Search

The aim of this contribution is to propose good medical practice in formulating and managing fitness for work (FFW) for health care workers exposed to biological agents. A literature review was conducted, together with a critical analysis of available scientific evidence and presentation of practical examples taken from the Italian multicentric study in which the authors have been participating since 2008. Within the health care sector and with special reference to biological risk, making and subsequently managing a FFW for a specific job is in fact a particularly arduous task for the occupational physician and for the entire hospital management system. The process that leads to issuing a FFW needs to follow the appropriate guidelines and good technical and scientific practice and also take into careful consideration current legislation (national, regional, etc); it is the result of a well grounded balance between professional ethics, rights and duties of the worker and patient, but also of the employer and of all those involved. All these aspects need to be adapted to the single work situations, applying the principle of precaution and careful flexibility in management, with accurate evaluation of each individual clinical case with its peculiarities and referral, where necessary, to expert opinion. It is also indispensable to have in place a clear and jointly agreed hospital management policy where co-responsibility is taken by each single actor, always with due respect for specific roles, so that the Occupational Physician and employers are not left to manage the issue alone.

The biological risk from exposure to bloodborne pathogens in health care environments represents a frequent prevaand widespread risk, involving a large number of exposed workers. On the basis of the available scientific innovations, the recent legislation regarding health and safety of workers and the experiences of SIMLII guidelines on health surveillance (HS) workers exposed to biological risk, a multicenter study was carried out, involving nine relevant hospitals and about 32 000 healthcare workers (HCW). A review of the literature was performed, with particular reference to the last 10 years. For each hospital, protocols of HS have been examined according to tasks and biological risk from bloodborne viruses (HBV, HDV, HCV, HIV) as well as management of HCW infected with this pathogens. Differences of risk management in the hospitals, in relationship also with recommendations of the literature have been evaluated. The literature supplies important indications for HS management of HCW exposed to bloodborne pathogens, with relevant information also for patient safety. Preventive examinations are in line with the recommendations of literature and similar across the hospitals for HCV and HIV, while they are different for HBV. Periodic surveillance was different for the frequency, among the hospitals and also as compared to national SIMLII guidelines. As for management, no differentiation among the hospitals was detected as referred to different risk of exposure, while differences were observed around definitions of restrictions. Finally, good medical practices to support occupational physicians in the prevention and management of HCWs’ exposed to biological risks are suggested

Background. Nosocomial transmission of varicellazoster virus, certain paramixovirus and rubivirus might pose a risk of morbidity for varicella (V), rubella (R), mumps (Mu) and measles (Me) in health care workers (HCW), patients and coworkers. International literature and European legislation recommend preventive interventions to minimize the risk. Methods. A literature review and a seroprevalence study were carried out in 9 hospitals located in north and central Italy, in order to evaluate risk assessment, health surveillance and fitness for work of HCW exposed to V, R, Mu and Me. Antibodies (Ab) against V, R, Mu and Me were determined. For a subgroup of 4 hospitals; sociodemographic, occupational data and sera were collected and analyzed. Results. About 36000 tests on about 9000 HCW were analyzed. Differences in seroprevalence ratios (V 85.7-95.1%, R 47-96.8%, Me 71.4-97.8%, Mu 52.5-87.6%) were detected. In a subgroup, a relevant number of non immune HCW was also found among women in fertile age and areas at higher risk. Statistically significant differences were detected only for selected variables and viruses. Discussion and conclusions. Data of multicenter study confirm literature evidences and allow to define good medical practices for manage and minimize the risk of nosocomial transmission of V, R, Me and Mu. Recommendation are issued about serologic screening on HCW exposed to all 4 viruses thorough the modern analytical techniques, in order to assess risk on individual a group basis and to select priorities for intervention. Vaccination should be prescribed for those HCW non immune, selecting areas and HCW according to priorities.

Introduction. The influenza illness is a concern for health care workers (HCW) due to the potential nosocomial transmission and sickness absenteeism. Immunization and Isolation Precautions might be effective preventive measures. Aims. To formulate recommendations on vaccination in healthcare settings. Methods. A multidisciplinary working group, led by occupational physicians (OP), examined the information on seasonal influenza immunisation campaign in 9 Italian hospitals in the period 2005-2009 and reviewed scientific evidence. Results. Many health organizations recommend vaccination of HCW. The literature shows that seasonal influenza vaccination of healthy adult have a modest effect in reducing work day lost; there is no evidence that it affects transmission or it prevents the disease in elderly residents. These observations might be conditioned by methodological limitations. Further studies are required to avoid the risk of bias and in pediatric settings. The rate of flu vaccination among HCW is widely variable and it depends on individual risk perception and information about efficacy and side effects. In the considered hospitals, in the fiveyears period the vaccination rate ranged between 0 and 29%: the median value was 16-17% in 2005, 2008 and 2009 (only against H1N1 influence), 11% and 13% in 2007 and 2006 respectively. OP participation in the vaccination campaign seems to increase the immunization rate. Discussion. Seasonal influenza immunization of HCW might be effective. We recommend to formalize written procedures in health care settings, to perform data computing and to periodically revise immunization activities and promotion and scientific litterature, with the aim to appropriately address resources. Key words: influenza, health care workers, good medical