1. Avoiding unnecessary ventricular pacing is associated with reduced incidence of heart failure hospitalizations and persistent atrial fibrillation in pacemaker patients.
- Author
-
Arnold M, Richards M, D'Onofrio A, Faulknier B, Gulizia M, Thakur R, Sakata Y, Lin W, Pollastrelli A, Grammatico A, Auricchio A, and Boriani G
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial methods, Incidence, Treatment Outcome, Sick Sinus Syndrome therapy, Hospitalization, Atrial Fibrillation diagnosis, Atrial Fibrillation epidemiology, Atrial Fibrillation prevention & control, Pacemaker, Artificial adverse effects, Heart Failure diagnosis, Heart Failure epidemiology, Heart Failure prevention & control
- Abstract
Aims: In bradycardia patients treated with dual-chamber pacing, we aimed to evaluate whether pacing with atrioventricular (AV) delay management [AV hysteresis (AVH)], compared with standard pacing with fixed AV delays, reduces unnecessary ventricular pacing percentage (VPP) and is associated with better clinical outcomes. Main study endpoints were the incidence of heart failure hospitalizations (HFH), persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), and cardiac death., Methods and Results: Data from two identical prospective observational studies, BRADYCARE I in the USA and BRADYCARE II in Europe, Africa, and Asia, were pooled. Overall, 2592 patients (75 ± 10 years, 45.1% female, 50% with AVH) had complete clinical and device data at 1-year follow-up and were analysed. Primary pacing indication was sinus node disease (SND) in 1177 (45.4%), AV block (AVB) in 974 (37.6%), and other indications in 441 (17.0%) patients. Pacing with AVH, compared with standard pacing, was associated with a lower 1-year incidence of HFH [1.3% vs. 3.1%, relative risk reduction (RRR) 57.5%, P = 0.002] and of persistent AF (5.3% vs. 7.7%, RRR = 31.1%, P = 0.028). Cardiac mortality was not different between groups (1.0% vs. 1.4%, RRR = 27.8%, P = 0.366). Pacing with AVH, compared with standard pacing, was associated with a lower (P < 0.001) median VPP in all patients (7% vs. 75%), in SND (3% vs. 44%), in AVB (25% vs. 98%), and in patients with other pacing indications (3% vs. 47%)., Conclusion: Cardiac pacing with AV delay management via AVH is associated with reduced 1-year incidence of HFH and persistent AF, most likely due to a reduction in VPP compared to standard pacing., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: M.A. participated in clinical trials sponsored by Abbott and Biotronik; he received speaker honoraria from Biotronik. A.A. participated in clinical trials sponsored by Boston Scientific, Medtronic, EPD Philips, and XSpline; he received consultant or speaker fees from Abbott, Boston Scientific, Cairdac, Corvia, EP Solution, Microport CRM, Philips, Radcliffe Publishers, and XSpline, and he has intellectual properties with Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, and Microport CRM. A.A. is the review editor of EP Europace and was not involved in the peer review process or publication decision. G.B. received speaker fees from Boston Scientific, Abbott, Daiichi, and Boehringer Ingelheim. A.P., W.L., and A.G. are Abbott employees. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF