Search

Aims: Adults with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) responded more favourably to an exercise intervention compared with those with reduced ejection fraction. This study explores factors that contributed to this response, focusing on the qualitative perceptions of adults with HFpEF enrolled in an exercise intervention., Methods and Results: This qualitative descriptive study is a secondary analysis of longitudinal interviews collected at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months from participants with HFpEF enrolled in a randomized controlled trial testing an intervention to promote adherence to exercise. We included participants with at least two interviews. Interviews were examined across and within participants and time points using thematic analysis. Analyses included 67 interviews from 21 adults with HFpEF enrolled in the intervention arm. The sample consisted of 52% (11/21) males and over 47% (10/21) non-White participants. Mean age at enrolment was 63.7 ± 9.9 years. We identified four major themes: (1) overcoming negative attitudes, barriers, and injury, (2) motivations to exercise, (3) exercise-the panacea for HFpEF symptoms and quality of life, and (4) advice for others with HFpEF., Conclusion: Our findings suggest that for many adults with HFpEF, initial hesitancy, fear, and negative attitudes about exercise can be overcome. Exercise coaching using social cognitive constructs, medical fitness centre memberships, and heart rate self-monitoring are successful strategies of engaging adults with HFpEF in long-term unsupervised exercise training., Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01658670., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: none declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) reduce the risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalizations and cardiovascular mortality among patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%. There is emerging evidence of the benefits of SGLT2i in HF patients with a higher LVEF (>40%). We aimed to evaluate the benefits of SGLT2i in different subgroups of patients with HF and LVEF >40%., Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane, and Google Scholar for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing outcomes of SGLT2i vs placebo in patients with HF and LVEF >40%. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in each study were used for the meta-analysis. The primary composite outcome (PCO) was HF hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality. Secondary outcomes included HF hospitalization, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality., Results: Six RCTs with 15,989 patients were included (median follow-up = 27.3 months, 40.8% females). In patients with HF and LVEF >40%, SGLT2i were associated with significantly lower PCO compared to placebo (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.74-0.86; P < 0.001). This was consistent across 10 of 13 subgroups examined, including LVEF. SGLT2i also reduced HF hospitalization but not cardiovascular or all-cause mortality. Patients <65 years old, from racial minorities, or from Asia receiving SGLT2i did not demonstrate a significant reduction in PCO., Conclusions: SGLT2i significantly reduce the combined risk of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular mortality among patients with HF and LVEF >40%. However, younger patients, racial minorities, and patients from Asia did not demonstrate such a reduction. Further research is necessary to identify the reasons for such disparities., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) reduces mortality and hospitalizations in adults with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); however, few are receiving GDMT. National registries show as few as 1% of patients are receiving appropriate GDMT. Development of heart failure clinics achieving optimal GDMT are crucial to improve outcomes for HFrEF patients., Objective: We developed a multidisciplinary HF-Optimize clinic aimed at improving GDMT use along with providing education, resources, and comorbidity screening for adults with HFrEF., Methods: We targeted patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF and/or recent or multiple admissions for 6 visits over 12 weeks. We measured medication use, ejection fraction, 6-minute walk test distance, and health-related quality of life (EuroQol Visual Analog Scale) at visits 1 and 6., Results: One-hundred ten patients completed all visits. Patients were a mean age of 58 (±14) years, 37% were female, and 42% were of non-White race. From visit 1 to visit 6, utilization of GDMT increased from 35.5% to 85.5% (p < 0.001) and significant improvements in ejection fraction (25.9% to 35.5%, p < 0.001), 6-minute walk distance (1032 feet to 1121.7 feet, p = 0.001), and quality of life (63.8/100 vs 70.8/100, p = 0.002). Only 2 patients (1.8%) that completed HF-Optimize had a 30-day heart failure readmission., Conclusion: Our multidisciplinary HF-Optimize clinic improved medication usage and clinical outcomes. Further studies are needed to validate outcomes of multidisciplinary GDMT clinics., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest No authors have conflicts of interest to disclose for our article, The Role of a Multidisciplinary Heart Failure Clinic in Optimization of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy: HF-Optimize, (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: We aimed to assess the impact of digoxin use following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation on clinical outcomes., Methods: Patients implanted with continuous flow LVADs at a single academic medical center and survived to initial hospital discharge were included in the analysis ( n  = 346). Clinical events were captured at a maximum of 2 years of follow up. Digoxin use was defined as 30-day continuous use post-LVAD. Negative binomial regression and Kaplan-Meier method were used to assess the association between digoxin use and clinical outcomes., Results: Mean age of the cohort was 56 years (±13) and 23% (79/346) were female sex. Digoxin was used in 144 patients (41.6%) for a median of 268 days (IQR 154, 616). Digoxin use was associated with a significant reduction in cumulative incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) (15% vs 26%, p  = 0.004). After adjusting for age, hypertension, post-operative hemoglobin, RDW, potassium, and GFR, and use of angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor, there remained a significant 47% reduction in GIB incidence in patients treated with digoxin. There was no significant difference in cumulative incidence in right ventricular failure (RVF) between the two groups. There was no difference in overall 2-year survival between groups., Conclusions: Digoxin use was associated with reduction in GIB events, but not in RVF or mortality. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and to investigate optimal timing and patient population.

