Search

Your search keyword '"wissenschaftliche Zeitschriften"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Descriptor "wissenschaftliche Zeitschriften" Topic guidelines as topic
3 results on '"wissenschaftliche Zeitschriften"'

1. [The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement].

Author

Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, Harron K, Hemkens LG, Moher D, Petersen I, Sørensen HT, von Elm E, and Langan SM

Subjects
Biomedical Research, Data Collection, Germany, Humans, Checklist, Guidelines as Topic, Research Report standards
Abstract

Routinely collected health data, obtained for administrative and clinical purposes without specific a priori research goals, are increasingly used for research. The rapid evolution and availability of these data have revealed issues not addressed by existing reporting guidelines, such as Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected health Data (RECORD) statement was created to fill these gaps. RECORD was created as an extension to the STROBE statement to address reporting items specific to observational studies using routinely collected health data. RECORD consists of a checklist of 13 items related to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion section of articles, and other information required for inclusion in such research reports. This document contains the checklist as well as explanatory and elaboration information to enhance the use of the checklist. Examples of good reporting for each RECORD checklist item are also included. This document, as well as the accompanying website and message board (http://www.record-statement.org), will improve the implementation and understanding of RECORD. By implementing RECORD, authors, journals editors, and peer reviewers can enhance transparency of research reporting., (Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier GmbH.)

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Das RECORD-Statement zum Berichten von Beobachtungsstudien, die routinemäßig gesammelte Gesundheitsdaten verwenden [The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement]

Author

Benchimol, E.I., Smeeth, L., Guttmann, A., Harron, K., Hemkens, L.G., Moher, D., Petersen, I., Sørensen, H.T., von Elm, E., Langan, S.M., and RECORD Working Committee

Subjects
Biomedical Research, Checklist, Data Collection, Germany, Guidelines as Topic, Humans, Research Report/standards, Administrative Gesundheitsdaten, Beobachtungsstudien, CPRD, Clinical Practice Research Datalink, Datenbanken zur Grundversorgung, Dokumentation, Elektronische Gesundheitsdaten, Epidemiologische Methoden, Fall-Kontroll-Studien, GPRD, General Practice Research Database, Gesundheitsbezogene Routinedaten, HSMR, Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio, ICD, ISC, Informationsverbreitung, International Classification of Diseases, Kohortenstudien, Konsensus, Leitlinien für Forschungsberichte, MDC, MeSH, Medical Subject Heading, Medizinischen Zeitschriften, NHS, NSCLC, National Health Service, New South Wales Inpatient Statistics Collection, New South Wales Midwives Data Collection, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, PET, PICANet, Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network, Positronen-Emissions-Tomographie, Publizieren, RECORD, REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected health Data, SEER, SNIIRAM, STROBE, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, Système National d’Informations Inter Régimes de l’Assurance Maladie, Wissenschaftliche Zeitschriften, Wissensverbreitung, Zeitschriften mit Peer-Review, case-control studies, cohort studies, consensus, documentation, electronic health data, epidemiologic methods, health administrative data, information dissemination, knowledge dissemination, mHealth-Apps, medical journals, mobile Gesundheitsapplikationen, observational research, publishing, reporting guidelines, routinely collected health data, scientific journals
Abstract

Routinely collected health data, obtained for administrative and clinical purposes without specific a priori research goals, are increasingly used for research. The rapid evolution and availability of these data have revealed issues not addressed by existing reporting guidelines, such as Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected health Data (RECORD) statement was created to fill these gaps. RECORD was created as an extension to the STROBE statement to address reporting items specific to observational studies using routinely collected health data. RECORD consists of a checklist of 13 items related to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion section of articles, and other information required for inclusion in such research reports. This document contains the checklist as well as explanatory and elaboration information to enhance the use of the checklist. Examples of good reporting for each RECORD checklist item are also included. This document, as well as the accompanying website and message board (http://www.record-statement.org), will improve the implementation and understanding of RECORD. By implementing RECORD, authors, journals editors, and peer reviewers can enhance transparency of research reporting.

Published
2016

3. The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement

Author

Eric I Benchimol, Liam Smeeth, Astrid Guttmann, Katie Harron, David Moher, Irene Petersen, Henrik T Sørensen, Erik von Elm, Sinéad M Langan, and RECORD Working Committee

Subjects
Research Report, Kohortenstudien, Biomedical Research, NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Datenbanken zur Grundversorgung, epidemiologic methods, GPRD, General Practice Research Database, mHealth-Apps, mobile Gesundheitsapplikationen, information dissemination, SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, documentation, Wissenschaftliche Zeitschriften, reporting guidelines, cohort studies, electronic health data, Germany, publishing, Dokumentation, routinely collected health data, Informationsverbreitung, Data Collection, Versorgungsforschung / Health Services Research, CPRD, Clinical Practice Research Datalink, Checklist, Observational Studies as Topic, Medizinischen Zeitschriften, HSMR, Hospital Standardised Mortality Ratio, Research Design, health administrative data, Medicine, Epidemiologische Methoden, knowledge dissemination, scientific journals, Leitlinien für Forschungsberichte, Guidelines as Topic, NHS, National Health Service, Beobachtungsstudien, PET, Positronen-Emissions-Tomographie, Fall-Kontroll-Studien, RECORD, REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected health Data, Elektronische Gesundheitsdaten, Humans, Wissensverbreitung, Zeitschriften mit Peer-Review, Administrative Gesundheitsdaten, PICANet, Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network, SNIIRAM, Système National d’Informations Inter Régimes de l’Assurance Maladie, ISC, New South Wales Inpatient Statistics Collection, MeSH, Medical Subject Heading, MDC, New South Wales Midwives Data Collection, case-control studies, Konsensus, Gesundheitsbezogene Routinedaten, medical journals, observational research, ICD, International Classification of Diseases, Publizieren, consensus, STROBE, Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology
Abstract

Zusammenfassung Zunehmend werden routinemäßig gesammelte Gesundheitsdaten, die zu administrativen und klinischen Zwecken und ohne spezifische, a priori festgelegte Forschungsziele erhoben wurden, auch für die Forschung eingesetzt. Die rasche Entwicklung und Verfügbarkeit dieser Daten machten Probleme deutlich, die in den bestehenden Berichts-Leitlinien, wie dem STROBE-Statement (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) nicht behandelt werden. Das RECORD-Statement (REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data) wurde entwickelt, um diese Lücken zu schließen. RECORD ist als Erweiterung des STROBE-Statements gedacht, um Punkte abzudecken, die spezifisch sind beim Berichten von Beobachtungsstudien, die routinemäßig gesammelte Gesundheitsdaten verwenden. RECORD besteht aus einer Checkliste von 13 Punkten mit Bezug zu Titel, Abstract, Einleitung, Methoden-, Ergebnis- und Diskussionsteil von Artikeln sowie zu anderen Informationen, die in Forschungsberichten dieser Art enthalten sein sollten. Dieses Dokument enthält die Checkliste sowie Erläuterungen und weitere Erklärungen, um die Verwendung der Checkliste zu verbessern. Beispiele für ein gutes Berichten der einzelnen Punkte der RECORD-Checkliste sind ebenfalls in diesem Dokument enthalten. Dieses Dokument sowie die zugehörige Website und ein Forum (http://www.record-statement.org) werden die Umsetzung und das Verständnis von RECORD verbessern. Autoren, Redakteure von Fachzeitschriften und Peer-Reviewer können die Transparenz beim Berichten von Forschungsergebnissen erhöhen, indem sie RECORD anwenden.

Published
2015

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results