Search

Aim: Pulsatile flow left ventricular assist devices (pf-LVADs) are being replaced by continuous flow LVADs (cf-LVADs) in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF). MicroRNAs (miRs) play an important role in the onset and progression of HF. Our aim was to analyze cardiac miR expression patterns associated with each type of device, to analyze differences in the regulation of the induced cardiac changes. Methods and Results: Twenty-six miRs were selected (based on micro-array data and literature studies) and validated in myocardial tissue before and after pf- (n = 17) and cf-LVAD (n = 17) support. Of these, 5 miRs displayed a similar expression pattern among the devices (miR-129*, miR-146a, miR-155, miR-221, miR-222), whereas others only changed significantly during pf-LVAD (miR-let-7i, miR-21, miR-378, miR-378*) or cf-LVAD support (miR-137). In addition, 4 miRs were investigated in plasma of cf-LVAD supported patients (n = 18) and healthy controls (n = 10). Circulating miR-21 decreased at 1, 3, and 6 months after LVAD implantation. MiR-146a, miR-221 and miR-222 showed a fluctuating time pattern post-LVAD. Conclusion: Our data show a different miR expression pattern after LVAD support, suggesting that differentially expressed miRs are partially responsible for the cardiac morphological and functional changes observed after support. However, the miR expression patterns do not seem to significantly differ between pf- and cf-LVAD implying that most cardiac changes or clinical outcomes specific to each device do not relate to differences in miR expression levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: During support with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), partial reverse remodelling takes place in which fibrosis plays an important role. In this study, we analysed the histological changes and expression of fibrotic markers in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) during continuous-flow LVAD (cf-LVAD) support. METHODS: In 25 patients, myocardial tissue at the time of LVAD implantation (pre-LVAD) was compared with tissue from the explanted left ventricle (post-LVAD). Interstitial fibrosis and cardiomyocyte size were analysed pre- and post-LVAD. Plasma was obtained from all patients before and during LVAD support. Plasma levels, cardiac mRNA and protein expression of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), galectin- 3 (Gal-3), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), osteopontin (OPN) and transforming growth factor β-1 were determined. RESULTS: Fibrosis increased during cf-LVAD unloading (P < 0.05). Cardiomyocytes elongated (P < 0.05), whereas cross-sectional area did not change. BNP, Gal-3, CTGF and OPN were significantly elevated pre-LVAD in comparison with controls. BNP decreased significantly after 1 month of cf-LVAD support (P < 0.001) to near-normal levels. Pro-fibrotic markers remained elevated in comparison with controls. CONCLUSIONS: cf-LVAD support is associated with lengthening of cardiomyocytes, without alterations in diameter size. Remarkably, myocardial fibrosis increased as well as circulating pro-fibrotic markers. Whether the morphological changes are a direct effect of reduced pulsatility during cf-LVAD support or due to HF progression requires further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is a stress-responsive cytokine and is emerging as a biomarker of cardiac remodelling. Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide unloading of the left ventricle, resulting in partial reverse remodelling. Our aim was to study GDF-15 in patients with a non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) during LVAD support. Methods and results We analysed circulating GDF-15 in 30 patients before and 1, 3, and 6 months after LVAD implantation and before heart transplantation or explantation. In addition, mRNA and protein expression of GDF-15 were evaluated in myocardial tissue obtained prior to and after LVAD support. Circulating GDF-15 was significantly higher before LVAD implantation as compared with healthy controls (P < 0.001). After 1 month of mechanical support, GDF-15 levels were significantly decreased compared with pre-implantation levels (P < 0.001) and remained stable thereafter. Circulating GDF-15 was significantly correlated with kidney function and the severity of myocardial fibrosis. Interestingly, GDF-15 mRNA and protein expression in the myocardium were hardly detectable. Conclusions High circulating levels of GDF-15 in patients with end-stage non-ischaemic DCM correlate with myocardial fibrosis and kidney function and decline strongly after 1 month of mechanical unloading, remaining stable thereafter. However, cardiac mRNA and protein expression of GDF-15 are very low, suggesting that the heart is not an important source of GDF-15 production in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A correction to the article "Single-centre experience of 85 patients with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: clinical practice and outcome after extended support" is presented.

OBJECTIVES We evaluated our single-centre clinical experience with the HeartMate II (HM II) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to transplantation (BTT) in end-stage heart failure (HF) patients. METHODS Survival rates, echocardiographic parameters, laboratory values and adverse events of 85 consecutive patients supported with a HM II were evaluated. RESULTS Overall, mean age was 45 ± 13 years, 62 (73%) were male and non-ischaemic dilatated cardiomyopathy was present in 60 (71%) patients. The median duration of mechanical support was 387 days (IQR 150–600), with a range of 1–1835 days. The 6-month, 1-, 2-, 3- and 4-year survival rates during HM II LVAD support were 85, 81, 76, 76 and 68%, respectively. Echocardiographic parameters demonstrated effective left ventricular unloading, while laboratory results reflected adequate organ perfusion. However, HM II support was associated with adverse events, such as infections in 42 patients (49%; 0.67 events/patient-year), cardiac arrhythmia in 44 (52%; 0.86 events/patient-year), bleeding complications in 32 (38%; 0.43 events/patient-year) and neurological dysfunction in 17 (20%; 0.19 events/patient-year). CONCLUSIONS In view of the increasing shortage of donor hearts, HM II LVAD support may be considered a life-saving treatment in end-stage HF patients, with good survival. However, it is still associated with some serious adverse events, of which neurological complications are the most critical. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]