Search

Highly pathogenic zoonotic Hendra virus (HeV) and Nipah virus (NiV) are prototypic members of the genus Henipavirus, family Paramyxoviridae, that have natural reservoirs in pteropodid flying foxes (1). These viruses [...]

If interventions promoting improved hygiene behaviour to prevent childhood diarrhoea are to be implemented and evaluated, valid methods for measuring this behaviour will be required. This paper presents findings from a study to investigate the use of structured observations to measure hygiene behaviour in Burkina Faso. Two hundred mothers with young children (2-36 months) were observed on several occasions, with particular attention focused on events/behaviour surrounding defaecation. Child defaecation occurred most often in a potty (67% of occasions). Stools were most often disposed of into a latrine (79%). Following defaecation the child's bottom was usually rinsed using water alone with a bare hand (76%). Subsequent hand washing by the mother/caretaker was much rarer (29%). None of these behaviours appeared 'reactive' to the presence of the observer. Less common behaviours showed some evidence of reactivity. The frequency of child defaecation in the yard increased over the course of three observations (5% to 16%; P = 0.01) and the proportion of occasions on which the child was observed to be cleaned after defaecation declined (95% to 85%; P = 0.01). Mothers usually took with them to the latrine a water recipient (91%). Hand washing after leaving the latrine was observed on 30% of occasions. This proportion declined from 36% to 22% over three observations (P = 0.05). Defaecation by older siblings (aged 3-5 years) was usually into a potty (48%) or directly into a latrine (30%). There was no evidence that this behaviour was reactive. The repeatability of behaviours at the individual level was generally low. The site of index child defaecation ([Kappa] = 0.27), how the child's bottom was cleaned ([Kappa] = -0.01) and whether the caretaker washed her hands afterwards ([Kappa] = 0.26) all showed low repeatability. The method of stool disposal was more repeatable ([Kappa] = 0.73). Hand washing by mothers after using the latrine showed moderate repeatability ([Kappa] = 0.40). Older sibling's defaecation behaviour had excellent repeatability ([Kappa] = 0.90). Our findings suggest that, in studies which aim to measure behaviour at the population level, structured observations may provide a useful tool. Studies which investigate links between hygiene behaviour and diarrhoea incidence at the individual level will require repeated observations of mothers and children since measuring behaviour during a single observation will lead to misclassification of exposure status, resulting in bias which could mask any underlying association. This is likely to be very costly. Key words - hygiene behaviour, structured observation, repeatability, reactivity, Burkina Faso, West Africa

Stool disposal practices have been shown to be associated with childhood diarrhoea. However, efforts to promote improved hygiene behaviour are hampered by a lack of understanding of what determines those behaviours. Data from 2793 household interviews with mothers of children from the town of Bobo-Dioulasso in Burkina Faso were analyzed to examine what differentiated mothers who reported using safer stool disposal practices from those who did not. Three 'outcomes' were considered: where the child was reported to defaecate; where the mother reported disposing of the child stools; and whether excreta were observed in the compound. Regression models were developed to identify those factors with the strongest independent associations with the outcomes. There was a consistent association between the source of water and the outcomes. Mothers with access to a tap in the yard reported using safe hygiene practices three times more often than mothers using wells outside the compound and twice as often as mothers who used public standpipes or wells within the yard. The source of water showed a similar pattern of association with observations of faecal matter in the environment. Improved sources of water may contribute to safer stool hygiene by reducing the time spent on water collection or by encouraging mothers to conform to higher standards of hygiene. Other factors which played a role in predicting the hygiene behaviour of mothers were the husbands' occupation, the number of health education sessions that she had attended, her zone of residence and family ownership of certain valuable objects. These factors are likely to be related and to be, to some extent, proxies for the real determinants of her behaviour. A model of the cultural, psycho-social and infrastructural proximate determinants of hygiene behaviour is proposed. Data from focus group discussions suggested that the main purpose of hygienic behaviour is to conform to existing norms of social etiquette. Trials of interventions based on changing such norms are needed to test whether this is an effective means of promoting of safer hygiene practices. Key words - hygiene behaviour, stool disposal, diarrhoea, Burkina Faso