Search

The authors have developed and verified the precision and accuracy of new automated cloned enzyme donor immunoassays (CEDIA) for haloperidol and bromperidol, and cross-validations have been performed with conventional semiautomated EIA kits (MARKIT-M) and high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) methods. The CEDIA method provides a quick (about 10 minutes) assay for haloperidol or bromperidol, requiring no serum/plasma pretreatment or predilution. The CEDIA haloperidol/bromperidol assay showed little or no cross reactivity with either their metabolites or many drugs commonly coprescribed. MARKIT-M revealed considerable cross reactivity values proportional to the spiked amounts of reduced metabolites. Precision, accuracy, recovery, and linearity testing for the CEDIA assay were all sufficient for clinical use. Significant linear correlations were found between CEDIA and HPLC in measuring haloperidol (CEDIA = 1.06 x HPLC + 0.869; n = 44, rs = 0.913, P < 0.001) and bromperidol (CEDIA = 1.06 x HPLC + 0.606; n = 56, rs = 0.914, P < 0.001) concentrations. This study has, therefore, demonstrated that the CEDIA assay has a quick run time with high precision and accuracy, and this method is a useful tool for the TDM of haloperidol or bromperidol.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) services for plasma concentrations of haloperidol and bromperidol using enzyme immunoassay (EIA) methods are available in Japan, whereas high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) methods are preferred in other countries. To compare these methods, we took 54 plasma samples for haloperidol and 91 plasma samples for bromperidol from schizophrenic patients receiving haloperidol or bromperidol, and the samples were measured using both commercial EIA and HPLC methods. Significant linear correlations were found between the two methods in determining haloperidol (EIA = 1.351 x HPLC + 1.39; r = 0.934, P < 0.001) and bromperidol (EIA = 1.420 x HPLC + 0.712; r = 0.956, P < 0.001) concentrations, but plasma concentrations using the EIA kits were approximately 92% (95% CI; 53-131%) and 62% (54-70%) higher than those using HPLC for haloperidol and bromperidol, respectively. Mean (and range) plasma concentrations of reduced metabolites were 54% (30-92%) and 55% (29-111%) of those of haloperidol and bromperidol, respectively. The present study suggests that reduced metabolites are included to a considerable degree in TDM data using the EIA kits. Therefore, some limitation of TDM data of haloperidol and bromperidol using the EIA kits, ie, high precision but poor accuracy, should be kept in mind.

The effects of histamine H1-receptor antagonists, promethazine and homochlorcyclizine, both of which are inhibitors of CYP2D6, on the steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol were studied in 23 schizophrenic inpatients receiving haloperidol, 12 to 36 mg/d, for 2 to 29 weeks. Promethazine, 150 mg/d, in 11 patients and homochlorcyclizine, 60 mg/d, in the others were coadministered for at least 1 week. Blood sampling was performed before and during coadministration of promethazine or homochlorcyclizine and 1 week after the discontinuation, together with clinical assessments by Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Udvalg for kliniske undersogelser (UKU) side effect rating scale. The Css (mean +/- SD) of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol during promethazine coadministration (27.6 +/- 24.9 and 8.6 +/- 13.2 ng/mL) were significantly higher than those before the coadministration (12.7 +/- 10.8 and 5.0 +/- 6.0 ng/mL; P < 0.01) or 1 week after the discontinuation (15.6 +/- 14.8 and 5.8 +/- 7.9 ng/mL; P < 0.05). The Css of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol during homochlorcyclizine coadministration (14.9 +/- 8.1 and 6.4 +/- 5.4 ng/mL) were also significantly higher than those before the coadministration (10.9 +/- 7.2 and 3.8 +/- 3.6 ng/mL; P < 0.01) or 1 week after the discontinuation (12.9 +/- 7.4 and 4.8 +/- 4.1 ng/mL; P < 0.05). No change in BPRS or UKU score was found throughout the study. Thus, the current study suggests that coadministration of clinical doses of promethazine and homochlorcyclizine increases the Css of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol via the inhibitory effects on the CYP2D6-catalyzed metabolism of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol.

