Search

Background: The short-term effects of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) have been extensively studied, but recent reports of G-CSF-induced genetic perturbations raised concerns regarding its long-term safety. In this respect, duration of G-CSF-induced perturbations has been less studied than short-term effects and needs to be evaluated., Study Design and Methods: G-CSF mobilization-induced immunologic alterations were prospectively analyzed in a cohort of 24 healthy donors. Blood samples were taken before G-CSF administration; at the time of administration; and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and analyzed for blood cell counts and in vitro cytokines (interleukin [IL]-2, -8, and -10) and immunoglobulin production, quantified in the culture supernatant of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) after, respectively, phytohemagglutinin and pokeweed mitogen stimulation., Results: Platelet, granulocyte, monocyte, B, and dendritic blood cell counts as well as the IL-2, -8, and -10 secretion by PBMNCs, perturbed at the time of G-CSF mobilization, returned to baseline values at 1 month, with T-cell and natural killer cell counts recovering at 3 months. In vitro immunoglobulin production was increased up to 6 months after mobilization., Conclusion: Although assessment of the potential long-term risk of G-CSF administration will require prolonged observation of larger cohorts, our data show that the duration of immunologic perturbations may be more persistent than previously anticipated, especially for B-cell functional alterations. Most perturbations remain, however, transient with a return to baseline values within 1 year., (© 2010 American Association of Blood Banks.)

Purpose: Ten years after the first clinical studies, the clinical impact of myeloid growth factors in acute myeloid leukemia is still unclear. One of the objectives of the Groupe Ouest-Est Leucémies Aigues Myeloblastiques (GOELAM) 2 trial was to evaluate the benefit of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) given only after the two courses of intensive consolidation chemotherapy (ICC) used to maintain complete remission (CR)., Patients and Methods: One hundred ninety-four patients who were in CR after induction treatment were randomly assigned to receive G-CSF (100 patients) or no G-CSF (94 patients) after two courses of ICC (ICC 1, high-dose cytarabine plus mitoxantrone; ICC 2, amsacrine plus etoposide). G-CSF (filgrastim) was administered from the day after chemotherapy until granulocyte recovery at a daily dose of 5 microg/kg., Results: In the G-CSF group, the median duration of neutropenia (< 0.5 x 10(9)/L) was dramatically reduced, both after ICC 1 (12 v 19 days, P <.001) and after ICC 2 (20 v 28 days, P <.001). The median duration of hospitalization was also significantly shorter in the G-CSF group (24 v 27 days after ICC 1, P <.001; 29 v 34 days after ICC 2, P <. 001). The median duration of intravenous antibiotics was significantly reduced after ICC 1 and ICC 2, and the median duration of antifungal therapy was significantly reduced after ICC 1. However, the incidence of microbiologically documented infections, the toxic death rate, the 2-year disease-free survival, and the 2-year overall survival were not affected by G-CSF administration. Moreover, the median interval between ICC1 and ICC2 was reduced by only 2 days, and the number of patients undergoing ICC2 was not increased in the G-CSF arm., Conclusion: G-CSF should be administered routinely after ICC to reduce the duration of neutropenia and hospitalization. However, G-CSF did not seem to significantly increase the feasibility of this two-course program or modify overall outcome.