Search

Background: Current monitoring after heart transplantation (HT) employs repeated invasive endomyocardial biopsies (EMB). Although positive EMB confirms rejection, EMB fails to predict impending, subclinical, or EMB-negative rejection events. While non-human leukocyte antigen (non-HLA) antibodies have emerged as important risk factors for antibody-mediated rejection after HT, their use in clinical risk stratification has been limited. A systematic review of the role of non-HLA antibodies in rejection pathologies has the potential to guide efforts to overcome deficiencies of EMB in rejection monitoring., Methods: Databases were searched to include studies on non-HLA antibodies in HT recipients. Data collected included the number of patients, type of rejection, non-HLA antigen studied, association of non-HLA antibodies with rejection, and evidence for synergistic interaction between non-HLA antibodies and donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody (HLA-DSA) responses., Results: A total of 56 studies met the inclusion criteria. Strength of evidence for each non-HLA antibody was evaluated based on the number of articles and patients in support versus against their role in mediating rejection. Importantly, despite previous intense focus on the role of anti-major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related gene A (MICA) and anti-angiotensin II type I receptor antibodies (AT1R) in HT rejection, evidence for their involvement was equivocal. Conversely, the strength of evidence for other non-HLA antibodies supports that differing rejection pathologies are driven by differing non-HLA antibodies., Conclusions: This systematic review underscores the importance of identifying peri-HT non-HLA antibodies. Current evidence supports the role of non-HLA antibodies in all forms of HT rejection. Further investigations are required to define the mechanisms of action of non-HLA antibodies in HT rejection., Competing Interests: Disclosure statement The authors declare they have no conflict of interest. ICJME disclosures completed. L.G.G. received funding from the Mendez National Institute of Transplantation Foundation (Grant# MEN-311437). A.J.P. received a graduate stipend from the Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research (MFMER). This systematic review contains 1 study performed by A.J.P. and L.G.G. The authors acknowledge Mayo Clinic Plummer Library for assisting with full-text retrieval. This work is supported by funding from the Mendez National Institute of Transplantation Foundation (Grant# MEN-311437) and the Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research (MFMER)., (Copyright © 2024 International Society for the Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: After kidney transplantation, donor-specific antibodies against human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSAs) drive antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and are associated with poor transplant outcomes. However, ABMR histology (ABMRh) is increasingly reported in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) without HLA-DSAs, highlighting the emerging role of non-HLA antibodies (Abs)., Methods: W e designed a non-HLA Ab detection immunoassay (NHADIA) using HLA class I and II-deficient glomerular endothelial cells (CiGEnC Δ HLA) that had been previously generated through CRISPR/Cas9-induced B2M and CIITA gene disruption. Flow cytometry assessed the reactivity to non-HLA antigens of pretransplantation serum samples from 389 consecutive KTRs. The intensity of the signal observed with the NHADIA was associated with post-transplant graft histology assessed in 951 adequate biopsy specimens., Results: W e sequentially applied CRISPR/Cas9 to delete the B2M and CIITA genes to obtain a CiGEnC Δ HLA clone. CiGEnC Δ HLA cells remained indistinguishable from the parental cell line, CiGEnC, in terms of morphology and phenotype. Previous transplantation was the main determinant of the pretransplantation NHADIA result ( P <0.001). Stratification of 3-month allograft biopsy specimens ( n =298) according to pretransplantation NHADIA tertiles demonstrated that higher levels of non-HLA Abs positively correlated with increased glomerulitis ( P =0.002), microvascular inflammation ( P =0.003), and ABMRh ( P =0.03). A pretransplantation NHADIA threshold of 1.87 strongly discriminated the KTRs with the highest risk of ABMRh ( P =0.005, log-rank test). A multivariate Cox model confirmed that NHADIA status and HLA-DSAs were independent, yet synergistic, predictors of ABMRh., Conclusion: The NHADIA identifies non-HLA Abs and strongly predicts graft endothelial injury independent of HLA-DSAs., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Background: Non-HLA antibodies against endothelial targets have been implicated in the pathogenesis of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), but data in pediatric patients are scarce., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed a carefully phenotyped single-center (University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Germany) cohort of 62 pediatric kidney transplant recipients (mean age at transplantation, 8.6 ± 5.0 years) at increased risk of graft function deterioration. Patients had received their transplant between January 1, 1999, and January 31, 2010. We examined at time of late index biopsies (more than 1-year post-transplant, occurring after January 2004) the association of antibodies against the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT 1 R), the endothelin type A receptor (ET A R), the MHC class I chain-like gene A (MICA), and vimentin in conjunction with overall and complement-binding donor-specific HLA antibodies (HLA-DSA) with graft histology and function., Results: We observed a high prevalence (62.9%) of non-HLA antibody positivity. Seventy-two percent of HLA-DSA positive patients showed additional positivity for at least one non-HLA antibody. Antibodies against AT 1 R, ET A R, and MICA were associated with the histological phenotype of ABMR. The cumulative load of HLA-DSA and non-HLA antibodies in circulation was related to the degree of microinflammation in peritubular capillaries. Non-HLA antibody positivity was an independent non-invasive risk factor for graft function deterioration (adjusted hazard ratio 6.38, 95% CI, 2.11-19.3)., Conclusions: Our data indicate that the combined detection of antibodies to HLA and non-HLA targets may allow a more comprehensive assessment of the patients' immune responses against the kidney allograft and facilitates immunological risk stratification.

Background: Correlation between antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and circulating HLA donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSA) is strong but imperfect in kidney transplant (KT) recipients, raising the possibility of undetected HLA-DSA or non-HLA antibodies contributing to ABMR. Detailed evaluation of the degree of HLA matching together with the identification of non-HLA antibodies in KT may help to decipher the antibody involved., Methods: We retrospectively assessed patients with transplant biopsies scored following Banff'15 classification. Pre- and post-transplant serum samples were checked for HLA and non-HLA antibodies [MICA-Ab, angiotensin-II type-1-receptor (AT 1 R)-Ab, endothelin-1 type-A-receptor (ETAR)-Ab and crossmatches with primary aortic endothelial cells (EC-XM)]. We also analyzed HLA epitope mismatches (HLA-EM) between donors and recipients to explore their role in ABMR histology (ABMR h ) with and without HLA-DSA., Results: One-hundred eighteen patients with normal histology (n = 19), ABMR h (n = 52) or IFTA (n = 47) were studied. ABMR h patients were HLA-DSA pos (n = 38, 73%) or HLA-DSA neg (n = 14, 27%). Pre-transplant HLA-DSA and AT 1 R-Ab were more frequent in ABMR h compared with IFTA and normal histology cases (p = 0.006 and 0.003), without differences in other non-HLA antibodies. Only three ABMR h DSA neg cases showed non-HLA antibodies. ABMR h DSA neg and ABMR h DSA pos cases showed similar biopsy changes and graft-survival. Both total class II and DRB1 HLA-EM were associated with ABMR h DSA pos but not with ABMR h DSA neg . Multivariate analysis showed that pre-transplant HLA-DSA (OR: 3.69 [1.31-10.37], p = 0.013) and AT 1 R-Ab (OR: 5.47 [1.78-16.76], p = 0.003) were independent predictors of ABMR h DSA pos ., Conclusions: In conclusion, pre-transplant AT 1 R-Ab is frequently found in ABMR h DSA pos patients. However, AT 1 R-Ab, MICA-Ab, ETAR-Ab or EC-XM + are rarely found among ABMR h DSA neg patients. Pre-transplant AT 1 R-Ab may act synergistically with preformed or de novo HLA-DSA to produce ABMR h DSA pos but not ABMR h DSA neg . HLA epitope mismatch associates with ABMR h DSA pos compared with ABMR h DSA neg , suggesting factors other than HLA are responsible for the damage., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Crespo, Llinàs-Mallol, Redondo-Pachón, Butler, Gimeno, Pérez-Sáez, Burballa, Buxeda, Arias-Cabrales, Folgueiras, Sanz-Ureña, Valenzuela, Reed and Pascual.)

Background: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody (AT1R-Ab) is a non-HLA antibody that has been reported to cause antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss in kidney transplantation. The prevalence of positive AT1R-Ab varies between 8% and 18% in different regions. Thus, this study aims to determine the prevalence of AT1R-Ab among the Malaysian population., Methodology: All sera for AT1R-Ab were collected at the University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The sera were centrifuged and kept refrigerated at -80 °C before being transported to the South Australian Transplantation and Immunogenetics Laboratory (SATIS). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (One Lambda) was used for the detection of AT1R-Ab, and it was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The level of >17.1 U/mL was considered to be AT1R-Ab positive; 10.0-17.1 U/mL at risk, and <10.0 U/mL negative., Results: A total of 115 samples were collected from 99 patients pre and post-kidney transplant recipients. From the pre-transplant sera (n = 68) 17.7% were positive, 35.3% were at risk and 47.0% were negative. The positive AT1R-Ab cohort were relatively younger, with a mean age of 34.7 ± 8.3 years old and statistically significant, with a p-value of 0.028. Among the sera that were tested positive, 19.0% were from the Chinese ethnicity, 6.7% from Malay and 16.7% from Indian. There was no difference in the rejection episodes, persistent or de novo HLA-DSA, and graft function between the group (AT1R-Ab negative vs AT1R-Ab at risk and positive) and the results were consistent in a model adjusted for all potential confounders., Conclusion: The prevalence of positive (>17.1 U/mL) pre-transplant AT1R-Ab was 17.7% and 35.3% were at risk (10.0-17.1 U/mL) in our pre-transplant cohort., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Non-HLA antibodies, anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (anti-AT1R) and anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECA), are known to play a role in allograft rejection. We evaluated the role of both antibodies in predicting post-transplant outcomes in low-risk living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) recipients., Methods: In 94 consecutive LDKT recipients who were ABO compatible and negative for pre-transplant HLA donor-specific antibodies, we determined the levels of anti-AT1Rs using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the presence of AECAs using a flow cytometric endothelial cell crossmatch (ECXM) assay with pre-transplant sera. Hazard ratio (HR) was calculated to predict post-transplant outcomes., Results: Pre-transplant anti-AT1Rs (≥11.5 U/mL) and AECAs were observed in 36 (38.3%) and 22 recipients (23.4%), respectively; 11 recipients had both. Pre-transplant anti-AT1Rs were a significant risk factor for the development of acute rejection (AR) (HR 2.09; P=0.018), while a positive AECA status was associated with AR or microvascular inflammation only (HR 2.47; P=0.004) throughout the follow-up period. In particular, AECA (+) recipients with ≥11.5 U/mL anti-AT1Rs exhibited a significant effect on creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (P<0.001; P=0.028), although the risk of AR was not significant., Conclusions: Pre-transplant anti-AT1Rs and AECAs have independent negative effects on post-transplant outcomes in low-risk LDKT recipients. Assessment of both antibodies would be helpful in stratifying the pre-transplant immunological risk, even in low-risk LDKT recipients.

Antibody-mediated rejection is the primary cause of renal allograft failure, and the molecular mechanistic is relatively less known in comparison to cell-mediated rejection. With the advent of new immunological agents, the short-term graft survival outcomes have improved, but the long-term outcomes are still unchanged. We present a case of 47-year-old with end-stage renal disease due to presumed lupus status post deceased donor renal transplantation. The patient developed recurrent (a total of five) antibody-mediated rejections (donor-specific antibody and C4d staining negative) spanning within a year of transplant despite the standard of care therapies. The present case draws attention to the importance of non-HLA antibodies in antibody-mediated rejection and diagnostic tools we can rely on when the histology is inconclusive and the role of new immunological agents.

Humoral response beyond human leukocyte antigen (HLA) is of great interest in the transplant community. We decided to summarize the data on a new antigenic target called angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1 receptor). Non-HLA antibodies can now be detected in routine clinical care of patients after transplantation, but their role is not fully understood. Numerous analyses showed that non-HLA response may exert a higher risk of allograft rejection and allograft loss independently of the HLA system. Non-HLA response may even have a higher rate of antibody-mediated rejection. Information regarding antigen target, as well as the pathophysiology of its antibodies and diagnostic tools, is essential for a better understanding of non-HLA humoral response. Angiotensin II type 1 receptors are the most recognized target for non-HLA antibodies. Anti-AT1R Abs (anti-angiotensin II type 1-receptor-activating antibodies) may identify renal transplant patients at higher risk of graft rejection and loss. The presence of AT1 receptor expression analyzed together with anti-AT1R Abs should be considered for better transplant immunological risk assessment. Further assessment is required for a better understanding and to create appropriate therapeutic strategies.

