Search

Purpose of Review: Sensitization to human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) limits access to potential donors and contributes to inferior graft survival after transplantation. In this article, we will review the effects of HLA-specific antibodies on intestinal transplant outcomes, and discuss considerations in the monitoring and treatment of anti-HLA antibodies., Recent Findings: Only a handful of studies has investigated the effects of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSAs) on intestinal allograft outcomes. Most have reported associations between DSA presence and rejection-related graft failure. The evolution of antibody detection methods and improvements in crossmatch testing have allowed for a systematic approach to the broadly sensitized transplant candidate, and facilitated the identification of compatible organ donors. The virtual crossmatch can be used to aid in organ allocation and avoid transplantation across preformed DSA. However, much remains unknown about the mechanisms of antibody-mediated injury in the intestinal graft, and the effectiveness of current therapies against DSA has yet to be established., Summary: On the basis of available data, we will provide recommendations for the testing and management of DSA among intestinal transplant recipients. The precise management protocol should be tailored to each individual based on immunologic risk as well as clinical status.

More than ten years after the initial description of the humoral theory of transplantation by Dr. Paul I. Terasaki, the significance of humoral alloimmunity in liver transplantation has yet to be clearly defined. The liver allograft has an inherent tolerogenic capacity which confers its resistance to cell-mediated as well as antibody-mediated rejection. Nevertheless, the protection against alloimmunity is not complete, and antibody-mediated tissue injury can occur in the liver graft under specific circumstances. In this article the evidence on the clinicopathologic effects of donor-specific alloantibodies in liver transplantation will be examined and interpreted in parallel with lessons learned from renal transplantation. The unique anatomic and immunologic features of the liver will be reviewed to gain new insights into the complex interactions between humoral immune system and the liver allograft., Competing Interests: The author declares that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Advances in immunosuppression (IS) agents and strategies have resulted in reduced rejection rates and improved survival outcomes after liver transplantation. The use of induction and maintenance IS agents is both associated with reductions in acute rejection (AR) risk within the first 6 to 12 months posttransplant and with superior failure-free survival. With the lowered incidence of allograft losses attributable to rejection, the long-term sequelae of IS have become the major therapeutic challenge. The long-term use of calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroids in maintenance immunotherapy regimens has been implicated in the development of renal dysfunction, infections, metabolic derangements, de novo and recurrent malignancies, and the propagation of hepatitis C virus reinfection. Our analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing registry shows the use of induction and maintenance therapy is each associated with reductions in AR risk, thereby improving post-transplant survival. The administration of intensive induction regimens appears to be safe and exhibits an additive beneficial effect. Therefore, the use of intensive induction regimens may be warranted to allow for reductions in long-term maintenance IS to minimize drug toxicities while preserving graft outcomes.

Background: Renal transplant outcomes in Hispanics have been conflicting regarding acute rejection (AR) and allograft survival. Additionally, the feasibility of early corticosteroid withdrawal (ECW) regimens among Hispanics has not been adequately addressed. The purpose of this study is to report outcomes following ECW among Hispanic renal transplant recipients., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 498 consecutive renal transplants performed at our institution between July 2005 and October 2007, including 73 Hispanic and 146 white recipients who had ECW (median follow-up 49 months). Demographics, transplant data, and outcomes of Hispanic and white recipients (WR) were analyzed., Results: Hispanics had a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus and hypertension (p = 0.007), a higher proportion of blood type O (p = 0.006), and a higher serum panel reactive antibody at the time of transplantation (p = 0.02) compared with WR. Additionally, Hispanics were on dialysis longer than WR prior to transplantation (p = 0.03). Nevertheless, the incidence of AR, patient, and graft survival rates was similar (p > 0.05) between Hispanics and WR. Ethnicity was not an independent predictor of inferior patient and graft outcomes in multivariate analyses., Conclusion: Our single-center experience indicates that ECW can be performed in Hispanic renal transplant recipients, with patient and allograft outcomes comparable with those observed in WR., (© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

BackgroundRejection remains the leading cause of allograft loss, and a major barrier to improving long-term outcomes after intestinal transplantation. Our aim is to define the prevalence and investigate the role of donor-specific antibody (DSA) on intestinal graft outcomes.MethodsThe study includes 109 transplants performed in 95 recipients at a single center. Patients were screened for DSA pretransplant, monitored regularly posttransplant and when clinically indicated using the single-antigen bead Luminex assay. Standard induction immunosuppression was with interleukin-2 receptor antagonists, and antithymocyte globulin in high-risk recipients. Maintenance regimens were tacrolimus-based.ResultsPretransplant DSA was detected in 12 (11%) recipients with 50% continuing to have circulating antibodies posttransplant. An additional 24 (25%) patients developed de novo DSA, and of these, 71% had persistent antibodies. Recipients with preformed DSA demonstrated elevated risks of early graft failure, whereas those with de novo DSA experienced accelerated graft loss once DSA was detected, reaching a 28% failure rate within 2 years. HLA-DQ mismatch is a significant risk factor for de novo DSA emergence, whereas the persistence of antibodies is predicted by DSA strength and specificity. Although inclusion of the liver in the intestinal allograft imparts an immunological advantage against rejection-related graft loss, this protective effect was lost among recipients with persistent DSA.ConclusionsThe presence of DSA is associated with inferior graft outcomes among intestinal transplant recipients. An enhanced understanding of the mechanisms by which DSA causes allograft injury, and effective strategies targeting humoral immune reactivity are needed to improve long-term intestinal graft outcomes.