Search

Free Fatty Acid Receptor 2 is a GPCR activated by short chain fatty acids produced in high levels in the lower gut by microbial fermentation of non-digestible carbohydrates. A major challenge in studying this receptor is that the mouse ortholog does not have significant affinity for antagonists that are able to block the human receptor. Docking of exemplar antagonists from two chemical series to homology models of both human and mouse Free Fatty Acid Receptor 2 suggested that a single lysine - arginine variation at the extracellular face of the receptor might provide the basis for antagonist selectivity and mutational swap studies confirmed this hypothesis. Extending these studies to agonist function indicated that although the lysine - arginine variation between human and mouse orthologs had limited effect on G protein-mediated signal transduction, removal of positive charge from this residue produced a signalling-biased variant of Free Fatty Acid Receptor 2 in which G i -mediated signalling by both short chain fatty acids and synthetic agonists was maintained whilst there was marked loss of agonist potency for signalling via G q/11 and G 12/13 G proteins. A single residue at the extracellular face of the receptor thus plays key roles in both agonist and antagonist function.

Opiate drugs mediate their analgesic, euphoriant, and rewarding effects by activating opioid receptors. Pharmacological and molecular studies have demonstrated the existence of three opioid receptor subtypes, μ, δ, and κ- that couple predominantly to Gi/Go types of G proteins to regulate the activity of a diverse array of effector systems. Ample experimental evidence has demonstrated that these receptors can physically interact with a variety of accessory proteins, confirming that signal transduction of the opioid receptors is not restricted to heterotrimeric G protein activation. Such interactions can alter the effectiveness of agonist-driven cell signalling, determine the signals generated and alter the trafficking, targeting, fine tuning and cellular localization of these receptors by providing a scaffold that links the receptors to the cytoskeletal network. The current review will summarize opioid receptor interacting partners and their role as currently understood. Increasing knowledge of the mechanisms by which these interactions are regulated is expected to address problems related to phenomena such as pain perception, tolerance and dependence that occur upon chronic opiate administration and define whether disruption of such interactions may contribute to the development of novel therapeutic strategies.

Some growth hormone secretagogues act as agonists at the ghrelin receptor and have been described as "ago-allosteric" ligands because of an ability to also modulate the maximum efficacy and potency of ghrelin (Holst et al., 2005). In membranes prepared from cells coexpressing the human ghrelin receptor and the G protein Galpha(o1), N-[1(R)-1, 2-dihydro-1-ethanesulfonylspiro-3H-indole-3,4'-piperidin)-1'-yl]carbonyl-2-(phenylmethoxy)-ethyl-2-amino-2-methylpropanamide (MK-677), growth hormone-releasing peptide 6 (GHRP-6), and the 2(R)-hydroxypropyl derivative of 3-amino-3-methyl-N-(2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-2-oxo-1-([2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl) (1,1'-biphenyl)-4-yl]methyl)-1H-1-benzazepin-3(R)-yl)-butanamide (L-692,585) each functioned as direct agonists, and each displayed higher efficacy than ghrelin. The effect of multiple, fixed concentrations of each of these ligands on the function and concentration-dependence of ghrelin and the effect of multiple, fixed concentrations of ghrelin on the action of MK-677, GHRP-6, and L-692,585 was analyzed globally according to a modified version of an operational model of allosterism that accounts for allosteric modulation of affinity, efficacy, and allosteric agonism. Each of the data sets was best fit by a model of simple competition between a partial and a full agonist. Both positive and negative allosteric modulators are anticipated to alter the kinetics of binding of an orthosteric agonist. However, none of the proposed ago-allosteric regulators tested had any effect on the dissociation kinetics of (125)I-[His]-ghrelin, and GHRP-6 and MK-677 were able to fully displace (125)I-[His]-ghrelin from the receptor. At least in the system tested, each of the ligands acted in a simple competitive fashion with ghrelin as demonstrated by analysis according to a model whereby ghrelin is a partial agonist with respect to each of the synthetic agonists tested.

Screening of a human brain cDNA library using the C-terminal tail of the melanin-concentrating hormone receptor 1 (MCHR1) as bait in a yeast two-hybrid assay resulted in the identification of the neurite-outgrowth related factor, neurochondrin. This interaction was verified in overlay, pulldown, and co-immunoprecipitation assays. Deletion mapping confined the binding to the C terminus of neurochondrin and to the proximal C terminus of MCHR1, a region known to be involved in G protein binding and signal transduction. This region of the MCHR1 is also able to interact with the actin- and intermediate filament-binding protein, periplakin. Interactions of MCHR1 with neurochondrin and periplakin were competitive, indicating that these two proteins bind to overlapping regions of MCHR1. Although neurochondrin did not interfere with melanin-concentrating hormone-mediated internalization of the receptor, it did inhibit G protein-coupled signal transduction via both Galpha(i/o) and Galpha(q/11) family G proteins as measured by each of melanin-concentrating hormone-induced G protein-activated inwardly rectifying K(+) channel activity of voltage-clamped amphibian oocytes, by calcium mobilization in transfected mammalian cells, and by reduction in the capacity of melanin-concentrating hormone to promote binding of [(35)S]guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate to both Galpha(o1) and Galpha(11). Immunohistochemistry revealed co-expression of neurochondrin and MCHR1 within the rodent brain, suggesting that neurochondrin may be involved in the regulation of MCHR1 signaling and play a role in modulating melanin-concentrating hormone-mediated functions in vivo.

Fusion proteins between a receptor and a pertussis toxin-insensitive G(i)alpha subunit were used to gain insight into the molecular interactions that take place upon mu and delta opioid receptor heterodimerization. When mu opioid receptor-G(i1)alpha fusions were coexpressed with nonfused delta opioid receptors in human embryonic kidney 293 cells, or vice versa, receptor heterodimers were detected by coimmunoprecipitation. In pertussis toxin-treated cells, receptor coexpression decreased the amount of guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) incorporated in the fused G alpha protein after the addition of agonists specific for the receptor-G(i1)alpha fusion. In addition, activation of the G alpha protein occurred in heterodimers upon addition of an agonist specific for the nonfused receptor. It remained unaffected by an inverse agonist specific for the receptor-G(i1)alpha fusion. These data suggest that signaling through the receptor-G(i1)alpha fusion protein is impaired in heterodimers and support a mechanism in which activation of the G alpha subunit is promoted by a direct interaction with the nonfused receptor. Alternatively, receptor coexpression did not modify the ligand binding properties for the high-affinity state of the receptor-G(i1)alpha fusion nor the EC50 values for agonist-induced [35S]GTPgammaS incorporation in the G(i1)alpha subunit. In addition, no binding competition was observed between delta and mu ligands. Together, the data point to mu-delta opioid receptor heterodimers formed by contact interactions between monomers that retain their structural integrity.