Therapeutic profiles of bromperidol and their relationship with plasma drug concentration and prolactin response were investigated in 30 acutely exacerbated schizophrenic patients treated with randomly allocated fixed-doses of bromperidol (6, 12 or 18 mg/day) for 3 weeks. The mean values (+/- S.D.) of percentage improvement at 3 weeks in total Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and five subgrouped symptoms were 59.8+/-29.2% for total, 64.6+/-37.5% for positive, 73.3+/-33.7% for excitement, 80.2+/-45.5% for cognitive, 43.1+/-46.5% for negative and 49.6+/-46.8% for anxiety-depression symptoms, respectively. Twenty (67%) of 30 patients were responders defined as having 50% or more symptom reduction significantly greater in responders than those in nonresponders after 2 weeks. Mean plasma bromperidol concentration in patients with 50% or more reduction in positive symptoms was significantly higher than in the others (8.2+/-4.7 vs. 4.1+/-1.8 ng/ml, P< .05). Percentage improvement in total BPRS at 1 and 2 weeks were correlated well with that at 3 weeks. These findings suggest that an early improvement in positive and anxiety-depression symptoms results in favorable outcome of total response to bromperidol treatment. Plasma drug monitoring may have a limited predictive value for improvement in positive symptoms.

Previous studies have demonstrated a lower density of dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) in subjects without Del alleles of the -141C Ins/Del polymorphism in DRD2 gene promoter region than in those with one or two Del alleles. The present study aimed to examine whether the -141C Ins/Del DRD2 promoter polymorphism is related to therapeutic response to selective DRD2 antagonists in the treatment of schizophrenia. Subjects consisted of 49 acutely exacerbated schizophrenic inpatients treated with bromperidol (30 cases, mean dose +/- SD: 11.4 +/- 4.8 mg/day) or nemonapride (19 cases, 18 mg/day). Clinical symptoms were evaluated by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) before and 3 weeks after the treatment. The -141C Ins/Del DRD2 genotypes, the Ins and Del alleles, were determined by a polymerase chain reaction method. Thirty-five patients were homozygous for the Ins allele and 14 were heterozygous for the Del and Ins alleles. The patients without Del allele showed a higher percentage of improvement in anxiety-depression symptoms than those with Del allele (58.5 +/- 44.5% versus 24.1 +/- 48.2%) after 3 weeks of treatment while percentage improvement in total BPRS or other subgrouped symptoms (positive, negative, excitement and cognitive symptoms) was similar between the two genotype groups. The present results suggest that the -141C Ins/Del DRD2 polymorphism is associated with anxiolytic and antidepressive effects of neuroleptic treatment in schizophrenic patients.

The relationship between TaqI A dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) polymorphism and therapeutic response to bromperidol, a selective dopamine antagonist, was investigated in 30 acutely exacerbated schizophrenic inpatients. Patients were treated with bromperidol 6-18 mg/day for 3 weeks. Clinical symptoms were evaluated by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) before and 3 weeks after the treatment. The TaqI A genotypes were determined with the PCR method. There was no significant difference in the percentage improvement of total BPRS or 5-subgrouped symptoms (positive, negative, anxiety-depression, excitement and cognitive symptoms) after the 3-week treatment between the patients with A1 alleles (n=18) and those with no A1 allele (n=12). Although the present study is preliminary, it is suggested that the TaqI A DRD2 polymorphism is not associated with therapeutic response to bromperidol in schizophrenic patients.

The effect of a genetic polymorphism of inducibility of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 on the steady state plasma concentrations (Css) of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol was studied to clarify if these Css are dependent on the CYP1A2 activity. The subjects were 101 Japanese schizophrenic inpatients receiving oral haloperidol 12 mg/d. The Css of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol were measured in duplicate by high performance liquid chromatographic method, and were corrected to the mean body weight. A point mutation from guanine (wild-type) to adenine (mutated-type) at position -2964 in the 5'-flanking region of CYP1A2 gene was identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-fragment length polymorphism method. Based on the present results, i.e., significant effects of CYP2D6 genotypes on the Css of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol, analyses were separately performed in two groups, i.e., patients with 0 mutated allele of the CYP2D6 (41 cases) and those with 1 or 2 mutated alleles (60 cases). Subjects in each CYP2D6 genotype group consisted of 4 subgroups according to smoking habit and the presence of the mutated allele of the CYP1A2. Neither the Css of haloperidol nor that of reduced haloperidol significantly differed among the 4 subgroups in either CYP2D6 genotype group. The present study thus suggests that the CYP1A2 activity does not play an important role in controlling the Css of haloperidol or reduced haloperidol.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between the gastrokinetic drug cisapride and the antipsychotic drugs bromperidol and haloperidol were studied in 29 schizophrenic inpatients. Fourteen patients were taking bromperidol (12-24 mg/d), and 15 were taking haloperidol (12-36 mg/d). Cisapride 10 mg/d was coadministered for 1 week, and blood sampling was performed before cisapride treatment, 1 week after starting cisapride treatment, and I week after stopping cisapride treatment. On the same days as the blood sampling, psychotic symptoms and side effects were evaluated using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser (UKU) side effect rating scale (UKU), respectively. Plasma concentrations of bromperidol, haloperidol, and their reduced metabolites were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. The mean BPRS scores after adding cisapride were significantly higher than those before cisapride (p<0.01) and after stopping cisapride (p<0.001) in the haloperidol group in this uncontrolled study. A similar tendency was observed in the bromperidol group, although it did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08). Cisapride coadministration caused no significant changes in the mean plasma concentrations of bromperidol, haloperidol, and their reduced metabolites or in the mean UKU score. The present study suggests that there is no significant pharmacokinetic interaction between cisapride and bromperidol or haloperidol, but cisapride appears to deteriorate psychotic symptoms by a pharmacodynamic interaction in schizophrenic patients treated with haloperidol.

