Search

Aims: We evaluated a generic quality of life (QoL) Functional Status Questionnaire (FSQ), in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). The FSQ assesses the 3 main dimensions of QoL: physical functioning, mental health and social role. It also includes 6 single item questions about: work status, frequency of social interactions, satisfaction with sexual relationships, days in bed, days with restricted activity and overall satisfaction with health status. The FSQ was compared to the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MLwHF)., Methods and Results: The FSQ was evaluated in a substudy (n = 340) of the second Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Survival study (CIBIS-II), a placebo-controlled mortality trial. 265 patients (75%) patients completed both questionnaires at 6 months of follow-up. Both questionnaires indicated substantially impaired QoL. The FSQ demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.7 for all items except "social activity" = 0.66) and construct and concurrent validity. After 6 months, the only item on either questionnaire to show a difference between the placebo- and bisoprolol-treatment groups was the single item FSQ question about "days in bed" (p = 0.018 in favour of bisoprolol)., Conclusions: The FSQ performed well in this study, provided additional information to the MLwHF questionnaire and allowed interesting comparisons with other chronic medical conditions. The FSQ may be a useful general QoL instrument for studies in CHF.

Aims: Information on the effectiveness of beta-blockade in patients with heart failure (HF) and concomitant renal impairment is scarce and beta-blockers are underutilized in these patients., Methods and Results: The Cockcroft-Gault formula normalized for body surface-area was used to estimate renal function (eGFR(BSA)) in 2622 patients with HF, left ventricular ejection fraction < or =35%, New York Heart Association class III/IV and serum creatinine <300 micromol/L (3.4 mg/dL) in the second Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II. Patients were divided into four sub-groups according to baseline eGFR(BSA) (<45, 45-60, 60-75 and > or =75 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)). Cox proportional-hazards models adjusted for pre-specified confounders were used to assess the effect of bisoprolol and potential heterogeneity of effect across the eGFR(BSA) sub-groups. Older age, female-sex, diabetes and ischaemic-aetiology were more common in those with reduced eGFR(BSA). The hazard associated with bisoprolol use for all-cause mortality, the composite of all-cause mortality or HF-hospitalization and HF-hospitalization alone was consistently <1.0 across eGFR(BSA) categories with no treatment by renal-function interaction (P = 0.81, P = 0.66, P = 0.71, respectively). The rate of bisoprolol discontinuation was higher in patients with eGFR(BSA) < 45 mL/min per 1.73 m(2). Nevertheless the absolute benefit of bisoprolol was greater for patients with chronic kidney disease compared with those without., Conclusion: The beneficial effects of bisoprolol on mortality and hospitalization for worsening heart-failure were not modified by baseline eGFR(BSA). Renal impairment should not prevent the use of bisoprolol in patients with HF.

Objective: To qualify 302 multinational echocardiography sites to record and read serial studies and to monitor quality in 5010 patients randomized into Valsartan in Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT)., Background: Decentralized echocardiography reading is unprecedented in large clinical trials., Methods: Single and duplicate recordings, and triplicate readings of echocardiographic variables were submitted to 3 core laboratories. Quality of recording was defined with a 16-point scoring system; accuracy of reading by agreement with core readings; reproducibility by agreement between the duplicate studies., Results: Seventy-five percent of initial submissions were approved for recording, and 50% for reading. Resubmissions were evaluated until approval. Initial scores of sites approved with 1 versus 2 submissions differed, 13.8 +/- 1.4 versus 10.6 +/- 2.0, P <.001; final score was similar, 13.4 +/- 1.6, P = ns. Initial score of sites approved after 3 or more submissions differed, 9.5 +/- 1.9, P <.001; final score improved to 12.7 +/- 1.9, but remained lower, P <.001. Expressed as 95% limits of agreement (mean difference +/- 1.96 x SD), accuracy = -0.04 +/- 0.74 cm for left ventricular internal end-diastolic diameter (LVIDd); -0.29 +/- 14.3% for ejection fraction (EF); reproducibility = 0.00 +/- 0.53 cm for LVIDd; -0.25 +/- 8.3% for EF. Quality of random sampling at baseline, 4, 12, and 18 months showed recording scores of 11.7 +/- 2.7, 12.3 +/- 2.4, 12.1 +/- 2.2, and 11.4 +/- 2.0, P =.24. Power analysis revealed differences of 0.09 cm for LVIDd, and 0.86% for EF detectable with a power of 90% and alpha of 5%., Conclusion: The qualifying process improved echocardiography recording and reading to bring 95% of the sites to an equivalent level of quality. Monitoring quality found that recording quality and reading accuracy were maintained 18 months into the trial. Reproducibility, given the large sample size, will be able to detect small changes in LVIDd and EF.

