Search

Spatial utilization of pasture landscapes by grazing animals is often heterogeneous and driven by complex environmental and physiological interactions between plants and animals. Synergistic energy pathways can be modeled using mechanistic relationships describing resource distribution, animal behavior, metabolic energy rate, and pasture utilization using biometric sensors. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the ability to measure the energy landscape by mapping fine-scale contributions to animal energy expenditure, nutrient acquisition, growth, and overall economic profitability. We utilized animal trajectories and location fixes recorded by virtual fencing collars (Vence) daily body weight (BW) using precision livestock scales (Smartscale, C-Lock Inc.) and oxygen consumption (GreenFeeds, C-Lock Inc.) on steers (n = 127), managed as part of a broader project to evaluate environmental synergies in extensive grazing systems. Steers were allocated to one of six native grass pastures assigned to either rotational or continuous grazing strategies, and one of three stocking rates (low, moderate, high) in a 2 x 3 factorial arrangement. Space utilization was quantified as the frequency of fixes located within each cell of a 5 x 5-meter Grid and the distance between grid cells and water was calculated using the Pythagorean theorem. Movement behavior was quantified using Program R to calculate step length, the distance between two temporally continuous fix points utilizing the Pythagorean Theorem, and turn angles calculated as the cosine of the pre- and pro-ceeding step lengths where larger values indicated greater deviation from a straight trajectory. A mixed linear regression model was fitted using the lmer function in the lme4 package. Space utilization decreased with increased distance from water (P < 0.05), with rotational grazing strategies increasing concentration around water sources (P < 0.05). This indicates an opportunity to utilize precision livestock technology to facilitate pasture management and increase space utilization in grazing cattle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The methodology of analyzing methane emissions in cattle grazing native rangeland is imperative for producing reliable and repeatable estimations of total enteric emissions on an individual and herd basis. However, due to seasonal differences in climate from year to year, there are distinct differences in forage biomass availability and nutrient composition on extensive rangelands. Thus, our objective was to evaluate the differences in methane emissions using phenological forage phases compared with specific time periods. Yearling Angus steers (n = 127) were allocated to one of six pastures grazed from June to September (2023) at the South Dakota State University Cottonwood Field Station (Cottonwood, SD). Each pasture was equipped with a GreenFeed (C-Lock Inc., Rapid City, SD) pasture system to measure individual animal CH4 emissions. A subset of CH4 data from two cool-seasondominated pastures were aggregated from the overall study. We used two methods to segment CH4 by either 1) month (June, July, August) or 2) phenology (vegetative, reproductive, and senescence) to derive average CH4 (g animal -1 d-1) for each period. Western wheatgrass (WWG), a cool-season native, was used as a proxy for cool season grass development. On May 28th, 2023, the growing degree days (GDD) reached 632, representing the 3.5 leaf stage. WWG has been documented to reach maturity at approximately 1,100 GDD, which occurred on June 20th, 2023. Nutrient content of the forage (i.e., lignin) was used to approximate the start of senescence on August 11th. These developmental markers created estimates of the vegetative, reproductive, and senescence periods within our emissions data. Differences in enteric emissions for each approach were analyzed using a linear mixed effects model in R, and posthoc contrast between methods was assessed using the lsmeans package. There were no statistical differences in CH4 by month (P > 0.05), and the means for June, July, and August were 217, 214, and 211 ± 4, respectively By phenological phases, there was a difference (P < 0.05) between maturity and senescence, with means for vegetative, reproductive, and senescence as 214, 219, and 206 ± 4, respectively. Methane intensity (g animal-1 d-1) per period was then multiplied by the number of days in each month or phase to estimate total emissions for the entire grazing season (86 d). The monthly approach totaled 18,383 g CH4 per animal, while phenology totaled 18,504 g for the grazing season. This is a difference of 0.654% between the same data segmented by month or by phenology. Therefore, because of the dynamic nature of forage and cattle production, it is likely that accounting for phenology will provide greater clarity for GHG on rangeland systems rather than arbitrary periods of time and will require the use of dynamic models to handle the complexity of enteric emissions of grazing animals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]