The effects of itraconazole, a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, on the steady-state plasma concentrations of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol were examined in schizophrenic patients. Thirteen schizophrenic patients treated with haloperidol 12 or 24 mg/day received 200 mg/day of itraconazole for 7 days. Plasma concentrations of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography together with clinical assessment by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser side effect rating scale just before and during itraconazole treatment and 1 week after its discontinuation. Plasma concentrations of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol during the itraconazole treatment (16.9 +/- 11.2 and 6.1 +/- 6.6 ng/mL, respectively) were significantly (p < 0.01) higher than those observed before itraconazole treatment (13.0 +/- 7.9 and 4.9 +/- 5.1 ng/mL) or 1 week after its discontinuation (13.5 +/- 8.2 and 4.9 +/- 5.0 ng/mL). No change was found in clinical symptoms assessed by BPRS, whereas neurologic side effects were significantly (p < 0.05) increased during itraconazole coadministration. The elevated plasma concentrations of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol during itraconazole coadministration were likely due to the inhibitory effects of itraconazole on the metabolism of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol. Thus, this study may provide in vivo evidence of involvement of CYP3A4 in the metabolism of haloperidol and possibly in that of reduced haloperidol. Deterioration of neurologic side effects during itraconazole treatment may result from the increased plasma concentrations of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol during itraconazole treatment.

The effects of repeated ingestion of grapefruit juice, an inhibitor of cytochrome P4503A4 (CYP3A4), on the steady-state plasma concentrations of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol were examined. Twelve schizophrenic inpatients receiving haloperidol 12 mg/day, ingested grapefruit juice 600 ml/day for 7 days. Blood samples were collected before and during grapefruit juice coadministration and 1 week after its discontinuation together with an assessment of clinical status. Plasma drug concentrations were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. Clinical status for each patient was assessed by the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the UKU side-effect rating scale (UKU). Plasma concentrations of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol during grapefruit juice coadministration (9.0 +/- 3.0 and 2.6 +/- 1.4 ng/ml, respectively) were not significantly different from those before grapefruit juice coadministration (9.1 +/- 2.8 and 2.6 +/- 1.5 ng/ml) or those 1 week after its discontinuation (8.8 +/- 2.7 and 2.6 +/- 1.3 ng/ml). There was no change in the scores of BPRS or UKU during the study period. The present results shows that grapefruit juice does not affect the plasma concentrations of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol or clinical status in patients receiving haloperidol.

Background: The CYP2D6*10 (*10) allele that causes decreased CYP2D6 activity is present in Asians with a high frequency of about 50%. In this study we studied the effects of the *10 allele on the steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol., Methods: The subjects were 67 Japanese inpatients with schizophrenia who had only the wild-type or *10 alleles. Thirty-four patients were homozygous for the wild-type allele, and 26 were heterozygous and 7 were homozygous for the *10 allele. All patients had been receiving 12 mg/day haloperidol for at least 2 weeks. Plasma concentrations of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol were measured by HPLC., Results: The mean +/- SD values of haloperidol Css in the patients with 0, 1, and 2 *10 alleles were 22.8+/-11.0, 30.1+/-10.6, and 31.2+/-21.2 nmol/L, respectively, and those values for reduced haloperidol were 6.1+/-2.9, 9.5+/-3.7, and 9.9+/-6.2 nmol/L, respectively. The mean haloperidol Css was significantly (P < .05) higher in the patients with 1 *10 allele than in those with no *10 alleles. The mean Css of reduced haloperidol was significantly (P < .05) higher in the patients with 1 and 2 *10 alleles than in those with no *10 alleles., Conclusion: This study suggests that the *10 allele plays an important role in controlling the Css of both haloperidol and reduced haloperidol, especially in Asian subjects.

1. Bromperidol is a close structural analogue of haloperidol, and its metabolic pathways are similar to those of haloperidol. The authors studied the correlation between the Css of bromperidol and haloperidol. 2. The subjects were 16 schizophrenic inpatients. Fourteen patients received firstly bromperidol 12 mg/day and secondly haloperidol 12 mg/day, while the remaining two patients received the two treatments in the opposite sequence. 3. Blood samplings were performed 2-3 weeks after the initiation of each treatment, and the Css of bromperidol, haloperidol and their reduced metabolites were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. 4. Neither the correlation between the Css of bromperidol and haloperidol (r = 0.246) nor that between the Css of reduced bromperidol and reduced haloperidol (r = 0.142) was significant. 5. The present study thus suggests that the Css of bromperidol and haloperidol do not correlate well in individuals.

To clarify the involvement of cytochromeP450 (CYP) 3A4 in the metabolism of haloperidol and bromperidol in humans, the effects of itraconazole, a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4, on steady-state plasma concentrations of both drugs and their reduced metabolites were investigated using 21 schizophrenic patients. Patients treated with haloperidol 12 or 24 mg/day (n = 13) or bromperidol 12 or 24 mg/day (n = 8) for at least 2 weeks were then given itraconazole 200 mg/day for 7 days. Blood samplings were performed before administration, 1 week during itraconazole coadministration and 1 week after its discontinuation together with clinical assessments. Plasma concentrations of haloperidol and bromperidol and their reduced metabolites were significantly higher during itraconazole treatment (P < 0.01). Deterioration in the neurological side effects of haloperidol was observed during itraconazole coadministration. Thus, this study suggests that itraconazole inhibits the metabolism of haloperidol and bromperidol, and that CYP3A4 is involved in the metabolism of both drugs.

The effects of various factors, including the cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 genotype and the coadministration of flunitrazepam, on the steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) of bromperidol and its reduced metabolite were studied in 62 schizophrenic inpatients receiving bromperidol 12 mg/day. By use of allele-specific PCR analysis, the wild type allele (CYP2D6*1A) and four mutated alleles causing either absent (CYP2D6*3, CYP2D6*4 and CYP2D6*5) or decreased (CYP2D6*10) CYP2D6 activity were identified. The means (ranges) of the Css of bromperidol and reduced bromperidol corrected to the median body weight were 7.2 (1.3-17.4) and 2.2 (0.4-8.9) ng/ml, respectively. Neither the Css of bromperidol nor that of reduced bromperidol significantly differed among the patients with no (n = 28), one (n = 30) and two mutated alleles (n = 4). The patients coadministered with flunitrazepam (n = 52) had significantly (P < 0.05) higher Css of bromperidol, but not reduced bromperidol, than those not (n = 10). Age, sex and smoking had no significant effects on the Css of these compounds. The present study thus suggests that the polymorphic CYP2D6 is not involved in the metabolism of bromperidol and reduced bromperidol to a major extent. The coadministration of flunitrazepam inhibits the metabolism of bromperidol, but age, sex and smoking do not affect it.

Objective: The interaction between carbamazepine and bromperidol was studied in 13 schizophrenic inpatients., Methods: Before carbamazepine addition, the subjects were taking bromperidol 12-24 mg.day-1 for 1-20 weeks. Carbamazepine 400 mg.day-1 was coadministered for 4 weeks, and blood samplings were performed before carbamazepine addition and at weekly intervals after the addition. Plasma concentrations of bromperidol and its reduced metabolite were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography., Results: Carbamazepine significantly decreased plasma concentrations of both bromperidol and reduced bromperidol for all weeks. On average, the plasma concentrations of bromperidol and reduced bromperidol at 4 weeks were 37% and 23% of the corresponding precarbamazepine values. Despite these decreases in plasma concentration, the Clinical Global Impression scores decreased slightly but significantly after carbamazepine addition., Conclusion: The present study suggests that carbamazepine decreases plasma concentrations of bromperidol and its reduced metabolite by inducing the metabolism of these compounds. Nevertheless, adjunctive carbamazepine may be useful for schizophrenic patients treated with bromperidol.