The cost-effectiveness of adding the beta blocker bisoprolol to standard treatment in patients with congestive heart failure was investigated, based on data from the Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS II). The medical resource consumption from CIBIS II was combined with Swedish cost data for medication and hospitalisations. Costs of added years of life, i.e. consumption net of production, were also included in the analysis. The health effects were measured in terms of gained years of life. The results of the analysis show that the cost-effectiveness of bisoprolol compares favourably with that of other cardiovascular treatments. Without the inclusion of costs of added years of life, the cost-effectiveness was in the range of SEK 3,351-13,096 per gained year of life, and with the costs of added years of life included, the cost-effectiveness was in the range of SEK 137,533-147,278 per gained year of life.

The aim of the present study was primarily to evaluate the haemodynamic effects of the ACE-inhibitor ramipril which is active via its metabolite ramiprilat. Ramipril 1.25, 2.5 and 5 mg and placebo was administered orally to 4 groups of 12 patients with heart failure (NYHA III) in a double-blind randomised, parallel study. Haemodynamics were monitored for 24 h and blood was sampled and urine collected for up to 96 h. In the placebo-treated group the cardiac index (CI) was significantly increased (15.8%) and right atrial pressure decreased (26.6%). Ramipril 1.25 mg had insignificant haemodynamic effects compared to placebo and the 2.5 mg dose had significant effects on some haemodynamic variables. Ramipril 5 mg had pronounced and sustained effects on pulmonary artery pressure, which fell by 43.7%, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP; -59.1%); systemic vascular resistance was also decreased 21%. A significant effect on CI was only seen after 2.5 mg ramipril (+7.4%). The mean maximal degree of ACE inhibition was 73.2, 90.4 and 98.5%, respectively, after the three doses of ramipril. Complete inhibition of ACE-activity was seen at a mean plasma concentration of ramiprilat of 4.7 ng.ml-1. The degree of inhibition declined with a half life of about 75 h. There was a significant relation between the degree of ACE-inhibition and change in PCWP but not with the change in SVR. Ramipril was mainly eliminated in the form of ramiprilat and inactive metabolites.

Echocardiographic recording of the atrioventricular (AV) plane displacement during the cardiac cycle was used to assess left ventricular (LV) global function in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). The study population consisted of 70 patients with chronic CHF (NYHA functional groups III and IV) following dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or myocardial infarction (MI), and 35 age-matched healthy subjects. The AV plane displacement was recorded from the apical 4- and 2-chamber views at four LV sites located about 90 degrees apart and representing the septal, anterior, lateral and posterior parts of the LV wall. A mean value was calculated from the above sites (AV-mean). Patients with CHF showed a significant generalized reduction of AV plane displacement compared to healthy subjects (5.6 mm vs. 14.5 mm, P less than 0.001). Thirty CHF patients also underwent radionuclide angiography in order to determine the ejection fraction (EF). The correlation between AV-mean and EF was good (r = 0.82, P less than 0.001). The selection of an AV-mean of less than 7 mm to define a severely depressed LV function (EF less than 30%) gave a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 67%. It is concluded that the AV plane displacement can be used to estimate LV systolic function in patients with CHF.