In mice genetic ablation of expression of either melanin-concentrating hormone or the melanin-concentrating hormone-1 receptor results in alterations in energy metabolism and a lean phenotype. There is thus great interest in the function and regulation of this receptor. Using the yeast two-hybrid system we identified an interaction of the actin- and intermediate filament-binding protein periplakin with the intracellular C-terminal tail of the melanin-concentrating hormone-1 receptor. Direct association of these proteins was verified in pull-down and coimmunoprecipitation experiments. Truncations and internal deletions delineated the site of interaction to a group of 11 amino acids proximal to transmembrane helix VII, which was distinct from the binding site for the melanin-concentrating hormone-1 receptor-interacting zinc finger protein. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated coexpression of periplakin with melanin-concentrating hormone-1 receptor in specific cells of the piriform cortex, amygdala, and other structures of the adult mouse brain. Coexpression of the melanin-concentrating hormone-1 receptor with periplakin in human embryonic kidney 293 cells did not prevent agonist-mediated internalization of the receptor but did interfere with binding of (35)S-labeled guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) to the G protein Galpha(o1) and the elevation of [Ca(2+)](i). Coexpression of the receptor with the interacting zinc finger protein did not modulate receptor internalization or G protein activation. The interaction of periplakin with receptors was selective. Coexpression of periplakin with the IP prostanoid receptor did not result in coimmunoprecipitation nor interfere with agonist-mediated binding of [(35)S]GTPgammaS to the G protein Galpha(s). Periplakin is the first protein described to modify the capacity of the melanin-concentrating hormone-1 receptor to initiate signal transduction.

A substantial number of G-protein-coupled receptor-interacting proteins have been identified initially by the use of yeast two-hybrid screens. Using the C-terminal tail of both opioid receptors and the melanin concentrating hormone receptor-1 as bait, the actin and intermediate filament-binding protein periplakin was isolated. In each case, the site of interaction is within helix VIII of the receptor and periplakin limits agonist-mediated G-protein activation potentially by competing with G-protein for this region of the receptor.

Fusion constructs between G-protein-coupled receptors and G-protein alpha-subunits have been used to examine a variety of aspects of the functioning of these signaling systems. Here we describe some of the various techniques and methods used in detail. The process of fusing the two components, the receptor and the G-protein alpha-subunit, result in a construct that acts as an agonist stimulated GTPase enzyme whose expression level can be accurately determined by radioligand binding. The effects of different ligands, mutations, and other signaling system components can thus be analyzed by a series of relatively simple assays. Recently we have begun to supplement this approach with the use of fusions between G-protein-coupled receptors and regulator of G-protein signaling proteins to examine the function of this important group of signaling molecules.

The histamine H1 receptor and the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor are G protein-coupled receptors that elevate intracellular [Ca2+] via activation of Gq/G11. Assessed by co-immunoprecipitation and time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer they both exist as homo-dimers. The addition of the G protein G11alpha to the C terminus of these receptors did not prevent dimerization. Agonists produced a large stimulation of guanosine 5'-3-O-([35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding to receptor-G protein fusions containing wild type forms of both polypeptides. For both receptors this was abolished by incorporation of G208AG11alpha into the fusions. Mutation of a highly conserved leucine in intracellular loop 2 of each receptor also eliminated agonist function but not binding. Co-expression of the two non-functional but complementary fusion constructs reconstituted agonist-mediated binding of [35S]GTPgammaS in membranes of HEK293 cells and elevation of [Ca2+]i in mouse embryo fibroblasts lacking both Gq and G11. Co-expression of the histamine H1 receptor- and the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor-G11alpha fusions allowed detection of functional hetero-dimeric complexes, whereas co-expression of histamine H1 receptor-G11alpha with increasing amounts of L151Dalpha1b-adrenoreceptor resulted in decreasing levels of histamine-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding. Co-expression of the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor with a fusion protein incorporating the N-terminal domain and transmembrane helix 1 of the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor and G11alpha did not result in agonist activation of the G protein but did indicate a role for transmembrane helix 1 in dimerization. These data demonstrate that dimers of these class A receptors function via trans-activation of associated G proteins.

Analysis of interactions between the C-terminal tail of the MOP-1 and MOP-1A variants of the human mu-opioid receptor with proteins derived from a human brain cDNA library resulted in identification of the actin and intermediate filament-binding protein periplakin. Mapping of this interaction indicated that the predicted fourth intracellular loop/helix VIII of the receptor interacts with the C-terminal rod and linker region of periplakin. Periplakin is widely expressed in the central nervous system of both man and rat and demonstrated an overlapping but not identical distribution with mu-opioid (MOP) receptors. Co-expression of periplakin with MOP-1 or a MOP-1-eYFP fusion construct in HEK293 cells did not interfere with agonist-mediated internalization of the receptor. When co-expressed with a MOP-1-Gi1 alpha fusion protein periplakin significantly reduced the capacity of the agonist to stimulate binding of 35S-labeled guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTP gamma S) to the receptor-associated G protein. By contrast, periplakin did not interfere with agonist-stimulation of [35S]GTP gamma S binding to either an alpha 2A-adrenoreceptor-Gi1 alpha fusion protein or a beta2-adrenoreceptor-Gs alpha fusion protein, indicating its selectivity of function. This represents the first example of an opioid receptor-interacting protein that functions to disrupt agonist-mediated G protein activation.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of proteins involved in transmembrane signal transduction and are actively studied because of their suitability as therapeutic small-molecule drug targets. Agonist activation of GPCRs almost invariably results in the receptor being desensitized. One of the key events in receptor desensitization is the sequestration of the receptor from the cell surface into acidic intracellular endosomes. Therefore, a convenient, generic, and noninvasive monitor of this process is desirable. A novel, pH-sensitive, red-excited fluorescent dye, CypHer 5, was synthesized. This dye is non-fluorescent at neutral pH and is fluorescent at acidic pH. Anti-epitope antibodies labeled with this dye were internalized in an agonist concentration- and time-dependent manner, following binding on live cells to a range of GPCRs that had been modified to incorporate the epitope tags in their extracellular N-terminal domain. This resulted in a large signal increase over background. When protonated, the red fluorescence of CypHer 5 provides a generic reagent suitable for monitoring the internalization of GPCRs into acidic vesicles. This approach should be amenable to the study of many other classes of cell surface receptors that also internalize following stimulation.