Despite the advancements in the management of heart failure, acute heart failure is one of the most common causes of mortality and morbidity. In light of the financial burden imposed by heart failure hospitalizations on the health care system, this area remains the focus of research, clinical advances, and policy changes aimed at improving the quality of care and outcomes. Despite practice guidelines, high-quality trial data, and consensus statements, barriers to therapy remain. The barriers related to physician, patient, economic, health care system, and logistical factors prevent widespread adoption of available therapeutics. In this review article, we outline guidelines directed therapies for heart failure, challenges associated with their implementation, and potential solutions to these challenges to help reduce mortality and improve clinical outcomes in this patient population., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a multifaceted syndrome that requires self-management for adherence to treatment to control symptoms. Symptoms need to be monitored to prevent impending HF exacerbations. Few HF study authors have assessed efficacy of mobile health (mHealth) interventions particularly with virtual visits to evaluate outcomes such as symptoms and healthcare utilization., Objective: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate the potential effect of mHealth self-management interventions on symptom status and health-related quality of life and describe health care utilization in patients with HF., Methods: This 3-month pilot study included 74 patients with HF and used a randomized 3-group repeated-measures design (enhanced usual care, mHealth, and mHealth plus [+] virtual visits). Surveys included the Heart Failure Symptom Survey, EuroQol, and a specialized phone application for patients to report weights and medications., Results: The mHealth groups had an overall decrease in most symptom severity and frequency, particularly shortness of breath. Compared to enhanced usual care, both the mHealth+ and mHealth groups showed promise with medium effect sizes (range .55-.60) in relation to shortness of breath and a medium effect (.51) for lower extremity edema for the mHealth+ group. There was a trend toward improvement in health-related quality of life in both intervention groups at month 3. The mHealth+ group had fewer rehospitalizations., Conclusions: In general, both mHealth groups fared better on symptoms and health care utilization. Small to medium effect sizes on selected symptom outcomes warrant this study to be conducted in a fully powered study. Virtual visits may assist in symptom recognition and self-management., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is common in patients before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement. The consequences of these deficits may differentially impact groups of patients with limited access to postimplantation resources, such as those in rural areas. However, to date, no studies have examined preimplantation cognition in rural and urban patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare cognition in rural and urban patients before LVAD implantation. This observational cohort study is a secondary analysis of 265 patients undergoing LVAD implantation between July 2004 and June 2019. Preimplantation cognitive function was assessed. Rural-Urban Commuting Area Codes designated rural and urban. Independent-samples Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare rural and urban cohorts. Subjects were 75.8% (201/265) male, 75.4% (200/265) urban, and 56.6% (±13.2) years old. Rural subjects scored significantly lower on the Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE) (27 ± 2.20) and Wide Range Achievement Test (WRAT) (32 ± 22.9) compared with urban counterparts (MMSE, 27.6 ± 2.7) (p = 0.009); WRAT (44.4 ± 26.2) (p = 0.02) pre-LVAD. These findings suggest rural patients may have greater MCI before LVAD implantation. Rural LVAD recipients with MCI may require additional intensive education and tailored resource identification before discharge., Competing Interests: Disclosure: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report., (Copyright © ASAIO 2021.)

