Search

Background: To evaluate diagnostic and long-term prognostic values of hFABP compared to NT-proBNP and troponin I (TnI) in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) suspected of acute heart failure (AHF)., Methods: 401 patients with acute dyspnea or peripheral edema, 122 suffering from AHF, were prospectively enrolled and followed up to 5 years. hFABP combined with NT-proBNP versus NT-proBNP alone was tested for AHF diagnosis. Prognostic value of hFABP versus TnI was evaluated in models predicting all-cause mortality (ACM) and AHF related rehospitalization (AHF-RH) at 1 and 5 years, including 11 conventional risk factors plus NT-proBNP., Results: Additional hFABP measurements improved diagnostic specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of sole NT-proBNP testing at the cutoff <300 ng/l to "rule out" AHF. Highest hFABP levels (4th quartile) were associated with increased ACM (hazard ratios (HR): 2.1-2.5; p = 0.04) and AHF-RH risk at 5 years (HR 2.8-8.3, p = 0.001). ACM was better characterized in prognostic models including TnI, whereas AHF-RH was better characterized in prognostic models including hFABP. Cox analyses revealed a 2 % increase of ACM risk and 3-7 % increase of AHF-RH risk at 5 years by each unit increase of hFABP of 10 ng/ml., Conclusions: Combining hFABP plus NT-proBNP (<300 ng/l) only improves diagnostic specificity and PPV to rule out AHF. hFABP may improve prognosis for long-term AHF-RH, whereas TnI may improve prognosis for ACM., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00143793 .

Background: To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of sensitive troponin I (TnI) in patients with acute dyspnea and/or peripheral edema suspected of having acute heart failure (AHF)., Methods: This single centre prospective clinical study evaluates 372 patients presenting with acute dyspnea and/or peripheral edema to the emergency department (ED). Measurements of TnI and NT-proBNP were performed at the initial presentation in the ED. All patients were followed up to 5 years. The diagnostic value of TnI compared to NT-proBNP for AHF diagnosis as well as long-term prognostic values for all cause mortality and AHF related rehospitalization were evaluated., Results: TnI plus NT-proBNP improved the diagnosis of AHF (improvement of accuracy (75%, 95% CI 71% - 79%), specificity (68%, 95% CI 62% - 74%), PPV (54%, 95% CI 47% - 62%), and NRI +0.15) compared to NT-proBNP alone (p = 0.0001). TnI levels showed independent prognostic value for all-cause mortality and AHF related rehospitalization after 1 and 5 years (range of AUCs 0.64 - 0.72; p = 0.03 or lower). Highest TnI levels of the 4th quartile revealed an up to 5.5 times higher risk of death within 1 and 5 years (range of HRs: 2.5 - 5.5; p = 0.0001). TnI added significantly to multivariable Cox prediction models even after adjusting for NT-proBNP, particularly in AHF patients (range of HRs: 2.1 - 2.7; p ≤ 0.05)., Conclusions: TnI improves AHF diagnosis when combined with NT-proBNP. TnI identifies patients with high 1- and 5-year all-cause mortality and AHF-related rehospitalization risk and adds prognostic value to NT-proBNP.

Aims: To evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of osteopontin in patients with acute dyspnoea and/or peripheral oedema suspected of having acute congestive heart failure (aCHF)., Methods and Results: A total of 401 patients presenting with acute dyspnoea and/or peripheral oedema to the emergency department were prospectively enrolled and followed up for up to 5 years. Blood samples for biomarker measurements were collected on admission to the emergency department. Osteopontin combined with NT-proBNP vs. NT-proBNP alone for diagnosis of aCHF was tested. Additionally, osteopontin vs. NT-proBNP for prognostic outcomes (i.e. all-cause mortality, aCHF-related rehospitalization, and both in combination) was tested. The diagnostic and prognostic capacity of osteopontin was tested by C-statistics, reclassification indices, and multivariable Cox prediction models. Osteopontin plus NT-proBNP improved the diagnostic capacity for aCHF diagnosis [accuracy 76%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 72-80%; specificity 74%, 95% CI 69-79%, net reclassification improvement (NRI) +0.10] compared with NT-proBNP alone in the emergency department (P = 0.0001). Osteopontin independently predicted all-cause mortality and aCHF-related rehospitalization after 1 and 5 years. Compared with NT-proBNP, osteopontin was of superior prognostic value, specifically in aCHF patients and for the prognostic outcome of aCHF-related rehospitalization., Conclusion: Osteopontin improves aCHF diagnosis when combined with NT-proBNP. Osteopontin identifies aCHF patients with high 1- and 5-year mortality and rehospitalization risk, and adds prognostic value to NT-proBNP. Trial registration NCT00143793.