Search

Background Ventricular assist devices ( VADs) have a proven survival benefit in select patients with advanced heart failure, yet many patients considered for implantation are declined for various reasons. The outcome of these patients is obscure owing to their exclusion from recent VAD studies. We aim to compare the outcomes of patients who received a VAD to those who did not. Methods For this study, the Artificial Heart Program's database at Intermountain Medical Center was queried from 2006 to 2012 for patients referred for a VAD. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed with log-rank test determining significance. Results Of 232 patients included, 118 patients received a VAD and 114 patients did not. The prevailing reason for VAD decline in eligible and willing patients was due to pre-existing illness (39%). Mortality was higher in non- VAD vs. VAD patients (58.8% vs. 35.6%, p < 0.001) with a median time-to-death of 67 ( IQR:12-314) and 301 ( IQR:136-694) d, respectively (p = 0.007). Conclusions In the current era of non-pulsatile VADs, mortality of patients who are considered but not implanted remains high. Additionally, mortality of these patients occurred much sooner. Educational efforts ensuring timely referral for VAD therapy are important to maximize the number of patients who may benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ventura PA, Alharethi R, Budge D, Reid BB, Horne BD, Mason NO, Stoker S, Caine WT, Rasmusson B, Doty J, Clayson SE, Kfoury AG. Differential impact on post-transplant outcomes between pulsatile- and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices. Clin Transplant 2011: 25: E390-E395. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: The HeartMate II (HMII) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has proven reliable and durable and has become the preferred choice for bridge to transplant therapy (BTT) when compared with the pulsatile HeartMate XVE (XVE). In this study, we compared the post-transplant (PTx) outcomes between XVE and HMII using a large national data registry. Methods: The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN)/United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Thoracic Registry database was queried for all patients implanted with either an XVE or an HMII as BTT during 2004-2009. Statistical analysis between XVE and HMII were performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analyses. Results: A total of 673 patients were implanted with the XVE and 484 with HMII. When adjusted for age, gender, ethnicity, intra-aortic balloon pump, ventilator, inotropes, dialysis, body mass index, creatinine, bilirubin, transfusion, pulmonary capillary wedge, and pulmonary arterial pressures, the HMII had similar one- and three-yr survival (hazard ratio = 0.95, CI = 0.64, 1.42) and rejection-free survival PTx compared to XVE. The XVE group had more early incidences of allograft rejection (AR) and hospitalization for infection (HI). Conclusions: Compared to XVE, patients with HMII have similar one- and three-yr survival after heart transplantation with less risk of early graft rejection and significant infection. With a strong shift toward use of continuous-flow LVADs, PTx outcomes are expected to continue to improve. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]