Search

ObjectivesPediatric cardiac ICUs should be adept at treating both critical medical and surgical conditions for patients with cardiac disease. There are no case-mix adjusted quality metrics specific to medical cardiac ICU admissions. We aimed to measure case-mix adjusted cardiac ICU medical mortality rates and assess variation across cardiac ICUs in the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium.DesignObservational analysis.SettingPediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium clinical registry.PatientsAll cardiac ICU admissions that did not include cardiac surgery.InterventionsNone.Measurements and main resultsThe primary endpoint was cardiac ICU mortality. Based on multivariable logistic regression accounting for clustering, we created a case-mix adjusted model using variables present at cardiac ICU admission. Bootstrap resampling (1,000 samples) was used for model validation. We calculated a standardized mortality ratio for each cardiac ICU based on observed-to-expected mortality from the fitted model. A cardiac ICU was considered a statistically significant outlier if the 95% CI around the standardized mortality ratio did not cross 1. Of 11,042 consecutive medical admissions from 25 cardiac ICUs (August 2014 to May 2017), the observed mortality rate was 4.3% (n = 479). Final model covariates included age, underweight, prior surgery, time of and reason for cardiac ICU admission, high-risk medical diagnosis or comorbidity, mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation at admission, and pupillary reflex. The C-statistic for the validated model was 0.87, and it was well calibrated. Expected mortality ranged from 2.6% to 8.3%, reflecting important case-mix variation. Standardized mortality ratios ranged from 0.5 to 1.7 across cardiac ICUs. Three cardiac ICUs were outliers; two had lower-than-expected (standardized mortality ratio 1) mortality.ConclusionsWe measured case-mix adjusted mortality for cardiac ICU patients with critical medical conditions, and provide the first report of variation in this quality metric within this patient population across Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium cardiac ICUs. This metric will be used by Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium cardiac ICUs to assess and improve outcomes by identifying high-performing (low-mortality) centers and engaging in collaborative learning.

BackgroundTargeted temperature management is recommended for comatose adults and children after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; however, data on temperature management after in-hospital cardiac arrest are limited.MethodsIn a trial conducted at 37 children's hospitals, we compared two temperature interventions in children who had had in-hospital cardiac arrest. Within 6 hours after the return of circulation, comatose children older than 48 hours and younger than 18 years of age were randomly assigned to therapeutic hypothermia (target temperature, 33.0°C) or therapeutic normothermia (target temperature, 36.8°C). The primary efficacy outcome, survival at 12 months after cardiac arrest with a score of 70 or higher on the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, second edition (VABS-II, on which scores range from 20 to 160, with higher scores indicating better function), was evaluated among patients who had had a VABS-II score of at least 70 before the cardiac arrest.ResultsThe trial was terminated because of futility after 329 patients had undergone randomization. Among the 257 patients who had a VABS-II score of at least 70 before cardiac arrest and who could be evaluated, the rate of the primary efficacy outcome did not differ significantly between the hypothermia group and the normothermia group (36% [48 of 133 patients] and 39% [48 of 124 patients], respectively; relative risk, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67 to 1.27; P=0.63). Among 317 patients who could be evaluated for change in neurobehavioral function, the change in VABS-II score from baseline to 12 months did not differ significantly between the groups (P=0.70). Among 327 patients who could be evaluated for 1-year survival, the rate of 1-year survival did not differ significantly between the hypothermia group and the normothermia group (49% [81 of 166 patients] and 46% [74 of 161 patients], respectively; relative risk, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.34; P=0.56). The incidences of blood-product use, infection, and serious adverse events, as well as 28-day mortality, did not differ significantly between groups.ConclusionsAmong comatose children who survived in-hospital cardiac arrest, therapeutic hypothermia, as compared with therapeutic normothermia, did not confer a significant benefit in survival with a favorable functional outcome at 1 year. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; THAPCA-IH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00880087 .).

Despite many advances in recent years for patients with critical paediatric and congenital cardiac disease, significant variation in outcomes remains across hospitals. Collaborative quality improvement has enhanced the quality and value of health care across specialties, partly by determining the reasons for variation and targeting strategies to reduce it. Developing an infrastructure for collaborative quality improvement in paediatric cardiac critical care holds promise for developing benchmarks of quality, to reduce preventable mortality and morbidity, optimise the long-term health of patients with critical congenital cardiovascular disease, and reduce unnecessary resource utilisation in the cardiac intensive care unit environment. The Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium (PC4) has been modelled after successful collaborative quality improvement initiatives, and is positioned to provide the data platform necessary to realise these objectives. We describe the development of PC4 including the philosophical, organisational, and infrastructural components that will facilitate collaborative quality improvement in paediatric cardiac critical care.