Search

This article reviews the literature on nitrate leaching under sheep grazing systems and focuses on identifying future research needs. Urinary nitrogen (N) is an important source of the nitrate leached from pastoral agriculture. Urinary N excretion can be measured or simulated using models and has been well characterised for dairy systems. It is difficult to continuously monitor the urinary N excretion of sheep under field conditions; consequently, measurements of N excretion in sheep urine are limited. Urination events by sheep vary greatly in volume (0.5 L to 6.9 L), concentration (3 to 13.7 g N/L), and frequency (8 to 23 events/day); this variation results in a corresponding variation in N loading rates in urine patches. The amount of nitrate leached under pastures grazed by sheep has typically varied between 1 and 50 kg N/ha/year, but rates as high as 300 kg N/ha/year have been reported. The quantity of nitrate leached under sheep depends on the season, climate, quantity and timing of drainage, the interaction between forage production and stocking rate, fertiliser applied, N fixation by legumes, forage type, and grazing management. The majority of studies examining nitrate leaching under sheep grazing systems are more than 20 years old; so, there is little recent information on nitrate leaching under modern pasture-based sheep production systems. Further research is required to quantify nitrate leaching levels under current sheep farming practices, to understand the impacts of this leaching on water quality, and to help identify effective strategies to reduce the transfer of N from grazed paddocks to receiving water bodies. This additional information will help provide information for decision support tools, including models and management practices, to help sheep farmers minimise their impact on the aquatic environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The annual quantities of nitrate-N (-N) and total N (TN) leached from mole and pipe drained dairy pastures on a Pallic soil, were reduced by an average of 52% and 42% (p < .05), respectively, by standing cows off pasture to ruminate and rest after grazing (Duration-controlled grazing, DC), compared to the standard grazing management (SG) of leaving cows at pasture between milkings. For the SG treatment, measured -N leached was 13, 8 and 21 kg N ha−1 and total N leached was 18, 13 and 26 kg N ha−1 in 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively. Annual surface runoff contained <1 kg -N ha−1 y−1 and <3 kg TN ha−1 y−1. The deposition of urine in the autumn period had the greatest influence on the quantity of leached in winter drainage. DC grazing is a practical method to reduce N leaching from grazed dairy pastures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Standing cows off pasture after 4 hours of grazing (duration-controlled (DC) grazing) was researched over 3 years (2008-2011) to compare the losses of nutrients in drainage and surface runoff water with losses under standard grazing (SG). Pasture growth rates, nutrient concentrations and apparent intake by cows were used to model nutrient removals from, and returns to, pasture. Pre- and post-grazing covers and apparent pasture intakes were similar for both treatments. Quantities of N, P and K returned to the DC plots in excreta and effluent were 34%, 0% and 45% less than those returned to SG plots. This reduction in nutrient returns was associated with a nil, 20% and 9% decrease in annual pasture growth on the DC plots in the three respective years. Reductions in annual pasture growth under DC grazing may be avoidable if nutrient removals are balanced with returns in effluent and fertiliser. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sheep farmers can increase production levels as a means to improve economic outcomes. However, this intensification can potentially result in more nitrogen (N) leaching which is at odds with the increasing pressure on farmers to reduce the quantity of N lost into the environment. Therefore, there is increasing interest in the use of alternative forages, such as Italian ryegrass and plantain, which could potentially allow farmers to increase production while decreasing N leaching. This study quantified and compared the quantity of N leaching under sheep grazing four different forages: perennial ryegrass/white clover (RGWC), Italian ryegrass/WC (IRWC), plantain/WC (PWC) and a winter brassica. Five replicates of each forage were established on plots of 800 m2 (40 m x 20 m). Each plot had an independent mole-pipe drain system with tipping-bucket monitoring equipment at the end of the pipe drain. Drainage volume and N concentrations (nitrate-N: NO 3 ⁻-N; ammonium-N; total-N) in drainage water were measured to estimate N losses. The forages were grazed according to the best management practice for each forage type over a two-and-a-half-year period (Year 1: July-December 2019; Year 2: January-December 2020; and Year 3: January-December 2021). In the first two years of this study, NO 3 ⁻-N leaching losses under IRWC and PWC were very small (ranging from 0.4 to 0.5 kg N/ha), and they were not different (P > 0.05) from those under RGWC. However, in Year 3, the leaching losses under IRWC and PWC treatments were greater (P < 0.05) than those under RGWC. This increased leaching was probably due to the need to re-establish these pastures. As part of renewing these swards, the IRWC and PWC plots were fallow during the key late summer-autumn period. In contrast, NO 3 ⁻-N leaching losses under brassica forages (3.5–6.4 kg N/ha) were greater (P < 0.05) than under RGWC (0.5–1.5 kg N/ha). Overall, the leaching losses measured under sheep grazing the forages were much smaller than those commonly reported by dairy studies. [Display omitted] • In recent years, there has been significant concern regarding the leaching of nutrients from grazing systems. • This study quantified the amount of nitrogen leaching lost in drainage water from sheep grazing four different forages. • Mole-and-pipe drainage systems were used to monitor drainage volume and collect samples. • Overall, leaching losses under sheep grazing forages were small. • Modern sheep grazing systems may offer mitigation options for dairying areas with high NO 3 - leaching. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]