Improving precision in predicting alloreactivity is an important unmet need and may require individualized consideration of non-HLA antibodies. We report a 21-year-old man with kidney failure from immunoglobulin A nephropathy who met all traditional criteria for a "low-risk" transplant for immune memory. He was unsensitized and received a haplotype-matched living donor kidney transplant from his mother. There were no anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies and flow cross-match was negative. After immediate function, he developed delayed graft function on postoperative day 2. The transplant biopsy specimen was suggestive of antibody-mediated rejection and acute tubular injury with increased vimentin proximal tubular expression compared to the implantation biopsy specimen. He had a history of juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and non-HLA antibody screening demonstrated preformed anti-vimentin antibody. He was successfully treated with plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, antithymocyte globulin, and methylprednisolone, with renal recovery. The follow-up biopsy specimen demonstrated decreased vimentin expression with decreased alloinflammation, and graft function remains stable at 1 year posttransplantation (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 62mL/min/1.73m 2 ). We postulate that preformed anti-vimentin autoantibodies bound to vimentin expressed on apoptotic tubular epithelial cells induced by ischemia-reperfusion injury and to constitutively expressed vimentin on peritubular capillaries and podocytes. Our case is suggestive of the involvement of anti-vimentin antibody, for which the pathogenic epitopes may be exposed during ischemia-reperfusion injury., (Copyright © 2019 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The clinical significance of non-HLA antibodies on renal allograft survival is a matter of debate, due to differences in reported results and lack of large-scale studies incorporating analysis of multiple non-HLA antibodies simultaneously. We developed a multiplex non-HLA antibody assay against 14 proteins highly expressed in the kidney. In this study, the presence of pretransplant non-HLA antibodies was correlated to renal allograft survival in a nationwide cohort of 4770 recipients transplanted between 1995 and 2006. Autoantibodies against Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor 2 (ARHGDIB) were significantly associated with graft loss in recipients transplanted with a deceased-donor kidney (N = 3276) but not in recipients of a living-donor kidney (N = 1496). At 10 years after deceased-donor transplantation, recipients with anti-ARHGDIB antibodies (94/3276 = 2.9%) had a 13% lower death-censored covariate-adjusted graft survival compared to the anti-ARHGDIB-negative (3182/3276 = 97.1%) population (hazard ratio 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-2.53; P = .0003). These antibodies occur independently from donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) or other non-HLA antibodies investigated. No significant relations with graft loss were found for the other 13 non-HLA antibodies. We suggest that pretransplant risk assessment can be improved by measuring anti-ARHGDIB antibodies in all patients awaiting deceased-donor transplantation., (© 2019 The Authors. American Journal of Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

The role of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to mismatched human leukocyte antigens (HLA) in lung allograft rejection has been recognized over the past 20 years. During this time, there has been growing experience and recognition of an important role for non-HLA antibodies in lung allograft rejection. Multiple self-antigens have been identified that elicit autoimmune responses including collagen V, K-α 1 tubulin, angiotensin type 1 receptor, and endothelin type A receptor, but it is likely that other antigens elicit similar responses. The paradigm for the pathogenesis of these autoimmune responses consists of exposure of sequestered self-antigens followed by loss of peripheral tolerance, which then promotes allograft rejection. Studies have focused mainly on the impact of autoimmune responses on the development of Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome or its mouse model surrogate. However, there are emerging data that illustrate that non-HLA antibodies can induce acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after lung transplantation. Treatment has focused on antibody-depletion protocols, but experience is limited to cohort studies and appropriate controlled trials have not been conducted. It is noteworthy that depletion of non-HLA antibodies has been associated with favorable clinical outcomes. Clearly, additional studies are needed to identify the optimal therapeutic approaches to non-HLA antibodies in clinical practice., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Antibodies against two G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) and endothelin A receptor (ETAR) are among a growing number of autoantibodies that are found to be associated with allograft dysfunction. AT1R antibodies (AT1Rabs) and ETAR antibodies (ETARabs) have been shown to activate their target receptors and affect signaling pathways. Multiple single center reports have shown an association between presence of these antibodies and acute or chronic rejection and graft loss in kidney, heart, liver, lung and composite tissue transplantations. However, the characteristics of patients that are most likely to develop adverse outcomes, the phenotypes associated with graft damage solely due to these antibodies, and the antibody titer required to cause dysfunction are areas that remain controversial. This review compiles existing knowledge on the effect of antibodies against GPCRs in other diseases in order to bridge the gap in knowledge within transplantation biology. Future areas for research are highlighted and include the need for functional assays and treatment protocols for transplant patients who present with AT1Rabs and ETARabs. Understanding how antibodies that activate GPCRs influence transplantation outcome will have direct clinical implications for preemptive evaluation of transplant candidates as well as the post-transplant care of organ recipients., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The improvement in the definition of serum anti-HLA antibodies (HLA-Abs) profiles after Luminex-assay implementation in transplant patients follow-up is clear. This success has permitted the development of hypersensitized-recipient allocation and donor-paired exchange programs improving the access to transplantation. However, non-HLA Abs have been described in transplanted patients but their effect in hypersensitized transplanted recipients is unclear., Methods: Twenty-seven HLA hypersensitized patients awaiting for kidney transplantation (KT) were studied and 11 of them were followed after KT. The HLA Abs profile was confirmed in serum by Single Antigen Luminex assay and panel reactive of antigens >98% was achieved in all patients. Subsequently, the ability to fix complement by C1q test was also assessed. Serum non-HLA Abs before and 1 month after transplantation were measured in the 11 hypersensitized recipients., Results: 95.2% of the hypersensitized on waiting list had concomitant serum anti-HLA and non-HLA Abs. The more frequent specificity in non-HLA Abs were found against Glutathione S-transferase theta-1 (GSST-1) (in 62%) and C-terminal fragment of perlecan (LG3) (in 52%). Four out of 11 transplanted patients presented early antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) confirmed by biopsy and had serum anti-LG3 antibodies, two of them with concomitant anti-anti-angiotensin II type I receptor. Only one patient developed de novo-donor specific HLA antibodies., Conclusions: The incidence of non-HLA antibodies in patients in the waiting list is largely underestimated. The concomitance anti-HLA and non-HLA Abs in hypersensitized patients is very common and the detection of non-HLA Abs in this population could allow to identify patients with an increased risk of humoral rejection., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background The development of antibodies specific to HLA expressed on donor tissue (donor-specific antibodies [DSAs]) is a prominent risk factor for kidney graft loss. Non-HLA antibodies with pathogenic potential have also been described, including natural antibodies (Nabs). These IgG Nabs bind to immunogenic self-determinants, including oxidation-related antigens. Methods To examine the relationship of Nabs with graft outcomes, we assessed Nabs in blinded serum specimens collected from a retrospective cohort of 635 patients who received a transplant between 2005 and 2010 at Necker Hospital in Paris, France. Serum samples were obtained immediately before transplant and at the time of biopsy-proven rejection within the first year or 1 year after transplant. Nabs were detected by ELISA through reactivity to the generic oxidized epitope malondialdehyde. Results Univariate Cox regression analysis identified the development of post-transplant Nabs (defined as 50% increase in reactivity to malondialdehyde) as a significant risk factor for graft loss (hazard ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.49 to 4.82; P =0.001). Post-transplant Nabs also correlated with increased mean Banff scores for histologic signs of graft injury in post-transplant biopsy specimens. Multivariable Cox analyses confirmed Nabs development as a risk factor independent from anti-HLA DSAs (hazard ratio, 2.