Search

Clearing of woodlands is used by graziers to promote pasture production, even though understanding of impacts of clearing on native fauna is lacking. We evaluate impacts of clearing on biodiversity by comparing invertebrates associated with ground-layer vegetation of cleared woodlands (grasslands) to that of nearby uncleared woodlands. Two replicates of grasslands consisting of pastures dominated by introduced grasses were compared with two woodlands at each of four locations. The adjacent riparian forest to each grassland and woodland site allowed evaluation of the effect of woodland clearing on the adjacent riparian zone. All habitats were grazed. Invertebrates of ground-layer vegetation were sampled using three suction subsamples of 1m2 at each site. Grasslands had significantly lower order richness and abundance of herbivores, pollinators and macroinvertebrates (food for birds) than the woodlands, whereas the riparian forests closely resembled each other in all metrics. Invertebrate assemblages of grasslands also differed significantly from those of the woodlands. BEST analysis showed that groundcover and leaf-litter percentage cover correlated strongest with invertebrate composition. This study has demonstrated that grazing management relying on clearing of fertile grassy woodlands of the rangelands of Central Queensland alters invertebrate diversity and assemblage. Thus, tree clearing not only leads to biodiversity losses in the canopy layer, but also in the ground-layer vegetation. Implications for insect conservation: Pastoralists have the capacity to improve outcomes for invertebrate biodiversity by maintaining groundcover (ground-layer vegetation and litter cover) above 80%, by encouraging native pastures over introduced species such as Buffel Grass and by retaining native woodlands. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Regular bird surveys at one site in the marine plain grasslands in the Rockhampton district of the Central Queensland coast, between 2005 and 2011, have recorded the presence of Brown Songlarks Cincloramphus cruralis throughout the year, indicating a sedentary population in this region. This sedentary pattern is at variance with the seasonally dispersive pattern typical for eastern Australia in which Brown Songlarks undergo a regular anticlockwise cycle from south-eastern Australia in summer, up the eastern coast and then spreading across central temperate and subtropical Australia in the winter, before returning to the south-eastern corner. The discovery of a nest with eggs in December 2010 confirmed local breeding by this subpopulation. The relative isolation, local breeding and sedentary nature of this subpopulation raises the possibility that it may be genetically separated from southern and inland Songlarks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]