P compared to placebo (3.1 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.4 +/- 0.1 IU/L, respectively; P less than 0.01). Mean plasma FSH levels were significantly increased by GnRH regardless of whether P or placebo was present. In conclusion, these data indicate that a short exposure to physiological levels of P in the range of early luteal phase levels has a stimulatory effect on LH secretion by acting directly at the pituitary level.

Objective: The present study was designed to further assess the mechanism of action of GnRH and GnRH analogues., Design and Patients: Both the Nal-Glu GnRH antagonist and the D-Trp6 GnRH agonist were administered sequentially to nine normal, post-menopausal women., Measurements: A baseline study of pulsatile LH, FSH and free alpha-subunit secretion was performed, with sampling every 10 min for 8 h, and then repeated 8 h after a single subcutaneous injection of Nal-Glu GnRH antagonist (5 mg). Sampling was repeated 21 days after the intramuscular injection of a depot preparation of D-Trp6 GnRH (3.75 mg) in the same women., Results: The baseline sampling period showed synchronous pulses of LH and free alpha-subunit. The antagonist Nal-Glu decreased plasma LH (71%) and free alpha-subunit (43%). However, with the single dose of 5 mg, pulsatile LH and free alpha-subunit release were not completely suppressed and remained temporally correlated. The GnRH agonist had a potent inhibitory action on plasma immunoreactive LH (IRMA) (93%). In contrast, it increased the mean plasma levels of free alpha-subunit from 1.66 +/- 0.01 to 5.06 +/- 0.02 micrograms/l (205%). The pulsatile secretory patterns of both LH and free alpha-subunit were abolished by the agonist. Immunoreactive FSH levels were decreased by the antagonist (24%) and suppressed by the agonist (93%)., Conclusions: The pulsatile study confirms the different mechanism of action of GnRH analogues. Following antagonist administration, low amplitude free alpha-subunit pulses persist and are synchronous with residual LH pulses. In contrast, LH and free alpha-subunit are not maintained under agonist treatment. These data provide evidence for the differential regulation of LH and free alpha-subunit by GnRH.

In two patients with severe hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism intermittent pulsatile delivery of gonadotrophin hormone (LHRH) 5 to 20 micrograms every 90 minutes by means of the Zyklomat pump promptly resulted in ovulation and pregnancy. The comparative effectiveness of the intravenous and subcutaneous routes was evaluated by radioimmuno assay of LHRH in plasma. The pulsatile patterns of LH was satisfactory with both routes, but plasma levels of LHRH were about 7 times lower with the subcutaneous route. The dosage range (5-20 micrograms) of LHRH must be adjusted to the severity of the hypothalamic deficiency and to the route of administration. The use of the pump, the monitoring of ovulation and the indications for this type of treatment are discussed.

A randomized cross-over study was done to compare the therapeutic efficacy of cyproterone acetate (CPA, 50 mg/day orally) and a depot preparation of the LHRH superagonist (D-Trp6 LHRH 3 mg i.m. once a month) in 10 patients with polycystic ovarian disease (PCO). The two treatment periods were separated by 6 months. Both treatments resulted in marked clinical improvement. In response to CPA treatment, basal plasma gonadotropin, estradiol, estrone, testosterone and androstenedione levels significantly decreased. In response to D-Trp6 LHRH, both basal and stimulated gonadotropin levels were completely suppressed after 3 weeks of treatment. After initial elevation on day 2, plasma ovarian steroid levels fell into the castrate range, without any change in dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels. Urinary 3 alpha-androstanediol excretion decreased significantly. In patients with PCO, LHRH-A induced more complete gonadotropin inhibition than did CPA. However, following cessation of either therapy, the disease rapidly recurred.

To investigate the efficacy of the different routes of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) administration upon pituitary responsiveness, we compared plasma LHRH concentrations and pituitary LH responses in four patients with hypothalamic amenorrhea treated with pulsatile LHRH. A portable computerized infusion pump delivered sc or iv LHRH pulses of 5, 10 or 20 micrograms every 90 min. Comparison of the two modes of LHRH delivery was performed using radioimmunoassay of exogenous LHRH and studying its pharmacokinetics for a 3 pulses period. With 10 micrograms of LHRH given iv, plasma LHRH levels increased between 700 and 1000 pg/ml within 3 min and returned to basal levels in 30 min. When given sc (10 micrograms), plasma LHRH levels peaked between 80 and 100 pg/ml in 15 min and returned to basal levels 60 min later. In one patient treated with 5 micrograms per pulse iv or sc, plasma LHRH increased to 380 and 60 pg/ml respectively. In all patients, computerized analysis of LH pulses was performed during sc and iv LHRH administration. LH pulsatile release displayed a similar rhythm period with both routes. However, for the same dose of LHRH (10 micrograms), the adjusted mean of LH plasma levels was lower with the sc route. In conclusions, the pharmacokinetics of LHRH administered sc or iv displayed a similar pattern but, with equivalent doses, higher plasma LHRH levels are attained with the iv route. Concomitantly, the mean LH levels were also greater after iv administration. Ovulation can be successfully induced by both pulsatile iv and sc LHRH therapy. However, with the sc route, a higher dose of LHRH should be used to prevent a delay of ovulation or a luteal deficiency.

A randomized cross-over study was done to compare the therapeutic efficacy of cyproterone acetate (CPA) and a depot preparation of the LHRH superagonist (DTrp6-LHRH) in 10 patients with polycystic ovarian disease (PCO). All patients were treated with both agents (50 mg/day CPA, orally and (3 mg DTrp6-LHRH, im, approximately once a month) for 3 months, the 2 treatment periods being separated by 6 months. Both treatments resulted in marked clinical improvement, with diminished acne and seborrhoea and normalization of ovarian size by ultrasonographic criteria. In response to CPA treatment, basal plasma gonadotropin levels decreased, but the response to a LHRH test was not completely suppressed. Plasma estradiol, estrone, testosterone, and androstenedione levels significantly decreased, but urinary 3 alpha-androstanediol and plasma dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels did not change significantly. In contrast to CPA treatment, both basal and stimulated gonadotropin levels were completely suppressed after 3 weeks of treatment with DTrp6-LHRH. After a slight initial evaluation on day 2, plasma estrogen and androgen levels, with the exception of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate fell into the castrate range urinary 3 alpha-androstanediol excretion decreased significantly. Thus, in patients with PCO, LHRH-A induced more complete gonadotropin inhibition than did CPA. After cessation of either therapy, the disease rapidly recurred.