G-protein-coupled receptors are the most tractable class of protein targets for small molecule drug design. Sequencing of the human genome allied to bio-informatic analysis has identified a large number of putative receptors for which the natural ligands remain undefined. A range of currently employed and developing strategies to identify ligands that interact with these orphan receptors and to validate them as drug targets are described and discussed.

Homo- and hetero-oligomerization of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) were examined in HEK-293 cells using two variants of bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET). BRET(2) (a variant of BRET) offers greatly improved separation of the emission spectra of the donor and acceptor moieties compared with traditional BRET. Previously recorded homo-oligomerization of the human delta-opioid receptor was confirmed using BRET(2). Homo-oligomerization of the kappa-opioid receptor was observed using both BRET techniques. Both homo- and hetero-oligomers, containing both delta- and kappa-opioid receptors, were unaffected by the presence of receptor ligands. BRET detection of opioid receptor homo- and hetero-oligomers required expression of 50,000-100,000 copies of the receptor energy acceptor construct per cell. The effectiveness of delta-kappa-opioid receptor hetero-oligomer formation was as great as for homomeric interactions. The capacity of the two opioid receptors to form oligomeric complexes with the beta(2)-adrenoceptor was also assessed. Although such interactions were detected, at least 250,000 copies per cell of the energy acceptor were required. Requirement for high levels of receptor expression was equally pronounced in attempts to measure hetero-oligomer formation between the kappa-opioid receptor and the thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor-1. These studies indicate that constitutively formed homo- and hetero-oligomers of opioid receptor subtypes can be detected in living cells containing less than 100,000 copies of the receptors. However, although hetero-oligomeric interactions between certain less closely related GPCRs can be detected, they appear to be of lower affinity than homo- or hetero-oligomers containing closely related sequences. Interactions recorded between certain GPCR family members in heterologous expression systems are likely to be artefacts of extreme levels of overexpression.

Fusion proteins in which the N-terminus of a G protein alpha subunit is attached in frame to the C-terminal tail of a G-protein-coupled receptor have become widely used as experimental systems to explore the quantitative details of ligand stimulation of specific receptor G-protein combinations. In part, this reflects that they function as agonist-activated GTPases that behave with simple Michaelan kinetics. They have also been used to explore the effects of mutation in both receptor and G protein on information transfer, ligand regulation of posttranslational acylation, and the mechanism and potential selectivity of regulators of G-protein signaling.

Constitutively active mutants (CAMs) of G protein-coupled receptors are found naturally in disease states and they can be generated by point mutation. As these mutants are able to activate G proteins in the absence of a ligand, they are useful tools in the study of conformational changes leading to receptor activation and in the drug discovery process. Early studies on CAMs noted that they are often expressed at lower levels than their wild-type forms. In this review we discuss the mechanisms responsible for this reduced expression and also provide an explanation for the observation that challenging cells with receptor ligands can increase the CAM expression level. The application of these observations to the development of a high-throughput reporter assay suitable for ligand identification is also discussed., (Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel)

The basic module of signal transduction that involves G-protein-coupled receptors is usually portrayed as comprising a receptor, a heterotrimeric G protein and an effector. It is now well established that regulated interactions between receptors and arrestins, and between G proteins and regulators of G-protein signalling alter the effectiveness and kinetics of information transfer. However, more recent studies have begun to identify a host of other proteins that interact selectively with individual receptors at both the intracellular and extracellular face of the membrane. Although the functional relevance of many of these interactions is only beginning to be understood, current information indicates that these interactions might determine receptor properties, such as cellular compartmentalization or signal selection, and can promote protein scaffolding into complexes that integrate function.

Transfection of either the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor or Galpha(11) into a fibroblast cell line derived from a Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) double knockout mouse failed to produce elevation of intracellular [Ca(2+)] upon the addition of agonist. Co-expression of these two polypeptides, however, produced a significant stimulation. Co-transfection of the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor with the palmitoylation-resistant C9S,C10S Galpha(11) also failed to produce a signal, and much reduced and kinetically delayed signals were obtained using either C9S Galpha(11) or C10S Galpha(11). Expression of a fusion protein between the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and Galpha(11) allowed [Ca(2+)](i) elevation, and this was also true for a fusion protein between the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and C9S,C10S Galpha(11), since this strategy ensures proximity of the two polypeptides at the cell membrane. For both fusion proteins, co-expression of transducin alpha, as a beta.gamma-sequestering agent, fully attenuated the Ca(2+) signal. Both of these fusion proteins and one in which an acylation-resistant form of the receptor was linked to wild type Galpha(11) were also targets for agonist-regulated [(3)H]palmitoylation and bound [(35)S]guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) in an agonist concentration-dependent manner. The potency of agonist to stimulate [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding was unaffected by the palmitoylation potential of either receptor or G protein. These studies provide clear evidence for coordinated, agonist-mediated regulation of the post-translational acylation of both a receptor and partner G protein and demonstrate the capacity of such fusions to bind and then release beta.gamma complex upon agonist stimulation whether or not the G protein can be palmitoylated. They also demonstrate that Ca(2+) signaling in EF88 cells by such fusion proteins is mediated via release of the G protein beta.gamma complex.

