Search

Health represents the dynamic balance of physical, mental, social, and existential well‐being in adapting to conditions of life and the environment. Health is essential for the quality of life (QoL) of all individuals, including those with intellectual disability (ID). People with ID experience health inequities and barriers to quality health care that must be addressed to foster the QoL of this population. This paper illustrates how poor health negatively impacts each of the eight domains of the QoL model proposed by Shalock and Verdugo (2002) (e.g., health conditions limit work performance, decreasing opportunities for personal development and self‐determination). Suggestions for healthcare practices and behaviors that would improve the quality of healthcare provided to people with ID, and thus their health and QoL, are offered (e.g., engaging people with ID in the medical conversation, talking to them in plain language and without jargon enhances the personal development, self‐determination, interpersonal relationships, and social inclusion domains of QoL). Finally, we suggest actions that people with ID and their families might implement to maximize their health and wellness (e.g., maintaining a healthy lifestyle, and using the health promotion resources provided by disability organizations). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Collecting self‐reported health and quality of life (QoL) outcomes is increasingly considered best practice, but people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are often excluded from patient‐reported outcome measures. Objective: This article provides a literature‐informed overview of the state of the field of self‐reporting of physical health and QoL in research with adults with IDD. Approach: We first identified and synthesized definitions of key constructs related to the self‐reporting of health. Next, we summarize literature on existing and emerging practices focused on health and QoL assessment, discussing the frequent and sometimes overly broad use of proxy‐respondents in the IDD field. We then highlight emerging directions focused on cognitive accessibility and universal design. Finally, we provide conclusions and recommendations for the field. Conclusions: Informed by the literature, we provide action steps to guide the field in considering how to incorporate self‐reporting of health outcomes by people with IDD in research, policy, and practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is growing recognition that preconception health, defined as the health of all reproductive-age individuals, impacts reproductive and perinatal outcomes. Although women with disabilities are becoming pregnant at increasing rates, little is known about their preconception health. Our objective was to describe the preconception health characteristics of women with physical, sensory, and intellectual/developmental disabilities and compare these characteristics with women without disabilities. Materials and Methods: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional study of 15- to 44-year-old women with physical (n = 253,184), sensory (n = 93,170), intellectual/developmental (n = 8,986), and multiple disabilities (n = 29,868), and women without these disabilities (n = 2,307,822) using Ontario health administrative data (2017–2018). We described preconception health variables related to social determinants of health, physical health status, psychosocial well-being, history of assault, medication use, and continuity of primary care and compared women with and without disabilities in crude and age-standardized analyses, with standardized differences >0.10 indicating clinically meaningful results. Results: Women with physical, sensory, intellectual/developmental, and multiple disabilities had poorer preconception health than women without disabilities. Disparities were pronounced for physical health status, psychosocial well-being, use of potentially teratogenic medications, and history of assault. Of all groups, women with intellectual/developmental disabilities had the greatest disparities. Conclusion: Further research is needed to identify contributors to poor preconception health among women with disabilities and to develop tailored preconception health interventions to meet their unique needs and experiences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) is an evidence-based program that is affective in managing chronic conditions and improving health outcomes in diverse populations; however, the program may not effectively reach the Deaf community. Deafness is associated with chronic health conditions and low health literacy, making a health education program such as CDSMP a good fit for this population. This study adapted and evaluated CDSMP in American Sign Language (ASL). The aims of this study were to (1) adapt the CDSMP curriculum for Deaf participants; (2) evaluate the program fidelity, participant satisfaction, and qualitative feedback; and (3) provide recommendations for improving the accessibility of CDSMP for the Deaf community. We evaluated the CDSMP program offered by lay leaders in ASL to Deaf participants. Program fidelity and participant satisfaction were high (93% and 88.9%, respectively). Qualitative feedback from participants and lay leaders informed implementation recommendations. Based on these findings, we offer 10 recommendations for offering CDSMP to the Deaf community. This study demonstrates that CDSMP can be successfully offered in ASL to Deaf participants with minimal adaptations. Offering CDSMP in ASL to accommodate Deaf learners promises to improve health outcomes in this vulnerable population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This qualitative study was carried out in Spain with the aim of identifying the changes that the health system should make to improve healthcare access for older adults with intellectual disability. Three hundred and sixty‐nine family members and professionals expressed their opinion on how healthcare access could be improved. Participants responded to two open‐ended questions included in a general survey about the health status of older individuals with intellectual disability. Most informants were women and professionals who had known the person with intellectual disability for more than 12 months. A system of categories, which showed good inter‐rater agreement, was developed to analyse participants' written responses. Both family members and professionals emphasized the need to improve disability training for healthcare practitioners and highlighted the urgent need for flexibility in the structure of a healthcare system that currently overlooks the specific needs of this vulnerable population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This issue, On Counting What Matters: Finding Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities in Population Health Data, presents an overview of health surveillance research for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) in the United States. Although public health now conducts surveillance of people with disabilities broadly defined and compares their health status with that of individuals without disabilities, there are many challenges in conducting health surveillance of people with IDD. Difficulties include how to define cases, how to find cases, and how to obtain accurate information ( Krahn, Fox, Campbell, Ramon, & Jesien, 2010 ). This issue will present critical conceptual and methodological issues, including recent prevalence and population health analyses, along with proposals that can lead to more equitable health and improved health surveillance for people with IDD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The intellectual disability field has learned about the lives of people with intellectual disabilities (ID), largely from the perspective of their family and caregivers. Information from caregivers has been critical to scientific advancement, especially when caregivers are engaged on behalf of individuals with significant language impairment. On the other hand, the perspective of individuals with ID themselves is critical for internal subjective content such as thoughts and feelings. Methods: Participants were 90 adults with ID and a proxy of their choosing. Results: Overall, self and caregiver report were significantly related for subjective health but varied for physical activity, social support and stress. Conclusions: These findings add to the growing literature establishing the importance of considering the self‐report of adults with ID, particularity when the subject matter focuses on internal thoughts or feelings. Clinical considerations for the use of self and proxy report are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We explored health care differences across the lifespan comparing people with developmental disabilities to people without developmental disabilities. Health care disparities are inequities occurring during the provision of and in access to health care that are experienced by socially disadvantaged populations. We discovered significant disparities between persons with and without developmental disabilities in health status, quality, utilization, access, and unmet health care needs. Our results highlight the need to educate health care clinicians on the care of patients with developmental disabilities of all ages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Self-report is important for measuring health outcomes; however, most research in intellectual disability (ID) relies on proxy report. The lack of cognitively accessible measures is one barrier to accurate self-reporting by individuals with ID.Aims: This paper describes the process of adapting self-report measures of health status, health-related quality of life, and environment for use by individuals with ID and presents evidence on their usability (accessibility), usefulness (independent self-report), and reliability (internal consistency and test-retest).Methods and Procedures: We used an inclusive research approach, in which we collaborated with adults with ID to revise, cognitively test, and pilot test cognitively accessible self-report measures. Technology supported the independent completion of measures. We assessed usability, usefulness, and reliability of these measures in 41 adults with ID.Outcomes and Results: The resulting measures are useful (independently completed) and usable (elicit a range of responses), with modest reliability (internal consistency and test-retest).Conclusions and Implications: Self- report by adults with ID is feasible. A key element of this measure adaptation process was engaging adults with ID. More research is needed to understand the reliability and validity of the adapted measures and the characteristics of the population for whom they are most usable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]