Search

The GM.CD40L vaccine, which recruits and activates dendritic cells, migrates to lymph nodes, activating T cells and leading to systemic tumor cell killing. When combined with the CCL21 chemokine, which recruits T cells and enhances T-cell responses, additive effects have been demonstrated in non-small cell lung cancer mouse models. Here, we compared GM.CD40L versus GM.CD40L plus CCL21 (GM.CD40L.CCL21) in lung adenocarcinoma patients with ≥ 1 line of treatment. In this phase I/II randomized trial (NCT01433172), patients received intradermal vaccines every 14 days (3 doses) and then monthly (3 doses). A two-stage minimax design was used. During phase I, no dose-limiting toxicities were shown in three patients who received GM.CD40L.CCL21. During phase II, of evaluable patients, 5/33 patients (15.2%) randomized for GM.DCD40L (p = .023) and 3/32 patients (9.4%) randomized for GM.DCD40L.CCL21 (p = .20) showed 6-month progression-free survival. Median overall survival was 9.3 versus 9.5 months with GM.DCD40L versus GM.DCD40L.CCL21 (95% CI 0.70-2.25; p = .44). For GM.CD40L versus GM.CD40L.CCL21, the most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were grade 1/2 injection site reaction (51.4% versus 61.1%) and grade 1/2 fatigue (35.1% versus 47.2%). Grade 1 immune-mediated TRAEs were isolated to skin. No patients showed evidence of pseudo-progression or immune-related TRAEs of grade 1 or greater of pneumonitis, endocrinopathy, or colitis, and none discontinued treatment due to toxicity. Although we found no significant associations between vaccine immunogenicity and outcomes, in limited biopsies, one patient treated with GMCD40L.CCL21 displayed abundant tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. This possible effectiveness warrants further investigation of GM.CD40L in combination approaches.

Background: A proportion of candidates for high-dose chemotherapy with autologous PBPC support (HDC-PBPCS) will not provide an adequate PBPC yield from their first mobilization. The value of re-mobilization and the best regimen for re-mobilization in these patients is unclear., Methods: In 23 patients who failed to provide > or = 3 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg after their first mobilization, PBPC were re-mobilized using a regimen of simultaneous administration of G-CSF and GM-CSF (10 microg/kg/day each) with leukaphereses (LP) starting Day 4 or 5 of CSF administration. Yields of WBC/kg, MNC/kg and CD34+ cells/kg/L of processed blood were compared between the first and second mobilization in each patient. The ability of the combined yield from the two mobilizations to achieve the desired threshold PBPC yield and the tolerability of the re-mobilization were determined., Results: The re-mobilization regimen was well-tolerated and no patient discontinued the regimen because of toxicity. Median collected WBC/kg/L (1.37 x 10(7) versus 2.62 x 10(7), p = 0.0065), MNC/kg/L (0.77 x 10(7) versus 1.97 x 10(7), p = 0.0003), CD34+ cells/kg/L (1.64 x 10(7) versus 4.18 x 10(7), p = 0.001) were significantly higher after the second mobilization (G-CSF/GM-CSF combination). Percentage of CD34+ cells in the leukapheresis was also significantly higher after the second mobilization (median 0.104% versus 0.195%, p = 0.036). Twelve of 22 patients achieved the target PBPC dose (> 3 x 10(6)/CD34+ cells/kg) after two mobilizations (six patients achieved the target from the second mobilization alone). A further eight underwent HDC-PBPCS without achieving the target PBPC dose. These patients experienced a significant delay in neutrophil and platelet engraftment when compared with those patients achieving the target dose., Discussion: This study demonstrates that the combination of G-CSF and GM-CSF is an effective and tolerable method for re-mobilization of PBPC in patients who fail to provide an adequate yield from their first mobilization.