Search

Within the last decade, the Greenland ice sheet (GrIS) and its surroundings have experienced record high surface temperatures (Mote, 2007; Box et al., 2010), ice sheet melt extent (Fettweis et al., 2011) and record-low summer sea-ice extent (Nghiem et al., 2007). Using three independent data sets, we derive, for the first time, consistent ice-mass trends and temporal variations within seven major drainage basins from gravity fields from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE; Tapley et al., 2004), surface-ice velocities from Inteferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR; Rignot and Kanagaratnam, 2006) together with output of the regional atmospheric climate modelling (RACMO2/GR; Ettema et al., 2009), and surface-elevation changes from the Ice, cloud and land elevation satellite (ICESat; Sørensen et al., 2011). We show that changing ice discharge (D), surface melting and subsequent run-off (M/R) and precipitation (P) all contribute, in a complex and regionally variable interplay, to the increasingly negative mass balance of the GrIS observed within the last decade. Interannual variability in P along the northwest and west coasts of the GrIS largely explains the apparent regional mass loss increase during 2002-2010, and obscures increasing M/R and D since the 1990s. In winter 2002/2003 and 2008/2009, accumulation anomalies in the east and southeast temporarily outweighed the losses by M/R and D that prevailed during 2003-2008, and after summer 2010. Overall, for all basins of the GrIS, the decadal variability of anomalies in P, M/R and D between 1958 and 2010 (w.r.t. 1961-1990) was significantly exceeded by the regional trends observed during the GRACE period (2002-2011). © 2012 Elsevier B.V.

Surface melting occurs during summer on the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets, but the volume of stored surface meltwater has been difficult to quantify due to a lack of accurate depth estimates. NASA's ICESat‐2 laser altimeter brings a new capability: photons penetrate water and are reflected from both the water and the underlying ice; the difference provides a depth estimate. ICESat‐2 sampled Amery Ice Shelf on January 2, 2019 and showed double returns from surface depressions, indicating meltwater. For four melt features, we compared depth estimates from eight algorithms: six based on ICESat‐2 and two from coincident Landsat‐8 and Sentinel‐2 imagery. All algorithms successfully identified surface water at the same locations. Algorithms based on ICESat‐2 produced the most accurate depths; the image‐based algorithms underestimated depths (by 30%–70%). This implies that ICESat‐2 depths can be used to tune image‐based algorithms, moving us closer to quantifying stored meltwater volumes across Antarctica and Greenland. Plain Language Summary: Summer surface melting on Antarctica's ice shelves is a small component of overall ice sheet mass loss but can be important for individual ice shelves and may increase as the climate warms. However, the volume of meltwater has been difficult to monitor because depth estimates are challenging. NASA's ICESat‐2 laser altimetry mission brings a new capability to this problem. ICESat‐2 532 nm photons (green light) are able to pass through water and reflect from both the water surface and the underlying ice surface; the difference in elevation provides meltwater depth estimates. In this pilot study, we compared depths from eight algorithms (six ICESat‐2 and two image based) over four Amery Ice Shelf meltwater lakes for an ICESat‐2 pass in early January 2019. The ICESat‐2 algorithms all produced more reliable depth estimates, and the image‐based algorithms underestimated the depths. This implies that ICESat‐2 water depths can be used to tune image‐based depth retrieval algorithms, enabling improved performance and allowing us to estimate more accurately how much surface melt is stored in melt ponds on the ice sheets each summer. Key Points: ICESat‐2 photons penetrate surface melt lakes and reflect from both the water surface and the underlying ice, providing depth estimatesWe compared depths from eight algorithms (six ICESat‐2 and two image‐based) for four lakes present on Amery Ice Shelf in January 2019Depths from ICESat‐2 were more accurate than from imagery (30%–70% too low); merging these data will improve estimates ice‐sheet wide [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Surface mass balance (SMB) provides mass input to the surface of the Antarctic and Greenland Ice Sheets and therefore comprises an important control on ice sheet mass balance and resulting contribution to global sea level change. As ice sheet SMB varies highly across multiple scales of space (meters to hundreds of kilometers) and time (hourly to decadal), it is notoriously challenging to observe and represent in models. In addition, SMB consists of multiple components, all of which depend on complex interactions between the atmosphere and the snow/ice surface, large‐scale atmospheric circulation and ocean conditions, and ice sheet topography. In this review, we present the state‐of‐the‐art knowledge and recent advances in ice sheet SMB observations and models, highlight current shortcomings, and propose future directions. Novel observational methods allow mapping SMB across larger areas, longer time periods, and/or at very high (subdaily) temporal frequency. As a recent observational breakthrough, cosmic ray counters provide direct estimates of SMB, circumventing the need for accurate snow density observations upon which many other techniques rely. Regional atmospheric climate models have drastically improved their simulation of ice sheet SMB in the last decade, thanks to the inclusion or improved representation of essential processes (e.g., clouds, blowing snow, and snow albedo), and by enhancing horizontal resolution (5–30 km). Future modeling efforts are required in improving Earth system models to match regional atmospheric climate model performance in simulating ice sheet SMB, and in reinforcing the efforts in developing statistical and dynamic downscaling to represent smaller‐scale SMB processes. Plain Language Summary: Ice sheets, the largest class of glaciers, contain the majority of ice on Earth. The amount of ice contained in ice sheets changes constantly with the addition of new snow and ice, and melting taking place at the surface, base, and terminus of ice sheets. The balance between these inputs and outputs is known as the "mass balance." Processes affecting the addition and removal of snow on top of the ice sheet are termed the "surface mass balance" and include rainfall, moisture evaporation, snow‐transporting winds, and melting due to temperature changes. Scientists can now monitor these processes with tools on‐site, such as automated weather stations, Global Positioning Systems, and sensors that record high‐energy radiation (cosmic rays) originating outside the Earth's atmosphere. Several methods are also available where Earth‐orbiting satellites measure how ice is changing. Data collected in these ways have revealed how the surface mass balance varies over time and space. A better understanding of these processes is critical to predicting future behavior of ice sheets and their effect on sea level. Improvements to regional‐scale models in the past decade have allowed good simulations of surface mass balance, and the next step is to build models that work at a global scale. Key Points: Emerging (remote) observational techniques provide enhanced insights in spatial and temporal variability of ice sheet surface mass balance (SMB)Regional climate models can be used to assess ice sheet SMB, although deficiencies remain in representing subgrid processesIn the near future, Earth System Models can be used to assess internal variability, forced change, and positive feedbacks on ice sheet SMB [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Satellite gravimetry data acquired by the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) allows to derive the temporal evolution in ice mass for both the Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) and the Greenland Ice Sheet (GIS). Various algorithms have been used in a wide range of studies to generate Gravimetric Mass Balance (GMB) products. Results from different studies may be affected by substantial differences in the processing, including the applied algorithm, the utilised background models and the time period under consideration. This study gives a detailed description of an assessment of the performance of GMB algorithms using actual GRACE monthly solutions for a prescribed period as well as synthetic data sets. The inter-comparison exercise was conducted in the scope of the European Space Agency's Climate Change Initiative (CCI) project for the AIS and GIS, and was, for the first time, open to everyone. GMB products generated by different groups could be evaluated and directly compared against each other. For the period from 2003-02 to 2013-12, estimated linear trends in ice mass vary between −99 Gt/yr and −108 Gt/yr for the AIS and between −252 Gt/yr and −274 Gt/yr for the GIS, respectively. The spread between the solutions is larger if smaller drainage basins or gridded GMB products are considered. Finally, findings from the exercise formed the basis to select the algorithms used for the GMB product generation within the AIS and GIS CCI project. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]