Fusion proteins were constructed between the delta opioid receptor and forms of the alpha subunit of G(i1) in which cysteine(351) was mutated to a range of amino acids. GDP reduced the binding of the agonist [(3)H]DADLE but not the antagonist [(3)H]naltrindole to both the receptor alone and all the delta opioid receptor-Cys(351)XaaG(i1)alpha fusion proteins. For the fusion proteins the pEC(50) for GDP was strongly correlated with the n-octanol/H(2)O partition co-efficient of G protein residue(351). Fusion proteins in which this residue was either isoleucine or glycine had similar observed binding kinetics for [(3)H]DADLE. However, the rate of dissociation of [(3)H]DADLE was substantially greater for the glycine-containing fusion protein than that containing isoleucine, indicating that more hydrophobic residues imbued greater stability to the agonist-receptor-G protein ternary complex. This resulted in a higher affinity of binding of [(3)H]DADLE to the fusion protein containing isoleucine(351). In expectation with the binding data, maximal DADLE-stimulated GTP hydrolysis by the isoleucine(351)-containing fusion protein was two-fold greater and the potency of DADLE seven-fold higher than for the version containing glycine. These results demonstrate that the stability of the ternary complex between delta opioid receptor, G(i1)alpha and an agonist (but not antagonist) ligand is dependent upon the nature of residue(351) of the G protein and that this determines the effectiveness of information flow from the receptor to the G protein.

Although many G-protein-coupled neurotransmitter receptors are potentially capable of modulating both voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channels (I(Ca)) and G-protein-gated K(+) channels (I(GIRK)), there is a substantial degree of selectivity in the coupling to one or other of these channels in neurons. Thus, in rat superior cervical ganglion (SCG) neurons, M(2) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) selectively activate I(GIRK) whereas M(4) mAChRs selectively inhibit I(Ca). One source of selectivity might be that the two receptors couple preferentially to different G-proteins. Using antisense depletion methods, we found that M(2) mAChR-induced activation of I(GIRK) is mediated by G(i) whereas M(4) mAChR-induced inhibition of I(Ca) is mediated by G(oA). Experiments with the beta gamma-sequestering peptides alpha-transducin and beta ARK1(C-ter) indicate that, although both effects are mediated by G-protein beta gamma subunits, the endogenous subunits involved in I(GIRK) inhibition differ from those involved in I(Ca) inhibition. However, this pathway divergence does not result from any fundamental selectivity in receptor-G-protein-channel coupling because both I(GIRK) and I(Ca) modulation can be rescued by heterologously expressed G(i) or G(o) proteins after the endogenously coupled alpha-subunits have been inactivated with Pertussis toxin (PTX). We suggest instead that the divergence in the pathways activated by the endogenous mAChRs results from a differential topographical arrangement of receptor, G-protein and ion channel.

The wild-type beta2-adrenoceptor and a constitutively active mutant of this receptor were C-terminally tagged with luciferase from the sea pansy Renilla reniformis. C-terminal addition of Renilla luciferase did not substantially alter the levels of expression of either form of the receptor, the elevated constitutive activity of the mutant beta2-adrenoceptor nor the capacity of isoprenaline to elevate cyclic AMP levels in intact cells expressing these constructs. Treatment of cells expressing constitutively active mutant beta2-adrenoceptor-Renilla luciferase with antagonist/inverse agonist ligands resulted in upregulation of levels of this polypeptide which could be monitored by the elevated luciferase activity. The pEC50 for ligand-induced luciferase upregulation and ligand affinity to bind the receptor were highly correlated. Similar upregulation could be observed following sustained treatment with agonist ligands. These effects were only observed at a constitutively active mutant of the beta2-adrenoceptor. Co-expression of the wild-type beta2-adrenoceptor C-terminally tagged with the luciferase from Photinus pyralis did not result in ligand-induced upregulation of the levels of activity of this luciferase. Co-expression of the constitutively active mutant beta2-adrenoceptor-Renilla luciferase and an equivalent mutant of the alpha1b-adrenoceptor C-terminally tagged with green fluorescent protein allowed pharmacological selectivity of adrenoceptor antagonists to be demonstrated. This approach offers a sensitive and convenient means, which is amenable to high throughput analysis, to monitor ligand binding to a constitutively active mutant receptor. As no prior knowledge of receptor ligands is required this approach may be suitable to identify ligands at orphan G protein-coupled receptors.

A range of approaches have recently provided evidence that G-protein-coupled receptors can exist as oligomeric complexes. Both homo-oligomers, comprising multiple copies of the same gene product, and hetero-oligomers containing more than one receptor have been detected. In several, but not all, examples, the extent of oligomerisation is regulated by the presence of agonist ligands, and emerging evidence indicates that receptor hetero-oligomers can display distinct pharmacological characteristics. A chaperonin-like role for receptor oligomerisation in effective delivery of newly synthesised receptors to the cell surface is a developing concept, and recent studies have employed a series of energy-transfer techniques to explore the presence and regulation of receptor oligomerisation in living cells. However, the majority of studies have relied largely on co-immunoprecipitation techniques, and there is still little direct information on the fraction of receptors existing as oligomers in intact cells.

During the past 10 years or so, associated with the introduction of molecular biology techniques to G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) research, outstanding progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms of action of these key proteins and their physiological functions. in-vivo manipulation of levels of GPCRs using transgenic and gene knock-out approaches have been particularly successful in assessing the roles of specific GPCRs in animal physiology. Drug discovery is aiming to produce highly specific compounds based on subtle definition of receptor subtypes which can best be studied using heterologous expression of wild type or mutated forms of cDNA or genes encoding these proteins. Furthermore, new therapeutic opportunities may be provided by investigation of orphan receptors, the natural ligands for which remain unidentified. Some human diseases have been shown to be associated with rare mutations of GPCRs and the possibility that widely distributed polymorphisms in GPCR genes may allow selective therapeutic strategies for population subgroups is driving the development of the science of pharmacogenetics.

Production of chimeric DNAs in which the 5' end of G-protein alpha-subunits are linked directly to the 3' tail of a G-protein-coupled receptor has recently offered an unusual strategy to explore the detailed pharmacology of receptor-G-protein interactions. Expression of such fusion proteins ensures a 1:1 stoichiometry of receptor and G-protein expression and their proximity to each other. The capacity of such fusion proteins to be regarded as agonist-activated GTPases that allow simple enzyme kinetics to be applied to issues of ligand efficacy will be considered. In addition, the effects of point mutations, in both receptors and G proteins, on ligand function are particularly amenable to the types of robust quantitative analyses that can be produced using such fusion proteins.

