1. Free-breathing pseudo-golden-angle bSSFP cine cardiac MRI for biventricular functional assessment in congenital heart disease.
- Author
-
Kravchenko D, Isaak A, Zhang S, Katemann C, Mesropyan N, Bischoff LM, Pieper CC, Kuetting D, Attenberger U, Weber O, Hart C, and Luetkens JA
- Subjects
- Humans, Prospective Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine methods, Breath Holding, Reproducibility of Results, Respiration, Heart Defects, Congenital diagnostic imaging
- Abstract
Purpose: To compare standard breath-hold (BH) cine imaging to a radial pseudo-golden-angle free-breathing (FB) technique in congenital heart disease (CHD)., Methods: In this prospective study, short-axis and 4-chamber BH and FB cardiac MRI sequences of 25 participants with CHD acquired at 1.5 Tesla, were quantitatively compared regarding ventricular volumes, function, interventricular septum thickness (IVSD), apparent signal to noise ratio (aSNR), and estimated contrast to noise ratio (eCNR). For qualitative comparison, three image quality criteria (contrast, endocardial edge definition, and artefacts) were rated on a 5-point Likert scale (5: excellent, 1: non-diagnostic). Paired t-Test was used for group comparisons, Bland-Altman analysis for agreement between techniques. Inter-reader agreement was compared using intraclass correlation coefficient., Results: IVSD (BH 7.4 ± 2.1 mm vs FB 7.4 ± 1.9 mm, p =.71), biventricular ejection fraction (left ventricle [LV]: 56.4 ± 10.8% vs 56.1 ± 9.3%, p =.83; right ventricle [RV]: 49.5 ± 8.6% vs 49.7 ± 10.1%, p =.83), and biventricular end diastolic volume (LV: 176.3 ± 63.9 ml vs 173.9 ± 64.9 ml, p =.90; RV: 185.4 ± 63.8 ml vs 189.6 ± 66.6 ml, p =.34) were comparable. Mean measurement time for FB short-axis sequences was 8.1 ± 1.3 compared to 4.4 ± 1.3 min for BH (p <.001). Subjective image quality between sequences was deemed comparable, (4.6 ± 0.6 vs 4.5 ± 0.6, p =.26, for 4-chamber views) with a significant difference regarding short-axis views (4.9 ± 0.3 vs 4.5 ± 0.6, p =.008). aSNR was similar (BH 25.8 ± 11.2 vs FB 22.2 ± 9.5, p =.24), while eCNR was higher for BH (89.1 ± 36.1 vs 68.5 ± 32.1, p =.03)., Conclusion: FB sequences yielded comparable results to BH regarding image quality, biventricular volumetry, and function, though measurement times were longer. The FB sequence described might be clinically valuable when BHs are insufficiently performed., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF