Jennifer Zeitlin, Hugo Pilkington, Béatrice Blondel, Marion Carayol, Gérard Bréart, Laboratoire Dynamiques Sociales et Recomposition des Espaces (LADYSS), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (UP1)-Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis (UP8)-Université Paris Nanterre (UPN)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7), Recherche Epidémiologique en Santé Périnatale et Santé des Femmes et des Enfants (UMR_S 953), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11), Dynamique des capacités humaines et des conduites de santé (EPSYLON), Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UM3)-Université de Montpellier (UM), Laboratoire dynamiques sociales et recomposition des espaces ( LADYSS ), Université Panthéon-Sorbonne ( UP1 ) -Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis ( UP8 ) -Université Paris Nanterre ( UPN ) -Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 ( UPD7 ) -Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique ( CNRS ), Recherche Epidémiologique en Santé Périnatale et Santé des Femmes et des Enfants ( UMR_S 953 ), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ) -Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 ( UPD5 ) -Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 ( UPMC ) -Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 ( UP11 ), Dynamique des capacités humaines et des conduites de santé ( EPSYLON ), Université de Montpellier ( UM ) -Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 ( UM3 ) -Université Montpellier 1 ( UM1 ), Institut de santé publique (ISP), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (UP1)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis (UP8)-Université Paris Nanterre (UPN)-Université de Paris (UP), Recherches épidémiologiques en santé périnatale et santé des femmes, Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Université de Montpellier (UM)-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Université Montpellier 1 (UM1), Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 (UP11)-Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne (UP1)-Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis (UP8)-Université Paris Nanterre (UPN)-Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Université de Montpellier (UM), Université Paris Diderot - Paris 7 (UPD7)-Université Paris Nanterre (UPN)-Université Paris 8 Vincennes-Saint-Denis (UP8)-Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (UP1)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Paris-Sud - Paris 11 ( UP11 ) -Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 ( UPMC ) -Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 ( UPD5 ) -Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM ), Institut de santé publique ( ISP ), and Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale ( INSERM )
As in many other countries, the number of maternity units has diminished substantially in France, raising concerns about the reduced accessibility of obstetric services. We describe here the impact of closures on distance and mean travel time between pregnant women's homes and maternity units. We used data from the 1998 and 2003 French National Perinatal Surveys and from vital registries to measure indicators of accessibility: straight-line distance to the nearest maternity unit, number of units within a 15-km radius and reported travel time to the unit for delivery. We analyzed these measures for all births, births in rural versus urban areas and according to regional rates of maternity closures. From 1998 to 2003, 20% of maternity units closed (reducing the number from 759 to 621) with regional variations in the rate of closure from 0.0% to 36.0%. Mean distance to the nearest maternity unit increased (6.6-7.2 km, p < 0.001). The proportion of women living more than 30 km from a maternity ward was low; but rose from 1.4% to 1.8%. The number of maternity units with a 15-km radius of the place of residence fell (median, 3 to 2). Differences were more marked in rural areas and in regions highly affected by closures. However, reported travel time did not increase and even declined slightly for women from urban areas and in regions moderately affected by the closures. As such, the closures do not appear to have had a negative impact on the geographic accessibility of maternity units. Pregnant women were faced with a reduction in the number of maternity units near their homes and our results suggest that they more often chose their maternity units based on proximity. A full assessment of the impact of closures on accessibility to obstetric services would require information on how these changes affected available choices for care during pregnancy and delivery.