The role of detergent-insensitive membrane domains (DIMs) in desensitisation of the G protein-coupled receptor-mediated hormone response was studied in clone E2M11 of HEK293 cells which stably express high levels of both thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) receptors and G(11)alpha G protein. DIMs were prepared by flotation in equilibrium sucrose density gradients and characterised by a panel of membrane markers representing peripheral, glycosylphosphatidylinositol-bound as well as integral membrane proteins (caveolin, CD29, CD55, CD59, CD147, the alpha subunit of Na, K-ATPase) and enzyme activities (alkaline phosphatase, adenylyl cyclase). Caveolin-containing DIMs represented only a small fraction of the overall pool of G(q)alpha/G(11)alpha-rich domains. Prolonged stimulation of E2M11 cells with TRH resulted in dramatic depletion of G(q)alpha/G(11)alpha from all DIMs, which was paralleled by a concomitant G(q)alpha/G(11)alpha increase in the high-density gradient fractions containing the bulk-phase membrane constituents soluble in 1% Triton X-100. Distribution of membrane markers was unchanged under these conditions. Membrane domains thus represent a substantial structural determinant of the G protein pool relevant to desensitisation of hormone action.

Fusion proteins were generated between the human 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(1A) receptor and both wild-type (Cys(351)) and pertussis toxin-resistant (Gly(351) and Ile(351)) forms of G(i1). These were expressed stably. Pertussis toxin treatment substantially reduced basal high-affinity GTPase activity in clones expressing the 5-HT(1A) receptor wild-type G(i1)alpha construct but not in clones expressing 5-HT(1A) receptor (Gly(351))G(i1)alpha or (Ile(351))G(i1)alpha. Spiperone functioned as an inverse agonist in membranes expressing the 5-HT(1A) receptor wild-type G(i1)alpha fusion protein and in those expressing 5-HT(1A) receptor (Ile(351))G(i1)alpha but not the 5-HT(1A) receptor (Gly(351))G(i1)alpha fusion protein. The effect of spiperone at the 5-HT(1A) receptor wild-type G(i1)alpha construct but not the 5-HT(1A) receptor (Ile(351))G(i1)alpha construct was blocked by pertussis toxin treatment. By contrast, agonists functioned with equal effectiveness at the three fusion proteins and were unaffected by pertussis toxin treatment of the (Ile(351))G(i1)alpha- and (Gly(351))G(i1)alpha-containing constructs. 5-HT resulted in strong inhibition of forskolin-amplified adenylyl cyclase in intact cells expressing the isolated 5-HT(1A) receptor. In fusion protein-expressing cells, 5-HT-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase was also observed. Pertussis toxin treatment obliterated 5-HT-mediated inhibition in cells expressing the isolated receptor and the 5-HT(1A) receptor wild-type G(i1)alpha fusion protein but not in those expressing the 5-HT(1A) receptor (Ile(351)) or (Gly(351))G(i1)alpha fusion proteins. These studies demonstrate that alteration of a single amino acid in G(i1)alpha located at a key contact site between the G protein and a G protein-coupled receptor can regulate agonist-independent constitutive activity of the G protein-coupled receptor and that fusion proteins can directly regulate adenylyl cyclase.

Direct measures of G-protein activation based on guanine nucleotide exchange and hydrolysis are frequently impossible to monitor for receptors which interact predominantly with G(s)alpha. An isolated FLAG (Asp-Tyr-Lys-Asp-Asp-Asp-Asp-Lys)-epitope-tagged human IP prostanoid receptor and fusion proteins generated between this form of the receptor and the alpha subunits of its cognate G-protein G(s), G(i1), a G-protein which it fails to activate in co-expression studies, and a chimaeric G(i1)-G(s)6 (a form of G(i1) in which the C-terminal six amino acids were replaced with the equivalent sequence of G(s)) were stably expressed in HEK293 cells. These were detected by [(3)H]ligand-binding studies and by immunoblotting with both an anti-FLAG antibody and with appropriate antisera to the G-proteins. Each construct displayed similar affinity to bind the agonist iloprost. Iloprost stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in clones expressing both IP prostanoid receptor and the IP prostanoid receptor-G(s)alpha fusion protein, and both constructs were shown to interact with and activate endogenously expressed G(s)alpha. Addition of iloprost to membranes of cells expressing the isolated receptor resulted in a small stimulation of high-affinity GTPase activity. Iloprost produced no stimulation of GTPase activity which could be attributed to the IP prostanoid receptor-G(i1)alpha fusion. However, the fusion proteins containing either G(s)alpha or G(i1)-G(s)6alpha produced substantially greater stimulation of GTPase activity than the isolated IP prostanoid receptor. Treatment of cells expressing the IP prostanoid receptor-G(i1)-G(s)6alpha fusion protein with a combination of cholera and pertussis toxins allowed direct measurement of agonist activation of the receptor-linked G-protein. Normalization of such results for levels of expression of the IP prostanoid receptor constructs demonstrated a 5-fold higher stimulation of GTPase activity when using the G(s)alpha-containing fusion protein and a 9-fold improvement when using the fusion protein containing G(i1)-G(s)6alpha to detect G-protein activation compared with expression of the isolated receptor.

The rat thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor-1 (TRHR-1) was modified by the addition of green fluorescent protein (GFP) and expressed stably in HEK293 cells. Extensive overlap of plasma membrane distribution of autofluorescent TRHR-1-GFP with that of the phosphoinositidase C-linked G-proteins Gqalpha/G11alpha, identified by indirect immunofluorescence, was monitored concurrently. Addition of thyrotropin-releasing hormone resulted in rapid separation of TRHR-1-GFP and Gqalpha/G11alpha signals as the receptor was internalized. This situation persisted for more than an hour. At longer time periods a fraction of the cellular Gqalpha/G11alpha was also internalized, although much of the Gqalpha/G11alpha immunoreactivity remained associated with the plasma membrane. Parallel experiments, in which the cellular distribution of TRHR-1-GFP and Gqalpha/G11alpha immunoreactivity were monitored in sucrose-gradient fractions following cell disruption, also demonstrated a rapid, agonist-induced movement of TRHR-1-GFP away from the plasma membrane to low-density vesicular fractions. At later time points, a fraction of the cellular Gqalpha/G11alpha immunoreactivity was also redistributed to overlapping, but non-identical, low-density-vesicle-containing fractions. Pretreatment of the cells with cytochalasin D or nocodazole prevented agonist-induced redistribution of G-protein but not TRHR-1-GFP, further indicating resolution of the mechanics of these two processes. The combination of a GFP-modified receptor and immunostaining of the G-proteins activated by that receptor allows, for the first time, concurrent analysis of the varying dynamics and bases of internalization and redistribution of two elements of the same signal-transduction cascade.

