Search

Introduction: Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue is an essential step in Ovarian Tissue Banking. In order to prevent the formation of ice crystals, typically the tissue is slowly frozen using a cryoprotectant. As an alternative the method of ultra-fast freezing by vitrification becomes more attention for freezing ovarian tissue because it has successfully been used for oocytes, embryos and sperm. However the impact of vitrification on granulosa cells, which are an essential part of ovarian tissue is uncertain., Aim: In this study, we have therefore analysed the influence of vitrification on the survival rates of granulosa cells, the impact of DMSO or ethylenglycol containing vitrification protocols and investigated to what extent the gene expression of apoptosis- and temperature-sensitive genes changes., Material and Methods: We used the human granulosa cell line KGN as a model for human granulosa cells and determined the survival rate and cell cycle stages by FACS analyses. The change in gene expression was determined by quantitative PCR analyses., Results: Our results show that vitrification is possible in granulosa cells but it reduces cell viability and leads to fluctuations in the cell cycle. The DMSO containing protocol results in a lower amount of dead cells than the ethylenglycol containing protocol. Gene expression analysis reveals that TNF-alpha expression is strongly increased after vitrification, while other apoptosis or temperature-related genes seem to stay unaffected., Conclusion: We conclude that vitrification influences the viability of human granulosa cells. Furthermore, our results suggest that this could be mediated by a change in TNF-alpha gene expression., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of our laboratory-based study was to investigate the extent of delayed-onset cell death after cryopreservation in endothelial and epithelial cell lines of ovarian origin. We found differences in percentages of vital cells directly after warming and after cultivation for 48 to 72 h. A granulosa cell line of endothelial origin (KGN) and an epithelial cell line (OvCar-3) were used. In both DMSO-containing and DMSO-free protocols, significant differences in vitality rates between the different cell lines when using open and closed vitrification could be shown (DMSO-containing: KGN open vs. OvCar open, p = 0.001; KGN closed vs. OvCar closed, p = 0.001; DMSO-free: KGN open vs. OvCar open, p = 0.001; KGN closed vs. OvCar closed, p = 0.031). Furthermore, there was a marked difference in the percentage of vital cells immediately after warming and after cultivation for 48 to 72 h; whereas the KGN cell line showed a loss of cell viability of 41% using a DMSO-containing protocol, the OvCar-3 cell loss was only 11% after cultivation. Using a DMSO-free protocol, the percentages of late-onset cell death were 77% and 48% for KGN and OvCar-3 cells, respectively. Our data support the hypothesis that cryopreservation-induced damage is cell type and cryoprotective agent dependent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In humans, granulosa cells (GCs) are part of the follicle and nourish the growing oocyte. GCs produce estrogen and, after ovulation, progesterone. They are embedded in a multicellular tissue structure of the ovary, which consists of a variety of different cell types that are essential for the physiological function of the ovary. However, the extent to which individual ovarian cell types contribute to overall functionality has not yet been fully elucidated. In this study, we aim to investigate the effects of co-culturing human granulosa cells with ovarian cancer cells on their progesterone and estrogen production in an in vitro model. Methods: After seeding, the cells were stimulated with 200 µM forskolin in DMEM for 72 h and the medium of the different cell culture experiments was collected. Subsequently, progesterone and oestradiol concentrations were determined using an Elisa assay. Results: Morphologically, it was striking that the cells self-organize and form spatially separated areas. Compared to culturing granulosa cells alone, co-culturing human granulosa cells together with the ovarian cancer cell line OvCar-3 resulted in a significant increase in progesterone production (20.3 ng/ml versus 50.2 ng/ml; p < 0.01). Conclusions: Using a simple in vitro model, we highlight the importance of cellular crosstalk between different ovarian cells in a complex cellular network and that it strongly influences granulosa cell hormone production. This could have potential implications for the procedure of transplanting endocrine tissues after cryopreservation, as it highlights the importance of survival of all cells for the functionality of the transplanted tissue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In reproductive medicine, the technique of rapid cooling becomes increasingly important for the preservation of tissue and cells. In order to protect the cells, incubation in different cryopreservation solutions is essential. The speed of the cooling process also makes a pivotal contribution to the success of this method. Using Flourescence Activated Cell Sorting (FACS), we investigated the impact of an open rapid and a closed rapid cooling technique on the vitality of human granulosa cells. Furthermore, we examined effects of the different solutions used for rapid cooling and warming before and after rapid cooling. We found a significant lower proportion of vital cells after rapid cooling compared to untreated controls independently of the technique and the tube size. However, we did not find any significant differences between open and closed rapid cooling. In both, a lower proportion of vital granulosa cells were found after incubation in rapid cooling solution only compared to warming solution only. Our results lend support to the conclusion that the difference of cooling-speed between open and closed rapid cooling is, in our settings, not crucial for the success of the procedure and that cryoprotective agents in the rapid cooling solutions have a higher potential to cause severe cell damage than agents used for warming. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]