Search

Chlortalidone (CLT) is a thiazide-type diuretic with high affinity for the erythrocyte carbonic anhydrase. Therapeutically, it is mostly used to treat edema and hypertension due to liver cirrhosis, heart insufficiency, or renal dysfunction. Although diuretics and masking agents are prohibited by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) at all times in sports, substances belonging to this category are constantly detected in athlete samples, according to WADA's annual testing figures. Within this group of structurally diverse compounds, a threshold of 20 ng/mL has been introduced for six substances solely due to their presence as contaminants in other permitted drugs because of pharmaceutical production processes. In a recent presumptive doping case with a low urinary CLT concentration, the question of unintentional doping, for example, by contaminated non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug intake, arose. To examine this potential scenario, a co-elimination of low-dose CLT and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTA; 20 × 50 μg, 0.2 mg/day each) was conducted on five consecutive days in two volunteers. Urine samples were subjected to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Moreover, we examined the incorporation of CLT in scalp hair. HCTA is rapidly excreted renally in comparatively high concentrations. In contrast, the elimination of CLT is considerably slower (terminal elimination half-life extended by a factor of 12) and, consequently, much less concentrated in corresponding urine samples (45 and 53 ng/mL, respectively). Conversely, a higher hair incorporation of chlorthalidone was observed with simultaneous dosing of both. The results suggest that an unintentional intake of sub-therapeutic CLT doses due to contamination might result in an adverse analytical finding., (© 2024 The Authors. Drug Testing and Analysis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

In case of an adverse analytical finding, a low (estimate) urine concentration can be the consequence of 2 very different situations: it can be the tail end of a drug voluntarily consumed to enhance athletic performance, even by microdosing (which is not effective for all drugs), or it can be the result of a contamination, irrespective of its source. For numerous doping agents, a hair test can allow discriminating doping from contamination based on the measured concentration or even the absence of the target drug. Given hair produces incremental concentrations, its analysis offers the possibility of establishing a pattern of drug use and thus, verifying self-reported histories of exposure. In order to provide a retrospective calendar of drug use, segmental analysis of the hair strand can be performed. In doping, the usual practice is to test the substance in short segments, such as 1 cm to avoid drug dilution when using larger segments. During the last months, seven athletes have returned an adverse analytical finding for the diuretic chlortalidone, with reported urine concentrations in the range 20 to 50 ng/mL. All these athletes submitted, via their legal team, their hair for establishing a pattern of exposure. Results were always consistent with incidental contamination (hair concentration lower than 5 pg/mg), although the source of contamination was never identified. The interpretation of the findings was established in the light of the limited literature, including hair tests after microdosing and therapeutic use., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)