Approaches that allow ligand occupancy of a wide range of G protein-coupled receptors to be converted into robust assays amenable to relatively high-throughput analysis are ideal for screening for novel ligands at this class of receptor. Many attempts have been made to design universal ligand-screening systems such that any GPCR can be screened using a common assay end-point. Manipulation of the G protein within the assay system offers the possibility of achieving this. To better understand the domains involved in the interactions between G protein-coupled receptors, G proteins and effector polypeptides and the fine details of these contacts, a wide range of chimaeric G protein alpha subunits have been produced. Graeme Milligan and Stephen Rees discuss the information generated by such studies and the ways in which such chimaeric G proteins can be integrated into assay systems for drug discovery.

Here we investigate the molecular mechanisms that govern the targeting of G-protein alpha subunits to the plasma membrane. For this purpose, we used Gi1alpha as a model dually acylated G-protein. We fused full-length Gi1alpha or its extreme NH2-terminal domain (residues 1-32 or 1-122) to green fluorescent protein (GFP) and analyzed the subcellular localization of these fusion proteins. We show that the first 32 amino acids of Gi1alpha are sufficient to target GFP to caveolin-enriched domains of the plasma membrane in vivo, as demonstrated by co-fractionation and co-immunoprecipitation with caveolin-1. Interestingly, when dual acylation of this 32-amino acid domain was blocked by specific point mutations (G2A or C3S), the resulting GFP fusion proteins were localized to the cytoplasm and excluded from caveolin-rich regions. The myristoylated but nonpalmitoylated (C3S) chimera only partially partitioned into caveolin-containing fractions. However, both nonacylated GFP fusions (G2A and C3S) no longer co-immunoprecipitated with caveolin-1. Taken together, these results indicate that lipid modification of the NH2-terminal of Gi1alpha is essential for targeting to its correct destination and interaction with caveolin-1. Also, a caveolin-1 mutant lacking all three palmitoylation sites (C133S, C143S, and C156S) was unable to co-immunoprecipitate these dually acylated GFP-G-protein fusions. Thus, dual acylation of the NH2-terminal domain of Gi1alpha and palmitoylation of caveolin-1 are both required to stabilize and perhaps regulate this reciprocal interaction at the plasma membrane in vivo. Our results provide the first demonstration of a functional role for caveolin-1 palmitoylation in its interaction with signaling molecules.

Using a combination of confocal immunofluorescence microscopy and subcellular fractionation, we demonstrate for the first time active internalization, trafficking, and down-regulation of a G protein alpha subunit subsequent to agonist occupation of a receptor. This proceeds on a much slower time scale than internalization of the corresponding receptor. In intact E2M11 HEK293 cells that express high levels of murine G11alpha and the rat thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) receptor, the immunofluorescence signal of G11alpha was restricted almost exclusively to the plasma membrane. Exposure to TRH (10 microM) resulted first in partial relocation of G11alpha to discrete, segregated patches within the plasma membrane (10-60 min). Further exposure to TRH caused internalization of G11alpha to discrete, punctate, intracellular bodies (2-4 h) and subsequently to a virtually complete loss of G11alpha from plasma membranes and the cells (8-16 h). Short-term treatment with TRH followed by wash-out of the ligand allowed G11alpha immunofluorescence to be restored to the plasma membrane within 12 h. In subcellular membrane fractions, G11alpha was centered on plasma membranes, and this was not altered by up to 1-2 h of incubation with TRH. Further exposure to TRH (2-4 h) resulted in transfer of a significant portion of G11alpha to light-vesicular and cytosol fractions. At longer time intervals (4-16 h), an overall decrease in G11alpha content was observed.

A FLAG-tagged form of the human IP prostanoid receptor was expressed stably in HEK 293 cells. This bound [3H]iloprost with high affinity and stimulated cAMP production when exposed to agonist. Iloprost produced weak stimulation of GTPase activity and [35S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding in membranes of these cells. Pretreatment of cells with pertussis toxin did not modify iloprost-mediated stimulation, but this was blocked by cholera toxin. The effects of iloprost were not increased by coexpression of either Gsalpha or Gi1alpha. In contrast, coexpression of a chimeric G protein alpha subunit in which the carboxyl-terminal six amino acids of Gi1alpha were altered to those of Gsalpha resulted in robust stimulation by iloprost. Because the chimeric G protein alpha subunit (Gi1/Gs6alpha) is not a substrate for either pertussis or cholera toxin, pretreatment of cells coexpressing the IP prostanoid receptor and Gi1/Gs6alpha with a mixture of these toxins resulted in resolution of the signal derived from activation of the chimeric G protein. Agonist-stimulated [35S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate binding and GTPase activity assays are the most commonly used strategies to examine interactions between G protein-coupled receptors and G proteins. These usually are not appropriate for receptors such as the IP prostanoid receptor that interact with G proteins with low rates of guanine nucleotide exchange and hydrolysis. Chimeric G proteins such as Gi1/Gs6alpha that allow appropriate receptor contacts to be converted to the higher nucleotide turnover rates typical of the Gi family G proteins can overcome this and offer a novel means to examine agonist function at such receptors.

To examine the effects of a novel selective D4 receptor ligand, L-745,870 (3-[4-(4-chlorophenyl)piperazin-1-yl]methyl-1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyrid ine), on human dopamine receptor function, the ability of this ligand to antagonise G-protein gated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK/Kir3) currents activated by cloned human D2 and D4 receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes was examined using voltage-clamp recording. Its effects were also contrasted with that of a selective D2 receptor antagonist L-741,626. L-745,870 had no detectable agonist activity on human D4 receptors and selectively blocked currents activated by D4 but not D2 receptors. The role of G-protein subunits in dopamine receptor modulation of GIRK currents was also examined by co-expression of beta1 and/or gamma2 subunits on spontaneously active and receptor-activated currents. Currents activated by both D2 and D4 receptors were occluded by direct activation of GIRK currents following co-transfection with the cDNA encoding G-protein betagamma subunits. These data demonstrate that L-745,870 and L-741,626 act as antagonists on human D4 and D2 receptors respectively, and that activation of GIRK channels by these dopamine receptors can be disrupted by direct stimulation of K+ currents by G-protein betagamma subunits.

