1. Community Guide Cardiovascular Disease Economic Reviews: Tailoring Methods to Ensure Utility of Findings.
- Author
-
Chattopadhyay SK, Jacob V, Mercer SL, Hopkins DP, Elder RW, and Jones CD
- Subjects
- Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory economics, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory standards, Cardiovascular Diseases economics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. legislation & jurisprudence, Community Health Workers economics, Decision Making, Decision Support Systems, Clinical economics, Health Expenditures legislation & jurisprudence, Health Policy legislation & jurisprudence, Humans, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Program Evaluation economics, Program Evaluation standards, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, United States, Cardiovascular Diseases prevention & control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. standards, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Policy economics, Program Evaluation methods
- Abstract
The Community Preventive Services Task Force recommended five interventions for cardiovascular disease prevention between 2012 and 2015. Systematic economic reviews of these interventions faced challenges that made it difficult to generate meaningful policy and programmatic conclusions. This paper describes the methods used to assess, synthesize, and evaluate the economic evidence to generate reliable and useful economic conclusions and address the comparability of economic findings across interventions. Specifically, steps were taken to assess completeness of data and identify the components and drivers of cost and benefit. Except for the intervention cost of self-measured blood pressure monitoring intervention, either alone or with patient support, all cost and benefit estimates were standardized as per patient per year. When possible, intermediate outcomes were converted to quality-adjusted life year. Differences within and between interventions were considered to generate economic conclusions and inform their comparability. The literature search period varied among interventions. This analysis was completed in 2016. Although team-based care, self-measured blood pressure monitoring with patient support, and self-measured blood pressure monitoring within team-based care were found to be cost effective, their cost-effectiveness estimates were not comparable because of differences in the intervention characteristics. Lack of enough data or incomplete information made it difficult to reach an overall economic finding for the other interventions. The Community Guide methods discussed here may help others conducting systematic economic reviews of public health interventions to respond to challenges with the synthesis of evidence and provide useful findings for public health decision makers., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF