Search

Background: In January 1997, reference pricing for angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for patients 65 years of age or older was introduced in British Columbia, Canada. For medications within a specific class, insurance covers the cost up to the reference price, and patients pay the extra cost of more expensive medications. Although reference pricing may reduce the costs of prescription drugs, there is concern that patients may switch to less effective medications or stop treatment., Methods: We analyzed data from the Ministry of Health on all 37,362 residents of British Columbia who were 65 or older and were enrolled in the provincial health insurance program, received ACE inhibitors priced higher than the reference price of $27 a month in 1996, and were potentially affected by the new policy. We identified 5353 residents who switched to an ACE inhibitor not subject to cost sharing during the first six months and compared them with 27,938 residents who received only ACE inhibitors subject to cost sharing., Results: Reference pricing for ACE inhibitors was not associated with changes in the rates of visits to physicians, hospitalizations, admissions to long-term care facilities, or mortality. The probability of stopping antihypertensive therapy decreased as compared with the probability before the change in policy (relative risk, 0.76; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.65 to 0.89). Eighteen percent of patients who had been prescribed ACE inhibitors subject to cost sharing switched to lower-priced alternatives. As compared with patients who did not switch, those who did had a moderate transitory increase in the rates of visits to physicians (rate ratio, 1.11; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.07 to 1.15) and hospital admissions through the emergency room (rate ratio, 1.19; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.99 to 1.42) during the two months after switching, but not subsequently., Conclusions: We found little evidence that when reference pricing for ACE inhibitors was introduced in British Columbia, patients stopped treatment for hypertension or that health care utilization and costs increased.

Objective. To quantify resource utilization and costs incurred for patients who received transdermal fentanyl as their first long-acting analgesic for non-malignant pain, and to compare these with utilization and costs for similar patients dispensed other long-acting oral opioids. Design. A retrospective matched cohort study using medical claims data from a large New England Insurer. Patients. We identified 478 patients without cancer who received transdermal fentanyl during 1995-1998. We selected patients who had no previous long-acting opioid dispensings and were enrolled during the 180 days before and 30 days following the initial dispensing. We used propensity scores to identify a matched comparison group of 478 long-acting oral opioid users. Results. Transdermal fentanyl and matched long-acting oral opioid users incurred identical median costs for outpatient medical services and prescriptions during 2 years of follow-up. A larger proportion of transdermal fentanyl patients were still taking their initial opioid analgesic at the end of the 2-year follow-up than were patients initially taking other long-acting opioids. Use of short-acting opioids tapered off more slowly among transdermal fentanyl patients than among long-acting opioid patients. In the first 6 months, the transdermal fentanyl patients had more hospital discharges than the long-acting oral opioid patients, but this difference appeared to reflect preexisting conditions. Conclusions. Users of fentanyl transdermal system and other long-acting opioids experienced essentially identical evolution of health services utilization and costs over a 2-year period. The choice of long-acting opioid analgesia does not appear to be a determinant of future medical costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Complications of influenza are a major cause of morbidity and mortality during the influenza season. Clinical trials of zanamivir have reported a reduced incidence of influenza complications among high-risk patients.Objectives: This retrospective study sought to determine whether the use of zanamivir lowers the risk of acute influenza complications in a broader population, based on an analysis of claims data from a large managed care organization.Methods: Medical and pharmacy health insurance claims data from October 1, 1999, through April 30, 2000, were compiled for UnitedHealthcare members in 19 states. All patients with a diagnosis of influenza (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnostic code 487.xx) associated with a physician visit were identified. From these, all patients were selected who had received zanamivir on the same day as the diagnosis of influenza. The propensity score matching technique was used to identify a comparison group with similar health service utilization and comorbidities who received a diagnosis of influenza but no antiviral therapy. Follow-up started the day after the influenza diagnosis and continued for 21 days.Results: From the 43,741 patients originally identified, 2341 were selected who received a simultaneous diagnosis of influenza and a prescription for zanamivir. The untreated comparator group numbered 2337. Fewer zanamivir patients than untreated patients were hospitalized for complications, and the absolute risks were low (0.6% and 1.0%, respectively; risk ratio [RR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.30–1.12). Zanamivir-treated patients had an excess of outpatient visits (16.9% vs 14.5%; RR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.02–1.33) and antibiotic use (16.3% vs 14.8%; RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.97–1.26), although the RRs were modest.Conclusions: In the setting of a large managed care plan, patterns of influenza complications were similar in zanamivir-treated and untreated patients with a diagnosis of influenza. The results of this study are in contrast to those of published clinical trials reporting a reduction in the risk of influenza complications in zanamivir-treated patients. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Background: Inhaled zanamivir is indicated for treatment of uncomplicated acute illness due to influenza A and B viruses in patients aged ≥12 years who have been symptomatic for no more than 2 days.Objective: The primary objective of this study was to estimate the incidence of adverse respiratory events among zanamivir-treated patients under conditions of usual care.Methods: The Ingenix research database includes insurance claims for all dispensations, inpatient and outpatient services, and procedures including the associated diagnoses and costs for a subset of all enrolled UnitedHealthcare members. We identified all persons with a dispensation of zanamivir recorded between October 1, 1999, and April 30, 2000. We captured medical and pharmaceutical claims data for the 6 months before the dispensation to obtain information about comorbidities, overall health status, and respiratory events. Medical and hospital record abstraction and clinical review served to confirm inpatient/emergency department (ED) events. We also examined the records of an ∼ 10% random sample of patients treated for a potential respiratory event in an outpatient/physician office visit during the 10-day follow-up period. Respiratory events not sufficiently severe to result in medical care were not captured in this study.Results: A total of 5498 eligible zanamivir dispensations contributed by 5450 patients (2911 females, 2539 males; mean age, 38.8 years), with 40 confirmed inpatient/ED respiratory events, were included in the study. Of these 40 events, 31 were pneumonia, bronchitis, or exacerbations of existing chronic respiratory disease; none required intubation or ventilation. No events occurred on the dispensation date. The overall risk for an inpatient/ED respiratory event was 0.7 per 100 episodes (95% CI, 0.5–1.0). Seven events of wheezing or shortness of breath were not an obvious extension of the original influenza-like illness or of a complicating bronchitis (risk = 0.13 per 100 episodes; 95% CI, 0.06–0.26).Conclusions: No immediate or severe bronchoconstrictive responses occurred among 5498 zanamivir dispensations. The overall risk for any respiratory event was low, and none was sufficiently severe to suggest respiratory failure. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]