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 4.17; P =0.04). Moreover, patients with Nabs and DSAs had a further increased risk of kidney graft loss. Conclusions These findings reveal an association between Nabs, kidney graft injury, and eventual graft failure, suggesting the involvement of Nabs in immune mechanisms of rejection., (Copyright © 2018 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Retrospective studies of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Ab) and anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECA) have linked these antibodies to allograft injury. Because rising healthcare costs dictate judicious use of laboratory testing, we sought to define characteristics of kidney transplant recipients who may benefit from screening for non-HLA antibodies. Kidney recipients transplanted between 2011 and 2016 at Johns Hopkins, were evaluated for AT1R-Ab and AECA. Pre-transplant antibody levels were compared to clinical and biopsy indications of graft dysfunction. Biopsies were graded using the Banff' 2009-2013 criteria. AT1R-Ab and AECA were detected using ELISA and endothelial cell crossmatches, respectively. AT1R-Ab levels were higher in patients who were positive for AECAs. Re-transplanted patients (p < 0.0001), males (p = 0.008) and those with FSGS (p = 0.04) and younger (p = 0.04) at time of transplantation were more likely to be positive for AT1R-Ab prior to transplantation. Recipients who were positive for AT1R-Ab prior to transplantation had increases in serum creatinine within 3 months post-transplantation (p < 0.0001) and developed abnormal biopsies earlier than did AT1R-Ab negative patients (126 days versus 368 days respectively; p = 0.02). Defining a clinical protocol to identify and preemptively treat patients at risk for acute rejection with detectable non-HLA antibodies is an important objective for the transplant community., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1Rabs) have been associated with significantly reduced graft survival. Earlier graft loss has been observed in patients who had pretransplant AT1Rabs and posttransplant donor-specific antibodies (DSA)., Methods: The main goal of this retrospective cohort study was to examine the association between AT1Rabs and the time period to detection of de novo human leukocyte antigen (HLA-DSA) posttransplantation in living donor kidney transplant recipients (KTR). The analysis included 141 KTRs. Pretransplant frozen serum samples were tested for AT1Rabs by ELISA and HLA-DSA by SAB (Luminex) at both the pre- and post-KT time points., Results: The median AT1Rab level was 9.13 U (interquartile range 5.22-14.33). After a mean follow-up period of 3.55 years, 48 patients were found to harbour de novo HLA-DSAs. The presence of AT1Rabs [hazard ratio (HR) 1.009, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.002-1.01, P = 0.010], male-to-male transplantation (HR 2.57, 95% CI 1.42-4.67, P = 0.002) and antecedent borderline changes or acute cellular rejection (ACR) (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.29-4.75, P = 0.006) were significantly associated with de novo DSA detection. A dose-dependent association between AT1Rab levels (<10 U, 10.1-16.9 U, 17-29.9 U and >30 U) and de novo DSA detection was observed (log-rank P = 0.0031). After multivariate analysis of AT1Rab levels (continuous variable), AT1Rabs >30 U, male-to-male transplantation, donor age, higher class I percentage of Panel Reactive Antibody and antecedent borderline changes or ACR remained as independent significant risk factors for the detection of de novo DSAs., Conclusions: The findings suggest that higher levels of pretransplant circulating antibodies against AT1R (>30 U) in kidney graft recipients constitute an independent risk factor for earlier de novo HLA-DSA detection during the posttransplant period., (© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved.)

The main challenge in solid organ transplantation remains to tackle antibody-mediated rejection. Our understanding of the antibody-mediated response and the capacity to detect it has improved in the last decade. However, the sensitivity and specificity of the current clinical tools to monitor B cell activation are perfectible. New strategies, including the refinement in the characterization of HLA and non-HLA antibodies, as well as a better understanding of the circulating B cell phenotype will hopefully help to non-invasively identify patients at risk or undergoing antibody-mediated allograft damage. The current review discusses the current knowledge of the B cell biomarkers in solid organ transplantation, with a focus on circulating antibodies and peripheral B cells., (Copyright © 2015 The Canadian Society of Clinical Chemists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

HLA antibodies can damage a kidney transplant. In January 2013, consensus guidelines from The Transplantation Society were published regarding technical aspects of HLA antibody determination, as well as their potential significance in the pre- and posttransplantation periods. During the past 2 years, new studies have been reported, but controversies remain. In this article, these new data related to HLA antibodies in kidney transplantation are reviewed and compared to relevant prior research. Pretransplantation sensitization issues are discussed, including the new more sensitive assays (flow cytometry and solid-phase immunoassays such as Luminex single-antigen bead assays). A positive complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch remains an absolute contraindication to transplantation, although a positive flow cytometry crossmatch is only a relative contraindication. Positivity only by solid-phase assays increases the risk for acute rejection and transplant loss, but acceptable cutoffs are not defined. The sensitizing effect of red blood cell transfusions is substantiated. Following allograft failure, continued immunosuppression decreases the risk of sensitization, whereas overall, the effect of nephrectomy remains uncertain. Regarding the posttransplantation period, new data are available concerning the timing and significance of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). Whereas some centers report DSA appearance after years, others detect DSA within months. The prominence of class II DSA, especially DQ, in the posttransplantation period is noted. The relevance of non-HLA antibodies is discussed, including anti-endothelial cell antibodies, major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related protein A antibodies, and angiotensin II type 1 receptor autoantibodies., (Copyright © 2015 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: In cardiac transplant recipients, the development of antibodies to the endothelial intermediate filament protein vimentin (antivimentin antibodies, AVA) has been associated with rejection and poor outcomes. However, the incidence of these antibodies prior to transplantation and their association with early rejection has not been investigated., Methods: Pre-transplant serum was analyzed from 50 patients who underwent de novo cardiac transplant at Johns Hopkins Hospital from 2004 to 2012. Demographic, one-yr rejection, and survival data were obtained from the transplant database., Results: The incidence of pre-transplant AVA was 34%. AVA-positive patients were younger (p = 0.03), and there was an a trend toward incidence in females (p = 0.08). Demographic data were similar among both groups. AVA positivity did not predict rejection in the first year post-transplant. There was no difference in rejection-free graft survival (53 vs. 52%, p = 0.85) at one yr. Similarly, there was no difference in graft survival at one yr (82 vs. 88%, p = 0.56) or graft survival at a median follow-up of 23 and 26 months, respectively (76 vs. 85%, p = 0.41)., Conclusions: AVA is common in the cardiac pre-transplant population with a higher incidence in the young. The presence of detectable AVA did not correlate with early post-transplant rejection or graft survival., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

We report a case of probable C4d-negative accelerated acute antibody-mediated rejection due to non-HLA antibodies. A 44 year-old male was admitted to our hospital for a kidney transplant. The donor, his wife, was an ABO minor mismatch (blood type O to A) and had Gitelman syndrome. Graft function was delayed; his serum creatinine level was 10.1 mg/dL at 3 days after transplantation. Open biopsy was performed immediately; no venous thrombosis was observed during surgery. Histology revealed moderate peritubular capillaritis and mild glomerulitis without C4d immunoreactivity. Flow cytometric crossmatching was positive, but no panel-reactive antibodies against HLA or donor-specific antibodies (DSAbs) to major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A (MICA) were detected. Taken together, we diagnosed him with probable C4d-negative accelerated antibody-mediated rejection due to non-HLA, non-MICA antibodies, the patient was treated with steroid pulse therapy (methylprednisolone 500 mg/day for 3 days), plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin (40 g/body), and rituximab (200 mg/body) were performed. Biopsy at 58 days after transplantation, at which time S-Cr levels were 1.56 mg/dL, found no evidence of rejection. This case, presented with a review of relevant literature, demonstrates that probable C4d-negative accelerated acute AMR can result from non-HLA antibodies., (© 2015 Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology.)

Non-HLA antibodies (Abs) targeting vascular receptors are thought to have an impact on renal transplant injury. Anti-angiotensin II type 1-receptor-activating antibodies (anti-AT1R) have been mentioned to stimulate a severe vascular rejection, but the pretransplant screening has not been introduced yet. The aim of our study was to assess the incidence and importance of anti-AT1R antibodies and their influence on renal transplant in the 1st year of observation. We prospectively evaluated the presence of anti-AT1R antibodies in 117 consecutive renal transplant recipients in pre- and post-transplant screening. Anti-AT1R antibodies were observed in 27/117 (23%) of the analyzed recipients already before transplantation. The function of renal transplant was considerably worse in anti-AT1R(+) group. The patients with anti-AT1R Abs >9 U/ml lost their graft more often. Biopsy-proven AR was described in 4/27 (15%) pts in the anti-AT1R(+) group and 13/90 (14.4%) in the anti-AT1R(-) group, but more severe cases of Banff IIB or antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) were more often observed in anti-AT1R (+) 4/27 (15%) vs. 1/90 (1.1%) in anti-AT1R(+) (P = 0.009). Patients with anti-AT1R Abs level >9 U/ml run a higher risk of graft failure independently of classical immunological risk factors. The recipients with anti-AT1R Abs developed more severe acute rejections described as IIB or AMR in Banff classification. More recipients among the anti-AT1R-positive ones lost the graft. Our study suggests monitoring of anti-AT1R Abs before renal transplantation for assessment of immunologic risk profiles and the identification of patients highly susceptible to immunologic events, graft failure, and graft loss., (© 2014 Steunstichting ESOT.)

Unlabelled: Antibodies against donor's HLA antigens and B cell activity are recognized modulators of immune response to allograft. The role of both anti-HLA and non-HLA antibodies is understood in solid organ transplantation, but has not been addressed in composite tissue allografts., Aim: We decided to evaluate the presence and role of anti-HLA and non-HLA antibodies after hand transplantation., Methods: We assayed anti-HLA and non-HLA antibodies in 5 consecutive hand transplant patients. The presence of anti-HLA antibodies was tested by flow-PRA method (One Lambda). Non-HLA antibodies were defined as anti-endothelial cell (AECA), anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor (anti-AT1R), anti-endothelin receptor antibodies (anti-ETAR)., Results: Anti-HLA antibodies were present in 1 patient in class I and in another one in class II. Both patients developed one episode of acute rejection. AECA were present in only one recipient with borderline activity. Both anti-AT1R and Anti-ETAR were found strongly positive in one patient who repeatedly developed acute rejection episodes., Conclusion: The presence of non-HLA antibodies (anti-AT1R and anti-ETAR) and the occurrence of multiple rejection episodes found in one patient here require further investigation into a possible association and role of humoral immunity in composite tissue rejection., (Copyright © 2014 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Non-HLA antibodies (Abs) targeting vascular receptors are considered to have an influence on renal transplant injury. Anti-endothelin-1 type A receptor (anti-ETAR) antibodies were associated with cellular and antibody-mediated rejection and early onset of vasculopathy in heart transplant patients but their role in renal transplantation remains unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the incidence and importance of anti-ETAR antibodies and their impact on renal transplant during the first year observation., Methods: We evaluated the presence of anti-ETAR antibodies in 116 consecutive renal transplant recipients in pre- and post-transplant screening (before and in 1st, 3rd, 6th, 12th month after transplantation). Additionally, we assessed the presence of anti-HLA antibodies. Anti-ETAR antibodies were assayed by ELISA. The diagnosis of acute rejection was based on the Banff criteria., Results: Anti-ETAR antibodies were observed in 55 (47.4%) of the analyzed recipients before transplantation. The function of renal transplant was significantly worse in the anti-ETAR(+) group compared to the anti-ETAR(-) group during the first post-transplant year. One month after transplantation the serum creatinine in anti-ETAR (+) patients (pts) was 1.86±0.8mg/dl and 1.51±0.5 in anti-ETAR(-) pts (p=0.009). Twelve months after transplantation the difference between the groups was still observed 1.70±0.7 vs. 1.40±0.4 (p=0.04). Biopsy proven acute rejection was recognized in 8/55 (14.5%) in ETAR(+) and 9/61 (14.8%) in ETAR(-) patients but cases with mild to severe intimal arteritis (v1-v3) were more often observed in patients with the presence of anti-ETAR Abs 4/55 (7.2%) comparing with 1/61 (1.6%) in anti-ETAR(-) patients. The anti-ETAR antibody levels varied at different measurement intervals during the one-year follow-up., Conclusions: The presence of anti-ETAR antibodies is associated with a worse renal transplant function during the first 12months after transplantation. Including anti-ETAR antibodies in the diagnostics of renal transplant recipient immune status should be considered to provide comprehensive assessment of humoral alloimmunity., (© 2013. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The presence of anti-Glutathione S-transferase Tl (GSTT1) antibodies (abs) has been hypothesized as a pathogenic contributor in antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Methods: We aimed to evaluate the relationship between genetic variants of GSTT1, anti-GSTTl abs and AMR in a cohort of 87 kidney transplant (KTx) patients using Immucor's non-HLA Luminex assay. Patients were classified according to biopsy-proven AMR and HLA-DSA status: AMR with positive anti-HLA-DSAs (AMR/DSA-t-, n = 29), AMR but no detectable anti-HLA-DSAs (AMR/DSA-, n = 28) and control patients with stable allograft function and no evidence of rejection (n = 30). Results: At an MFI cut-off of 3000, the overall prevalence of anti-GSTTl abs was 18.3%. The proportion of patients with anti-GSTTl abs was higher in the AMR/DSA-group (25%), compared to the control (13.3%) and AMR/DSA - group (3.4%) (p 0.06). Among patients with anti-GSTTl abs, the MFI was higher in AMR/DSAand GSTTl-Null patients. Of 81 patients who underwent GSTT1 genotyping, 19.8% were homozygotes for the null allele (GSTTl-Null). GSTTl-Null status in the transplant recipients was associated with the development of anti-GSTTl abs (OR. 4.49; 95%CI, 1.2-16.7). In addition, GSTTl-Null genotype (OR 26.01; 95%CI, 1.63-404) and anti-GSTTl ab positivity (OR 14.8; 95%CI, 1.1-190) were associated with AMR. Within AMR/DSA-patients, the presence of anti-GSTTl abs didn't confer a higher risk of failure within the study observation period. Conclusion: The presence of anti-GSTTl abs and GSTTl-Null genotype is associated with AMR, but do not appear to lead to accelerated graft injury in this cohort of early allograft injury changes, with a limited period of followup. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundCorrelation between antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and circulating HLA donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSA) is strong but imperfect in kidney transplant (KT) recipients, raising the possibility of undetected HLA-DSA or non-HLA antibodies contributing to ABMR. Detailed evaluation of the degree of HLA matching together with the identification of non-HLA antibodies in KT may help to decipher the antibody involved.MethodsWe retrospectively assessed patients with transplant biopsies scored following Banff'15 classification. Pre- and post-transplant serum samples were checked for HLA and non-HLA antibodies [MICA-Ab, angiotensin-II type-1-receptor (AT1R)-Ab, endothelin-1 type-A-receptor (ETAR)-Ab and crossmatches with primary aortic endothelial cells (EC-XM)]. We also analyzed HLA epitope mismatches (HLA-EM) between donors and recipients to explore their role in ABMR histology (ABMRh) with and without HLA-DSA.ResultsOne-hundred eighteen patients with normal histology (n = 19), ABMRh (n = 52) or IFTA (n = 47) were studied. ABMRh patients were HLA-DSApos (n = 38, 73%) or HLA-DSAneg (n = 14, 27%). Pre-transplant HLA-DSA and AT1R-Ab were more frequent in ABMRh compared with IFTA and normal histology cases (p = 0.006 and 0.003), without differences in other non-HLA antibodies. Only three ABMRhDSAneg cases showed non-HLA antibodies. ABMRhDSAneg and ABMRhDSApos cases showed similar biopsy changes and graft-survival. Both total class II and DRB1 HLA-EM were associated with ABMRhDSApos but not with ABMRhDSAneg. Multivariate analysis showed that pre-transplant HLA-DSA (OR: 3.69 [1.31-10.37], p = 0.013) and AT1R-Ab (OR: 5.47 [1.78-16.76], p = 0.003) were independent predictors of ABMRhDSApos.ConclusionsIn conclusion, pre-transplant AT1R-Ab is frequently found in ABMRhDSApos patients. However, AT1R-Ab, MICA-Ab, ETAR-Ab or EC-XM+ are rarely found among ABMRhDSAneg patients. Pre-transplant AT1R-Ab may act synergistically with preformed or de novo HLA-DSA to produce ABMRhDSApos but not ABMRhDSAneg. HLA epitope mismatch associates with ABMRhDSApos compared with ABMRhDSAneg, suggesting factors other than HLA are responsible for the damage.

Allo- and autoimmune mechanisms are involved in kidney allograft rejection and loss. This study investigates the impact of anti-angiotensin II type-1 receptor antibodies (anti-AT1RAbs) detected alone or in association with HLA donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSAs) on the outcome of kidney transplantation (KTx). Anti-AT1RAbs and HLA-DSAs were detected in 71 kidney transplant (KT) recipients who developed biopsy-proven acute or chronic active T-cell rejection (TCMR) (n = 51) or antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) (n = 20), forming the rejection group (RG). The control group (CG) included 71 KTx recipients with comparable characteristics without rejection. All patients had been transplanted with negative T/B flow crossmatch (T/BFCXM). The median follow-up period was 3.7 years. Antibodies were determined pre- and periodically post-KTx by Luminex method for HLA-DSAs and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for anti-AT1RAbs. Before KTx, twenty-three (32.4%) patients in the RG, sixteen with TCMR and seven with ABMR, were found anti-AT1Rabs-positive (≥10 U/mL) versus eleven (15.5%) patients in the CG (p = 0.031). Simultaneous detection of preformed anti-AT1RAbs and HLA-DSAs was found in five patients of the RG versus two of the CG (p = 0.355). At the time of transplant biopsy, fifteen (21.1%) patients, four with ABMR and eleven with TCMR, were positive for anti-AT1RAbs. Anti-AT1RAbs and HLA-DSAs were detected simultaneously in 7/15 (46.7%) cases, three with ABMR and four with TCMR. During the follow-up, thirteen (18.3%) patients in the RG, eight with ABMR and five with TCMR, lost their graft compared to one patient (1.4%) in the CG (p = 0.001). Six out of thirteen (46.2%) RG patients who lost the graft were found positive for anti-AT1RAbs pretransplant. Patient survival with functioning graft did not differ significantly between anti-AT1Rabs-positive and negative KT recipients (log-rank p = 0.88). Simultaneous detection of anti-ATR1Abs and HLA-DSAs did not have a significant influence on patient survival with functioning graft (log-rank p = 0.96). Graft function at the end of the follow-up was better, but not significantly, in anti-AT1Rabs-negative patients, with serum creatinine 1.48 [1.20–1.98] mg/dL and eGFR (CKD-EPI) 48.5 [33.5–59.0] mL/min/1.73 m2, compared to anti-AT1Rabs-positive ones who had serum creatinine 1.65 [1.24–2.02] mg/dL (p = 0.394) and eGFR (CKD-EPI) 47.0 [34.8–60.3] mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.966). Anti-AT1RAbs detection pretransplant characterizes KT recipients at increased risk of cellular or antibody-mediated rejection. Furthermore, anti-AT1RAbs, detected alone or simultaneously with HLA-DSAs, appear to be associated with impaired graft function, but their role in graft survival has not been documented in this study. Screening for these antibodies appears to complement pretransplant immunological risk assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background.· There is growing evidence on the important role of nonhuman leukocyte antigen (HLA ) antibodies in lung and heart transplant rejection. Since data on the prevalence and clinical significance of non-HLA anti- bodies in the Asian population are scarce, we analyzed non-HLA antibodies in heart and lung transplant patients. Methods: We used the Luminex method to measure non-HLA antibodies in patients who underwent heart transplantation (N = 28) or lung transplantation (N = 36) between 2016 and 2019. We evaluated the association between pre-existing non-HLA antibodies and acute rejection-free days in these recipients. Results: Of 64 patients, 27 (42.2%) patients underwent rejection, with 26 (40.6%) acute cellular rejection and one 1.696) acute antibody-mediated rejection. Among 33 identified different non-HLA antibodies, only the antiglutathione S-transferase theta-1 (GSTI'l) antibody positive rate was significantly higher in patients with acute rejection compared to those without rejection (14.8% vs. 0%, p = 0.016). The angiotensin Il type I receptor positive rate was not significantly different between the two groups (40% vs. 18.50/6, p = 0.129). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, anti-GSTrl antibody-positive patients had a higher risk of acute allograft rejection (hazard ratio, 4.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-12.49; p = 0.010). The Kaplan-Meier curve showed that anti-GSTTl antibody-positive patients had fewer acute rejection-free days (%2 = 7.892; p = 0.005). Additionally, patients who underwent platelet transfusion (odds ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.16-1.91; p = 0.002) before transplantation were more likely to be positive for anti-GSTTl antibody. Conclusion.· Patients with antibodies against GSTTl before heart or lung transplantation have an increased risk of acute rejection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immunological injury to the allograft, specifically by antibodies to de novo donor specific human leukocyte antigen (dn DSA) and antibody mediated injury and rejection are the major limitations to graft survival after heart transplantation (HT). As such, our approach to allosensitization remains limited by the inability of contemporaneous immunoassays to unravel pathogenic potential of dn DSA. Additionally, the role of dn DSA is continuously evaluated with emerging methods to detect rejection. Moreover, the timing and frequency of dn DSA monitoring for early detection and risk mitigation as well as management of dn DSA remain challenging. A strategic approach to dn DSA employs diagnostic assays to determine relevant antibodies in conjunction with clinical presentation and injury/rejection of allograft to tailor therapeutics. In this review, we aim to outline contemporary knowledge involving detection, monitoring and management of dn DSA after HT. Subsequently, we propose a diagnostic and therapeutic approach that may mitigate morbidity and mortality while balancing adverse reactions from pharmacotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Abs) have been recognized as non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies associated with allograft rejection and poor allograft outcomes after kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to assess the risk anti-AT1R-Abs pose for rejection and graft loss among kidney transplant (KT) populations. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library databases for relevant articles published from inception until June 2021 to identify all studies concerning the role AT1R-Abs play in the clinical outcome after kidney transplantation. Two reviewers independently identified studies, abstracted outcome data and assessed the quality of the studies. The meta-analysis was summarized using fixed-effects or random-effects models, according to heterogeneity. The major outcomes included delayed graft function, acute rejection, graft loss or patient death after transplantation. Results Twenty-one eligible studies involving a total of 4023 KT recipients were included in the evaluation. Meta-analysis results showed that the AT1R-Ab-positive KT group had a greater incidence of antibody-mediated rejection {relative risk [RR] 1.94 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.61–2.33]; P < 0.00001} and graft loss [RR 2.37 (95% CI 1.50–3.75); P = 0.0002] than did the AT1R-Abs-negative KT group. There was no significant statistical difference in delayed graft function rate, T-cell-mediated rejection, mixed rejection, acute cellular rejection, acute rejection and patient death rate between the AT1R-Ab-positive KT and AT1R-Ab-negative KT groups. Conclusions Our study shows that the presence of anti-AT1R-Abs was associated with a significantly higher risk of antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss in kidney transplantation. Future studies are still needed to evaluate the importance of routine anti-AT1R monitoring and therapeutic targeting. These results show that assessment of anti-AT1R-Abs would be helpful in determining immunologic risk and susceptibility to immunologic events for recipients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is associated with poor transplant outcomes and was identified as a leading cause of graft failure after kidney transplantation. Although the hallmark histological features of ABMR (ABMRh), i.e., microvascular inflammation (MVI), usually correlate with the presence of anti-human leukocyte antigen donor-specific antibodies (HLA-DSAs), it is increasingly recognized that kidney transplant recipients can develop ABMRh in the absence of HLA-DSAs. In fact, 40-60% of patients with overt MVI have no circulating HLA-DSAs, suggesting that other mechanisms could be involved. In this review, we provide an update on the current understanding of the different pathogenic processes underpinning MVI. These processes include both antibody-independent and antibody-dependent mechanisms of endothelial injury and ensuing MVI. Specific emphasis is placed on non-HLA antibodies, for which we discuss the ontogeny, putative targets, and mechanisms underlying endothelial toxicity in connection with their clinical impact. A better understanding of these emerging mechanisms of allograft injury and all the effector cells involved in these processes may provide important insights that pave the way for innovative diagnostic tools and highly tailored therapeutic strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Many kidney allografts fail due to the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), related to donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (HLA-DSA). However, the histology of ABMR can also be observed in patients without HLA-DSA. While some non-HLA antibodies have been related to the histology of ABMR, it is not well known to what extent they contribute to kidney allograft injury. Here we aimed to investigate the role of 82 different non-HLA antibodies in the occurrence of histology of ABMR after kidney transplantation. Methods: We included all patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2004-2013 in a single center and had biobanked serum. Pre- and post-transplant sera (n=2870) were retrospectively tested for the presence of 82 different non-HLA antibodies using a prototype bead assay on Luminex (Immucor, Inc). A ratio was calculated between the measured MFI value and the cut-off MFI defined by the vendor for each non-HLA target. Results: 874 patients had available pretransplant sera and were included in this analysis. Of them, 133 (15.2%) received a repeat kidney allograft, and 100 (11.4%) had pretransplant HLA-DSA. In total, 204 (23.3%) patients developed histology of ABMR after kidney transplantation. In 79 patients (38.7%) the histology of ABMR was explained by pretransplant or de novo HLA-DSA. The multivariable Cox analysis revealed that only the broadly non-HLA sensitized (number of positive non-HLA antibodies) patients and those with the highest total strength of the non-HLA antibodies (total ratios of the positive non-HLA antibodies) were independently associated with increased rates of histology of ABMR after transplantation. Additionally, independent associations were found for antibodies against TUBB (HR=2.40; 95% CI 1.37 – 4.21, p=0.002), Collagen III (HR=1.67; 95% CI 1.08 – 2.58, p=0.02), VCL (HR=2.04; 95% CI 1.12 – 3.71, p=0.02) and STAT6 (HR=1.47; 95% CI 1.01 – 2.15, p=0.04). The overall posttransplant non-HLA autoreactivity was not associated with increased rates of ABMRh. Conclusions: This study shows that patients highly and broadly sensitized against non-HLA targets are associated with an increased risk of ABMR histology after kidney transplantations in the absence of HLA-DSA. Also, some pretransplant non‐HLA autoantibodies are individually associated with increased rates of ABMR histology. However, whether these associations are clinically relevant and represent causality, warrants further studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pretransplant crossmatch (XM) testing is widely used for detecting preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) against human leukocyte antigen (HLA). However, in some cases, there is a positive XM result in the absence of HLA-DSAs, the cause of which was rarely identified. We reviewed the causes of sequential positive XM results at a single center and analyzed the presence of non-HLA antibodies in patients with an unexplained positive pretransplant XM result. Among 251 patients with T-cell/B-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) or flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) positivity, HLA-DSAs were confirmed in 88 (35.1%) by a single antigen bead (SAB) assay, 150 (59.8%) used rituximab (anti-CD20), and 13 (5.2%) had neither HLA-DSAs nor a desensitization history. Anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor IgG and 33 non-HLA antibodies were tested in the 13 patients with an unexplained positive pretransplant XM result, and more than one non-HLA antibody were revealed in all these patients; 11 patients had non-HLA antibodies reported to be associated with graft rejection, and two patients experienced rejection episode after kidney transplantation. Our study suggests considering non-HLA antibodies testing when a CDC or FCXM test is positive without a definite cause. Assessing non-HLA antibodies might be useful for interpreting XM results and evaluating immunologic risk in transplant recipients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The detection and characterization of anti-HLA antibodies and the clinical impact of their appearance following renal transplantation are areas of immense interest. In particular, de novo development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) has been associated with acute and chronic antibody-mediated graft rejection (AMR). Recently, methods for antibody detection have evolved remarkably from conventional cell-based assays to advanced solid phase systems. These systems have revolutionized the art of defining clinically relevant antibodies that are directed toward a renal graft. While anti-HLA DSAs have been widely associated with poor graft survival, the role of non-HLA antibodies, particularly those directed against endothelial cells, is beginning to be realized. Appreciation of the mechanisms underlying T cell recognition of alloantigens has generated great interest in the use of synthetic peptides to prevent graft rejection. Hopefully, continued progress in unraveling the molecular mechanisms of graft rejection and posttransplant monitoring of antibodies using highly sensitive testing systems will prove beneficial to immunological risk assessment and early prediction of renal allograft failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antibody-mediated rejection is the leading cause of deterioration of graft function and graft loss after kidney transplantation. Recent studies have reported an increasing role of non-HLA antibodies in the humoral injury after kidney transplantation. We decided to present the influence of non-HLA antibodies - anti-endothelin II type A receptor (ETAR) on a transplanted kidney and characterize the significance of their receptor. The role of non-HLA antibodies is still uncertain. Many studies suggest that the presence of non-HLA antibodies, including anti-ETAR antibodies, is among the risk factors for antibody-mediated rejection, graft injury, and graft loss. The discovery of new antigen targets and antibodies, which participate in the humoral response, has provided a significantly better understanding of the mechanism of antibody-mediated rejection after organ transplantation. Endothelin and its receptors play an important role in physiology and pathophysiology after solid organ transplantation. ETAR and antibodies against ETAR may participate in humoral rejection and graft damage. The measurement of anti-ETAR antibodies may identify patients with an increased risk of rejection and even loss of a transplanted organ. Expression of ETAR detected in biopsy of transplant could become an additional tool used to better understand humoral activity. More research is needed to address many questions about non-HLA directed rejection and graft damage. • Endothelin and its receptors play an important role after solid organ transplantation. • ETAR and antibodies against ETAR may participate in humoral rejection and graft damage. • Anti-ETAR antibodies may identify patients with an increased risk of rejection. • Expression of ETAR detected in biopsy of transplant could become diagnostic tool. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The role of anti-HLA antibodies in transplant rejection is well-known but the injury associated with non-HLA antibodies is now widely discussed. The aim of our study was to investigate a role of non-HLA antibodies in hand allografts rejection. The study was performed on six patients after hand transplantation. The control group consisted of: 12 kidney transplant recipients and 12 healthy volunteers. The following non-HLA antibodies were tested: antibody against angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R-Ab), antibody against endothelin-1 type-A-receptor (ETAR-Ab), antibody against protease-activated receptor 1 (PAR-1-Ab) and anti-VEGF-A antibody (VEGF-A-Ab). Chosen proinflammatory cytokines (Il-1, IL-6, IFNγ) were used to evaluate the post-transplant humoral response. Laboratory markers of endothelial activation (VEGF, sICAM, vWF) were used to assess potential vasculopathy. The patient with the highest number of acute rejections had both positive non-HLA antibodies: AT1R-Ab and ETAR-Ab. The same patient had the highest VEGF-A-Ab and very high PAR1-Ab. All patients after hand transplantation had high levels of laboratory markers of endothelial activation. The existence of non-HLA antibodies together with multiple acute rejections observed in patient after hand transplantation should stimulate to look for potential role of non-HLA antibodies in humoral injury in vascular composite allotransplantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The occurrence of anti-endothelin A receptor antibodies may be useful in diagnosis of transplant damage. We noticed that the presence of the endothelin A receptor (ETA receptor) in biopsy compartments is yet to be defined. We decided therefore to analysed the presence and relevance of the ETA receptor in biopsy to define the cause. Our study aims to evaluate the expression of ETA receptors in renal recipients after a biopsy due to the worsening of transplant function. Methods: The expression of ETA receptors was analyzed in renal transplant biopsies using the immunohistochemical method. The evaluation of ETA receptors was performed on paraffin sections. ETA receptor expression was analyzed in four compartments of renal transplant biopsies: glomeruli; vessels; tubular epithelium; and interstitium. The assessment was presented using a three-step scale (0: lack of expression; 1: mild to moderate immunoreactivity; 2: high expression). The results of each compartment from a single biopsy were summarized and assessed in the context of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Results: We analyzed 156 patients who had a renal allograft biopsy after renal transplantation. For each patient, we created a summarized ETA receptor expression score. The summarized ETA receptor expression score analysis showed statistically significant differences in patients with and without AMR. In addition, we noticed that patients with AMR had a significantly higher mean summarized expression of ETA receptor score of 3.28 ± 1.56 compared to patients who had a biopsy for other reasons with a mean summarized ETA receptor expression score of 1.47 ± 1.35 (p < 0.000001). ROC analysis of the ETA receptor expression score for detecting AMR status showed that the most appropriate cut-off for the test of the chosen binary classifier is between 2 and 3 of the summarized ETA receptor expression score. Conclusions: The expression of endothelin A receptors in renal transplant compartments may be associated with antibody-mediated rejection. The positive ETA receptor staining might be a vital feature in the diagnosis of damage in AMR. The summarized ETA receptor expression score seems to be an exciting diagnostic tool in transplant injury assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute rejection with vascular involvement remains a challenging problem in renal allotransplantation. Fibrinoid necrosis of the arteries with secondary thrombotic occlusions is C4d negative in 50% of cases and has the worst prognosis among all allograft vascular lesions. Nonhuman leukocyte antigen (HLA) non-complement-fixing antibodies reacting to artery-specific antigens have been speculated to be responsible for causing severe vascular injury. We recently reported the presence of agonistic antibodies against the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R-AA) in 16 recipients of renal allografts who had severe vascular rejection and malignant hypertension but who did not have anti-HLA antibodies. AT1R-AA stimulate AT1R and induce mediators of inflammation and thrombosis. Removal of AT1R-AA by plasmapheresis in combination with pharmacologic AT1R blockade leads to improved renal function and graft survival in AT1R-AA-positive patients. We have shown that the analysis of the subtle diagnostic and mechanistic differences may help to identify patients at particular risk and improve outcome of rejections with vascular pathology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]