Rat superior cervical ganglion (SCG) neurons express low-threshold noninactivating M-type potassium channels (IK(M)), which can be inhibited by activation of M1 muscarinic receptors. This inhibition occurs via pertussis toxin-insensitive G-proteins belonging to the Galphaq family (Caulfield et al., 1994 ). We have used DNA plasmids encoding antisense sequences against the 3' untranslated regions of Galpha subunits (antisense plasmids) to investigate the specific G-protein subunits involved in muscarinic inhibition of IK(M). These antisense plasmids specifically reduced levels of the target G-protein 48 hr after intranuclear injection. In cells depleted of Galphaq, muscarinic inhibition of IK(M) was attenuated compared both with uninjected neurons and with neurons injected with an inappropriate GalphaoA antisense plasmid. In contrast, depletion of Galpha11 protein did not alter IK(M) inhibition. To determine whether the alpha or beta gamma subunits of the G-protein mediated this inhibition, we have overexpressed the C terminus of beta adrenergic receptor kinase 1 (betaARK1), which binds free beta gamma subunits. betaARK1 did not reduce muscarinic inhibition of IK(M) at a concentration of plasmid that can reduce beta gamma-mediated inhibition of calcium current (). Also, expression of beta1gamma2 dimers did not alter the IK(M) density in SCG neurons. In contrast, IK(M) was virtually abolished in cells expressing GTPase-deficient, constitutively active forms of Galphaq and Galpha11. These data suggest that Galphaq is the principal mediator of muscarinic IK(M) inhibition in rat SCG neurons and that this more likely results from an effect of the alpha subunit than the beta gamma subunits of the Gq heterotrimer.

One postsynaptic action of the transmitter acetylcholine in sympathetic ganglia is to inhibit somatic N-type Ca2+ currents: this reduces Ca2+-activated K+ currents and facilitates high-frequency spiking. Previous experiments on rat superior cervical ganglion neurons have revealed two distinct pathways for this inhibitory action: a rapid, voltage-dependent inhibition through activation of M4 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs), and a slower, voltage-independent inhibition via M1 mAChRs [Hille (1994) Trends in Neurosci., 17, 531-536]. We have analysed the mechanistic basis for this divergence at the level of the individual G-proteins and their alpha and betagamma subunits, using a combination of site-directed antibody injection, plasmid-driven antisense RNA expression, overexpression of selected constitutively active subunits, and antagonism of endogenously liberated betagamma subunits by over-expression of Dy-binding P-adrenergic receptor kinase 1 (PARK1) peptide. The results indicate that: (i) M4 mAChR-induced inhibition is mediated by GoA; (ii) a and Py subunits released from the activated GoA heterotrimer produce separate voltage-insensitive and voltage-sensitive components of inhibition, respectively; and (iii) voltage-insensitive M1 mAChR-induced inhibition is likely to be mediated by the alpha subunit of Gq. Hence, Ca2+ current inhibition results from the concerted, but independent actions of three different G-protein subunits.

A fusion protein between a pertussis toxin-resistant (C351G) mutant of the alpha subunit of the G protein Gi1 and the porcine alpha2A-adrenoreceptor was stably expressed in Rat 1 fibroblasts. Agonists caused stimulation of high affinity GTPase activity, which was partially prevented by pertussis toxin treatment, demonstrating that the toxin-resistant component of the GTPase activity was derived from the receptor-fused G protein and the remainder from endogenous Gialpha. Half-maximal stimulation of the GTPase activity of endogenous Gi was achieved with lower concentrations of agonist. Although the Km for GTP of the fusion protein-linked Gi was lower than for the endogenous G protein, Vmax measurements demonstrated that adrenaline activated some 5 mol of endogenous Gi/mol of fusion protein-linked Gi. The isolated alpha2A-adrenoreceptor could activate Gs; however, the fusion protein did not. Compared with adrenaline, the efficacy of a range of partial agonists to stimulate endogenous Gialpha was greater than for the fusion protein-constrained C351G Gi1alpha. alpha2A-Adrenoreceptor agonists could stimulate both p44 mitogen-activated protein kinase and p70 S6 kinase and inhibit forskolin-amplified adenylyl cyclase activity in untreated alpha2A-adrenoreceptor-C351G Gi1alpha fusion protein-expressing cells, but these signals were abolished following pertussis toxin treatment. These results demonstrate conclusively, and for the first time, that agonist occupancy of a receptor-G protein fusion protein can result in activation of G proteins other than that physically linked to the receptor. This was selective between G protein classes. Analysis of the contributions of fusion protein-linked and endogenous G proteins to agonist-stimulated GTPase activity provided a direct and original measure of receptor-G protein activation stoichiometry.

A cDNA encoding the rat mu-opioid receptor was expressed stably in a Rat-1 fibroblast cell line. Expression of this receptor was demonstrated with specific binding of the mu-opioid selective ligand [3H][D-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin ([3H]DAMGO). In membranes of clone mu11 cells DAMGO produced a robust, concentration-dependent stimulation of basal high affinity GTPase activity. Cholera toxin-catalyzed [32P]ADP-ribosylation in membranes of this clone labelled a 40 kDa Gi family polypeptide(s) that was markedly enhanced by the addition of DAMGO. Antisera against Gi2alpha and Gi3alpha were both able to immunoprecipitate a [32P]-radiolabelled 40 kDa polypeptide(s) from DAMGO and cholera-toxin treated membranes of clone mu11, indicating that the mu-opioid receptor was able to interact effectively with both Gi2 and Gi3 in Rat-1 fibroblasts. A series of peptides derived from the delta-opioid receptor sequence were assessed for their ability to modify agonist-stimulated G protein activation and [3H] agonist binding to the receptor. In membranes from the clone mu11, specific binding of [3H]DAMGO was reduced by peptides corresponding to the NH2-terminal region of the third intracellular loop (i3.1) and the carboxyl-terminal tail (i4) of this receptor. Agonist stimulated GTPase activity and DAMGO dependent cholera toxin-catalyzed [32P]ADP-ribosylation were inhibited by peptides derived from the proximal (i3.1) and the distal portion (i3.3) of the third intracellular loop. Peptide i3.1 also inhibited DAMGO-stimulated [35S]guanosine-5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTP-gammaS) binding in the same membranes. In contrast, peptides derived from the second intracellular loop were without any effect.