Background: Despite exercise being one of few strategies to improve outcomes for individuals with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), exercise clinical trials in HFpEF are plagued by poor interventional adherence. Over the last 2 decades, our research team has developed, tested, and refined Heart failure Exercise And Resistance Training (HEART) Camp, a multicomponent behavioral intervention to promote adherence to exercise in HF. We evaluated the effects of this intervention designed to promote adherence to exercise in HF focusing on subgroups of participants with HFpEF and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF)., Methods and Results: This randomized controlled trial included 204 adults with stable, chronic HF. Of those enrolled, 59 had HFpEF and 145 had HFrEF. We tested adherence to exercise (defined as ≥120 minutes of moderate-intensity [40%-80% of heart rate reserve] exercise per week validated with a heart rate monitor) at 6, 12, and 18 months. We also tested intervention effects on symptoms (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 and dyspnea-fatigue index), HF-related health status (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire), and physical function (6-minute walk test). Participants with HFpEF (n = 59) were a mean of 64.6 ± 9.3 years old, 54% male, and 46% non-White with a mean ejection fraction of 55 ± 6%. Participants with HFpEF in the HEART Camp intervention group had significantly greater adherence compared with enhanced usual care at both 12 (43% vs 14%, phi = 0.32, medium effect) and 18 months (56% vs 0%, phi = 0.67, large effect). HEART Camp significantly improved walking distance on the 6-minute walk test (η 2  = 0.13, large effect) and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire overall (η 2  = 0.09, medium effect), clinical summary (η 2  = 0.16, large effect), and total symptom (η 2  = 0.14, large effect) scores. In the HFrEF subgroup, only patient-reported anxiety improved significantly in the intervention group., Conclusions: A multicomponent, behavioral intervention is associated with improvements in long-term adherence to exercise, physical function, and patient-reported outcomes in adults with HFpEF and anxiety in HFrEF. Our results provide a strong rationale for a large HFpEF clinical trial to validate these findings and examine interventional mechanisms and delivery modes that may further promote adherence and improve clinical outcomes in this population., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/. Unique identifier: NCT01658670., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Disclosure: T.R.R has a consultant relationship with Abbott. The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Although temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) for hemodynamic failure following heart transplantation is associated with increased early morbidity and mortality, the impact of etiology of graft dysfunction and long-term clinical implications are less well known. The objective of our study was to evaluate outcomes in patients who required venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) or temporary right ventricular assist device (RVAD) support for either primary or secondary early graft dysfunction. Hospital mortality in 27 patients who required tMCS following heart transplantation at our institution between 2007 and 2017 was 56%, 30% in patients with right ventricular dysfunction secondary to increased afterload, 60% in patients with primary graft dysfunction, and 100% in patients with graft failure secondary to coagulopathy with intraoperative bleeding or overwhelming sepsis. Conditional 1-year and 5-year survival was comparable between patients with, and without, the need for post-transplantation support with tMCS (98% and 89%; 92% and 65% at 1 and 5 years, P = .21). Etiology of early graft failure plays an important part in determining the short-term post-heart transplantation outcome. Although complications associated with tMCS use, such as renal dysfunction and infection, extend beyond index transplant hospitalization, long-term conditional survival is not compromised., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Psychosocial factors have been show to impact survival and outcomes in a number of different diseases, including heart failure and patients receiving heart transplantation. With the increasing utilization of these devices, it is important to identify risk factors that could impact post-left ventricular assist device (LVAD) outcomes. This study was a single center, retrospective analysis of 238 patients who underwent implantation of a LVAD between July 27, 2004, and July 21, 2016, at The University of Nebraska Medical Center. Data collected include length of stay, number of readmission, alive status at 30 days, 180 days, and 1 year, as well as multiple psychosocial factors including history of drug abuse, history of alcohol abuse, history of noncompliance, history of anxiety, and history of depression, among others. Outcomes were calculated using univariate and multivariate analyses with SAS Version 9.4. None of the psychosocial factors assessed in this study showed statistical significance in predicting 30 day or 6 month mortality, but patients who smoked at the time of admission for LVAD implantation had higher mortality at 1 year (odds ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval, 1.226-15.898, p = 0.011.) Patients with a diagnosis of depression had higher numbers of readmissions compared with those without depression (p = 0.048) with the number of readmissions further increased in patients with a diagnosis of both depression and anxiety (p = 0.0074). Psychosocial determinants do not appear to have a significant effect on mortality, but can result in increased risk of readmission if not adequately addressed before implantation and continually monitored postimplantation.

Mobile health (mHealth) is used to encourage and support self-management skills in patients with heart failure. The purpose of the study was to describe the feasibility, fidelity, usability, and acceptability of mHealth interventions. This pilot study used a randomized 3-group (enhanced usual care, mHealth, and mHealth plus, which included a nurse practitioner and community health worker) repeated-measure design to determine the feasibility of using a self-management behavior app and a Bluetooth-enabled scale for daily self-monitoring of weights and medications. In the 2 mHealth groups, of the 48 patients, 38 (79%) engaged partially in recording daily weights and medications, and of the 74 patients in the sample, we obtained partial to complete data on 63 (85%) of the patients during follow-up outcome phone calls.Most patients found the intervention to be feasible, usable, and acceptable, and (93%) patients in themHealth group and 100%of patients in themHealth plus group agreed or strongly agreed that they learned howto self-manage their heart failure using the app. The intervention was reasonable to implement and provided insight for future intervention improvements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]