Search

Background: RV and LV have different embryologic, structural, metabolic, and electrophysiologic characteristics, but whether interventricular differences exist in β-adrenergic (β-AR) responsiveness is unknown. In this study, we examine whether β-AR response and signaling differ in right (RV) versus left (LV) ventricles., Methods and Results: Sarcomere shortening, Ca(2+) transients, ICa,L and IKs currents were recorded in isolated dog LV and RV midmyocytes. Intracellular [cAMP] and PKA activity were measured by live cell imaging using FRET-based sensors. Isoproterenol increased sarcomere shortening ≈10-fold and Ca(2+)-transient amplitude ≈2-fold in LV midmyocytes (LVMs) versus ≈25-fold and ≈3-fold in RVMs. FRET imaging using targeted Epac2camps sensors revealed no change in subsarcolemmal [cAMP], but a 2-fold higher β-AR stimulation of cytoplasmic [cAMP] in RVMs versus LVMs. Accordingly, β-AR regulation of ICa,L and IKs were similar between LVMs and RVMs, whereas cytoplasmic PKA activity was increased in RVMs. Both PDE3 and PDE4 contributed to the β-AR regulation of cytoplasmic [cAMP], and the difference between LVMs and RVMs was abolished by PDE3 inhibition and attenuated by PDE4 inhibition. Finally LV and RV intracavitary pressures were recorded in anesthetized beagle dogs. A bolus injection of isoproterenol increased RV dP/dtmax≈5-fold versus 3-fold in LV., Conclusion: Canine RV and LV differ in their β-AR response due to intrinsic differences in myocyte β-AR downstream signaling. Enhanced β-AR responsiveness of the RV results from higher cAMP elevation in the cytoplasm, due to a decreased degradation by PDE3 and PDE4 in the RV compared to the LV., (© 2014 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell.)

Background and Purpose: In cardiovascular pharmacology, electrical and mechanical events can be distinguished, and the phrase 'electro-mechanical window' (EMw) describes the temporal difference between these events. We studied whether changes in EMw have potential predictive value for the occurrence of arrhythmias in fentanyl/etomidate-anaesthetized beagle (FEAB) dogs.Experimental Approach: The EMw was calculated as differences between the QT interval and QLVP(end) in FEAB dogs during atrial pacing, treatment with isoprenaline or atropine, body temperature changes and induction of Torsade de Pointes (TdP) in an LQT1 model.Key Results: The electrical systole (QT interval) was shorter than the duration of the mechanical event (QLVP(end) ), providing a positive EMw. Atrial pacing, atropine or body temperature changes had no major effects on EMw, despite large changes in QT duration. However, β-adrenoceptor stimulation (with isoprenaline) decreased the EMw (from 90 to 5 ms) and in combination with HMR1556, a blocker of the slowly activating potassium current (I(Ks) ), induced a large negative EMw (-109ms) and TdP. Prevention of TdP by atenolol or verapamil was associated with a less negative EMw (-23 to -16ms). Mexiletine, a poorly effective long QT treatment, did not affect the EMw or prevent TdP induction.Conclusions and Implications: The EMw is a marker, other than QT prolongation, of TdP risk in the FEAB model. Therefore, we suggest examining the EMw as a risk marker in cardiovascular safety studies and as a potential biomarker to improve clinical management of long QT syndrome patients, especially in patients with borderline QT prolongation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]