Inverse agonists are ligands that preferentially stabilize inactive conformations of G protein-coupled receptors. In a range of systems, sustained treatment with inverse agonists can produce substantially greater upregulation of receptor levels than antagonists. The use of constitutively active mutant receptors can exaggerate this effect but may also allow agonists and antagonists to mimic the effect by preventing denaturation of the mutant receptor polypeptide. In this review Graeme Milligan and Richard Bond consider the basis for these effects and their therapeutic implications.

Transient expression of apoaequorin in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and reconstitution with the co-factor coelenterazine resulted in a large, concentration-dependent agonist-mediated luminescent response following cotransfection with the endothelin ETA, angiotensin ATII, thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH), and neurokinin NK1 receptors, all of which interact pre-dominantly with the G alpha q-like phosphoinositidase-linked G-proteins. A substantially greater luminescence was obtained with mitochondrially targeted apoaequorin compared to cytoplasmically expressed apoaequorin. To generate a system amenable for the study of agonist activity at virtually any G-protein-coupled receptor the alpha subunit of the receptor promiscuous G-protein G alpha 16 was either transiently or stably expressed in CHO cells together with apoaequorin. In cells expressing G alpha 16, but not in its absence, agonists at a series of receptors which normally interact with either G alpha s or G alpha i were now able to cause a luminescent response from mitochondrially targeted apoaequorin. In the case of the A1 adenosine receptor, this response was clearly a result of activation of G alpha 16 and not a consequence of the release of the G alpha i-associated beta/gamma complex, as the luminescent response was unaffected by pertussis toxin treatment of the cells, whereas agonist-mediated inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity was attenuated. These studies describe the use of coexpressed apoaequorin as a reporter for G-protein-coupled receptor-mediated calcium signaling. Furthermore, coexpression of G alpha 16 and apoaequorin provides a basis for a generic mammalian cell microplate assay for the assessment of agonist action at virtually any G-protein-coupled receptor, including orphan receptors for which the physiological signal transduction mechanism may be unknown.

Co-expression of the alpha2A-adrenoreceptor with a pertussis toxin-resistant (C351G), but not with an also palmitoylation-resistant (C3S/C351G), form of the alpha subunit of Gi1 resulted in agonist-induced, pertussis toxin-independent, GTP hydrolysis. Construction and expression of a chimeric fusion protein between the receptor and C351G Gi1alpha generated a membrane protein in which the G protein element was activated by receptor agonist. An equivalent fusion protein containing C3S/C351G Gi1alpha rescued the ability of receptor agonist to activate this mutant. Fusion proteins of a palmitoylation-resistant (C442A) alpha2A-adrenoreceptor and either C351G or C3S/C351G Gi1alpha also responded effectively to agonist. Myristoylation resistant (G2A/C351G) and combined acylation-resistant (G2A/C3S/C351G) mutants of Gi1alpha are cytosolic proteins. Expression of these as chimeric alpha2A-adrenoreceptor-G protein fusions restored membrane localization and activation of the G protein by receptor agonist. These studies demonstrate the general utility of generating chimeric fusion proteins to examine receptor regulation of G protein function and that the lack of functional activation of acylation-negative G proteins by a co-expressed receptor is related to deficiencies in cellular targeting and location rather than an inherent incapacity to produce appropriate protein-protein interactions and signal transmission.

It is clear that the details of binding of different classes of agonist ligands to the same receptor may be distinct. This could result in subtle differences in the profile of G protein activation by individual ligands at the same receptor due to agonist-induced selection of conformational states of the receptor which favor interaction and ternary-complex formation with different G proteins. This can result in differences in the details of receptor pharmacology when measured at the level of effector output. Such differences are also likely to be dependent upon both the levels of expression of the receptor and the relevant G proteins and the G protein and effector enzyme isoform expression profile of a particular tissue. It would be foolish, however, to use such differences, in isolation, as a means to expand the classification of G protein-coupled receptors particularly when more molecular approaches to receptor classification are readily available.

Wild-type and palmitoylation defective mutants of the murine G protein G11alpha were transfected into HEK293 cells. Wild-type G11alpha was membrane associated, Cys9Ser Cys10Ser G11alpha was present in the soluble fraction whilst both Cys9Ser G11alpha and Cys10Ser G11alpha were distributed between the fractions. Expression of the rat TRH receptor resulted in agonist stimulation of inositol phosphate accumulation. The degree of stimulation produced by TRH following co-transfection of the palmitoylation-resistant forms of G11alpha compared to the wild-type protein correlated with the amount of membrane-associated G protein.

The molecular mechanisms underlying B- and T-cell development are, as yet, poorly understood. However, as G proteins regulate a diverse range of biological responses including growth, proliferation and differentiation, we have investigated differential expression of G proteins during B- and T-cell development with the aim of identifying key signals involved in lymphocyte maturation. Differential expression of beta 1/2 and alpha-subunits of the Gs-, i- and q-families was found throughout lymphoid development. Most strikingly, G alpha i1 and G alpha i1 were very weakly, or not expressed in pre-, immature and mature B cells, thymocytes or mature T cells, but strongly induced in mature B-lymphoblastoid cell lines, some of which have been used as models of germinal centre B cells, suggesting that expression of these G proteins may correlate with the later stages of B-cell development. In contrast, G alpha 16 expression was highest in T cells and pre-B cells and progressively declined with B-cell maturation. These findings suggest that G proteins, and the signals they regulate, such as ion channels and/or adenylate cyclase (G alpha s/i) and phospholipase C (G beta gamma and G alpha 11/16) are differentially regulated in lymphoid cells in a maturation-and lineage-dependent manner.